The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making: A User??s Guide
Open accessAbstract
Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are regularly used in health economics to elicit preferences for healthcare products and programmes. There is growing recognition that DCEs can provide more than information on preferences and, in particular, they have the potential to contribute more directly to outcome measurement for use in economic evaluation. Almost uniquely, DCEs could potentially contribute to outcome measurement for use in both cost-benefit and cost-utility analysis. Within this expanding remit, our intention is to provide a resource for current practitioners as well as those considering undertaking a DCE, using DCE results in a policy/commercial context, or reviewing a DCE. We present the fundamental principles and theory underlying DCEs. To aid in undertaking and assessing the quality of DCEs, we discuss the process of carrying out a choice study and have developed a checklist covering conceptualizing the choice process, selecting attributes and levels, experimental design, questionnaire design, pilot testing, sampling and sample size, data collection, coding of data, econometric analysis, validity, interpretation and welfare and policy analysis. In this fast-moving area, a number of issues remain on the research frontier. We therefore outline potentially fruitful areas for future research associated both with DCEs in general, and with health applications specifically, paying attention to how the results of DCEs can be used in economic evaluation. We also discuss emerging research trends. We conclude that if appropriately designed, implemented, analysed and interpreted, DCEs offer several advantages in the health sector, the most important of which is that they provide rich data sources for economic evaluation and decision making, allowing investigation of many types of questions, some of which otherwise would be intractable analytically. Thus, they offer viable alternatives and complements to existing methods of valuation and preference elicitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We followed recommended guidelines to design and implement the DCE. [7, 8, 11–16]”
From Assessing the American public's preferences for reforms to teen driving licensure systems: a discrete choice experiment (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“The opt-out option has the potential to make the choices more realistic [34] by simulating a real-world context where individuals can exercise their right not to take up an app, given the apps on offer [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“However, this type of design is often considered impractical due to the high number of choice tasks required [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“The higher the number of attributes, alternatives, and choice tasks, the higher the task complexity [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“When a range is not wide enough, there is a risk that participants could ignore the attributes because they judge the difference between levels to be insignificant [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“When perfect orthogonality and balance cannot be achieved or are not desirable, an efficient design can be applied [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior
McFadden, D. L. (1972) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 14,203
Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
Drummond, M. E., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198529446.001.0001 · Cited by 13,648
Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method
Dillman, D. A. (2007) · Cited by 9,587
A New Approach to Consumer Theory
Lancaster, K. J. (1966) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/259131 · Cited by 8,471
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait́, J., & Adamowicz, W. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753831 · Cited by 7,008
Self-citationA New Approach to Consumer Theory
Lancaster, K. J. (1976) · Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-51565-1_34 · Cited by 6,946
Addelman, S., Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (1979) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1267766 · Cited by 6,753
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Hensher, 1983, Transport Res, 890, 11
- Ryan, 2003, Applied Health Econ Health Policy, 2, 55
- Chakraborty, 1994, J Health Care Mark, 14, 21
- Swait, 1993, JMark Res, 30, 305
- Longo, 2006, Br J Gen Practice, 56, 35
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,001
How Patients Choose a Laryngologist: A Pilot Stated Preference Study
Fischman, V., Wittenberg, E., Song, S. A., Huston, M. N., Franco, R. A., Song, P. C., & Naunheim, M. R. (2021) · OTO Open · doi:10.1177/2473974x21999601 · Cited by 7
Eliciting SF-6Dv2 health state utilities using an anchored best-worst scaling technique
Osman, A., Wu, J. H., He, X., & Chen, G. (2021) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114018 · Cited by 7
Raghunandan, R., Howard, K., Marra, C. A., Tordoff, J. M., & Smith, A. J. (2021) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-021-00529-9 · Cited by 10
Khan, M. U., Balbontín, C., Bliemer, M. C. J., & Aslani, P. (2021) · Journal of Mental Health · doi:10.1080/09638237.2021.1979495 · Cited by 7
Broderick, L. E., Bjorner, J. B., Lauher-Charest, M., White, M. K., Kosinski, M. R., Mulhern, B. J., & Brazier, J. E. (2022) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2022.07.018 · Cited by 7
dosReis, S., Bozzi, L. M., Butler, B., Xie, R. Z., Chapman, R. H., Bright, J. L., Malik, E., & Slejko, J. F. (2022) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-022-00596-6 · Cited by 8
Identifying the impact of social influences in health-related discrete choice experiments
de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Howard, K., & Swait́, J. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0276141 · Cited by 7
Angell, B. J., Onwujekwe, O. E., Roy, P., Nwokolo, C. C., McKee, M., Mandeville, K., Obodoechi, D. N., Agwu, P., Odii, A., Orjiakor, C. T., et al. (2023) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106208 · Cited by 7
Armeni, P., Meregaglia, M., Borsoi, L., Callea, G., Torbica, A., Benazzo, F., & Tarricone, R. (2023) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x231201805 · Cited by 7
Heidenreich, S., Trapali, M., Krucien, N., Tervonen, T., & Phillips-Beyer, A. (2023) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2023.10.002 · Cited by 7
Riboulet, M., Clairet, A., Bennani, M., & Nerich, V. (2023) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-023-00652-9 · Cited by 7
McCusker, J., Yaffe, M., Sussman, T., Kates, N., Mulvale, G., Jayabarathan, A., Law, S., & Haggerty, J. (2013) · Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · doi:10.1177/070674371305800306 · Cited by 9
Comans, T. A., Whitty, J. A., Hills, A. P., Kendall, E. A., Turkstra, E., Gordon, L. G., Byrnes, J., & Scuffham, P. (2013) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-1182 · Cited by 7
Spinks, J., & Mortimer, D. (2014) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.049 · Cited by 7
Choice Blindness and Health-State Choices among Adolescents and Adults
Law, E. H., Pickard, A. L., Kaczynski, A., & Pickard, A. S. (2017) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x17700847 · Cited by 7
Priaulx, J., Csanádi, M., de Koning, H. J., & McKee, M. (2018) · The International Journal of Health Planning and Management · doi:10.1002/hpm.2697 · Cited by 7
Oncology patient preferences for depression care: A discrete choice experiment
Hobden, B., Turon, H., Bryant, J., Wall, L., Brown, S. D., & Sanson‐Fisher, R. (2019) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.5024 · Cited by 7
McLeod, C., Norman, R., Schultz, A., Mascaro, S., Webb, S. A. R., & Snelling, T. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030348 · Cited by 7
Slejko, J. F., Hong, Y. D., Sullivan, J. L., Reed, R. M., & dosReis, S. (2021) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-021-00495-2 · Cited by 7
Preferences of patients with asthma or COPD for treatments in pulmonary rehabilitation
Damm, K., Lingner, H., Schmidt, K., Aumann, I., Buhr-Schinner, H., van der Meyden, J., & Schultz, K. (2021) · Health Economics Review · doi:10.1186/s13561-021-00308-0 · Cited by 7
Saya, U. Y., Wagner, Z., Mukasa, B., Wabukala, P., Lunkuse, L., & Linnemayr, S. (2022) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0000374 · Cited by 7
Binyaruka, P., Andreoni, A., Balabanova, D., McKee, M., Hutchinson, E., & Angell, B. J. (2022) · International Journal of Health Policy and Management · doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6877 · Cited by 8
Preferences for Surveillance of Barrett’s Oesophagus: a Discrete Choice Experiment
Bulamu, N. B., Chen, G., Bright, T., Ratcliffe, J., Chung, A., Fraser, R. J., Törnqvist, B., & Watson, D. I. (2018) · Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11605-018-4049-6 · Cited by 7
Does Device or Connection Type Affect Health Preferences in Online Surveys?
Hartman, J. D., & Craig, B. M. (2019) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-019-00380-z · Cited by 7
Gouglas, D., Hoyt, K., Peacocke, E. F., Kaloudis, A., Ottersen, T., & Røttingen, J. (2019) · INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics · doi:10.1287/inte.2019.1011 · Cited by 7
Societal attitudes towards in ovo gender determination as an alternative to chick culling
Reithmayer, C., Danne, M., & Mußhoff, O. (2020) · Agribusiness · doi:10.1002/agr.21650 · Cited by 7
And When I Die: Theory of Planned Behavior as Applied to Sperm Cryopreservation
Gonen, L. D. (2021) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare9050554 · Cited by 7
Dzobo, M., Dzinamarira, T., Strauss, M., & Mashamba-Thompson, T. P. (2024) · AJOG Global Reports · doi:10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100414 · Cited by 6
Arslan, I. G., Vervloet, M., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Hek, K., Knottnerus, B. J., Wagner, C., & van Eikenhorst, L. (2025) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-025-02941-8 · Cited by 6
Har, C. E., Gao, Q., Chen, W., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-025-00775-1 · Cited by 6
Lee, S. W., & Sharma, A. (2025) · Tourism Economics · doi:10.1177/13548166251391486 · Cited by 6
Eze, V. H. U., Eze, C. E., Alaneme, G. U., Mirembe, N. F., Ugwu, O. P.-C., Ogenyi, F. C., Ugwu, C. N., Okon, M. B., & Ugwu, J. N. (2026) · Frontiers in Nanotechnology · doi:10.3389/fnano.2025.1686599 · Cited by 6
Venning, B., Bergin, R. J., Pearce, A. M., Lee, A., & Emery, J. D. (2022) · BJGP Open · doi:10.3399/bjgpo.2022.0168 · Cited by 6
Otekunrin, O. A., Olasehinde, L. O., Oliobi, C. E., Otekunrin, O. A., & Osuolale, K. A. (2022) · Scientific African · doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01499 · Cited by 6
Kumar, M., Tele, A., Kathono, J., Nyongesa, V., Yator, O., Mwaniga, S., Huang, K., McKay, M. M., Lai, J., Levy, M., et al. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0273274 · Cited by 6
Raghunandan, R., & Howard, K. (2023) · Journal of physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2023.11.004 · Cited by 6
What medical specialists want to stay in remote areas of Indonesia: Discrete choice experiments
Kurniati, A., Efendi, F., Widowati, A. R., Simanjuntak, A., Mudina, S., Ikhwansyah, B., Noor, A. Y. M., & McKenna, L. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0308225 · Cited by 6
Measuring beekeepers' economic value of contract enhancements in almond pollination agreements
Fenton, M., Goodrich, B. K., & Penn, J. (2024) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108351 · Cited by 6
Perceptions of “sustainable fisheries” in the UK and Japan using best-worst scaling
Okazaki, R., Glenk, K., & Makino, M. (2024) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106400 · Cited by 6
Durno, N. S., Prieto, P. A., Pantiri, K., Heisen, M., Boeri, M., Paris, J., Jack, K., Chambenoit, O., Subramanian, R., Puelles, J., et al. (2024) · Journal of Dermatological Treatment · doi:10.1080/09546634.2024.2417966 · Cited by 6
Gonen, L. D. (2024) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2024.1467213 · Cited by 6
Hill, C. E., Vanderboll, K., Parent, J. M., Skolarus, L. E., & Zahuranec, D. B. (2025) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110359 · Cited by 7
Hettiarachchi, R. M., Kularatna, S., Byrnes, J., Mulhern, B. J., Chen, G., & Scuffham, P. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038626 · Cited by 6
Loss aversion, reference dependence and diminishing sensitivity in choice experiments
Scott, A., & Witt, J. C. (2020) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2020.100230 · Cited by 6
Men’s preferences for image-guidance in prostate radiation therapy: A discrete choice experiment
Brown, A., Pain, T., Tan, A., Anable, L., Callander, E. J., Watt, K., Street, D. J., & Lourenço, R. D. A. (2021) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2021.11.032 · Cited by 6
Brunet-Houdard, S., Monmousseau, F., Berthon, G., Garets, V. D., Laharie, D., Picon, L., Fotsing, G., Gargot, D., Charpentier, C., Buisson, A., et al. (2022) · Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1080/00365521.2022.2085057 · Cited by 6
Folkvord, F., Peschke, L., Ağca, Y. G., van Houten, K., Stazi, G., Roca‐Umbert, A., Peschke, S. G., Seyfafjehi, S., Gallego, A., Gaeta, E., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2022.900066 · Cited by 6
Liu, R., Lu, Y., Li, Y., Wei, W., Sun, C., Zhang, Q., Wang, X., Wang, J., & Zhang, N. (2022) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.917622 · Cited by 6
Wright, S. J., Dalal, G., Vass, C., Georgsson, S., & Payne, K. (2022) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.6243 · Cited by 6
Banjara, B., Poudel, N., Garza, K. B., Westrick, S. C., Whitley, H. P., Redden, D. T., & Ngorsuraches, S. (2022) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s391719 · Cited by 6
Sarigiovannis, P., Foster, N. E., Jowett, S. M., & Saunders, B. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072989 · Cited by 6
Mexican consumers' perceptions and preferences for US and Texas beef
García, M., Carpio, C. E., Hudson, D., Boonsaeng, T., & Wang, C. (2023) · Agribusiness · doi:10.1002/agr.21844 · Cited by 6
Hall, N. Y., Le, L. K., Abimanyi-Ochom, J., & Mihalopoulos, C. (2023) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104939 · Cited by 6
Yin, Y. M., Peng, Q., Ma, L., Dong, Y., Sun, Y., Xu, S., Ding, N., Liu, X., Zhao, M., Tang, Y., et al. (2023) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-023-03562-3 · Cited by 6
Howard, K., Norris, S., Salisbury, A., Pearce, A. M., Hay, L., Stapleton, B., Lean, C. L., Last, A. J., Kwedza, R., White, K. M., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.11.027 · Cited by 6
Gilli, V. L., Giménez, G., & Valbuena, J. (2024) · Economic Analysis and Policy · doi:10.1016/j.eap.2024.04.014 · Cited by 6
Kessels, R. (2016) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2016.08.001 · Cited by 6
Harris, P., Whitty, J. A., Kendall, E., Ratcliffe, J., Wilson, A. J., Littlejohns, P., & Scuffham, P. (2017) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.11.006 · Cited by 6
Gutknecht, M., Schaarschmidt, M., Danner, M., Blome, C., & Augustin, M. (2018) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s152509 · Cited by 6
Dai, W., Liu, C., Liu, J., Lin, Y., Cheng, Y., & Ming, W. (2020) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-020-01466-1 · Cited by 6
Schwoerer, T., Little, J. M., & Hayward, G. D. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110924 · Cited by 6
Erku, D., Scuffham, P., Gething, K., Norman, R., Mekonnen, A. B., Gebretekle, G. B., Assefa, Y. A., & Tessema, G. A. (2021) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-021-00553-9 · Cited by 6
Chiwire, P., Beaudart, C., Evers, S., Mahomed, H., & Hiligsmann, M. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19010590 · Cited by 6
Patient preferences in obstructive sleep apnea—a discrete choice experiment
Braun, M., Dietz-Terjung, S., Taube, C., & Schoebel, C. (2022) · Sleep And Breathing · doi:10.1007/s11325-021-02549-z · Cited by 6
Identifying and managing psoriasis-associated comorbidities: the IMPACT research programme
Cordingley, L., Nelson, P. A., Davies, L. M., Ashcroft, D. M., Bundy, C., Chew-Graham, C. A., Chisholm, A., Elvidge, J., Hamilton, M., Hilton, R., et al. (2022) · Programme Grants for Applied Research · doi:10.3310/lvuq5853 · Cited by 6
Menges, D., Piatti, M. C., Cerny, T., & Puhan, M. A. (2022) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s362802 · Cited by 6
Brinkmann, M., Diedrich, L., Hemmerling, M., Krauth, C., Robra, B., Stahmeyer, J. T., & Dreier, M. (2022) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2022.07.012 · Cited by 6
Wei, Y. Q., Zhao, J., Ming, J., Zhang, X., & Chen, Y. (2022) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s375938 · Cited by 6
The kids are not all the same – Heterogeneity in children’s snack purchase behavior
Landwehr, S. C., Hartmann, M., Cash, S. B., & Yeh, C. (2023) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104906 · Cited by 6
Plöthner, M., Schmidt, K., Schips, C., & Damm, K. (2018) · Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine · doi:10.2147/pgpm.s149803 · Cited by 6
Alkhoury, D., Atchison, J., Trujillo, A. J., Oslin, K. A., Frey, K. P., O’Toole, R. V., Castillo, R. C., & O’Hara, N. N. (2021) · Health Economics Review · doi:10.1186/s13561-021-00313-3 · Cited by 6
Afsharmanesh, G., Rahimi, F., Zarei, L., Peiravian, F., & Mehralian, G. (2021) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice · doi:10.1186/s40545-021-00365-0 · Cited by 6
Doughty, H. L., Lim, N. E., Carrasco, L. R., Milner‐Gulland, E. J., & Veríssimo, D. (2021) · Conservation Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/csp2.567 · Cited by 6
Ma, Y., Geng, H., Leng, A., & Zhuang, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2480845 · Cited by 5
Taste and trust: The impact of psychographics on certified meat demand
Joya, K. (2025) · Future Foods · doi:10.1016/j.fufo.2025.100763 · Cited by 5
Nurses’ Job Preferences: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments
Cao, T., Chen, H., Chen, S., Chen, X., Lu, X., Bai, D., Li, Y., Song, Z., Hou, C., & Gao, J. (2025) · International Nursing Review · doi:10.1111/inr.70117 · Cited by 5
Degeling, C., Yarwood, T., Nettel‐Aguirre, A., Mullan, J., Reynolds, N. L., & Chen, G. (2023) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-023-00640-z · Cited by 5
Rael, C. T., Giguere, R., Tfaily, E. B., Sutton, S., Horn, E., Schieffer, R. J., Hendrix, C. W., D’Aquila, R. T., & Hope, T. J. (2024) · AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses · doi:10.1089/aid.2023.0120 · Cited by 5
Jones, C. K., Scott, S. E., Pashayan, N., Stephen Morris, A., Okan, Y., & Waller, J. (2024) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x241254828 · Cited by 5
Caplan, A. J., Woods, T., Chamberlain, B. C., & Klain, S. C. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2024.2353763 · Cited by 6
Ross, M., Chung, Y., Carr, T. F., Ambrose, C. S., Lindsley, A., Collacott, H., Schulz, A., Desai, P., Rane, P., Williams, M. R., et al. (2024) · Journal of Asthma · doi:10.1080/02770903.2024.2380520 · Cited by 5
Reducing Resource Expenditure in Value Co-Creation: A Path to Market Shaping
Lipnickas, G., Plewa, C., Conduit, J., & Wilkie, D. C. H. (2024) · Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) · doi:10.1177/14413582241268562 · Cited by 5
Jin, W., Wang, J., & Hu, X. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1445273 · Cited by 5
Public Valuations of Managing Compromised Molars: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Taylor, G., Boyers, D., Exley, C., Innes, N., Vale, L. D., & Vernazza, C. R. (2024) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/00220345241285154 · Cited by 5
Harrington, E. K., Congo, O., Pike, M., Awuor, M., Kimanthi, S., Onono, M. A., Barnabas, R. V., Mugo, N., Bukusi, E. A., & Hauber, B. (2025) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.1111/sifp.12280 · Cited by 5
Lian, X., & Liu, Z. (2025) · International Journal of Urban Sciences · doi:10.1080/12265934.2025.2470162 · Cited by 5
Preferences of patients with depression for exercises: a discrete choice experiment
Li, H., Xie, P. P., Hou, Y., Jiang, W., Gong, S., & Jin, S. (2025) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-22404-0 · Cited by 5
Kovalchuk, A. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251343353 · Cited by 5
Kostaki, S.-M., & Linardakis, M. (2025) · Journal of Computers in Education · doi:10.1007/s40692-025-00365-y · Cited by 5
Patient Preferences for Biologic and Biosimilar Osteoporosis Treatments in Colombia
Graham-Clarke, P., Hauber, B., Boeri, M., Leonardi, F., Burge, R. T., Fernandez, M., Tockhorn‐Heidenreich, A., & Flórez, S. (2020) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s250745 · Cited by 6
Towards Personalising the Use of Biologics in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Vass, C., Barton, A. C., & Payne, K. (2021) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-021-00533-z · Cited by 5
Eliciting Preferences from Choices: Discrete Choice Experiments
Howell, M., & Howard, K. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_93 · Cited by 7
Nguyen, H. T. T., Vo, T. Q., Tran, H. T. B., Nguyen, B. T., Nguyen, H. T., Nguyen, T. D., & Anuratpanich, L. (2022) · The International Journal of Health Planning and Management · doi:10.1002/hpm.3597 · Cited by 5
Nicolet, A., Perraudin, C., Krucien, N., Wagner, J., Peytremann‐Bridevaux, I., & Marti, J. (2023) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104819 · Cited by 5
Priority setting in the German healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment
Meusel, V., Mentzakis, E., Baji, P., Fiorentini, G., & Paolucci, F. (2023) · International Journal of Health Economics and Management · doi:10.1007/s10754-023-09347-y · Cited by 5
Nguyen, H. M., Lindsay, C., Baradaran, M., Guertin, J. R., Nshimyumukiza, L., Soukkhaphone, B., & Reinharz, D. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0287653 · Cited by 5
Assessing Patients’ Preferences for Preventive Dental Care: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Bahanan, L. O., Bashkail, F., Alghamdi, A. A., & Alhazmy, A. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.44028 · Cited by 5
Sharma, P., Kularatna, S., Abell, B., Eagleson, K. J., Vo, L. K., Halahakone, U., Senanayake, S. J., & McPhail, S. (2023) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s425578 · Cited by 5
Jiang, S., Xiong, M., Rao, X., Liang, J., Zhu, X., Fu, H., Chen, J., & Wang, C. (2023) · Risk Management and Healthcare Policy · doi:10.2147/rmhp.s430636 · Cited by 5
Touré, M., & Poder, T. G. (2024) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117001 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle University (GB)
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Lancsar, Emily
- Venue
- PharmacoEconomics
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 661-677
- ISSN
- 1170-7690 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122707212
- Cited by
- 1,707
- References
- 107
- Citations by year
- 2026: 159 · 2025: 163 · 2024: 156 · 2023: 155 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 135 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 55.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- PharmacoEconomics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- discrete choice experiment, healthcare decision-making, outcome measurement, economic evaluation, cost-benefit analysis, cost-utility analysis, preference elicitation, questionnaire design, validity, welfare analysis, policy analysis
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Health, Choice Behavior, Consumer Behavior, Costs and Cost Analysis, Health Services Research, Humans, Policy Making, Models, Econometric, Patient Satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
