The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 47 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Foregrounding the Disciplines in Secondary Literacy Teaching and Learning: A Call for Change
Open accessAbstract
In this commentary, the author argues for building disciplinary literacy instructional programs, rather than merely encouraging subject matter teachers to employ literacy teaching practices and strategies. Readers might wisely question a focus on disciplinary learning in a time when new media, literacies, and social networking practices are so powerful. The author's argument is that knowledge and skill in the subject matter of the disciplines is essential to young people becoming active participants in a democratic society. Although literacy educators acknowledge the value and power of the knowledge, practices, and texts young people bring to school, it is also critical that we acknowledge the need to expand youth knowledge, practices, and texts. Disciplinary literacy instruction can help youths gain access to the accepted knowledge of the disciplines, thereby allowing them also to critique and change that knowledge. Beginning with disciplinary practices in efforts to integrate literacy instruction more fully throughout secondary schools may better position secondary school educators to draw from a range of new texts and practices available in the disciplines and in adolescents' everyday lives to generate critical learning opportunities. [ Notes. Elizabeth Moje expands on this commentary in a podcast available at www.reading.orgdownloadspodcastsII‐Moje.mp3 . See also Rafael Heller's “Friendly Critique” of the commentary at http:dx.doi.org10.1598JAAL.54.4.4 , Moje's response to Heller at http:dx.doi.org10.1598JAAL.54.4.5 , and continuing discussion on Heller's blog at http:literacyforamateurs.blogspot.com .] في هذا التعليق المؤلفة تعطي حججاً لبناء برامج تعليمية منهاجية لمعرفة القراءة والكتابة بدلاً من مجرد تشجيع أساتذة مادة الموضوع على تفعيل ممارسات تعليم معرفة القراءة والكتابة واستراتيجياتها. وقد يشكّك القراء تشكيكاً ذكياً في التركيز على التعلم المنهاجي في الوقت الذي تتمتع فيه الوسائلة الجديدة ومعارف القراءة والكتابة وممارسات التشبيك الاجتماعي بكل هذا القدر من القوة. وتعتقد المؤلفة أن المعرفة والمهارة في مادة موضوع المناهج هما جوهر موضوع مشاركة الفتيان بشكل فعال في مجتمع ديموقراطي. ومع أن معلّمي معرفة القراءة والكتابة يعترفون بقيمة معرفة الفتيان وممارساتها وقوتها التي يأتون بها إلى المدرسة فإنه أيضاً في أوج الخطر بأننا نعترف بالحاجة إلى توسيع معرفة الفتيان وممارساتهم ونصوصهم. إذ من الممكن أن يساعد تعليم معرفة القراءة والكتابة المنهاجية الفتيان في فتح أبواب معرفة المجالات العلمية المعترف بها وبذلك يتم السماح لهم بنقد تلك المعرفة وتحيولها. وابتداءاً من ممارسات منهاجية في الجهود المبذولة لإدماج تعليم معرفة القراءة والكتابة بشكل أوسع في المدارس الثانوية قد يحسّن موقف معلّمي المدرسة الثانوية لاختيار النصوص الجديدة الممتدة والممارسات المتوفرة في المجالات وفي حياة المراهقين اليومية لتوليد فرص التعلم الخطيرة. [Podcast: www.reading.orgdownloadspodcastsII‐Moje.mp3 .] 在此评论中,作者主张建立学科读写能力教学课程,而不是单靠鼓励学科教师采用读写能力教学实践与策略。在这个新媒体、多元读写能力和新社会网络有强大影响力的时代中,读者会明智地质疑把焦点放在学科学习上的意义。作者的论点是,学科中的知识与技能都是年青人要成为民主社会的积极参与者所必须的。虽然文化教育工作者肯定了年青人所带进学校的知识,文化实践与读写篇章的价值与力量,但我们亦亟需肯定扩展年青人的知识、文化实践与读写篇章的重要性。学科读写能力教育可以帮助年青人有机会获得这些学科的普遍知识,从而帮助他们建立批判与革新这些知识的能力。若学科教育实践能开始于致力把读写能力教学更全面地融入中学教育中,则中学教育工作者会较有效地利用学科已有的广泛而新颖的篇章和文化实践,以及青少年日常生活的经验,给学生营造批判式学习的机会。 [Podcast: www.reading.orgdownloadspodcastsII‐Moje.mp3 .] Dans cette analyse, l'auteur défend l'idée de construire des programmes pédagogiques de littératie par discipline, plutôt que d'inciter les professeurs des disciplines à utiliser des stratégies et des pratiques d'enseignement venues de la lecture‐écriture. Les lecteurs devraient avoir la sagesse de remettre en question la centration sur l'apprentissage de la discipline à un moment où les nouveaux médias, les littératies, et les pratiques sociales de travail en réseau sont si puissants. L'argument de l'auteur est que les savoirs et les savoir‐faire des contenus disciplinaires est essentiel pour que les jeunes deviennent des membres actifs d'une société démocratique. Quoique les maîtres reconnaissent la valeur et le pouvoir des connaissances, des pratiques et des textes que les jeunes apportent à l'école, il est également capital que nous reconnaissions la nécessité d'étendre les connaissances, les pratiques, et les textes des jeunes. Un enseignement de littératie par discipline peut aider les jeunes à accéder à une acceptation des disciplines, en les autorisant aussi de ce fait à critiquer et à changer la connaissance. Commencer par les pratiques de disciplines pour s'efforcer d'intégrer plus complètement l'enseignement de la littératie dans les écoles secondaires pourrait placer les enseignants du secondaire en meilleure position pour tirer parti de tout un ensemble de nouveaux textes et de nouvelles pratiques disponibles dans les disciplines et dans la vie quotidienne des adolescents et fournir des occasions d'apprentissage critique. [Podcast: www.reading.orgdownloadspodcastsII‐Moje.mp3 .] Автор утверждает, что мало просто предлагать учителям‐предметникам развивать грамотность учащихся и даже предлагать им методы для развития грамотности. Следует создавать учебные программы по развитию предметной грамотности. Читатели вправе усомниться в целесообразности такого подхода в эпоху новых медийных носителей, новых видов грамотности и мощных социальных сетей. Доводы автора состоят в том, что для молодежи как активных членов демократического общества крайне важны дисциплинарные знания и навыки. Хотя учителя признают ценность тех знаний, методов, и текстов, которые молодые люди приносят в школу из реальной жизни, все‐таки необходимо расширять эти знания, вооружать молодых людей различными методами работы со словом и знакомить их со все новыми и новыми текстами. Развитие предметной грамотности даст учащимся доступ к общеизвестным знаниям в той или иной предметной области, что в свою очередь позволит им критически анализировать и видоизменять эти знания. Если в школах произойдет интеграция обучения грамотности с преподаванием различных дисциплин, под рукой у педагогов окажется целый арсенал новых текстов и практик – как предметных, так и относящихся к каждодневной жизни подростков. Это создаст наиболее оптимальные предпосылки для обучения. [Podcast: www.reading.orgdownloadspodcastsII‐Moje.mp3 .] En este comentario, el autor propone la creación de programas de instrucción de competencias disciplinarias , en vez de meramente incentivar a los maestros de materias a utilizar estrategias y prácticas de la enseñanza de competencias. Los lectores podrían cuestionar con razón un enfoque en la enseñanza de disciplinas en este tiempo en que nuevos medios, las competencias, y el establecimiento de contactos sociales son tan poderosos. El argumento del autor es que tener conocimiento y habilidad en la materia de las disciplinas es esencial para que los jóvenes puedan participar activamente en una sociedad democrática. Aunque los educadores de las competencias reconocen el valor y el poder del conocimiento al igual que las prácticas y los textos que los jóvenes traen al salón de clase, es también de importancia crítica que reconozcamos la necesidad de expandir el conocimiento, las prácticas, y los textos de los jóvenes. Instrucción sobre las competencias de las disciplinas puede ayudar a los jóvenes a tener acceso al conocimiento aceptado de las disciplinas, de esa forma permitiéndoles criticar y cambiar ese conocimiento. Empezar con las prácticas de las disciplinas—en un esfuerzo para mejor integrar la instrucción de competencias en las escuelas secundarias—podría poner a los maestros de las escuelas secundarias en una mejor posición para hacer uso de una gama de prácticas y textos nuevos disponibles en las disciplinas y las vidas diarias de los adolescentes para crear oportunidades de aprendizaje crítico. [Podcast: www.reading.orgdownloadspodcastsII‐Moje.mp3 .]
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
3 of 47 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In recently conducted surveys of adolescent literacy practices among youth in one large midwestern U.S. city, the average young person reported engaging in roughly nine different family and community activities outside of school each week, and reported reading books, websites, music lyrics, and magazines several times per week, in addition to the reading they did for school (Moje, Overby, Tysvaer,”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Moje, Overby, Tysvaer, & Morris, 2008 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Reading and Writing Practices Outside of School passage reports that students read websites, music lyrics, magazines, and novels or other literary works outside school. But the survey scale defines 4 as once a week and 5 as three to four times a week; the reported averages for these text types range from 3.43 to 4.31. Thus, the source does not support saying the average student read each of them several times per week. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In recently conducted surveys of adolescent literacy practices among youth in one large midwestern U.S. city, the average young person reported engaging in roughly nine different family and community activities outside of school each week, and reported reading books, websites, music lyrics, and magazines several times per week, in addition to the reading they did for school (Moje, Overby, Tysvaer,”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Moje, Overby, Tysvaer, & Morris, 2008 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Participants and Sites passage (page unavailable) describes surveys of students in a large Midwestern city, and the survey-measures passage says students were asked about out-of-school activities, including family activities. Neither passage, nor the passages on results, reports that the average student engaged in roughly nine different family and community activities each week. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“At the same time, my own work with young people in one urban community (Moje et al., 2008) suggests that youths' transfer of proficient skills from popular texts that interest them-and for which they have constructed extensive domain knowledge in practice-is compromised when they find themselves confronted with texts for which they have little sophisticated domain knowledge and for which they have”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Moje et al., 2008 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
In the paper
“In a recent teaching experience I observed firsthand the critical role of knowledge in adolescent students' abilities to make sense of even short segments of primary source texts (Moje & Speyer, 2008).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Moje & Speyer, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As our students read immigration laws, for example, they needed basic information from immigration history, world geography, political theory, cultural studies, and mathematics, not to mention vocabulary, discursive knowledge, and knowledge of how and when to question texts and search for additional information (what we labeled”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In other words, teachers hold cultural beliefs about the appropriate practices of their respective disciplines.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Students also engage in literacy practices and learning outside of school, learning they consider powerful and important.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hull & Schultz, 2002
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Leander & Lovvorn, 2006 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Lee, 2007
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Although my basic premise is that the reason for a lack of integration is that secondary content literacy has focused more on literacy than on the subject areas (cf.Conley, 2008), I review each of these points brief ly because they each have important connections to what I argue is the key challenge, that of reconceptualizing how we think of disciplinary learning and literacy instruction.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Conley, 2008 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In sum, new media and new literacy practices are important to the disciplines.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Jenkins, 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Typical approaches to secondary school content learning often overlook the learning and literacy practices that youth engage in apart from their school-based, content learning (e.g., Hull & Schultz, 2002;Leander & Lovvorn, 2006;Lee, 2007;Moje, 2002;Tatum, 2008).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hull & Schultz, 2002
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Leander & Lovvorn, 2006 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Lee, 2007
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 45
- It may state two separate claims as one. 16
In the paper
“Finally, as Lee (2007) has eloquently argued, knowledge and skill in the subject areas is essential to supporting young people in becoming active participants in a democratic society.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lee, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Young people do not need to go to school to learn what they already know; content literacy instruction can help youth gain access to the accepted knowledge of the disciplines, thereby allowing them also to critique and change that knowledge.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Young people do not need to go to school to learn what they already know.
In the paper
“O'Brien et al. (1995) argued that students' beliefs, values, and knowledges support and constrain teachers' practices and the dominant structures of the secondary school.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites O'Brien et al., 1995 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Disciplinary learning is, from Lee's and Bain's perspective (and that of many others who advocate for a disciplinary stance toward secondary school learning) a form of critical literacy because it builds an understanding of how knowledge is produced in the disciplines, rather than just building knowledge in the disciplines.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lee
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Bain
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A significant body of research over the last 20 years has demonstrated that preservice teachers are skeptical about the efficacy of teaching and learning strategies offered by content literacy research, and inservice teachers rarely enact such strategies in their subject area classrooms (Alvermann & Moore, 1991;Holt-Reynolds, 1992;O'Brien & Stewart, 1990;Ratekin, Simpson, Alvermann, & Dishner, 198”
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Students bring ideas about what counts as learning to their disciplinary classrooms, and teachers make decisions about classroom practices in interaction with students and in the context of the secondary school as an institution (Moje, 1996).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Moje, 1996 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These practices and strategies, although important to improving literacy learning, overlook an important question: What does literacy instruction do for learning in the subject areas?”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, it may be that beginning with disciplinary practices in efforts to bring literacy instruction into secondary schools will better position secondary school researchers, teacher educators, and teachers to draw from the new texts and literate practices of adolescent students' lives as well.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Drawing from their study of engineering students, Stevens and colleagues (in press) suggested that disciplinary learning is a matter of simultaneous intersections of constructing knowledge, identifying with a domain, and navigating different pathways toward goals.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Stevens et al., in press
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“More to the point, teachers do not operate in a vacuum: The structures of the secondary school, an amazingly stable and enduring institution that has changed little over the course of its existence (Cuban, 1986), constrain and support the ways that teachers and students carry out their day-to-day classroom practices.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Cuban, 1986
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even more important, knowledge production in the disciplines needs to be understood to be the result of human interaction.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The time period in which a claim is situated matters tremendously to an historian; thus, temporal context is one dimension-among many other dimensions-a reader of historical texts must know, uncover, or examine as she or he reads (Bain, 2000;Wineburg, 1991).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bain, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Wineburg, 1991 source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“They demonstrated that these engineering students developed engineering knowledge in multiple sources and practices, and that the knowledge itself contributed to whether and how they identified as engineering students and, ultimately, as engineers.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Stevens et al., in press
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The role of knowledge and information as described here has, I believe, often been backgrounded in literacy research and teaching in an attempt to avoid communicating the idea that knowledge should be simply transferred from teacher to learner.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In other words, knowledge, identities, and critical literacy skill develop iteratively; this development requires scaffolding and mediation by teachers who know the content well and understand the role that language and literate practice play in producing knowledge within it.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Knowledge production in the disciplines operates according to particular norms for everyday practice, conventions for communicating and representing knowledge and ideas, and ways of interacting, defending ideas, and challenging the deeply held ideas of others in the discipline.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For others, literate skill is undeveloped, creating a similar challenge but one with a different etiology.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Students may enter classrooms and schools with gaps in knowledge, skill, or motivation.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That is, in the past, secondary literacy has been approached from the standpoint of literacy theory, rather than from the standpoint of the disciplinary learning theory.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, in science, a norm of practice is that researchable problems be carefully defined and systematically and repeatedly studied before claims can be made about phenomena.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We have not acknowledged that the disciplines themselves are replete with cultural practices and can be considered discourse communities students must navigate.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Particular forms of evidence-typically empirical or observable forms that derive from experimental study-are required to make claims.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That is, we might argue that adolescent students learn in the disciplines by simultaneously navigating through various practices and texts of the disciplines, thus supporting the construction of knowledge in practice and identification with the discipline.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Each of these forms-now readily available through digital venues-can support the construction of knowledge necessary to access the abstract and dense print texts of the disciplines.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, motivation to take on or engage with the identity as historian, scientist, mathematician, or literary critic/writer may be waning as students enter secondary schools with little evidence that disciplinary knowledge or practice is meaningful for their lives.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Students may enter classrooms and schools with gaps in knowledge, skill, or motivation.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A number of theorists have argued that the subject areas can be viewed as spaces in which knowledge is produced or constructed, rather than as repositories of content knowledge or information (Foucault, 1972;Halliday & Martin, 1993;Hicks, 1995;Lemke, 1990;Luke, 2001).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Foucault, 1972
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Halliday & Martin, 1993
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hicks, 1995 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To learn deeply in a subject area, then, young people need to have access to the ways that conventions of disciplinary knowledge production and communication can be routinely or more explicitly challenged and reshaped; such knowledge gives young people the power to read critically across various texts and various disciplines.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In history, by contrast, the norms of practice differ.Historians, like natural scientists, study researchable problems systematically, but the means of obtaining evidence and the forms that provide warrant for claims differ.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For some students, requisite disciplinary background knowledge is lacking and so reading upper-level texts and textbooks is challenging.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Students may enter classrooms and schools with gaps in knowledge, skill, or motivation.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These constraints, even taken together, however, fail to pinpoint a central problem in secondary school literacy: Without careful attention to what it means to learn in the subject areas and what counts as knowledge in the disciplines that undergird those subjects, educators will continue to struggle to integrate literacy instruction and those areas.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In particular, the division of secondary school learning into subject areas drawn from the disciplines reifies a belief (and constructs sets of practices) that implies knowledge is inherently different in different disciplines.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“People cannot learn in a deep way within a semiotic domain if they are not willing to commit themselves fully to the learning in terms of time, effort, and active engagement.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gee, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Just as secondary school teachers do not teach in a vacuum, young people do not learn in one; they encounter many different forms of text and employ many different literate practices throughout a given day.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Key to preventing the construction of knowledge-in-practice from devolving into the transfer of rote information is providing opportunities for young people to examine how the norms of knowing, doing, and communicating are constructed.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These studies demonstrate that the youths' knowledge of and identifications with the domain both support their skill in reading and writing and motivate them to persevere even when confronted with a challenging text or writing task.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Alvermann, 2001
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Gustavson, 2007 source
- Not matchedcites Moje, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Such a commitment requires that they are willing to see themselves in terms of a new identity, that is, to see themselves as the kind of person who can learn, use, and value the new semiotic domain.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gee, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“All deep learning-that is, active, critical learningis inextricably caught up with identity in a variety of ways....”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gee, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, we have not thoroughly conceptualized language and literacy practice as an integral aspect of subject area learning, rather than as a set of strategies for engaging with texts.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This last question reminds me of Orellana and colleagues' (2003) analysis of young Latino/a children co-constructing meaning of complex Englishlanguage documents with their Spanish-speaking parents: The children could access the language codes of English, but could not make meaning of words and concepts; their parents brought sophisticated world knowledge to the decoding process, and thereby the”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Orellana and colleagues' (2003)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Teachers can employ many different forms of representation to construct knowledge of one concept-different genres (e.g., narrative, expository, poetics, music), different symbol systems (e.g., print, graphs, tables), and different semiotic tools (image, sound, and performance).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, secondary school teachers will face challenges at the classroom level with the question of how to support young people as they construct identities across different disciplines.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Disciplinary texts, however, can be extremely challenging to the reader with little prior knowledge of the discipline, thus producing the conundrum mentioned previously.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This fear of reifying knowledge has resulted in a great deal of talk about disciplinary identity development and strategy instruction without attention to how being a certain kind of person (developing a disciplinary identity) and engaging in strategic practice is dependent on knowing some things about the domain in which one is practicing.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“In a typical school day, young people in secondary school are expected to participate in the discourses of the disciplines, to incorporate those discourses with other discourses and identities they experience throughout the day, and to forge, or at least try out, new identities as they take up those discourses (cf.Gee, 2000Gee, /2001;;Luke, 2001).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gee, 2000/2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Luke, 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To learn deeply in a subject area, then, young people need to have access to the ways that conventions of disciplinary knowledge production and communication can be routinely or more explicitly challenged and reshaped; such knowledge gives young people the power to read critically across various texts and various disciplines.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Bain (2000) calls this the generation of an epistemically grounded curriculum and pedagogy, or one in which students come to understand that knowing how knowledge is produced is as important as access to the knowledge itself.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bain (2000)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Subject areas become subcultures of the secondary school, with their own ways of knowing, doing, and believing.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Without a change in the typical school structures of 50-minute classes, relative isolation of teachers in single classrooms, and confinement of classes within the physical school space, a broad, metadiscursive pedagogy and curriculum will be difficult to develop.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These constraints do not exist in some sort of hierarchical form (i.e., changes in structures lead to changes in culture or vice versa) and, therefore, each set of constraints needs to be addressed simultaneously as interlocking pieces of the disciplinary/secondary school literacy puzzle.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The integration of literacy instruction in the secondary schools is a complex change process that will require collaboration, com-”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No one group can act alone.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These pieces include teacher educators, school administrators, teachers, researchers, local and national policymakers, and the young people themselves.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The work and commitment required for developing an integrated approach to literacy teaching and learning in the secondary subject areas is enormous, requiring conceptual changes in our definitions, cultural changes in our practices, and structural changes in the enduring institutions of the secondary school and secondary teacher education.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The issues of the subject area subcultures, limited opportunities for teachers to work across disciplines, and the implacable structure and timing of the typical secondary school day all work to challenge a metadiscursive approach to content literacy, just as they challenge strategy-based approaches.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The authors state this as an assumption.
The disciplines are constituted by discourses.
“This turn toward literacy as an essential aspect of disciplinary learning, requires the acceptance of a key premise that”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Producing knowledge in a discipline requires fluency in making and interrogating knowledge claims, which in turn require fluency in a wide range of ways of constructing and communicating knowledge.
“This premise assumes that producing knowledge in a discipline requires f luency in making and interrogating knowledge claims, which in turn require f luency in a wide range of ways of constructing and communicating knowledge.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Teachers and administrators are aware of the need to do something different in classrooms, and teacher educators are generally committed to teacher education around content literacy.
“Teachers and administrators are aware of the need to do something different in classrooms, and teacher educators are generally committed to teacher education around content literacy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Young people do not need to go to school to learn what they already know.
“Young people do not need to go to school to learn what they already know; content literacy instruction can help youth gain access to the accepted knowledge of the disciplines, thereby allowing them also to critique and change that knowledge.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Students may enter classrooms and schools with gaps in knowledge, skill, or motivation.
“The question of repair work-or the idea that students may enter classrooms and schools with gaps in knowledge, skill, or motivation-operates at multiple levels.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Disciplinary scholars have turned increasingly to new media to conduct disciplinary investigations.
“As indicated previously, disciplinary scholars have turned increasingly to new media, which demand new literacy practices, to conduct disciplinary investigations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The texts youth had access to outside of school were often more compelling to them than those they were presented with in school.
“More to the point, the texts they had access to outside of school were often more compelling to them than those they were presented with in school.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Two articles are assigned overlapping pages in the same issue
MinorThe references place two different articles in volume 78, issue 1 of Harvard Educational Review, but their stated page ranges overlap on pages 107-108.
“Conley, M.W. (2008). Cognitive strategy instruction for ado- lescents: What we know about the promise, what we don't know about the potential. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 84-108.”
“Moje, E.B., Overby, M., Tysvaer, N., & Morris, K. (2008). The complex world of adolescent literacy: Myths, motivations, and mysteries. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 107-154.”
Two stated reasons are followed by a third
MinorThe author says there are two reasons for pursuing disciplinary literacy teaching and introduces them as "First" and "Second." A subsequent "Finally" paragraph presents a distinct rationale about participation in a democratic society.
“I have pursued the question of disciplinary literacy teaching for two reasons.First, in the current sociopolitical context”
“Finally, as Lee (2007) has eloquently argued, knowledge and skill in the subject areas is essential to supporting young people in becoming active participants in a democratic society.”
Citations
Cites
Review of research in education
Shulman, L. S., Mowry, S., & Berliner, D. C. (1973) · F.E. Peacock eBooks · Cited by 7,754
Pearson, P. D., Barr, (. E., Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., & Barr, R. (1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5764 · Cited by 6,850
What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy
(2004) · Education + Training · doi:10.1108/et.2004.00446dae.002 · Cited by 6,674
A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures
Cazden, C. (2006) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u · Cited by 6,196
What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy
Gee, J. P. (2003) · Computers in Entertainment · doi:10.1145/950566.950595 · Cited by 5,735
(1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,727
Talking science: language, learning, and values
Lemke, J. L. (1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5211 · Cited by 4,001
A pedagogy of Multiliteracies Designing Social Futures
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (1996) · doi:10.4324/9780203979402-6 · Cited by 3,323
Chapter 3 : Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research in Education
Gee, J. P. (2000) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x025001099 · Cited by 2,727
Teaching Disciplinary Literacy to Adolescents: Rethinking Content- Area Literacy
Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. R. (2008) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101 · Cited by 1,685
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Gee J.P.(2001 December).Reading in “new times”.Paper presented at the National Reading Conference San Antonio TX.
- Jenkins H., 2006, Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Media consumers in a digital age
- Lee C.D., 2006, Reading in the disciplines and the challenges of adolescent literacy.
- Luke A., 2001, Constructions of literacy: Studies of teaching and learning in and out of secondary schools, ix
- Moje E.B., 1997, Exploring discourse, subjectivity, and knowledge in chemistry class, Journal of Classroom Interaction, 32, 35
- Moje E.B., 2004, Bridging the gap: Improving literacy learning for preadolescent and adolescent learners in grades 4–12, 227
- Moore D.W., 1996, Literacies for the 21st century: Research and practice (45th yearbook of the National Reading Conference, pp 15–46).
- Moore D.W., 2001, Constructions of literacy: Studies of teaching and learning in and out of secondary schools, 3
- Readence J.E., 1989, Content area reading: An integrated approach
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century
Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (2012) · Cited by 2,038
Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction
Mayer, R. E., & Alexander, P. A. (2011) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203839089 · Cited by 969
“, biology, Carter, Ferzli, & Wiebe, 2007; chemistry, McDermott & Hand, 2011), mathematics (Brown, 2007), and history (Moje, 2008; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008).”
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2011) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x11413260 · Cited by 635
“…more from interventions, content, and texts pitched at deeper reading components and media of 21st-century literacy (Biancarosa & Snow, 2004; Meyer et al., 2010; Moje, 2008; Resnick, 2010; Wiley, Goldman, Graesser, Sanchez, Ash, & Hemmerich, 2009; Williams, Stafford, Lauer, Hall, & Pollini, 2009).”
Doing and Teaching Disciplinary Literacy with Adolescent Learners: A Social and Cultural Enterprise
Moje, E. B. (2015) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.254 · Cited by 379
“…(although it surely will produce some new members, and perhaps some from a range of diverse backgrounds) but about providing all students with the opportunity to understand how disciplines work and to raise questions about the trustworthiness of disciplinary knowledge (Moje, 2007, 2008, 2010).”
BackgroundSelf-citationGoldman, S. R., Britt, M. A., Brown, W. R., Cribb, G., George, M., Greenleaf, C. L., Lee, C. D., Shanahan, C. R., & Project READI (2016) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741 · Cited by 396
“In other words, what is taken as claims, evidence, or principles, and the criteria for valid arguments or explanations, differs from discipline to discipline (Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundComprehending and Learning From Internet Sources: Processing Patterns of Better and Poorer Learners
Goldman, S. R., Braasch, J. L. G., Wiley, J., Graesser, A. C., & Brodowinska, K. (2012) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.027 · Cited by 365
“When experts read articles in their field to advance their own understanding of a phenomenon, they explicitly consider the reliability of the information sources (Chinn & Malhotra, 2002; Leinhardt & Young, 1996; Moje, 2008; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008; Wineburg, 1991, 1998).”
BackgroundAnalysis of Expert Readers in Three Disciplines
Shanahan, C. R., Shanahan, T., & Misischia, C. (2011) · Journal of Literacy Research · doi:10.1177/1086296x11424071 · Cited by 320
“The research described here aims to contribute to the expansion of discipline-specific literacy strategies by identifying specialized properties of disciplinary reading (Draper, 2010; Moje, 2008; Moje, Overby, Tysvaer, & Morris, 2008; Moje, Stockdill, Kim, & Kim, 2011; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008).”
BackgroundFang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2010) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1598/jaal.53.7.6 · Cited by 318
“In addition, Moje (2008) suggested that “it may be most productive to build disciplinary literacy instructional programs, rather than to merely encourage content teachers to employ literacy teaching practices and strategies” (emphasis original, p. 96).”
BackgroundDisciplinary Literacy : What You Want to Know About It
Fang, Z., & Coatoam, S. (2013) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.190 · Cited by 222
Trends in Research on Writing as a Learning Activity
Klein, P. D., & Boscolo, P. (2016) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2016.07.03.01 · Cited by 226
“This was one of several recent calls to teach students the particular forms KLEIN TRENDS IN RESEARCH ON WRITING AS A LEARNING ACTIVITY | 326 of reading, reasoning, and writing needed in specific secondary school subjects (Moje, 2008; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008).”
Language Correlates of Disciplinary Literacy
Fang, Z. (2012) · Topics in Language Disorders · doi:10.1097/tld.0b013e31824501de · Cited by 189
“From this perspective, literacy is no longer just a set of strategies or tools to be imported into the disciplines to improve reading and writing of texts across content areas; it is an essential part of disciplinary enculturation and socialization (Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialDisciplinary Literacy in History: An Exploration of the Historical Nature of Adolescents' Writing
Monte‐Sano, C. (2010) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2010.481014 · Cited by 182
“One way to confront the needs of adolescents is to focus on disciplinary literacy, which foregrounds subject-specific ways of reading and writing that are the hallmarks of advanced literacy (Moje, 2008; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008).”
BackgroundUsing Writing Tasks to Elicit Adolescents’ Historical Reasoning
Monte‐Sano, C., & Paz, S. D. L. (2012) · Journal of Literacy Research · doi:10.1177/1086296x12450445 · Cited by 165
“Disciplinary literacy has emerged as a pathway to advance students’ literacy skills and necessitates the integration of literacy and subject matter (cf. Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialIntegrating Literacy and Science in Biology
Greenleaf, C. L., Litman, C., Hanson, T., Rosen, R., Boscardin, C., Herman, J. L., Schneider, S., Madden, S., & Jones, B. (2010) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831210384839 · Cited by 186
“Literacy researchers have therefore argued that for all students to learn to perform academic literacy tasks, teachers need to make explicit the tacit reasoning processes, strategies, and discourse rules that shape successful readers’ and writers’ work in particular disciplines (e.g., Delpit, 1995; Fielding & Pearson,…”
BackgroundMonte‐Sano, C. (2011) · Curriculum Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1467-873x.2011.00547.x · Cited by 151
“There are some literacy experts, nonetheless, who have begun to embrace and explore the disciplinespecific nature of reading and writing (Conley, 2008; Moje, 2007, 2008; Moje et al., 2004; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008).”
BackgroundGoldman, S. R., & Scardamalia, M. (2013) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/10824669.2013.773217 · Cited by 158
Paz, S. D. L., Monte-Sano, C., Felton, M., Croninger, R. G., Jackson, C., & Piantedosi, K. W. (2017) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.147 · Cited by 129
“…growing consensus that as students progress through the curriculum, they should write not only to demonstrate content area learning but also to grapple with domain- dependent and intellectually challenging issues (Bain, 2012; Beaufort, 2004; Moje, 2008; Stevens, Wineburg, Herrenkohl, & Bell, 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialAdolescent Literacy: Learning and Understanding Content
Goldman, S. R. (2012) · The Future of Children · doi:10.1353/foc.2012.0011 · Cited by 131
Content Area Reading and Disciplinary Literacy: A Case for The Radical Center
Brozo, W. G., Moorman, G. B., Meyer, C., et al. (2013) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.153 · Cited by 112
“The second is that the real goal of disciplinary instruction in science, math, social studies, and literature is to develop in students the capacity to think, read, and write like an insider or expert, and that generic literacy strategies are inadequate tools for meeting this goal (Moje, 2008; Shanahan & Shanahan, 201…”
BackgroundInfluentialDeveloping Historical Reading and Writing With Adolescent Readers: Effects on Student Learning
Paz, S. D. L., Felton, M. K., Monte‐Sano, C., Croninger, R. G., Jackson, C., Deogracias, J. S., & Hoffman, B. P. (2014) · Theory & Research in Social Education · doi:10.1080/00933104.2014.908754 · Cited by 107
Rainey, E. C. (2016) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.154 · Cited by 100
“Recent years have seen multiple calls for K–12 disciplinary literacy instruction (Lee & Spratley, 2010; Moje, 2008; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialMagnusson, C. G., Roe, A., & Blikstad‐Balas, M. (2018) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.231 · Cited by 92
Science Literacy for All: More than a Slogan, Logo, or Rally Flag!
Yore, L. D. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-3980-2_2 · Cited by 87
Observing Literacy Practices in History Classrooms
Nokes, J. D. (2010) · Theory & Research in Social Education · doi:10.1080/00933104.2010.10473438 · Cited by 85
“Fall 2010 537 unique texts and require unique literacies (Draper et al., in press; Moje, 2008; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008), most teacher education programs require generic content-area literacy courses that focus on traditional reading and general texts (Stewart & O’Brien, 1989).”
BackgroundInfluentialGillis, V. (2014) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.301 · Cited by 84
Paz, S. D. L., Ferretti, R. P., Wissinger, D. R., Yee, L. S., & MacArthur, C. A. (2012) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088312461591 · Cited by 101
“Clearly, students must differentiate everyday argumentation from argumentation in the disciplines to read and write in secondary contexts (Moje, 2008; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008).”
BackgroundEffects of critical discussions on middle school students’ written historical arguments.
Wissinger, D. R., & Paz, S. D. L. (2015) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000043 · Cited by 83
59th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference
Jiménez, R. T., Risko, V. J., Hundley, M. K., & Rowe, D. W. (2010) · Cited by 83
Writing in the Secondary-Level Disciplines: a Systematic Review of Context, Cognition, and Content
Miller, D. M., Scott, C. E., & McTigue, E. M. (2016) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-016-9393-z · Cited by 99
Disciplinary Literacy and the Common Core State Standards
Zygouris‐Coe, V. I. (2012) · Topics in Language Disorders · doi:10.1097/tld.0b013e31824561a2 · Cited by 81
“Rather, it situates literacy as an integral part of content (Moje, 2008) so that “literacy within the discipline” becomes the goal of disciplinary literacy.”
BackgroundInfluentialClose Reading: A Cautionary Interpretation
Hinchman, K. A., & Moore, D. W. (2013) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.163 · Cited by 81
“Current scholarship on disciplinary literacies reminds educators that purposes and approaches to reading differ by subject matter (Moje, 2008; Shanahan, Shanahan, & Misischia, 2011).”
BackgroundA Social Semiotics Framework for Conceptualizing Content Area Literacies
Wilson, A. A. (2011) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1598/jaal.54.6.5 · Cited by 75
“been questioned by others (e.g., Conley, 2008; Moje, 2008) who believe that more discipline-specific, context-specific approaches may be required to equip”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGreenleaf, C. L., & Hinchman, K. A. (2009) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1598/jaal.53.1.1 · Cited by 75
“Despite this, some schools have reduced time spent on such instruction to provide remediation for students with limited literacy achievement (Center on Education Policy, 2007; Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundLiteracy culture management of elementary school in Indonesia
Marmoah, S., & Poerwanti, S. J. I. S. (2022) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09315 · Cited by 167
Monte-Sano, C., Paz, S. D. L., & Felton, M. (2014) · Journal of Curriculum Studies · doi:10.1080/00220272.2014.904444 · Cited by 77
“…social studies education; teaching history; literacy; teacher knowledge In recent years, educators in the USA have emphasized disciplinary literacy as an essential path forward in cultivating adolescents’ understanding of subject matter in tandem with their literacy skills (cf. Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundColwell, J., & Enderson, M. C. (2015) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.11.001 · Cited by 74
Hall, L. A. (2012) · Journal of Literacy Research · doi:10.1177/1086296x12445370 · Cited by 73
“Students must also learn how knowledge is created and communicated and how reading and writing within one discipline is both similar and different from reading and writing in others (Heller & Greenleaf, 2007; Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundScott, C. E., McTigue, E. M., Miller, D. M., et al. (2018) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.010 · Cited by 71
“…integration of authentic, content-specific literacy practices into the processes and discourses of disciplinary study (Fang & Schleppegrell, 2010; Moje, 2008; Rainey, 2015, 2017; Reisman, 2012; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008, 2012) and “to the shared ways of reading, writing, thinking, and reasoning…”
BackgroundIn Praise of Amateurism: A Friendly Critique of Moje's “Call for Change” in Secondary Literacy
Heller, R. (2010) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1598/jaal.54.4.4 · Cited by 70
Lai, M. K., Wilson, A., McNaughton, S., & Hsiao, S. (2014) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.73 · Cited by 69
The transition from primary to secondary school: Teachers’ perspectives
Hopwood, B., Hay, I., & Dyment, J. (2016) · The Australian Educational Researcher · doi:10.1007/s13384-016-0200-0 · Cited by 66
Román, D. X., & Busch, K. C. (2015) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1091878 · Cited by 63
“Among the functional approaches, Halliday’s (1994) Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) has had a strong influence in the field of education because it has offered educators insights into how language varies between genres and content-areas (Moje 2008).”
BackgroundReading, Writing, and Thinking Like a Scientist
Cervetti, G. N., & Pearson, P. D. (2012) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.00069 · Cited by 64
“One outcome of the recent interest in disciplinary literacy has been a deeper understanding of the relationship between literacy practices and the development of knowledge in disciplines (Heller & Greenleaf, 2007; Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundData Literacy for Social Studies: Examining the Role of Data Visualizations in K–12 Textbooks
Shreiner, T. L. (2017) · Theory & Research in Social Education · doi:10.1080/00933104.2017.1400483 · Cited by 62
“One proposed explanation for the literacy crisis in the United States is that targeted literacy instruction tends to decrease as students move through school, even as students encounter more challenging and complex texts in the separate school subjects of secondary school (Goldman et al., 2016; Moje, 2008; Shanahan &…”
BackgroundInfluentialOperationalizing and validating disciplinary literacy in secondary education
Spires, H. A., Kerkhoff, S. N., Graham, A. C. K., Thompson, I. B., & Lee, J. K. (2018) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-018-9839-4 · Cited by 73
“Moje (2008) advocated that using the tenets of the disciplines as a grounding tool has the potential to improve literacy practices.”
Background60th Yearbook of the Literacy Research Association
Dunston, P. J., Fullerton, S. K., Bates, C. C., Headley, K. N., & Stecker, P. M. (2011) · Cited by 62
A Literature Review on Disciplinary Literacy
Hillman, A. M. (2013) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.256 · Cited by 59
Class on Fire: Using the Hunger Games Trilogy to Encourage Social Action
Simmons, A. M. (2012) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.00099 · Cited by 58
A general framework and supporting strategies for teaching mixed classes
Carreira, M. M. (2016) · Studies in bilingualism · doi:10.1075/sibil.49.09car · Cited by 57
Bunch, G. C., & Martin, D. (2020) · Language and Education · doi:10.1080/09500782.2020.1842443 · Cited by 67
Research on Learning and Instruction
Goldman, S. R., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2015) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732215601866 · Cited by 80
“Such disciplinary differences have important implications for what is taught, how it is taught, and how it is assessed (Goldman, 2012; Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundCommon Themes in Teaching Reading for Understanding: Lessons From Three Projects
Goldman, S. R., Snow, C. E., & Vaughn, S. R. (2016) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.586 · Cited by 56
“Critics of that work have argued for explicitly focusing instruction on disciplinary literacies rather than generic reading comprehension (Goldman & Snow, 2015; Moje, 2008; T. Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008).”
BackgroundMoore, J., Schleppegrell, M. J., & Palincsar, A. S. (2018) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.472 · Cited by 56
“We also returned to research on disciplinary literacy (Christie & Derewianka, 2008; Moje, 2008) to foreground social purpose and habits of mind important to successful participation in ELA.”
MethodOutliers: Upper Secondary School Students Who Read Better in the L2 than in L1
Brevik, L. M., & Hellekjær, G. O. (2017) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2017.10.001 · Cited by 36
“This relates to another research gap we intend to fill, namely that of moving from a focus on generic comprehension strategy use to comprehension strategy use in the English L2 subject in secondary school (e.g. Moje, 2008; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialDisciplinary Literacy and Inquiry: Teaching for Deeper Content Learning
Spires, H. A., Kerkhoff, S. N., & Graham, A. C. K. (2016) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.577 · Cited by 67
“Constructing disciplinary knowledge through disciplinary literacy allows students to learn both the process and the content of a discipline (Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundAn Exploration of Text Difficulty and Knowledge Support on Adolescents' Comprehension
Lupo, S. M., Tortorelli, L. S., Invernizzi, M. A., Ryoo, J. H., & Strong, J. Z. (2019) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.247 · Cited by 50
Widodo, H. P. (2015) · Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) · Cited by 50
Shreiner, T. L., & Dykes, B. M. (2020) · Theory & Research in Social Education · doi:10.1080/00933104.2020.1850382 · Cited by 54
“One proposed explanation for poor literacy is that targeted literacy instruction tends to decrease as students move through school, even as students encounter more challenging and complex discipline-specific texts (Goldman et al., 2016; Moje, 2008; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008).”
BackgroundRelating Multimodal Representations to the Literacies of Science
Tang, K., & Moje, E. B. (2010) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9158-5 · Cited by 51
“From our perspective, we see science literacy, and disciplinary literacy in general, as the cultural practices that encompass specific ways of talking, writing, viewing, drawing, graphing, and acting, within a specialized discourse community ( Moje 2008 ).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDisciplinary Literacy: From Infusion to Hybridity
Hinchman, K. A., & O’Brien, D. G. (2019) · Journal of Literacy Research · doi:10.1177/1086296x19876986 · Cited by 50
“…2002; Moje, Ciechanowski, et al., 2004; Moje, Peek-Brown, et al., 2004), more recent theoretical articulations among literacy education scholars (Moje, 2007, 2008; T. Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008, 2012); and the proliferation of research catalyzed by the U.S. Common Core State Standards (Goldman…”
BackgroundHand, B. M., Yore, L. D., Jagger, S. L., & Prain, V. (2010) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057260903562342 · Cited by 48
“It is critical that teachers recognise that science is a discipline with a set of associated language and literacy practices that are related to the discipline itself (Moje, 2008 ; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008 ).”
BackgroundAnderson, J. O., Chiu, M., & Yore, L. D. (2010) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-010-9210-y · Cited by 48
“We are hopeful that the operational definitions of mathematical literacy and scientific literacy will be revised to more explicitly reflect the language/literacy components of these disciplinary literacies (Moje, 2008; Norris & Phillips, 2003; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008; Yore et al., 2007).”
BackgroundTeachers’ Enactment of Content Literacy Strategies in Secondary Science and Mathematics Classes
Adams, A. E., & Pegg, J. (2012) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.00116 · Cited by 49
“More recent perspectives emphasize that all learning is language based, and therefore attention to literacy is integral to teaching and learning disciplinary content and engaging in discipline-based discourse (Draper, 2010; Fisher & Ivey, 2005; Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMoje, E. B. (2010) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1598/jaal.54.4.5 · Cited by 46
“A related issue, which I address at the end of my original piece (Moje, 2008), is the extent to which the current structures of schooling, from the timing of the school day to accountability measures, allow high school teachers to engage in such work.”
BackgroundSelf-citationFraming Preservice Teachers' Interpretations of Graphic Novels in the Social Studies Classroom
Mathews, S. (2011) · Theory & Research in Social Education · doi:10.1080/00933104.2011.10473461 · Cited by 45
Teachers’ perceptions on the changing role of language in the curriculum
Skinnari, K., & Nikula, T. (2017) · European Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1515/eujal-2017-0005 · Cited by 43
Schall‐Leckrone, L., & McQuillan, P. J. (2012) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2012.05.001 · Cited by 45
Where We Read From Matters: Disciplinary Literacy in a Ninth‐Grade Social Studies Classroom
Damico, J. S., Baildon, M. C., Exter, M., & Guo, S.-J. (2009) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1598/jaal.53.4.6 · Cited by 42
Engaging Preservice Teachers in Disciplinary Literacy Learning Through Writing
Pytash, K. E. (2012) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.00062 · Cited by 42
Both Theory and Practice: Science Literacy Instruction and Theories of Reading
Wright, K. L., Franks, A. D., Kuo, L., McTigue, E. M., & Serrano, J. (2015) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9661-2 · Cited by 53
Crocco, M., & Livingston, E. (2017) · doi:10.1002/9781118768747.ch16 · Cited by 39
Goldman, S. R., Greenleaf, C. L., Yukhymenko–Lescroart, M. A., Brown, W., Ko, M. M., Emig, J. M., George, M., Wallace, P. S., Blaum, D., & Britt, M. A. (2019) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831219831041 · Cited by 41
“Yet, the Text-based Explanatory Modeling in Science 4 disciplinary literacies - the oral and written communication practices of disciplines (Moje, 2008) - are rarely the focus of instruction, either in content area classes or in reading or English language arts classes.”
BackgroundConceptualising and teaching discursive and performative reflection in higher education
Ryan, M. E. (2011) · Studies in Continuing Education · doi:10.1080/0158037x.2011.611799 · Cited by 40
Representing Science Literacies: An Introduction
Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. G. (2010) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9153-x · Cited by 40
“There is now growing recognition that learning science means learning a particular “disciplinary literacy” ( Moje 2008, p. 1 ), and therefore learning how to integrate the multi-modal literacies of this subject.”
BackgroundInfluentialBuilding and Justifying Interpretations of Texts: A Key Practice in the English Language Arts
Deane, P. (2020) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/ets2.12304 · Cited by 64
Using Historical Knowledge to Reason About Contemporary Political Issues: An Expert–Novice Study
Shreiner, T. L. (2014) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2014.948680 · Cited by 38
“However, it also shows the usefulness of such historical literacy skills (Moje, 2008; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008) for people using texts to reason about a contemporary issue.”
BackgroundGarwood, J. D., Brunsting, N. C., & Fox, L. C. (2014) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/0741932513514856 · Cited by 38
“Reading comprehension is a skill particularly important to adolescent students, as it is critical to academic success in all content areas (Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundDobbs, C. L., Ippolito, J., & Charner‐Laird, M. (2016) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.547 · Cited by 38
Reynolds, T., & Rush, L. S. (2017) · Literacy Research and Instruction · doi:10.1080/19388071.2017.1299820 · Cited by 38
“Additionally, Moje (2008) cited knowledge construction and identity construction as precursors to disciplinary literacy, and Hynd, Holschuh, and Hubbard (2004) used social and educational psychology based on Perry’s (1970) work.”
BackgroundRethinking Academic Literacies
Kiili, C., Mäkinen, M., & Coiro, J. (2013) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.223 · Cited by 37
“For example, Moje (2008) argues that the core function of disciplinary literacies is to build students’ understanding of how texts represent both the knowledge and the ways of knowing, doing, and believing in different disciplinary communities.”
BackgroundContent Area Reading and Writing: Practices and Beliefs
Ulusoy, M., & Dedeoğlu, H. (2011) · The Australian journal of teacher education · doi:10.14221/ajte.2011v36n4.1 · Cited by 37
“In these courses, disciplinary literacy instructional programs would be most productive and useful (Moje, 2008).”
InfluentialLocke, T., & Johnston, M. (2016) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.01.001 · Cited by 37
“…recently, it has merged with a growing focus on, and an attendant literature advocating, the key role of disciplinary literacies (including subject-specific writing) in enhancing student performance across the full range of curriculum areas (see, for example, Mojé, 2008; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008).”
BackgroundBrevik, L. M. (2014) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2014.05.002 · Cited by 44
“This outcome proposes an apparent paradox, as research suggests that reading comprehension strategy instruction is not carried out in the majority of reading classrooms (Duke et al., 2011; Hellekjær & Hopfenbeck, 2012; McNamara, 2011; Moje, 2008; Pressley, 2008).”
BackgroundResultWriting and Argumentation in History Education
Nokes, J. D., & Paz, S. D. L. (2018) · doi:10.1002/9781119100812.ch21 · Cited by 36
Missing the Savoir for the Connaissance
Dunkerly‐Bean, J., & Bean, T. W. (2016) · Journal of Literacy Research · doi:10.1177/1086296x16674988 · Cited by 33
“Interestingly, this work preceded more recent efforts to explore the particularities of content area literacy in the disciplines including science, mathematics, chemistry, English, and history (Alvermann & Moje, 2013; Lesley, 2014; Moje, 2008; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008).”
BackgroundConsidering a Twitter-Based Professional Learning Network in Literacy Education
Colwell, J., & Hutchison, A. C. (2017) · Literacy Research and Instruction · doi:10.1080/19388071.2017.1370749 · Cited by 33
“Research in content area literacy has long suggested a resistance to literacy instruction among secondary teachers (Moje, 2008; O ’ Brien & Stewart, 1990; O ’ Brien, Stewart, & Moje, 1995).”
BackgroundLiteracidad y alfabetización disciplinar: enfoques teóricos y propuestas pedagógicas
Silva, M. E. M., & Bonilla, G. L. (2017) · Perfiles Educativos · doi:10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2017.155.58062 · Cited by 33
Disciplinary literacy in religious education: the role and relevance of reading
Unstad, L., & Fjørtoft, H. (2020) · British Journal of Religious Education · doi:10.1080/01416200.2020.1754164 · Cited by 33
“Thus, academic learning processes are not only about obtaining information through reading, but ‘understanding how texts represent both the knowledge and the ways of knowing, doing and believing in different discourse communities’ (Moje 2008, 103).”
BackgroundInfluentialRainey, E. C., & Moje, E. B. (2012) · English in Education · Cited by 33
Self-citationWilson, A., Madjar, I., & McNaughton, S. (2016) · The Curriculum Journal · doi:10.1080/09585176.2015.1134339 · Cited by 32
“that discipline communities have established for representing, communicating, evaluating and defending ideas (Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundJagger, S. L., & Yore, L. D. (2012) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9271-6 · Cited by 32
“…cultural) by facilitating engagement in the public debate about science, technology, society, and environment issues, thereby leading to informed solutions and sustainable actions, which impact on citizenship and economic success (Yore 2011; Yore et al. 2007; Moje 2008; Norris and Phillips 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialYore, L. D., Anderson, J. O., & Chiu, M. (2010) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-010-9211-x · Cited by 32
“However, the datasets have provided a much more complete picture of disciplinary literacies (Moje, 2008; Norris & Phillips, 2003; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008) in terms of fundamental literacy based on informal text and disciplinary understandings and contextual applications needed for survival in twenty-first century ec…”
BackgroundAcademic literacies: the word is not enough
Richards, K., & Pilcher, N. (2017) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2017.1360270 · Cited by 33
Secondary science teachers’ implementation of CCSS and NGSS literacy practices: a survey study
Drew, S. V., & Thomas, J. D. (2017) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-017-9784-7 · Cited by 42
Multimodal Literacy in School Science
Unsworth, L., Tytler, R., Fenwick, L., Humphrey, S. L., Chandler, P., Herrington, M. H., & Pham, L. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003150718 · Cited by 37
A focus on disciplinary language: Bringing critical perspectives to reading and writing in science
Moore, J., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2019) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405841.2019.1685337 · Cited by 30
“Disciplinary literacy likewise informed the purpose of instructional units and resulted in language-focused lessons that were embedded in larger disciplinary practices (Lee & Spratley, 2010; Moje, 2008).”
BackgroundRevisiting Lexington Green: Implications for Teaching Historical Thinking
Jay, L. P. (2021) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2021.1880410 · Cited by 30
“As disciplinary literacy became a watchword, the 1991 study became an anchor for its application in history (Shanahan, Shanahan, & Misischia, 2011; Moje, 2008).”
Alvermann, D., Rezak, A. T., Mallozzi, C., Boatright, M., & Jackson, D. (2011) · Teachers College Record · doi:10.1177/016146811111300104 · Cited by 34
“…largely overlook the fact that the pedagogic nature of each discipline’s domain knowledge is unique to a great extent (McEwan & Bull, 1991; Moje, 2008) and that it is this uniqueness that renders generic reading strategies somewhat less potent than tests of statistical significance might…”
BackgroundYore, L. D. (2011) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6091-506-2_2 · Cited by 30
Wang, J., & Chen, S. (2013) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21131 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Moje, E. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Moje, Elizabeth Birr
- ORCID
- Moje, Elizabeth Birr
- Venue
- Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 96-107
- ISSN
- 1081-3004 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-2706
- OpenAlex
- W1985846190
- Cited by
- 785
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 48
- FWCI
- 490.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy (publishedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Literacy, Media, and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Linguistics and Education Research
- Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
- Keywords
- disciplinary literacy, critical literacy, new literacies, democratic participation, new media in education, critical pedagogy, critical reading instruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review