The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current development of biodegradable polymeric materials for biomedical applications
Open accessAbstract
In the last half-century, the development of biodegradable polymeric materials for biomedical applications has advanced significantly. Biodegradable polymeric materials are favored in the development of therapeutic devices, including temporary implants and three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering. Further advancements have occurred in the utilization of biodegradable polymeric materials for pharmacological applications such as delivery vehicles for controlled/sustained drug release. These applications require particular physicochemical, biological, and degradation properties of the materials to deliver effective therapy. As a result, a wide range of natural or synthetic polymers able to undergo hydrolytic or enzymatic degradation is being studied for biomedical applications. This review outlines the current development of biodegradable natural and synthetic polymeric materials for various biomedical applications, including tissue engineering, temporary implants, wound healing, and drug delivery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Altman, G. H., Diaz, F., Jakuba, C., Calabro, T., Horan, R. L., Chen, J., Lu, H., Richmond, J., & Kaplan, D. L. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00353-8 · Cited by 3,458
Hyaluronan: from extracellular glue to pericellular cue
Toole, B. P. (2004) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1391 · Cited by 2,125
Billiet, T., Gevaert, E., De Schryver, T., Cornelissen, M., & Dubruel, P. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078 · Cited by 1,015 · cited 1×
“Of course, studies are still in its infancy stages and, so far, reported literature on silk 3D bioprinting has demonstrated cell viability after printing to be anywhere from 45% to 98%.(170) However, of the limited available hydrogel bio-inks currently tested, optimized blends of B.”
BackgroundFibrin: A versatile scaffold for tissue engineering applications
Ahmed, T. A. E., Dare, E. V., & Hincke, M. (2008) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2007.0435 · Cited by 994
Immune response to biologic scaffold materials
Badylak, S. F., & Gilbert, T. W. (2008) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.003 · Cited by 857
Santerre, J. P., Woodhouse, K., Laroche, G., & Labow, R. S. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.079 · Cited by 718
Cameron, D. J. A., & Shaver, M. P. (2011) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c0cs00091d · Cited by 421
Use of polyphosphazenes for skeletal tissue regeneration
Laurencin, C. T., Norman, M. E., Elgendy, H. M., El‐Amin, S. F., Allcock, H. R., Pucher, S. R., & Ambrosio, A. A. (1993) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.820270716 · Cited by 179
Cited by
A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds
Reddy, M. S. B., Ponnamma, D., Choudhary, R., & Sadasivuni, K. K. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13071105 · Cited by 1,104
Biodegradable magnesium-based implants in orthopedics-a general review and perspectives
Wang, J., Xu, J., Hopkins, C., Chow, D. H., & Qin, L. (2020) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201902443 · Cited by 574
Drug release study of the chitosan-based nanoparticles
Herdiana, Y., Wathoni, N., Shamsuddin, S., & Muchtaridi, M. (2022) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08674 · Cited by 576
Daminabo, S. C., Goel, S., Grammatikos, S. A., Nezhad, H. Y., & Thakur, V. K. (2020) · Materials Today Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100248 · Cited by 567
Current applications and future perspective of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in cancer
Wang, S.-W., Gao, C., Zheng, Y.-M., Yi, L., Lu, J.-C., Huang, X.-Y., Cai, J.-B., Zhang, P.-F., Cui, Y.-H., & Ke, A.-W. (2022) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-022-01518-8 · Cited by 478
Bami, M. S., Raeisi Estabragh, M. A., Khazaeli, P., Ohadi, M., & Dehghannoudeh, G. (2022) · Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102987 · Cited by 101
Recent updates on innovative approaches to overcome drug resistance for better outcomes in cancer
Sharma, M., Bakshi, A. K., Mittapelly, N., Gautam, S., Marwaha, D., Rai, N., Singh, N., Tiwari, P., Agarwal, N., Kumar, A., et al. (2022) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.04.007 · Cited by 84
Synthesis and molecular characterization of chitosan/starch blends based polyurethanes
Javaid, M. A., Zia, K. M., Zafar, K., Khosa, M. K., Akram, N., Ajmal, M., Imran, M., & Iqbal, M. N. (2020) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.234 · Cited by 54
Parikh, B. H., Liu, Z., Blakeley, P., Lin, Q., Singh, M., Ong, J. Y., Ho, K. H., Lai, J. W., Bogireddi, H., Tran, K. C., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30474-6 · Cited by 54
Structure-property relationships in 3D-printed poly(l-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) degradable polymer
Bachtiar, E. O., Ritter, V. C., & Gall, K. (2021) · Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104650 · Cited by 27
Regulated differentiation of stem cells into an artificial 3D liver as a transplantable source
Chen, F., Wang, H., & Xiao, J. (2020) · Clinical and Molecular Hepatology · doi:10.3350/cmh.2019.0022n · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Song, R., Murphy, M., Li, C., Ting, K., Soo, C., & Zheng, Z.
- Venue
- Drug Design, Development and Therapy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- Volume 12
- Pages
- 3117-3145
- ISSN
- 1177-8881 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2892069689
- Cited by
- 915
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 22.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
