The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 47 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Foregrounding the Disciplines in Secondary Literacy Teaching and Learning: A Call for Change
Open accessAbstract
In this commentary, the author argues for building disciplinary literacy instructional programs, rather than merely encouraging subject matter teachers to employ literacy teaching practices and strategies. Readers might wisely question a focus on disciplinary learning in a time when new media, literacies, and social networking practices are so powerful. The author's argument is that knowledge and skill in the subject matter of the disciplines is essential to young people becoming active participants in a democratic society. Although literacy educators acknowledge the value and power of the knowledge, practices, and texts young people bring to school, it is also critical that we acknowledge the need to expand youth knowledge, practices, and texts. Disciplinary literacy instruction can help youths gain access to the accepted knowledge of the disciplines, thereby allowing them also to critique and change that knowledge. Beginning with disciplinary practices in efforts to integrate literacy instruction more fully throughout secondary schools may better position secondary school educators to draw from a range of new texts and practices available in the disciplines and in adolescents' everyday lives to generate critical learning opportunities. [ Notes. Elizabeth Moje expands on this commentary in a podcast available at www.reading.orgdownloadspodcastsII‐Moje.mp3 . See also Rafael Heller's “Friendly Critique” of the commentary at http:dx.doi.org10.1598JAAL.54.4.4 , Moje's response to Heller at http:dx.doi.org10.1598JAAL.54.4.5 , and continuing discussion on Heller's blog at http:literacyforamateurs.blogspot.com .] في هذا التعليق المؤلفة تعطي حججاً لبناء برامج تعليمية منهاجية لمعرفة القراءة والكتابة بدلاً من مجرد تشجيع أساتذة مادة الموضوع على تفعيل ممارسات تعليم معرفة القراءة والكتابة واستراتيجياتها. وقد يشكّك القراء تشكيكاً ذكياً في التركيز على التعلم المنهاجي في الوقت الذي تتمتع فيه الوسائلة الجديدة ومعارف القراءة والكتابة وممارسات التشبيك الاجتماعي بكل هذا القدر من القوة. وتعتقد المؤلفة أن المعرفة والمهارة في مادة موضوع المناهج هما جوهر موضوع مشاركة الفتيان بشكل فعال في مجتمع ديموقراطي. ومع أن معلّمي معرفة القراءة والكتابة يعترفون بقيمة معرفة الفتيان وممارساتها وقوتها التي يأتون بها إلى المدرسة فإنه أيضاً في أوج الخطر بأننا نعترف بالحاجة إلى توسيع معرفة الفتيان وممارساتهم ونصوصهم. إذ من الممكن أن يساعد تعليم معرفة القراءة والكتابة المنهاجية الفتيان في فتح أبواب معرفة المجالات العلمية المعترف بها وبذلك يتم السماح لهم بنقد تلك المعرفة وتحيولها. وابتداءاً من ممارسات منهاجية في الجهود المبذولة لإدماج تعليم معرفة القراءة والكتابة بشكل أوسع في المدارس الثانوية قد يحسّن موقف معلّمي المدرسة الثانوية لاختيار النصوص الجديدة الممتدة والممارسات المتوفرة في المجالات وفي حياة المراهقين اليومية لتوليد فرص التعلم الخطيرة. [Podcast: www.reading.orgdownloadspodcastsII‐Moje.mp3 .] 在此评论中,作者主张建立学科读写能力教学课程,而不是单靠鼓励学科教师采用读写能力教学实践与策略。在这个新媒体、多元读写能力和新社会网络有强大影响力的时代中,读者会明智地质疑把焦点放在学科学习上的意义。作者的论点是,学科中的知识与技能都是年青人要成为民主社会的积极参与者所必须的。虽然文化教育工作者肯定了年青人所带进学校的知识,文化实践与读写篇章的价值与力量,但我们亦亟需肯定扩展年青人的知识、文化实践与读写篇章的重要性。学科读写能力教育可以帮助年青人有机会获得这些学科的普遍知识,从而帮助他们建立批判与革新这些知识的能力。若学科教育实践能开始于致力把读写能力教学更全面地融入中学教育中,则中学教育工作者会较有效地利用学科已有的广泛而新颖的篇章和文化实践,以及青少年日常生活的经验,给学生营造批判式学习的机会。 [Podcast: www.reading.orgdownloadspodcastsII‐Moje.mp3 .] Dans cette analyse, l'auteur défend l'idée de construire des programmes pédagogiques de littératie par discipline, plutôt que d'inciter les professeurs des disciplines à utiliser des stratégies et des pratiques d'enseignement venues de la lecture‐écriture. Les lecteurs devraient avoir la sagesse de remettre en question la centration sur l'apprentissage de la discipline à un moment où les nouveaux médias, les littératies, et les pratiques sociales de travail en réseau sont si puissants. L'argument de l'auteur est que les savoirs et les savoir‐faire des contenus disciplinaires est essentiel pour que les jeunes deviennent des membres actifs d'une société démocratique. Quoique les maîtres reconnaissent la valeur et le pouvoir des connaissances, des pratiques et des textes que les jeunes apportent à l'école, il est également capital que nous reconnaissions la nécessité d'étendre les connaissances, les pratiques, et les textes des jeunes. Un enseignement de littératie par discipline peut aider les jeunes à accéder à une acceptation des disciplines, en les autorisant aussi de ce fait à critiquer et à changer la connaissance. Commencer par les pratiques de disciplines pour s'efforcer d'intégrer plus complètement l'enseignement de la littératie dans les écoles secondaires pourrait placer les enseignants du secondaire en meilleure position pour tirer parti de tout un ensemble de nouveaux textes et de nouvelles pratiques disponibles dans les disciplines et dans la vie quotidienne des adolescents et fournir des occasions d'apprentissage critique. [Podcast: www.reading.orgdownloadspodcastsII‐Moje.mp3 .] Автор утверждает, что мало просто предлагать учителям‐предметникам развивать грамотность учащихся и даже предлагать им методы для развития грамотности. Следует создавать учебные программы по развитию предметной грамотности. Читатели вправе усомниться в целесообразности такого подхода в эпоху новых медийных носителей, новых видов грамотности и мощных социальных сетей. Доводы автора состоят в том, что для молодежи как активных членов демократического общества крайне важны дисциплинарные знания и навыки. Хотя учителя признают ценность тех знаний, методов, и текстов, которые молодые люди приносят в школу из реальной жизни, все‐таки необходимо расширять эти знания, вооружать молодых людей различными методами работы со словом и знакомить их со все новыми и новыми текстами. Развитие предметной грамотности даст учащимся доступ к общеизвестным знаниям в той или иной предметной области, что в свою очередь позволит им критически анализировать и видоизменять эти знания. Если в школах произойдет интеграция обучения грамотности с преподаванием различных дисциплин, под рукой у педагогов окажется целый арсенал новых текстов и практик – как предметных, так и относящихся к каждодневной жизни подростков. Это создаст наиболее оптимальные предпосылки для обучения. [Podcast: www.reading.orgdownloadspodcastsII‐Moje.mp3 .] En este comentario, el autor propone la creación de programas de instrucción de competencias disciplinarias , en vez de meramente incentivar a los maestros de materias a utilizar estrategias y prácticas de la enseñanza de competencias. Los lectores podrían cuestionar con razón un enfoque en la enseñanza de disciplinas en este tiempo en que nuevos medios, las competencias, y el establecimiento de contactos sociales son tan poderosos. El argumento del autor es que tener conocimiento y habilidad en la materia de las disciplinas es esencial para que los jóvenes puedan participar activamente en una sociedad democrática. Aunque los educadores de las competencias reconocen el valor y el poder del conocimiento al igual que las prácticas y los textos que los jóvenes traen al salón de clase, es también de importancia crítica que reconozcamos la necesidad de expandir el conocimiento, las prácticas, y los textos de los jóvenes. Instrucción sobre las competencias de las disciplinas puede ayudar a los jóvenes a tener acceso al conocimiento aceptado de las disciplinas, de esa forma permitiéndoles criticar y cambiar ese conocimiento. Empezar con las prácticas de las disciplinas—en un esfuerzo para mejor integrar la instrucción de competencias en las escuelas secundarias—podría poner a los maestros de las escuelas secundarias en una mejor posición para hacer uso de una gama de prácticas y textos nuevos disponibles en las disciplinas y las vidas diarias de los adolescentes para crear oportunidades de aprendizaje crítico. [Podcast: www.reading.orgdownloadspodcastsII‐Moje.mp3 .]
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
3 of 47 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In recently conducted surveys of adolescent literacy practices among youth in one large midwestern U.S. city, the average young person reported engaging in roughly nine different family and community activities outside of school each week, and reported reading books, websites, music lyrics, and magazines several times per week, in addition to the reading they did for school (Moje, Overby, Tysvaer,”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Moje, Overby, Tysvaer, & Morris, 2008 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Reading and Writing Practices Outside of School passage reports that students read websites, music lyrics, magazines, and novels or other literary works outside school. But the survey scale defines 4 as once a week and 5 as three to four times a week; the reported averages for these text types range from 3.43 to 4.31. Thus, the source does not support saying the average student read each of them several times per week. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In recently conducted surveys of adolescent literacy practices among youth in one large midwestern U.S. city, the average young person reported engaging in roughly nine different family and community activities outside of school each week, and reported reading books, websites, music lyrics, and magazines several times per week, in addition to the reading they did for school (Moje, Overby, Tysvaer,”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Moje, Overby, Tysvaer, & Morris, 2008 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Participants and Sites passage (page unavailable) describes surveys of students in a large Midwestern city, and the survey-measures passage says students were asked about out-of-school activities, including family activities. Neither passage, nor the passages on results, reports that the average student engaged in roughly nine different family and community activities each week. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“At the same time, my own work with young people in one urban community (Moje et al., 2008) suggests that youths' transfer of proficient skills from popular texts that interest them-and for which they have constructed extensive domain knowledge in practice-is compromised when they find themselves confronted with texts for which they have little sophisticated domain knowledge and for which they have”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Moje et al., 2008 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
In the paper
“In a recent teaching experience I observed firsthand the critical role of knowledge in adolescent students' abilities to make sense of even short segments of primary source texts (Moje & Speyer, 2008).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Moje & Speyer, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As our students read immigration laws, for example, they needed basic information from immigration history, world geography, political theory, cultural studies, and mathematics, not to mention vocabulary, discursive knowledge, and knowledge of how and when to question texts and search for additional information (what we labeled”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In other words, teachers hold cultural beliefs about the appropriate practices of their respective disciplines.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Students also engage in literacy practices and learning outside of school, learning they consider powerful and important.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hull & Schultz, 2002
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Leander & Lovvorn, 2006 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Lee, 2007
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Although my basic premise is that the reason for a lack of integration is that secondary content literacy has focused more on literacy than on the subject areas (cf.Conley, 2008), I review each of these points brief ly because they each have important connections to what I argue is the key challenge, that of reconceptualizing how we think of disciplinary learning and literacy instruction.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Conley, 2008 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In sum, new media and new literacy practices are important to the disciplines.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Jenkins, 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Typical approaches to secondary school content learning often overlook the learning and literacy practices that youth engage in apart from their school-based, content learning (e.g., Hull & Schultz, 2002;Leander & Lovvorn, 2006;Lee, 2007;Moje, 2002;Tatum, 2008).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hull & Schultz, 2002
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Leander & Lovvorn, 2006 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Lee, 2007
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 45
- It may state two separate claims as one. 16
In the paper
“Finally, as Lee (2007) has eloquently argued, knowledge and skill in the subject areas is essential to supporting young people in becoming active participants in a democratic society.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lee, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Young people do not need to go to school to learn what they already know; content literacy instruction can help youth gain access to the accepted knowledge of the disciplines, thereby allowing them also to critique and change that knowledge.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Young people do not need to go to school to learn what they already know.
In the paper
“O'Brien et al. (1995) argued that students' beliefs, values, and knowledges support and constrain teachers' practices and the dominant structures of the secondary school.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites O'Brien et al., 1995 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Disciplinary learning is, from Lee's and Bain's perspective (and that of many others who advocate for a disciplinary stance toward secondary school learning) a form of critical literacy because it builds an understanding of how knowledge is produced in the disciplines, rather than just building knowledge in the disciplines.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lee
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Bain
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A significant body of research over the last 20 years has demonstrated that preservice teachers are skeptical about the efficacy of teaching and learning strategies offered by content literacy research, and inservice teachers rarely enact such strategies in their subject area classrooms (Alvermann & Moore, 1991;Holt-Reynolds, 1992;O'Brien & Stewart, 1990;Ratekin, Simpson, Alvermann, & Dishner, 198”
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Students bring ideas about what counts as learning to their disciplinary classrooms, and teachers make decisions about classroom practices in interaction with students and in the context of the secondary school as an institution (Moje, 1996).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Moje, 1996 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These practices and strategies, although important to improving literacy learning, overlook an important question: What does literacy instruction do for learning in the subject areas?”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, it may be that beginning with disciplinary practices in efforts to bring literacy instruction into secondary schools will better position secondary school researchers, teacher educators, and teachers to draw from the new texts and literate practices of adolescent students' lives as well.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Drawing from their study of engineering students, Stevens and colleagues (in press) suggested that disciplinary learning is a matter of simultaneous intersections of constructing knowledge, identifying with a domain, and navigating different pathways toward goals.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Stevens et al., in press
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“More to the point, teachers do not operate in a vacuum: The structures of the secondary school, an amazingly stable and enduring institution that has changed little over the course of its existence (Cuban, 1986), constrain and support the ways that teachers and students carry out their day-to-day classroom practices.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Cuban, 1986
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even more important, knowledge production in the disciplines needs to be understood to be the result of human interaction.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The time period in which a claim is situated matters tremendously to an historian; thus, temporal context is one dimension-among many other dimensions-a reader of historical texts must know, uncover, or examine as she or he reads (Bain, 2000;Wineburg, 1991).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bain, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Wineburg, 1991 source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“They demonstrated that these engineering students developed engineering knowledge in multiple sources and practices, and that the knowledge itself contributed to whether and how they identified as engineering students and, ultimately, as engineers.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Stevens et al., in press
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The role of knowledge and information as described here has, I believe, often been backgrounded in literacy research and teaching in an attempt to avoid communicating the idea that knowledge should be simply transferred from teacher to learner.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In other words, knowledge, identities, and critical literacy skill develop iteratively; this development requires scaffolding and mediation by teachers who know the content well and understand the role that language and literate practice play in producing knowledge within it.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Knowledge production in the disciplines operates according to particular norms for everyday practice, conventions for communicating and representing knowledge and ideas, and ways of interacting, defending ideas, and challenging the deeply held ideas of others in the discipline.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For others, literate skill is undeveloped, creating a similar challenge but one with a different etiology.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Students may enter classrooms and schools with gaps in knowledge, skill, or motivation.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That is, in the past, secondary literacy has been approached from the standpoint of literacy theory, rather than from the standpoint of the disciplinary learning theory.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, in science, a norm of practice is that researchable problems be carefully defined and systematically and repeatedly studied before claims can be made about phenomena.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We have not acknowledged that the disciplines themselves are replete with cultural practices and can be considered discourse communities students must navigate.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Particular forms of evidence-typically empirical or observable forms that derive from experimental study-are required to make claims.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That is, we might argue that adolescent students learn in the disciplines by simultaneously navigating through various practices and texts of the disciplines, thus supporting the construction of knowledge in practice and identification with the discipline.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Each of these forms-now readily available through digital venues-can support the construction of knowledge necessary to access the abstract and dense print texts of the disciplines.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, motivation to take on or engage with the identity as historian, scientist, mathematician, or literary critic/writer may be waning as students enter secondary schools with little evidence that disciplinary knowledge or practice is meaningful for their lives.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Students may enter classrooms and schools with gaps in knowledge, skill, or motivation.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A number of theorists have argued that the subject areas can be viewed as spaces in which knowledge is produced or constructed, rather than as repositories of content knowledge or information (Foucault, 1972;Halliday & Martin, 1993;Hicks, 1995;Lemke, 1990;Luke, 2001).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Foucault, 1972
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Halliday & Martin, 1993
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hicks, 1995 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To learn deeply in a subject area, then, young people need to have access to the ways that conventions of disciplinary knowledge production and communication can be routinely or more explicitly challenged and reshaped; such knowledge gives young people the power to read critically across various texts and various disciplines.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In history, by contrast, the norms of practice differ.Historians, like natural scientists, study researchable problems systematically, but the means of obtaining evidence and the forms that provide warrant for claims differ.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For some students, requisite disciplinary background knowledge is lacking and so reading upper-level texts and textbooks is challenging.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Students may enter classrooms and schools with gaps in knowledge, skill, or motivation.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These constraints, even taken together, however, fail to pinpoint a central problem in secondary school literacy: Without careful attention to what it means to learn in the subject areas and what counts as knowledge in the disciplines that undergird those subjects, educators will continue to struggle to integrate literacy instruction and those areas.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In particular, the division of secondary school learning into subject areas drawn from the disciplines reifies a belief (and constructs sets of practices) that implies knowledge is inherently different in different disciplines.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“People cannot learn in a deep way within a semiotic domain if they are not willing to commit themselves fully to the learning in terms of time, effort, and active engagement.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gee, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Just as secondary school teachers do not teach in a vacuum, young people do not learn in one; they encounter many different forms of text and employ many different literate practices throughout a given day.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Key to preventing the construction of knowledge-in-practice from devolving into the transfer of rote information is providing opportunities for young people to examine how the norms of knowing, doing, and communicating are constructed.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These studies demonstrate that the youths' knowledge of and identifications with the domain both support their skill in reading and writing and motivate them to persevere even when confronted with a challenging text or writing task.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Alvermann, 2001
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Gustavson, 2007 source
- Not matchedcites Moje, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Such a commitment requires that they are willing to see themselves in terms of a new identity, that is, to see themselves as the kind of person who can learn, use, and value the new semiotic domain.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gee, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“All deep learning-that is, active, critical learningis inextricably caught up with identity in a variety of ways....”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gee, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, we have not thoroughly conceptualized language and literacy practice as an integral aspect of subject area learning, rather than as a set of strategies for engaging with texts.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This last question reminds me of Orellana and colleagues' (2003) analysis of young Latino/a children co-constructing meaning of complex Englishlanguage documents with their Spanish-speaking parents: The children could access the language codes of English, but could not make meaning of words and concepts; their parents brought sophisticated world knowledge to the decoding process, and thereby the”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Orellana and colleagues' (2003)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Teachers can employ many different forms of representation to construct knowledge of one concept-different genres (e.g., narrative, expository, poetics, music), different symbol systems (e.g., print, graphs, tables), and different semiotic tools (image, sound, and performance).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, secondary school teachers will face challenges at the classroom level with the question of how to support young people as they construct identities across different disciplines.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Disciplinary texts, however, can be extremely challenging to the reader with little prior knowledge of the discipline, thus producing the conundrum mentioned previously.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This fear of reifying knowledge has resulted in a great deal of talk about disciplinary identity development and strategy instruction without attention to how being a certain kind of person (developing a disciplinary identity) and engaging in strategic practice is dependent on knowing some things about the domain in which one is practicing.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“In a typical school day, young people in secondary school are expected to participate in the discourses of the disciplines, to incorporate those discourses with other discourses and identities they experience throughout the day, and to forge, or at least try out, new identities as they take up those discourses (cf.Gee, 2000Gee, /2001;;Luke, 2001).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gee, 2000/2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Luke, 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To learn deeply in a subject area, then, young people need to have access to the ways that conventions of disciplinary knowledge production and communication can be routinely or more explicitly challenged and reshaped; such knowledge gives young people the power to read critically across various texts and various disciplines.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Bain (2000) calls this the generation of an epistemically grounded curriculum and pedagogy, or one in which students come to understand that knowing how knowledge is produced is as important as access to the knowledge itself.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bain (2000)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Subject areas become subcultures of the secondary school, with their own ways of knowing, doing, and believing.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Without a change in the typical school structures of 50-minute classes, relative isolation of teachers in single classrooms, and confinement of classes within the physical school space, a broad, metadiscursive pedagogy and curriculum will be difficult to develop.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These constraints do not exist in some sort of hierarchical form (i.e., changes in structures lead to changes in culture or vice versa) and, therefore, each set of constraints needs to be addressed simultaneously as interlocking pieces of the disciplinary/secondary school literacy puzzle.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The integration of literacy instruction in the secondary schools is a complex change process that will require collaboration, com-”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No one group can act alone.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These pieces include teacher educators, school administrators, teachers, researchers, local and national policymakers, and the young people themselves.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The work and commitment required for developing an integrated approach to literacy teaching and learning in the secondary subject areas is enormous, requiring conceptual changes in our definitions, cultural changes in our practices, and structural changes in the enduring institutions of the secondary school and secondary teacher education.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The issues of the subject area subcultures, limited opportunities for teachers to work across disciplines, and the implacable structure and timing of the typical secondary school day all work to challenge a metadiscursive approach to content literacy, just as they challenge strategy-based approaches.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The authors state this as an assumption.
The disciplines are constituted by discourses.
“This turn toward literacy as an essential aspect of disciplinary learning, requires the acceptance of a key premise that”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Producing knowledge in a discipline requires fluency in making and interrogating knowledge claims, which in turn require fluency in a wide range of ways of constructing and communicating knowledge.
“This premise assumes that producing knowledge in a discipline requires f luency in making and interrogating knowledge claims, which in turn require f luency in a wide range of ways of constructing and communicating knowledge.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Teachers and administrators are aware of the need to do something different in classrooms, and teacher educators are generally committed to teacher education around content literacy.
“Teachers and administrators are aware of the need to do something different in classrooms, and teacher educators are generally committed to teacher education around content literacy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Young people do not need to go to school to learn what they already know.
“Young people do not need to go to school to learn what they already know; content literacy instruction can help youth gain access to the accepted knowledge of the disciplines, thereby allowing them also to critique and change that knowledge.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Students may enter classrooms and schools with gaps in knowledge, skill, or motivation.
“The question of repair work-or the idea that students may enter classrooms and schools with gaps in knowledge, skill, or motivation-operates at multiple levels.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Disciplinary scholars have turned increasingly to new media to conduct disciplinary investigations.
“As indicated previously, disciplinary scholars have turned increasingly to new media, which demand new literacy practices, to conduct disciplinary investigations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The texts youth had access to outside of school were often more compelling to them than those they were presented with in school.
“More to the point, the texts they had access to outside of school were often more compelling to them than those they were presented with in school.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Two articles are assigned overlapping pages in the same issue
MinorThe references place two different articles in volume 78, issue 1 of Harvard Educational Review, but their stated page ranges overlap on pages 107-108.
“Conley, M.W. (2008). Cognitive strategy instruction for ado- lescents: What we know about the promise, what we don't know about the potential. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 84-108.”
“Moje, E.B., Overby, M., Tysvaer, N., & Morris, K. (2008). The complex world of adolescent literacy: Myths, motivations, and mysteries. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 107-154.”
Two stated reasons are followed by a third
MinorThe author says there are two reasons for pursuing disciplinary literacy teaching and introduces them as "First" and "Second." A subsequent "Finally" paragraph presents a distinct rationale about participation in a democratic society.
“I have pursued the question of disciplinary literacy teaching for two reasons.First, in the current sociopolitical context”
“Finally, as Lee (2007) has eloquently argued, knowledge and skill in the subject areas is essential to supporting young people in becoming active participants in a democratic society.”
Citations
Cites
Review of research in education
Shulman, L. S., Mowry, S., & Berliner, D. C. (1973) · F.E. Peacock eBooks · Cited by 7,754
Pearson, P. D., Barr, (. E., Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., & Barr, R. (1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5764 · Cited by 6,850
What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy
(2004) · Education + Training · doi:10.1108/et.2004.00446dae.002 · Cited by 6,674
A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures
Cazden, C. (2006) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u · Cited by 6,196
What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy
Gee, J. P. (2003) · Computers in Entertainment · doi:10.1145/950566.950595 · Cited by 5,735
(1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,727
Talking science: language, learning, and values
Lemke, J. L. (1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5211 · Cited by 4,000
A pedagogy of Multiliteracies Designing Social Futures
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (1996) · doi:10.4324/9780203979402-6 · Cited by 3,323
Chapter 3 : Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research in Education
Gee, J. P. (2000) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x025001099 · Cited by 2,727
Teaching Disciplinary Literacy to Adolescents: Rethinking Content- Area Literacy
Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. R. (2008) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101 · Cited by 1,685
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Gee J.P.(2001 December).Reading in “new times”.Paper presented at the National Reading Conference San Antonio TX.
- Jenkins H., 2006, Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Media consumers in a digital age
- Lee C.D., 2006, Reading in the disciplines and the challenges of adolescent literacy.
- Luke A., 2001, Constructions of literacy: Studies of teaching and learning in and out of secondary schools, ix
- Moje E.B., 1997, Exploring discourse, subjectivity, and knowledge in chemistry class, Journal of Classroom Interaction, 32, 35
- Moje E.B., 2004, Bridging the gap: Improving literacy learning for preadolescent and adolescent learners in grades 4–12, 227
- Moore D.W., 1996, Literacies for the 21st century: Research and practice (45th yearbook of the National Reading Conference, pp 15–46).
- Moore D.W., 2001, Constructions of literacy: Studies of teaching and learning in and out of secondary schools, 3
- Readence J.E., 1989, Content area reading: An integrated approach
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 782
Fenwick, L., & Herrington, M. H. (2021) · Language and Education · doi:10.1080/09500782.2021.1912082 · Cited by 15
“Researchers from genre theory, representation in science and disciplinary literacy all agree that an apprenticeship is required (Tytler 2007; Moje 2008, 2015; Shanahan and Shanahan 2008; Rose and Martin 2012) but the methods for providing this apprenticeship have been contested (Moje 2015; Prain…”
BackgroundYakimowski, M. E., Faggella‐Luby, M. N., Kim, Y., & Wei, Y. (2016) · Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR) · doi:10.1080/10824669.2016.1147962 · Cited by 15
“As the curricula in secondary schools shift toward teaching of content over basic literacy skills, comprehension of text becomes a significantly greater challenge to overcome for academic success (e.g., Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundWissinger, D. R., & Paz, S. D. L. (2020) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/0022219420904343 · Cited by 15
“In addition, while some have written widely about the benefits of discipline-specific strategy instruction (Moje, 2008; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008), many argue discipline-specific strategies cannot replace domain-general strategies, especially among students with disabilities and those at risk of…”
BackgroundMethodCinnamon, S. A., Rivera, M. O., & Sellers, H. K. D. (2021) · The Journal of Social Studies Research · doi:10.1016/j.jssr.2021.03.001 · Cited by 15
“Teacher training is required to shift classrooms from the traditional direct instruction approach to a disciplinary literacy through historical inquiry approach, beginning with professional development opportunities for classroom teachers (Moje, 2008; Voet& DeWever, 2017).”
BackgroundWhat RTI Means for Content Area Teachers
Lenski, S. D. (2011) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.00034 · Cited by 15
Tang, K., Lin, S., & Kaur, B. (2022) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-022-10322-1 · Cited by 14
What Does the Eye See? Reading Online Primary Source Photographs in History
Lévesque, S., Ng-A-Fook, N., & Corrigan, J. A. (2014) · Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education · Cited by 14
Disciplined Judgment: Toward a Reasonably Constrained Constructivism
Stemhagen, K., Reich, G. A., & Muth, W. R. (2013) · Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy · doi:10.1080/15505170.2012.724360 · Cited by 14
“of knowledge and the limits that must be placed on them (Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialSarah’s Story: One Teacher’s Enactment of TPACK+ in a History Classroom
Vaerenewyck, L. M. V., Shinas, V. H., & Steckel, B. (2017) · Literacy Research and Instruction · doi:10.1080/19388071.2016.1269267 · Cited by 14
“Importantly, reading, writing, and vocabulary use vary across disciplines (Moje, 2008; Zygouris-Coe, 2012), making clear that a single approach to literacy in the content area classroom is not likely to be effective.”
BackgroundFankhauser, S. C., Reid, G., Mirzoyan, G., Meaders, C. L., & Ho-Shing, O. (2021) · Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research · doi:10.1186/s43031-021-00032-z · Cited by 16
“…teacher awareness and comfort with primary literature, or lack of time to devote to authentic literacy sources could contribute to the continued overall neglect of authentic communication practices in the STEM classroom (Moje, 2008; O’Brien, Stewart, & Moje, 1995; Pearson, Moje, & Greenleaf, 2010).”
BackgroundVocabulary Instruction in the Disciplines
Boyd, F. B., Sullivan, M. P., Popp, J. S., et al. (2012) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.00097 · Cited by 14
Bridging the Discontinuity in Adolescent Literacy? Mixed Evidence from a Middle Grades Intervention
Dougherty, S. M. (2015) · Education Finance and Policy · doi:10.1162/edfp_a_00157 · Cited by 14
Improving Clinical Practice: A School-Age and School-Based Perspective
Wallach, G. P. (2014) · Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/2014_lshss-14-0016 · Cited by 14
“Students need to articulate the ways that listeners and readers “get to meaning” in different subject areas and understand what is most significant in each area (Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundDEVELOPING A TEST FOR ASSESSING ELEMENTARY STUDENTS’ COMPREHENSION OF SCIENCE TEXTS
Wang, J., Chen, S., Tsay, R.-F., et al. (2011) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-011-9307-y · Cited by 14
“While interdisciplinary approach emphasizes integration of reading comprehension and writing in science instruction to enhance meaningful learning (Vitale & Romance, 2009), the disciplinary literacy perspective focuses on understanding the norms of practice for producing and communicating knowledge in specific discipl…”
BackgroundCharacteristics of Literacy Instruction That Support Reform in Content Area Classrooms
Siebert, D. K., Draper, R. J., Barney, D. T., Broomhead, P., Grierson, S. T., Jensen, A. P., Nielson, J. B., Nokes, J. D., Shumway, S. L., & Wimmer, J. J. (2016) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.526 · Cited by 15
Domenico, P. D., Elish‐Piper, L., Manderino, M., & L’Allier, S. K. (2017) · Literacy Research and Instruction · doi:10.1080/19388071.2017.1365977 · Cited by 18
“…the full range of texts valued in the discipline, (c) unique habits of practice enacted in the disciplines, and (d) beliefs about knowledge and knowledge production that constitute the disciplines (Fang, 2012; Moje, 2007, 2008; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008; Wickens, Manderino, Parker, & Jung, 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialInclusive science education: learning from Wizard
Koomen, M. H. (2016) · Cultural Studies of Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11422-015-9668-6 · Cited by 14
Berson, I. R., Berson, M. J., Dennis, D. V., & Powell, R. L. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118768747.ch18 · Cited by 14
Foundations, Insights, and Future Considerations of Reading in Science and Mathematics Education
Yore, L. D., & Tang, K. (2022) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-022-10321-2 · Cited by 13
McCulley, L. V., & Osman, D. J. (2015) · The Journal of Social Studies Research · doi:10.1016/j.jssr.2015.06.002 · Cited by 13
“In addition, social studies teachers, concerned that teaching reading strategies are an inefficient means to teach content knowledge, may resist the notion of sacrificing social studies content to make time for providing reading instruction (Conley, Kerner, & Reynolds, 2005; Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundDo Textbooks Matter for Reading Comprehension? A Study in Flemish Primary Education
Dockx, J., Bellens, K., & Fraine, B. D. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02959 · Cited by 22
“Therefore, a focus on only general strategies for reading comprehension may no longer be sufficient in areas with a specific nomenclature, syntax and text structure (Hirsch, 2006; Moje, 2008; Smagorinsky, 2015).”
BackgroundContent Area Teacher Candidates' Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Teaching Writing Online
Saine, P., & West, J. A. (2017) · Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/21532974.2017.1280433 · Cited by 13
“Likewise, researchers noted content area teachers refuse to implement specific literacy strategies when their knowledge and experiences were limited (Fisher & Ivey, 2005; Hall, 2005; Heller & Greenleaf, 2007; Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundHebbard, M., & Hern�ndez, Y. (2020) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2020.0360.2.14 · Cited by 13
Rhetorical Reading as a Gateway to Disciplinary Literacy
Warren, J. E. (2012) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.00151 · Cited by 12
Discourse of Learning and the Learning of Discourse
Goldman, S. R. (2018) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2018.1440866 · Cited by 13
“© 2018 Taylor & Francis argumentation practices, and (2) generic reading and problem-solving instruction provides insufficient opportunities for adolescents to learn these discipline-specific practices (for detailed discussion see Goldman & Snow, 2015; and Moje, 2008, 2015).”
BackgroundScott, J. A., & Hansen, S. G. (2019) · Communication Disorders Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1525740119838253 · Cited by 13
“One area of particular need of evidence for effective instructional strategies is the disciplinary reading that becomes increasingly essential for success as students navigate the content area texts found in middle and high schools (Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundNestlog, E. B. (2019) · HumaNetten · doi:10.15626/hn.20194202 · Cited by 12
“…ett övergripande perspektiv på ämnesspråk, som skiljer sig från många studier där ämnesspråk studeras med liknande teoretisk utgångspunkt men där språkliga strukturer på lexikogrammatisk nivå och genremönster fokuseras (se t.ex. Schleppegrell 2004; Fang & Schleppegrell 2010; Martin & Rose 2007).”
A Formative Experiment to Align Middle-School History Instruction with Literacy Goals
Colwell, J., & Reinking, D. (2016) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811611801201 · Cited by 12
“Further, it has been argued that disciplinary literacy promotes skills that extend beyond the particular discipline in which they are practiced and from which they might emerge (e.g., Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialde Oliveira, L. C., Jones, L., & Smith, S. L. (2021) · Journal of Language Identity & Education · doi:10.1080/15348458.2021.1885409 · Cited by 17
Secondary Teachers' Reflections From a Year of Professional Learning Related to Academic Language
Carter, H., Crowley, K., Townsend, D., et al. (2016) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.554 · Cited by 12
Designing knowledge construction in pre-service teachers’ collaborative planning talk
Aalto, E., & Mustonen, S. (2022) · Linguistics and Education · doi:10.1016/j.linged.2022.101022 · Cited by 12
Writing Like a Historian: What Teacher Candidates Should Know and Be Able To Teach
Hotchkiss, K., & Hougen, M. (2012) · The Social Studies · doi:10.1080/00377996.2011.596861 · Cited by 12
“Historians typically use four modes of prose in historical writing: exposition, description, narrative, and argument (Marius 1989 ).”
BackgroundMonte‐Sano, C., Paz, S. D. L., Felton, M. K., et al. (2017) · Teacher education quarterly (Claremont, Calif.) · Cited by 12
Kenna, J. L., Russell, W. B., III, & Bittman, B. L. (2018) · History Education Research Journal · doi:10.18546/herj.15.2.05 · Cited by 12
Exploring Japanese Fourth Graders’ Motivation to Read: A Mixed-Method Study
Kambara, H. (2020) · Literacy Research and Instruction · doi:10.1080/19388071.2020.1806416 · Cited by 19
“Based on these theoretical suggestions, researchers have suggested that motivational constructs should be reconceptualized to take into account more complex contextual factors, such as out-of-school contexts (e.g., Moje, 2008), and diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds (e.g., Protacio, 2012).”
BackgroundDisciplinary Literacy From the Perspective of One Beginning Social Studies Teacher Candidate
Carlson, J. R. (2015) · Literacy Research and Instruction · doi:10.1080/19388071.2015.1022284 · Cited by 12
“The troubling trends have also instigated ongoing conversations (Moje, 2008; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008, 2012) and developing practices (Conley, 2012; Gillis, 2014; Masuda, 2014; Pytash, 2012) investigating the role of disciplinary literacy in countering the current crisis (Lee & Spratley, 2010).”
BackgroundCentering Disciplinary Literacies on Student Consciousness: A Tanzanian Case Study
Wilder, P., & Msseemmaa, D. (2019) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.880 · Cited by 12
What are Disciplinary Literacies in Dance and Drama in the Elementary Grades
Frambaugh-Kritzer, C., Buelow, S. M., & Steele, J. S. (2015) · Journal of language & literacy education · Cited by 11
Intent and enactment: Writing in mathematics for conceptual understanding
Nachowitz, M. (2018) · Investigations in Mathematics Learning · doi:10.1080/19477503.2018.1461051 · Cited by 11
“From the original writing-acrossthe-curriculum movement in the 1980s through more recent developments in disciplinary literacy, scholars have argued that writing supports content-area learning as well as domain-specific literacy skills (Ackerman, 1993; Applebee, 1984; Moje, 2008b; Newell, 2006).”
BackgroundChubko, N., Morris, J. E., McKinnon, D. H., Slater, E., & Lummis, G. W. (2019) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-019-0095-6 · Cited by 16
“Hence, science disciplinary literacy is students’ ability “to communicate their learning, to synthesise ideas across texts and across groups of people, to express new ideas, and to question and challenge ideas held dear in the discipline and in broader spheres” (Moje 2008, p. 99).”
BackgroundGao, Y., & Wang, H. H. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1189555 · Cited by 11
“Research also suggests that the development of the advanced literacy skills can only be achieved via students’ active engagement in authentic and purposeful disciplinary learning activities, imbued with meaning, value, and emotions (Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundLeseopplæring i norskfagets begynneropplæring med fokus på fagspesifikk lesekompetanse
Háland, A., & Hoel, T. (2016) · Nordic Journal of Literacy Research · doi:10.17585/njlr.v2.195 · Cited by 11
“Discilinary literacy er en rimelig ung fagtradisjon som til nå primært har befattet seg med ungdomsskoleelever og deres lese- og skriveopplæring (Damico, Baildon, Exter & Guo, 2009; Moje, 2008; Monte-Sano, 2010; Monte-Sano, De La Paz & Felton, 2014).”
BackgroundDisciplinary Literacies in an Engineering Club
Shanahan, L. E., McVee, M. B., Slivestri, K. N., & Haq, K. S. (2016) · Literacy Research Theory Method and Practice · doi:10.1177/2381336916661534 · Cited by 12
“It is in part due to such differences that literacy researchers have recently advocated for attention to disciplinary literacies (e.g., Moje, 2008) as more than just a shift in terminology (Pytash & Ciecierski, 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialPaul, C. M. (2018) · Literacy · doi:10.1111/lit.12127 · Cited by 11
Foregrounding Collaboration in Disciplinary Literacy: Implications From JAAL , 2008–2017
Hinton, K., & Suh, Y. (2019) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.986 · Cited by 11
ter Beek, M., Opdenakker, M., Deunk, M., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2019) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.07.003 · Cited by 14
Disciplinary Literacy in a Second‐Grade Classroom: A Science Inquiry Unit
Welsh, K. M., Brock, C. H., Robertson, D. A., et al. (2019) · The Reading Teacher · doi:10.1002/trtr.1881 · Cited by 11
Lee, Y., Lemanski, L., Deventer, M. M. V., & O’Brien, D. G. (2020) · Literacy Research and Instruction · doi:10.1080/19388071.2020.1826069 · Cited by 18
“Moje (2007, 2008, 2010, 2015) discusses DL more broadly by investigating DL through a socio-cultural perspective, emphasizing that teaching in DL is not only for disciplinary learning but also civic participation and social justice to support the development of new kinds of knowledge (Moje, 2007,…”
BackgroundUrzúa, S., Yáñez, R. R., & Carvallo, S. M. (2021) · Íkala Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura · doi:10.17533/udea.ikala.v26n2a05 · Cited by 11
“De este modo, la enseñanza de la lectura y la escritura se circunscribe a una disciplina y género específico, ya que, como sostiene Moje (2008), cada disciplina tiene convenciones y normas propias que se deben tener en cuenta en la producción y la difusión del conocimiento, como también en las…”
BackgroundHow Rhetorical Theories of Genre Address Common Core Writing Standards
Collin, R. (2013) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.221 · Cited by 11
Content area reading pedagogy and domain knowledge: a Bourdieusian analysis
Alvermann, D. E., Friese, E. E. G., Beckmann, S., et al. (2011) · The Australian Educational Researcher · doi:10.1007/s13384-011-0024-x · Cited by 11
“In her discussion of disciplinary literacy practices, Moje (2008) noted several persistent challenges, which she phrased as questions:”
BackgroundLenski, S. D., & Thieman, G. Y. (2013) · PDXScholar (Portland State University) · Cited by 11
A Case Study of University Honors Students in Humanities Through a Disciplinary Literacy Lens
Cisco, J. (2015) · Literacy Research and Instruction · doi:10.1080/19388071.2015.1063742 · Cited by 14
“Indeed, Moje (2008) argued that disciplinary literacy is a form of critical literacy, given its emphasis not just on the ways in which disciplinary experts make meaning but also how those ways are “constructed, practiced, and enforced by people” (p. 102).”
BackgroundMitton‐Kükner, J., & Orr, A. M. (2017) · Pedagogies An International Journal · doi:10.1080/1554480x.2017.1376670 · Cited by 11
“misalignment between literacy instruction and the goals of specific subject matters (Colwell & Enderson, 2016; Friedland et al., 2011; Gillis, 2014; Moje, 2008; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2012), kinds of texts (Lesley & Matthews, 2009), or the constraints of field placements (Daisey, 2012; Scharlach, 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialPupils’ mathematical literacy characteristics for solving the minimum competency assessment (AKM)
Septiani, E. I., & Kholid, M. N. (2023) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0141404 · Cited by 10
Karkar-Esperat, T. M. (2022) · The Teacher Educator · doi:10.1080/08878730.2022.2147615 · Cited by 12
Knowledge without disciplines: a critique of social realism’s disciplinary fixation
Barton, K. C. (2024) · Journal of Curriculum Studies · doi:10.1080/00220272.2024.2328058 · Cited by 10
“Calls for ‘disciplinary thinking’ or ‘disciplinary literacy’ (e.g. Langer, 1994; Moje, 2008; Monte-Sano, 2010; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008) have played a significant role in social and civic education in recent decades, particularly in history and geography education.”
BackgroundFostering Proactive Reading Instruction within the Content Areas
Ortlieb, E., Verlaan, W., & Cheek, E. H. (2013) · Literacy research, practice and evaluation · doi:10.1108/s2048-0458(2013)0000003005 · Cited by 10
The Role of Bilingualism in Shaping Engineering Literacies and Identities
Mein, E. L., & Esquinca, A. (2017) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405841.2017.1350494 · Cited by 10
“This approach reflected a disciplinary literacies perspective, which emphasizes the ways in which different kinds of language, texts, approaches to reading/writing, and forms of knowledge production are taken up in distinct ways across the disciplines (Moje, 2008; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008).”
BackgroundReflective Practice in the Arts
Ryan, M. E. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04846-8_5 · Cited by 10
Rivard, L. P., & Gueye, N. R. (2016) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1183267 · Cited by 10
“Although disciplinary literacy is the ultimate aim of all secondary science education, we believe that foundational or generic literacy instruction is a crucial bridge for many linguistically struggling learners (Faggella-Luby, Graner, Deshler, & Drew, 2012; Lai, Wilson, McNaughton, & Hsiao, 2014; Moje, 2008; Shanahan…”
BackgroundDomenico, P. D., Elish‐Piper, L., Manderino, M., et al. (2019) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.943 · Cited by 10
A Construct Modeling Approach to the Assessment of Reading Comprehension for Adolescent Readers
Dray, A. J., Brown, N. J. S., Diakow, R., et al. (2019) · Reading Psychology · doi:10.1080/02702711.2019.1614125 · Cited by 10
“…exams in various disciplines, the general trend of plateaus in reading growth, and lags in comprehension reported in secondary schools can also be explained by reader skill interacting with the types of texts and literacy experiences adolescents encounter in school (Alexander, 2005; Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundHaara, F. O. (2018) · International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning · doi:10.4256/ijmtl.v19i2.95 · Cited by 10
“Making the effort to define literacy within the practices that mathematics teachers use in their teaching has proved to be the way past this scepticism (Moje, 2008; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2012).”
BackgroundTelesca, L., Ehren, B. J., Hahs‐Vaughn, D. L., Zygouris‐Coe, V. I., & Kong, A. P. (2020) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2020_jslhr-19-00086 · Cited by 10
Rainey, E. C., & Storm, S. (2021) · Literacy Research and Instruction · doi:10.1080/19388071.2020.1867264 · Cited by 10
“…for disciplinary literacy teaching and learning across subject areas and grade bands have been made by prominent scholars (Lee & Spratley, 2010; Moje, 2008; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008), and there have been major shifts in content learning standards toward disciplinary literacy learning (e.g.,…”
BackgroundBischoff, P. J., Avery, L. M., Golden, C. F., & French, P. (2010) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10972-010-9188-x · Cited by 10
“Interestingly, the work of Moje (2008) described the importance of ‘‘disciplinary literacy’’ in gaining access to understanding.”
BackgroundUsing Google Drive to Write Dialogically with Teachers
Rish, R. M., Bylen, K., Vreeland, H., et al. (2015) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8403-4.ch014 · Cited by 10
Colwell, J., & Gregory, K. (2016) · ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University) · Cited by 10
Vásquez, R. H., & Salinas, Y. M. (2017) · Diálogo andino · doi:10.4067/s0719-26812017000200007 · Cited by 10
Reading and Writing as Scientists? Text Genres and Literacy Practices in Girls’ Middle‐Grade Science
Faller, S. E. (2017) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.698 · Cited by 10
Burke, P., & Welsch, J. G. (2018) · Irish Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03323315.2017.1421088 · Cited by 10
“…approach requires literacy teaching to serve the needs of a particular discipline, in the promotion of the modes of thinking and communicating that are characteristic of knowledge formation and interaction within that discipline (Moje 2007, 2008; Shanahan and Shanahan 2008; Siebert et al. 2016).”
BackgroundWissinger, D. R., & Ciullo, S. P. (2018) · Learning Disabilities Research and Practice · doi:10.1111/ldrp.12182 · Cited by 10
“In recent years, these shifts in practice have been outlined in reforms that emphasize disciplinary literacy—that is, as forms of critical literacy that build an understanding of how knowledge is produced in the disciplines, rather than just building knowledge of facts (Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialApprenticing Third Graders in Disciplinary Literacy in History
Hughes, R. E. (2020) · Literacy Research and Instruction · doi:10.1080/19388071.2020.1789249 · Cited by 15
“However, as students move through secondary school and into adulthood, can they read and think critically about the complex disciplinary texts they may encounter as college students, professionals, and citizens using general literacy strategies alone? According to many literacy experts, policy makers, and teachers, th…”
BackgroundA multidimensional framework of bi- and multilingual disciplinary literacies
Nikula, T., Gülle, T., Bayyurt, Y., Dafouz, E., Gerns, P., Hüttner, J., Kaygısız, S., Llinares, A., Minardi, S., Mortimore, L., et al. (2026) · Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development · doi:10.1080/01434632.2026.2617424 · Cited by 13
“…discourse conventions, and cognitive practices (ranging from understanding complex concepts to producing knowledge in various formats) that learners need to acquire for both disciplinary and civic participation (Fang and Coatoam 2013; Moje 2008, 2015; Shanahan and Shanahan 2008, 2012).”
U.S. Secondary Students’ Source-Based Argument Writing in History
Steiss, J., Wang, J., Kim, Y. G., & Olson, C. B. (2024) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/07410883241263549 · Cited by 13
“Such writing requires higher-order reasoning aligned with norms for substantiating knowledge claims in a discipline, such as sourcing, contextualization, and corroboration (Kim, 2020; Kim & Graham, 2022; Moje, 2008; Wineburg, 1991).”
Preparing Preservice Teachers to Make the Literacy/History Connection
Howard, C. M., & Guidry, A. (2017) · Literacy Research and Instruction · doi:10.1080/19388071.2017.1304594 · Cited by 9
“Disciplinary literacy focuses more specifically on the subject matter embedded within the subject area as a base supported by skills and strategies that enable students to better learn the subject matter (Carney & Indrisano, 2013; Moje, 2008; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialTertiary-level STEM and EMI: where EFL and content meet to potentiate each other
Ting, Y.-L. T. (2022) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/ccab093 · Cited by 9
Walldén, R. (2022) · Classroom Discourse · doi:10.1080/19463014.2021.2023598 · Cited by 9
Transcending the Divide: Where College and Secondary Reading and Study Research Coincide
Flippo, R. F. (2011) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1598/jaal.54.6.1 · Cited by 9
Literacy Coaching in Wyoming Secondary Schools
Rush, L. S. (2013) · Journal of Literacy Research · doi:10.1177/1086296x13493039 · Cited by 9
“Adoption of a goal to ensure that literacy instruction is occurring within disciplines (Lesley & Matthews, 2009; Moje, 2008) would be an excellent place to begin.”
BackgroundWilder, P., & Herro, D. C. (2015) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.476 · Cited by 11
Literature as catalyst of homogenous and heterogeneous patterns of disciplinary thinking
Prinsloo, C. (2018) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.005 · Cited by 9
Access and Participation in the Transition from School to Higher Education: The Role of Language
Naidoo, L., Wilkinson, J., Adoniou, M., et al. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-0420-0_7 · Cited by 9
An, S. A., Tinajero, J., Tillman, D. A., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Early Childhood · doi:10.1007/s13158-019-00232-9 · Cited by 9
Björk, O., & Folkeryd, J. W. (2021) · L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature · doi:10.17239/l1esll-2021.21.01.03 · Cited by 9
“In fact, some researchers argue that teaching disciplinary literacy should only take place after basic literacy skills are mastered (Moje, 2008; Faggella-Luby, et al 2012).”
BackgroundThe Language-Literacy Ripple Effect on College-Goingness for a Refugee-Background Student
Hoff, M. A., & Armstrong, S. L. (2021) · Literacy Research and Instruction · doi:10.1080/19388071.2021.1921890 · Cited by 9
“In conceptualizing school literacies, Gee (2012) presented the term big-D Discourses, or “saying(writing)–doing–being–valuing–believing combinations” (p. 151) that undergird communication within different social spaces.”
BackgroundInfluentialEsquinca, A., de la Piedra, M. T., & Herrera-Rocha, L. (2021) · Bilingual Research Journal · doi:10.1080/15235882.2021.1970655 · Cited by 10
Entering the Arena: The Figured Worlds Transition of Preservice Teachers
Saunders, J. M., & Ash, G. E. (2013) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.170 · Cited by 9
To Dismantle an Idle Past: Using Historiography to Construct a Digital Learning Environment
Miller, G. R., & Toth, S. L. (2012) · The Social Studies · doi:10.1080/00377996.2011.571303 · Cited by 9
“The result is an approach to social studies education that problematizes a simple narrative and makes the discourses and practices of a discipline transparent for the learner (Moje 2008 ).”
BackgroundBecoming Academically Literate
Park, J. Y. (2013) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.241 · Cited by 12
McDonald, T., & Thornley, C. (2009) · Cited by 9
Shanahan, L. E., Silvestri, K. N., & McVee, M. B. (2017) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.707 · Cited by 9
Re-visiting historical literacy: Towards a disciplinary pedagogy
Roberts, P. (2013) · University of Canberra Research Portal · doi:10.7160/7737.20784 · Cited by 9
“This perspective draws attentions to the different ways in which knowledge is produced, constructed and communicated in the different disciplines and consequently shifts the perspective of literacy from the standpoint of literacy theory to the standpoint of disciplinary learning theory (Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialDisciplinary Literacy, English Learners, and STEM Education
Kamberelis, G., Gillis, V., & Leonard, J. (2014) · Action in Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/01626620.2014.936766 · Cited by 10
“Disciplinary literacy explores how the conceptual knowledge (and the language used to communicate knowledge) of different disciplines influences text comprehension and production in these disciplines (Draper, Broomhead, Jensen, Nokes, & Siebert, 2010; Harmon, Hedrick, & Wood, 2005; Moje, 2008; Shanahan & Shanahan, 200…”
BackgroundWeekes, P., Macken‐Horarik, M., Feez, S., & Unsworth, L. (2014) · RUNE (Research UNE) · Cited by 9
Holdinga, L., van Drie, J. P., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2025) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-025-10630-2 · Cited by 8
Rodriguez, T. L. (2015) · Literacy Research and Instruction · doi:10.1080/19388071.2014.997943 · Cited by 8
“Several challenges may impede such re-design, including content literacy knowledge, beliefs, and practices as well as school structures (Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialA Case Study of Literacy Teaching in Six Middle- and High-School Science Classes in New Zealand
Wilson, A., & Jesson, R. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-69197-8_9 · Cited by 8
How Do Teachers Develop and Enact a Disciplinary View of Literacy in Mathematics
Temple, C., & Doerr, H. M. (2018) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.664 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Moje, E. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Moje, Elizabeth Birr
- ORCID
- Moje, Elizabeth Birr
- Venue
- Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 96-107
- ISSN
- 1081-3004 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-2706
- OpenAlex
- W1985846190
- Cited by
- 785
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 48
- FWCI
- 490.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy (publishedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Literacy, Media, and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Linguistics and Education Research
- Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
- Keywords
- disciplinary literacy, critical literacy, new literacies, democratic participation, new media in education, critical pedagogy, critical reading instruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review