The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Development and Preliminary Validation of a Trait Version of the Toronto Mindfulness Scale
Abstract
After developing a trait version of the Toronto Mindfulness Scale (TMS), we evaluated its reliability, its convergent validity with six other trait mindfulness measures, and its construct validity in relation to prior meditation experience. A sample of nonmeditators (N = 218) and meditators (N = 243) with a wide range of meditation experience completed the Trait TMS and the six other mindfulness measures. Internal consistency reliability of the Trait TMS was comparable to that of the original State TMS. Significant positive correlations were found between both TMS factors and the other mindfulness measures; however, in general, the correlations for TMS Decenter were higher than for TMS Curiosity. Scores for TMS Decenter were shown to increase with meditation experience, but this was not the case for TMS Curiosity. The TMS Curiosity factor may assess a unique aspect of the mindfulness construct. Implications of these findings in relation to future mindfulness research are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Such use is justified because of the face validity of the items with respect to the construct of decentering, as well as previous findings indicating decentering and the non-reactivity subscale are highly interrelated, N = 461, r = .74 [81], potentially measuring a common, underlying construct.”
From Testing the mindfulness-to-meaning theory: Evidence for mindful positive emotion regulation from a reanalysis of longitudinal data (2017) · cites this paper as [81]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effects of mindfulness on psychological health: A review of empirical studies
Keng, S.-L., Smoski, M. J., & Robins, C. J. (2011) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.04.006 · Cited by 2,687
The psychological effects of meditation: a meta-analysis
Sedlmeier, P., Eberth, J., Schwarz, M., Zimmermann, D., Haarig, F., Jaeger, S., & Kunze, S. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0028168 · Cited by 910
Mindfulness, by any other name…: trials and tribulations of sati in western psychology and science
Grossman, P., & Van Dam, N. T. (2011) · Contemporary Buddhism · doi:10.1080/14639947.2011.564841 · Cited by 548
The Assessment of Mindfulness with Self-Report Measures: Existing Scales and Open Issues
Bergomi, C., Tschacher, W., & Kupper, Z. (2013) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-012-0110-9 · Cited by 506
“A trait version of the TMS was developed and preliminarily validated in meditators and nonmeditators (Davis et al. 2009).”
MethodPark, T., Reilly-Spong, M., & Gross, C. R. (2013) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0395-8 · Cited by 370
“Curiosity and Decentering scores were higher in meditators than nonmeditators, and scores for the Decentering subscale were shown to increase with meditation experience [70].”
BackgroundMalinowski, P., & Lim, H. J. (2015) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-015-0388-5 · Cited by 431
“Brown and Ryan 2003), two-dimensional (e.g. Cardaciotto et al. 2008; Davis et al. 2009) or multi-dimensional construct with up to five mindfulness facets (Baer et al.”
Quaglia, J. T., Braun, S. E., Freeman, S. P., McDaniel, M. A., & Brown, K. W. (2016) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000268 · Cited by 341
Metacognitive model of mindfulness
Jankowski, T., & Holas, P. (2014) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.06.005 · Cited by 276
Baer, R. A. (2011) · Contemporary Buddhism · doi:10.1080/14639947.2011.564842 · Cited by 279
Dispositional mindfulness: A critical review of construct validation research
Rau, H. K., & Williams, P. G. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.035 · Cited by 215
Trait mindfulness and health behaviours: a meta-analysis
Sala, M., Rochefort, C., Lui, P. P., & Baldwin, A. S. (2020) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2019.1650290 · Cited by 199
“TMS – Trait: Toronto Mindfulness Scale – Trait Version Davis et al. (2009) Measures two factors of mindfulness: curiosity and decentering.”
Mind the Gap in Mindfulness Research: A Comparative Account of the Leading Schools of Thought
Hart, R., Ivtzan, I., & Hart, D. (2013) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0035212 · Cited by 213
Garland, E. L., Hanley, A. W., Goldin, P. R., & Gross, J. J. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187727 · Cited by 163
Mindfulness, anxiety, and high-stakes mathematics performance in the laboratory and classroom
Bellinger, D. B., DeCaro, M. S., & Ralston, P. A. S. (2015) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2015.09.001 · Cited by 137
One-Session Mindfulness Meditation: A Randomized Controlled Study of Effects on Cognition and Mood
Johnson, S. K., Gur, R. M., David, Z., & Currier, E. (2013) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-013-0234-6 · Cited by 147
“2006) has 13 items and a two-factor structure (curiosity and decentering) that has been validated in a number of clinical contexts (Davis et al. 2009).”
BackgroundHanley, A. W., Nakamura, Y., & Garland, E. L. (2018) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000615 · Cited by 130
“The Toronto Mindfulness Scale’s Decentering subscale (Davis et al., 2009) is a seven-item instrument measuring the ability to remain observant of thoughts and feelings without overidentifying with such internal phenomena.”
Haigh, E. A. P., Moore, M., Kashdan, T. B., & Fresco, D. M. (2010) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191110386342 · Cited by 139
Measuring Mindfulness: Applying Generalizability Theory to Distinguish between State and Trait
Medvedev, O. N., Krägeloh, C. U., Narayanan, A., & Siegert, R. J. (2017) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-017-0679-0 · Cited by 127
The Experiential Incompatibility of Mindfulness and Flow Absorption
Sheldon, K. M., Prentice, M. S., & Halusic, M. (2014) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550614555028 · Cited by 135
“Additional mindfulness subscales include curiosity, acceptance, observing, describing, nonjudging, and nonreactivity (Baer et al., 2006; Cardaciotto et al., 2008; Davis et al., 2009).”
BackgroundSiegling, A. B., & Petrides, K. V. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01164 · Cited by 109
“Of a total of eight unidimensional scales, one is primarily a state measure requiring prior meditation (Lau et al., 2006), but a trait version has also been developed (Davis et al., 2009).”
BackgroundPsychological flexibility: Positive implications for mental health and life satisfaction
Lucas, J. J., & Moore, K. A. (2020) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/daz036 · Cited by 102
Initial Validation of the Mindful Eating Scale
Hulbert‐Williams, L., Nicholls, W., Joy, J., & Hulbert-Williams, N. (2013) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-013-0227-5 · Cited by 115
“2008) and the Toronto Mindfulness Scale (Davis et al. 2009).”
The mindful personality: A meta-analysis from a cybernetic perspective
Hanley, A. W., & Garland, E. L. (2017) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-017-0736-8 · Cited by 75
“…Mindfulness Questionnaire, Baer et al. 2006; Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale–Revised, Feldman et al. 2007; Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale, Cardaciotto et al. 2008; Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire, Chadwick et al. 2008; Toronto Mindfulness Scale Trait Version, Davis et al. 2009).”
Siegling, A. B., & Petrides, K. V. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153073 · Cited by 66
“FFMQ = Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire [18]; PHLMS = Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale [40]; TMS = Toronto Mindfulness Scale [39]; KIMS = Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills [19]; CAMS–R = Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale–Revised [21]; SMQ = Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire [20]; MAAS = Mindful At…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialTruong, Q. C., Krägeloh, C. U., Siegert, R. J., Landon, J., & Medvedev, O. N. (2020) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-020-01324-7 · Cited by 65
Huerta, M. V., Carberry, A. R., Pipe, T. B., & McKenna, A. F. (2021) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20407 · Cited by 74
“Most operational definitions of mindfulness include the capacity of being attentive or aware of the immediate, present moment or experience and the adoption of an orientation marked by acceptance, non-judgment, curiosity, and openness (e.g., Baer et al., 2006; Bishop et al., 2004; Cardaciotto et al., 2008; Davis et al…”
BackgroundStructure and validity of measures of decentering and defusion
Naragon-Gainey, K., & DeMarree, K. G. (2017) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000405 · Cited by 56
“, 2007) and Toronto Mindfulness Scale Decentering subscale (TMS-D; Davis et al., 2009) were designed to measure decentering, whereas the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ; Gillanders et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHanley, A. W., de Vibe, M., Solhaug, I., Farb, N., Goldin, P. R., Gross, J. J., & Garland, E. L. (2021) · Stress and Health · doi:10.1002/smi.3035 · Cited by 56
Phan, H. P., Ngu, B. H., Chen, S. C., Wu, L., Lin, W.-W., & Hsu, C.-S. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580186 · Cited by 59
“, 2008), a two-factor (e.g., Cardaciotto et al., 2008; Davis et al., 2009), and/or a more complex factorial structure of mindfulness (e.”
BackgroundPogrebtsova, E., Craig, J., Chris, A. C., O’Shea, D. E., & González‐Morales, M. G. (2017) · Stress and Health · doi:10.1002/smi.2759 · Cited by 56
The Application of Mindfulness for Interpersonal Dependency: Effects of a Brief Intervention
McClintock, A. S., & Anderson, T. (2013) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-013-0253-3 · Cited by 48
“Mindfulness (Trait) The Toronto Mindfulness Scale- Trait (TMS-T; Davis et al. 2009) is a 13-item self-report measure of trait mindfulness, which was derived from the TMS-S.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPhan, H. P., Ngu, B. H., Chen, S. C., Wu, L., Shi, S.-Y., Lin, R.-Y., Shih, J.-H., & Wang, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01602 · Cited by 57
Christopher, M., Woodrich, L., & Tiernan, K. A. (2012) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-012-0160-z · Cited by 46
“Additionally, for the FFMQ and TMS, we further divided content specific topics and codes by whether the content was perceived as being a concern or a strength.”
InfluentialMeta-Awareness During Day and Night
Stumbrys, T., Erlacher, D., & Malinowski, P. (2015) · Imagination Cognition and Personality · doi:10.1177/0276236615572594 · Cited by 47
“…uni-dimensional (e.g. Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, Brown & Ryan, 2003) and multi-dimensional with two-factor (e.g. Toronto Mindfulness Scale, Davis, et al., 2009; Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale, Cardaciotto et al., 2008), four-factor (e.g. Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Scale, Baer et…”
Shorey, R. C., Elmquist, J., Wolford‐Clevenger, C., Gawrysiak, M. J., Anderson, S. T., & Stuart, G. L. (2016) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2016.02.040 · Cited by 42
Mindfulness and physical activity: a systematic review and hierarchical model of mindfulness
Yang, C., & Conroy, D. E. (2019) · International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1612197x.2019.1611901 · Cited by 52
Abdollahi, A., Vadivel, B., Huy, D. T. N., Opulencia, M. J. C., Tuấn, P. V., Abbood, A. A. A., Nasirova, Z., Chupradit, S., Allen, K., & Bykanova, O. A. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.866816 · Cited by 39
“Various validated measures have been designed to assess mindfulness, including the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (17), the Toronto Mindfulness Scale- trait version (18), and the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (19).”
MethodRetractedMindful Attention and Awareness: Relationships with Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation
Gregório, S., & Pinto‐Gouveia, J. (2013) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1017/sjp.2013.79 · Cited by 40
Intrapersonal curiosity: Inquisitiveness about the inner self
Litman, J. A., Robinson, O. C., & Demetre, J. D. (2016) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2016.1255250 · Cited by 44
Decentering Attenuates the Associations of Negative Affect and Positive Affect With Psychopathology
Naragon-Gainey, K., & DeMarree, K. G. (2017) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702617719758 · Cited by 34
“, 2006) but was adapted to measure trait mindfulness (Davis et al., 2009).”
BackgroundA Review of Latino/Latinx Participants in Mindfulness-Based Intervention Research
Cotter, E. W., & Jones, N. (2019) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-019-01266-9 · Cited by 35
Shorey, R. C., Brasfield, H. M., Anderson, S. T., & Stuart, G. L. (2013) · Journal of Substance Use · doi:10.3109/14659891.2013.770570 · Cited by 32
“, 2009), mindfulness has been conceptualized as a multi-factorial construct, including a two-factor construct (Davis et al., 2009).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialDispositional Mindfulness May Be Associated with Deeper Connections with Nature
Hanley, A. W., Deringer, S. A., & Hanley, R. T. (2017) · Ecopsychology · doi:10.1089/eco.2017.0018 · Cited by 31
“Decentering is an often-cited mechanism of mindfulness that involves the recognition that a thought is simply a mental event instead of something intrinsically real and true (Davis, Lau & Cairns, 2009).”
An examination of concurrent and incremental validity of four mindfulness scales
Andrei, F., Vesely, A., & Siegling, A. B. (2016) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-016-9546-x · Cited by 29
Trait Mindfulness and Cognitive Task Performance
Quickel, E. J. W., Johnson, S. K., & David, Z. (2014) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244014560557 · Cited by 34
Zeng, X., Oei, T. P. S., Ye, Y., & Liu, X. (2015) · Journal of Religion and Health · doi:10.1007/s10943-013-9796-9 · Cited by 29
“The Trait Version of the Toronto Mindfulness Scale (Trait TMS) Davis et al. (2009) 13 items in 2 dimensions: “Curiosity” (6 items) and “Decentering” (7 items) (1) The original state version of TMS (Lau et al.”
BackgroundMethodHanley, A. W., & Garland, E. L. (2019) · Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice · doi:10.1037/cns0000204 · Cited by 29
Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R)
Feldman, G., Westine, M., Edelman, A., Higgs, M., Renna, M., & Greeson, J. (2022) · Handbook of Assessment in Mindfulness Research · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77644-2_19-1 · Cited by 31
Methods of mindfulness: how mindfulness is studied in the workplace
Choi, E., & Leroy, H. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107587793.006 · Cited by 38
Mechanisms of Mindfulness: A Longitudinal Study of a Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Program
Davis, K. M., Wojcik, C. M., Baillie, A. J., Foley, E., Goddard, T., Lau, M. A., & Haigh, E. A. P. (2024) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-024-02359-w · Cited by 25
“…several individual facets and mindfulness-adjacent skills, as they are defined by the commonly used scales of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ; Baer et al., 2006), the Toronto Mindfulness Scale-Trait Version (TMS-T; Davis et al., 2009), and the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS; Neff, 2003).”
InfluentialSelf-citationGregório, S., Pinto-Gouveia, J., Duarte, C., & Simões, L. (2015) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1017/sjp.2015.18 · Cited by 22
“TMS (Davis et al., 2009; Portuguese version by Gregório & Pinto-Gouveia, 2010) is a 13-item scale assessing two factors of mindfulness trait: curiosity, which reflects an attitude of wanting to learn more about one’s experiences; and decentering, meaning a shift from identifying personally with one’s internal experien…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialJazaieri, H., & Shapiro, S. L. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58763-9_3 · Cited by 26
Hytman, L., Amestoy, M. E., Ueberholz, R. Y., & Fiocco, A. J. (2025) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-024-02501-8 · Cited by 24
“…(MAAS; Brown & Ryan, 2003), the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ; Baer et al., 2006), or the Toronto Mindfulness Scale Trait-Version (TMS; Davis et al., 2009); (4) inclusion of facilitators with clinical training (e.g., clinical psychologists, trainees in clinical psychology, or social…”
Trait Mindfulness, Self-Compassion, and Self-Talk: A Correlational Analysis of Young Adults
Grzybowski, J., & Brinthaupt, T. M. (2022) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs12090300 · Cited by 20
“Specifically, self-reinforcing self-talk was significantly positively correlated with the acting with awareness and non-judging subscales of the FFMQ, in addition to the curiosity and decentering subscales of the TMS-T.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGardner, F. L., & Moore, Z. E. (2020) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119568124.ch35 · Cited by 21
Mindfulness or expectancy? The label of mindfulness leads to expectancy effects
Ghanbari Noshari, M., Kempton, H. M., & Kreplin, U. (2023) · Counselling and Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/capr.12589 · Cited by 16
Psychometric Validation of the Toronto Mindfulness Scale – Trait Version in Chinese College Students
Chung, P., & Zhang, C. (2014) · Europe’s Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5964/ejop.v10i4.776 · Cited by 14
“Although the feasibility of TMS-T in college students has been examined, the initial validation of the TMS-T (Davis et al., 2009) has only confirmed the internal consistency reliability and convergent validity, but not the structural and concurrent validities (Davis et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAdaptive self-concept: Identifying the basic dimensions of self-beliefs
Jankowski, T., Bąk, W., & Miciuk, Ł. R. (2021) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2021.1997796 · Cited by 24
“All but one of the items from the self-distance subscale are drawn from the decentering subscale of the Toronto Mindfulness Scale (Davis et al., 2009).”
MethodShorey, R. C., Gawrysiak, M. J., Anderson, S. T., & Stuart, G. L. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22139 · Cited by 19
Uebelacker, L. A., Wolff, J. C., Guo, J., Conte, K., Tremont, G., Kraines, M., O’Keeffe, B., Fristad, M. A., & Yen, S. (2023) · Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/13591045221092885 · Cited by 14
“Finally, to assess potential mediators of outcome, we used the trait version of the Toronto Mindfulness Scale (Davis et al., 2009), which has two subscales, Curiosity (score range = 0–24) and Decentering (score range = 0–28), and the Self-Compassion Scale Short Form (score range = 12–60; Raes et…”
MethodOliveira, P. D., Juneau, C., Stinus, C., Corman, M., Micheli, N., Pellerin, N., Shankland, R., & Dambrun, M. (2024) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941241246469 · Cited by 17
“The trait Toronto Mindfulness Scale (TMS; Davis et al., 2009) is a 13-item, 2-factor self-report measure of individual differences in dispositional mindfulness The TMS-Curiosity (6 items, α = .85) re fl ects an attitude of wanting to learn more about one ’ s experiences (e.g., “ I was curious to see…”
The Relationship Between Decentering and Adaptiveness of Response Styles in Reducing Depression
Ishikawa, H., Mieda, T., Oshio, A., & Koshikawa, F. (2017) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-017-0797-8 · Cited by 14
Mindfulness Interventions for College Students with ADHD: A Multiple Single Case Research Design
Lester, E. G., & Murrell, A. R. (2018) · Journal of College Student Psychotherapy · doi:10.1080/87568225.2018.1450107 · Cited by 14
“This is consistent with end of practice effects (Lau et al., 2006), and the associated decreases in mindfulness previously noted by Davis, Lau, and Cairns (2009).”
ResultBravo, A. J., Witkiewitz, K. A., Kelley, M. L., & Redman, J. C. (2018) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-018-1047-4 · Cited by 14
Heuristics for Mindfulness in Education and Beyond
Powietrzyńska, M. (2015) · Cultural studies of science education · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4240-6_3 · Cited by 13
“Thus, informed by Tobin’s earlier studies on prosody and proxemics and the work of Ekman (2003), Turner (2002) and Collins (2004), we included characteristics referring to the awareness of the expression of emotions in voice, face, and body movements in addition to body temperature, breathing patterns and pulse rates.”
MethodTeaching Mindfulness on an Inpatient Psychiatric Unit
Knight, M. M., Pultinas, D., Collins, S., Sellig, C., Freeman, D. C., Strimaitis, C., Simms, N., & Silver, R. R. (2012) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-012-0175-5 · Cited by 13
DeMarree, K. G., & Naragon‐Gainey, K. (2021) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191120986605 · Cited by 13
“To assess convergent validity with existing measures of decentering, we administered the CFQ (Gillanders et al., 2014), the EQ (Fresco et al., 2007), the Toronto Mindfulness Scale–Decentering (TMS; Davis et al., 2009), and the Drexel Defusion Scale (DDS; Forman et al., 2012).”
MethodMindfulness Scholarship and Interventions: A Review
Ivtzan, I., & Hart, R. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139871310.002 · Cited by 11
Roquet, C. D., & Sas, C. (2020) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/20819 · Cited by 14
“Correlations for the decentering subscale with most of the other measures of mindfulness ( r =0.20 to 0.74) were stronger than the correlations between the curiosity subscale and these measures ( r =0.10 to 0.54) [77].”
InfluentialAssessing mindfulness: The Spanish version of the Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale
León, J., Fernández, C., Grijalvo, F., & Alonso, J. L. N. (2013) · Studies in Psychology Estudios de Psicología · doi:10.1174/021093913806751447 · Cited by 10
Sturgess, M. A. (2012) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17003407 · Cited by 13
“Both factors of the trait version of the TMS were also found to have good convergent validity, in that they demonstrated significant positive correlations with the other mindfulness measures that they were associated with (including MAAS, FMI, KIMS, and the FFMQ), however it should be noted that correlations between T…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialVranceanu, A., Woodworth, E. C., Kanaya, M. R., Bannon, S. M., Mace, R. A., Manglani, H. R., Duarte, B. A., Rush, C. L., Choukas, N. R., Briskin, E. A., et al. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2022.106998 · Cited by 10
Mistretta, E. G., Davis, M. C., Bartsch, E. M., & Olah, M. S. (2023) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/13591053231167275 · Cited by 12
“mindful decentering subscale was selected for this study because it is a robust mechanism in the cultivation of state and trait mindfulness (Bieling et al., 2012; Davis et al., 2009).”
MethodThe Mindfulness Inventory: Nine Dimensions (MI:ND)
Malouf, E. T., Tangney, J. P., Monfort, S. S., Yarbro, J., Youman, K., & Schrader, S. W. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77644-2_26-1 · Cited by 7
Nicol, A. A. M., & France, K. D. (2022) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941221109096 · Cited by 9
“…nonjudgmental facets focus exclusively on the self (e.g., Freiburg Mindfulness Questionnaire, Walach et al., 2006; Toronto Mindfulness trait scale, Davis et al., 2009; The Philadelphia Mindfulness scale, Cardaciotto et al., 2008; Southhampton Mindfulness Questionnaire, Chadwick et al., 2008).”
BackgroundFacet Benchmarking: Advanced application of a new instrument refinement method
Siegling, A. B., Furnham, A. F., & Petrides, K. V. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.12.014 · Cited by 8
“Cardaciotto, Herbert, Forman, Moitra, & Farrow, 2008) and Toronto Mindfulness Scale (TMS; Davis et al., 2009).”
MethodBuhk, A. H., Schultz, H., & Bullock, W. A. (2023) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-023-10091-3 · Cited by 7
“…Cardaciotto et al., 2008), Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (SMQ; Chadwick et al., 2008), Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS; Baer et al., 2004), Toronto Mindfulness Scale Trait version (TMS Trait; Davis et al., 2009), and the Langer Mindfulness Scale (LMS; Pirson et al., 2018).”
BackgroundMeasuring mindfulness: A systematic review and evaluation of self-report mindfulness scales
Chems-Maarif, R., Cavanagh, K., Baer, R., Gu, J., & Strauss, C. (2026) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102719 · Cited by 7
Hanley, A. W., Lingard, A., & Garland, E. L. (2024) · Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine · doi:10.1089/jicm.2023.0501 · Cited by 7
Initial Validation of the Mindful Presence Scale: The Issue of the Construal Level of Scale Items
Lengyel, A., Keczeli, D., Orosz, R., Bács, Z., Müller, A., Szőke, S., & Bába, É. B. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626084 · Cited by 8
Financial Mindfulness: A Scale
Garbinsky, E. N., Blanchard, S. J., & Kim, L. (2024) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672241265995 · Cited by 12
“Such examples with two-factor solutions include awareness and acceptance (e.g., Cardaciotto et al., 2008), decentering and curiosity (e.g., Davis et al., 2009), and presence and acceptance (e.g., Kohls et al., 2009).”
Validation and measurement invariance of the Langer mindfulness scale: the Turkish version
Saraç, M. U., Yıldırım, Y., Eşici, H., Büyüköztürk, Ş., Pagnini, F., & Langer, E. J. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1474577 · Cited by 8
Walach, H., Sauer, S., Kohls, N., Rose, N., & Schmidt, S. (2025) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-025-03671-3 · Cited by 6
“Following a well-known tradition in psychometric research, one can operationalize mindfulness either as a transitory and changing state [25–27], or as a trait that is more stable [28–30].”
Eisenlohr-Moul, T. A., Peters, J. R., & Baer, R. A. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2263-5_12 · Cited by 6
Brown, S. M., & Bellamy, J. L. (2017) · Advances in Social Work · doi:10.18060/21281 · Cited by 6
“Scores on the Mindful Curiosity scale range from 0-24 and on the Mindful Decentering scale from 0- 28.”
BackgroundInfluentialApplied Mindfulness Process Scale (AMPS)
Roemer, A., & Medvedev, O. N. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77644-2_27-1 · Cited by 6
Gerhardt, E., & Baird, B. (2024) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci14050496 · Cited by 5
“The original scale measured state mindfulness and the survey incorporated the trait version of the TMS, asking for experiences during the previous 7 days [53].”
MethodLiyanagedera, N. D., Bareham, C. A., Kempton, H. M., & Guesgen, H. W. (2025) · Brain Informatics · doi:10.1186/s40708-025-00251-4 · Cited by 7
Marocco, S., Vitale, V., Grossi, E., Presaghi, F., & Talamo, A. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1637669 · Cited by 5
Sturgess, M. A. (2012) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17003407.v1 · Cited by 5
Liyanagedera, N. D., Hussain, A. A., Singh, A. S. G., Lal, S. P., Kempton, H. M., & Guesgen, H. W. (2023) · Brain Informatics · doi:10.1186/s40708-023-00204-9 · Cited by 5
“Trait [4, 42] changes are permanent modifications which are visible in a person after practicing meditation for a long time.”
BackgroundUsing life and death education to guide the teaching and research of mindfulness
Phan, H. P., Ngu, B. H., Chen, S.-C., & Hsu, C.-S. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1576500 · Cited by 4
Promoting Wellness Through Mindfulness-Based Activities
Powietrzyńska, M. (2014) · CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York) · Cited by 4
Visvalingam, S., Matheson, A. C., Magson, N. R., & Norberg, M. M. (2024) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-024-06238-4 · Cited by 3
“We used the curiosity and decentring subscales from the Toronto Mindfulness Scale-Trait Version (TMS; Davis et al., 2009) to assess aspects of trait mindfulness.”
The use of mindfulness in group work
Michalski, E., & Smith, S. J. (2023) · Social Work With Groups · doi:10.1080/01609513.2023.2257755 · Cited by 3
“…Mindfulness Scale-Trait Version, the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale, and the Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (Baer et al., 2004, 2006; Brown & Ryan, 2003; Buchheld et al., 2001; Cardaciotto et al., 2008; Chadwick et al., 2008; Davis et al., 2009; Feldman et al., 2007; Keng et al., 2011).”
A Critical Review of Mindfulness Measures
Miller, M. A., Ye, L., Pavone, K. J., & van Pelt, M. (2024) · Journal of Nursing Measurement · doi:10.1891/jnm-2023-0116 · Cited by 3
Brown, S. M. (2016) · Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver) · Cited by 3
Brief mindfulness training to improve mental health with Colombian healthcare professionals
Manotas, M. (n.d.) · ProQuest Demo Repository · Cited by 3
Sweeney, T. (2016) · Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) · Cited by 3
Who Wants to be Mindful? Personality Predictors of Meditation Practice
Ryakhovskaya, Y., Dam, N. T. V., & Smillie, L. D. (2025) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-025-02526-7 · Cited by 2
“Specifically, curiosity about one’s experience is often presented as something one should strive to cultivate during mindfulness meditation (Kabat-Zinn, 2003), and a curiosity factor is often identified within trait mindfulness questionnaires (e.g., Toronto Mind-fulness Scale; Davis et al., 2009).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, K. M., Lau, M. A., & Cairns, D. R.
- Affiliations
- Macquarie University (AU)
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy
- Publisher
- Springer Publishing Company
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 185-197
- ISSN
- 0889-8391 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-887X
- OpenAlex
- W2077056449
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 6.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Johns Hopkins University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
- Keywords
- trait mindfulness, mindfulness measurement, convergent validity, construct validity, meditation experience, decentering, curiosity, internal consistency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review