Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Institutional Quality and International Trade

Open access
Levchenko, Andrei A.·2005·SSRN Electronic Journal
DOI 10.2139/ssrn.646183
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Institutions - quality of contract enforcement, property rights, shareholder protection, and the like - have received a great deal of attention in recent years. Yet trade theory has not considered the implications of institutional differences, beyond treating them simply as different technologies or taxes. The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, we propose a simple model of international trade in which institutional differences are modeled within the Grossman-Hart-Moore framework of contract incompleteness. We show that doing so reverses many of the conclusions obtained by equating institutions with productivity. Institutional differences imply, among other things, that the less developed country may not gain from trade, and factor prices may actually diverge as a result of trade. Second, we test empirically whether institutions act as a source of trade, using data on 1998 US imports disaggregated by country and industry. The empirical results provide evidence of institutional content of trade: institutional differences are an important determinant of trade flows.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.646183

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Maurice Allais, 1992, Combats pour l'Europe
  2. Juan Botero, 2003, Regulation of Labor
  3. Kevin Cowan, 2002, Intermediate Goods, Institutions, and Output Per Worker
  4. Oded Galor, 2003, Why Are a Third of People Indian and Chinese? Trade, Industrialization and Demographic Transition
  5. 2001, Special Interest Politics
  6. 2002, Interest Groups and Trade Policy
  7. 2002, Outsourcing Versus FDI in Industry Equilibrium, Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, 317, 10.1162/154247603322390955 · doi:10.1162/154247603322390955
  8. Steven Husted, 2001, International Economics
  9. Daniel Kaufmann, 2002, Governance Matters II: Updated Governance Indicators for 2000-01
  10. Ann Lawson, 1992, Benchmark Input-Output Accounts for the, Survey of Current Business
  11. Angus Maddison, 2001, Development Centre of the Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development
  12. Priya Ranjan, 2003, Contract Enforcement and the Volume of International Trade in Different Types of Goods

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
Levchenko, A. A.
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2139/ssrn.646183
OpenAlex
W1589964441
Cited by
252
References
61
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.