Cited by 92Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchVestibular and auditory disorders

Synaptic transfer from outer hair cells to type II afferent fibers in the rat cochlea

Open access
Weisz, C. J. C., Lehar, M., Hiel, H., Glowatzki, E., Fuchs, P. A.·2012·Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Type II cochlear afferents receive glutamatergic synaptic excitation from outer hair cells (OHCs) in the rat cochlea. However, it remains uncertain whether this connection is capable of providing auditory information to the brain. The functional efficacy of this connection depends in part on the number of presynaptic OHCs, their probability of transmitter release, and the effective electrical distance for spatial summation in the type II fiber. The present work addresses these questions using whole-cell recordings from the spiral process of type II afferents that run below OHCs in the apical turn of young (5-9 d postnatal) rat cochlea. A "high potassium puffer" was used to elicit calcium action potentials from individual OHCs and thereby show that the average probability of transmitter release was 0.26 (range 0.02-0.73). Electron microscopy showed relatively few vesicles tethered to ribbons in equivalent OHCs. A "receptive field" map for individual type II fibers was constructed by successively puffing onto OHCs along the cochlear spiral, up to 180 μm from the recording pipette. These revealed a conservative estimate of 7 presynaptic OHCs per type II fiber (range 1-11). EPSCs evoked from presynaptic OHCs separated by >100 μm did not differ in amplitude or waveform, implying that the type II fiber's length constant exceeded the length of the synaptic input zone. Together these data suggest that type II fibers could communicate centrally by maximal activation of their entire pool of presynaptic OHCs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.6194-11.2012

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intracellular tight-seal recordings from type II afferents in cochlear explants revealed that glutamatergic transmission from one OHC was orders of magnitude weaker than that provided by each IHC to type I afferent ribbon synapse.

    “Intracellular tight-seal recordings from type II afferents in cochlear explants revealed that glutamatergic transmission from one OHC was orders of magnitude weaker than that provided by each IHC to type I afferent ribbon synapse (4, 33, 34).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Young ED Rees A Palmer A The Auditory Brain 2010 New York Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weisz, C. J. C., Lehar, M., Hiel, H., Glowatzki, E., & Fuchs, P. A.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Fuchs, P. A.
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2012-07-11
Volume
32
Issue
28
Pages
9528-9536
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1985132883
Cited by
92
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (005211, R01DC011741, F31DC010948, R01DC006476, P30DC005211, T32DC000023)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
outer hair cells, glutamatergic synapses, ribbon synapses, spatial summation, receptive field mapping, calcium action potentials, length constant
MeSH terms
Afferent Pathways, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Biophysics, Brain Mapping, Cochlea, Female, Male, Physical Stimulation, Synapses, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Hair Cells, Auditory, Outer, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review