Cited by 150Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyMind wandering and attention

Development and preliminary validation of a trait version of the Toronto Mindfulness Scale

Davis, Karen M., Lau, Mark A., Cairns, David R.·2009·Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy

Abstract

After developing a trait version of the Toronto Mindfulness Scale (TMS), we evaluated its reliability, its convergent validity with six other trait mindfulness measures, and its construct validity in relation to prior meditation experience. A sample of nonmeditators (N = 218) and meditators (N = 243) with a wide range of meditation experience completed the Trait TMS and the six other mindfulness measures. Internal consistency reliability of the Trait TMS was comparable to that of the original State TMS. Significant positive correlations were found between both TMS factors and the other mindfulness measures; however, in general, the correlations for TMS Decenter were higher than for TMS Curiosity. Scores for TMS Decenter were shown to increase with meditation experience, but this was not the case for TMS Curiosity. The TMS Curiosity factor may assess a unique aspect of the mindfulness construct. Implications of these findings in relation to future mindfulness research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1891/0889-8391.23.3.185

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Use of the FFMQ non-reactivity subscale to assess decentering is justified because of the face validity of the items and previous findings indicating decentering and the non-reactivity subscale are highly interrelated, N = 461, r = .74.

    “Such use is justified because of the face validity of the items with respect to the construct of decentering, as well as previous findings indicating decentering and the non-reactivity subscale are highly interrelated, N = 461, r = .74 [81], potentially measuring a common, underlying construct.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, K. M., Lau, M. A., & Cairns, D. R.
Affiliations
Macquarie University (AU)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy
Published
2009-08
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
185-197
ISSN
  • 0889-8391 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-887X
OpenAlex
W2077056449
Cited by
150
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
Funders
Johns Hopkins University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
Keywords
trait mindfulness, mindfulness measurement, convergent validity, construct validity, meditation experience, decentering, curiosity, internal consistency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review