Cited by 257Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesReading and Literacy Development

Functional heterogeneity of left inferior frontal cortex as revealed by fMRI

Paulesu, Eraldo, Goldacre, Ben, Scifo, Paola, Cappa, Stefano F., Gilardi, Maria Carla, Castiglioni, Isabella, Perani, Daniela, Fazio, Ferruccio·1997·Neuroreport

Abstract

Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we mapped brain activity in six normal volunteers during two silent verbal fluency tasks, one with a phonemic (letter) cue and one with a semantic (category) cue. In comparison with resting state, both tasks activated the anterior triangular portion of the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG or F3, for third frontal gyrus) and the left thalamus. There were also areas activated in one task but not in the other: the posterior opercular portion of the left IFG for phonemic fluency, and the left retrosplenial region for semantic fluency. Our findings concur with normal psychophysical data and neuropsychological observations to suggest the recruitment of two overlapping but dissociable systems for the two tasks, and demonstrate functional heterogeneity within the left IFG (Broca's area), where the opercular portion is responsible for obtaining access to words through a phonemic/articulatory route.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001756-199705260-00042

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Left lateralized thalamic activation is observed during verbal fluency, naming objects, naming letters, naming colours, and reading, especially when rate of speech production increases.

    “and this may explain some of the left lateralized thalamic activation observed during verbal fluency (Paulesu et al., 1997), naming objects, naming letters, naming colours and reading (Price and Friston, 1997) especially when the rate of speech production increased (Palmer et al., 2001).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paulesu, E., Goldacre, B., Scifo, P., Cappa, S. F., Gilardi, M. C., Castiglioni, I., Perani, D., & Fazio, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
Venue
Neuroreport
Published
1997-05
Volume
8
Issue
8
Pages
2011-2016
ISSN
0959-4965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055973760
Cited by
257
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroreport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
left inferior frontal gyrus, Broca's area, functional heterogeneity, verbal fluency, phonemic fluency, semantic fluency, thalamus, retrosplenial cortex, language lateralization
MeSH terms
Adult, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Recruitment, Neurophysiological, Rest, Verbal Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review