Cited by 122Hormonal and reproductive studiesAdrenal Hormones and DisordersSperm and Testicular Function

A mathematical comparison of techniques to predict biologically available testosterone in a cohort of 1072 men

Morris, PD, Malkin, CJ, Channer, KS, Jones, TH·2004·European Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In the absence of widely available measures of determining free and/or bioavailable testosterone (BioT) physicians may use formulae such as the free androgen index (FAI) to estimate free testosterone. We compared the efficacy of calculated markers of androgen status in predicting serum BioT and hypogonadism. DESIGN: Total testosterone (TT), sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and BioT were determined in a large cohort of men. Comparison of calculated androgen levels was performed following endocrine assessment. METHODS: TT and SHBG were determined by ELISA, and BioT was determined by ammonium sulphate precipitation. From these data we calculated FAI and free testosterone using two other published formulae - FTnw (free testosterone as calculated by the method of Nanjeee and Wheeler) and FTv (free testosterone as calculated by the method of Vermeulen). A novel formula was derived to calculate BioT from given levels of TT and SHBG (BTcalculated). The ability of the methods (FAI, FTnw, FTv, BTcalc) to predict BioT were compared using regression analysis. The ability of these markers of androgen status to predict biochemical hypogonadism was compared using area under receiver operator curve (auROC). RESULTS: The equation derived from our data was the best predictor of BioT (R(2)=0.73, P<0.0001) although TT was also a good marker (R(2)=0.68, P=0.0001). In the determination of hypogonadism, of all currently available formulae none were better that the TT (auROC: TT=0.93, FAI=0.72, FTnw=0.91, FTv=0.88) although when TT is borderline (7.5<TT<12 nmol/l) estimates of free testosterone are superior to TT alone (auROC: TT=0.63, FAI=0.74, FTnw=0.75 and FTv=0.75). CONCLUSIONS: TT is the best marker of hypogonadism and BioT, when TT is borderline calculated indices of free testosterone or BioT are useful and may help confirm hypogonadism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/eje.0.1510241

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Overall variability was only minimally influenced by the calculated free testosterone algorithm used (14%), while different total testosterone and SHBG assays accounted for 82% and 4% of observed variance, respectively.

    “Of interest, overall variability was only minimally influenced by the calculated fT algorithm utilized (14% of variability), while the different TT and SHBG assays accounted for 82% and 4% of observed variance, respectively.”
  • In the largest study evaluating predictive accuracy of free testosterone calculations, Sartorius and colleagues concluded that empirical methods (Ly, Sartorius) are most concordant, while other estimations (Vermeulen, Nanjee and Wheeler, Sodergard) overestimate the true value.

    “In the largest study evaluating predictive accuracy of fT calculations, Sartorius and colleagues concluded that empirical methods (Ly, Sartorius) of calculated fT are most concordant, with other estimations (Vermeulen, Nanjee and Wheeler, Sodergard) resulting in overestimation of the true value.”
  • The type of assay used for testosterone assessment should be reported, with greater variability among non-mass-spectrometry total testosterone samples, particularly at lower levels, and systematic overestimation from non-empirically calculated free testosterone measurements.

    “The type of assay utilized for T assessment should be reported, with greater variability noted among non-MS TT samples (particularly at lower levels) and systematic overestimation resulting from non-empirically calculated fT measurements.107”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morris, P., Malkin, C., Channer, K., & Jones, T.
Affiliations
Royal Hallamshire Hospital (GB)
Venue
European Journal of Endocrinology
Published
2004-08-01
Volume
151
Issue
2
Pages
241-249
ISSN
  • 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-683X
OpenAlex
W2097009096
Cited by
122
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
Keywords
bioavailable testosterone, free testosterone, total testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin, free androgen index, hypogonadism, androgen status
MeSH terms
Humans, Hypogonadism, Male, Models, Biological, Predictive Value of Tests, Regression Analysis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, Testosterone, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review