The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making: A User??s Guide
Open accessAbstract
Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are regularly used in health economics to elicit preferences for healthcare products and programmes. There is growing recognition that DCEs can provide more than information on preferences and, in particular, they have the potential to contribute more directly to outcome measurement for use in economic evaluation. Almost uniquely, DCEs could potentially contribute to outcome measurement for use in both cost-benefit and cost-utility analysis. Within this expanding remit, our intention is to provide a resource for current practitioners as well as those considering undertaking a DCE, using DCE results in a policy/commercial context, or reviewing a DCE. We present the fundamental principles and theory underlying DCEs. To aid in undertaking and assessing the quality of DCEs, we discuss the process of carrying out a choice study and have developed a checklist covering conceptualizing the choice process, selecting attributes and levels, experimental design, questionnaire design, pilot testing, sampling and sample size, data collection, coding of data, econometric analysis, validity, interpretation and welfare and policy analysis. In this fast-moving area, a number of issues remain on the research frontier. We therefore outline potentially fruitful areas for future research associated both with DCEs in general, and with health applications specifically, paying attention to how the results of DCEs can be used in economic evaluation. We also discuss emerging research trends. We conclude that if appropriately designed, implemented, analysed and interpreted, DCEs offer several advantages in the health sector, the most important of which is that they provide rich data sources for economic evaluation and decision making, allowing investigation of many types of questions, some of which otherwise would be intractable analytically. Thus, they offer viable alternatives and complements to existing methods of valuation and preference elicitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We followed recommended guidelines to design and implement the DCE. [7, 8, 11–16]”
From Assessing the American public's preferences for reforms to teen driving licensure systems: a discrete choice experiment (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“The opt-out option has the potential to make the choices more realistic [34] by simulating a real-world context where individuals can exercise their right not to take up an app, given the apps on offer [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“However, this type of design is often considered impractical due to the high number of choice tasks required [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“The higher the number of attributes, alternatives, and choice tasks, the higher the task complexity [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“When a range is not wide enough, there is a risk that participants could ignore the attributes because they judge the difference between levels to be insignificant [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“When perfect orthogonality and balance cannot be achieved or are not desirable, an efficient design can be applied [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior
McFadden, D. L. (1972) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 14,203
Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
Drummond, M. E., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198529446.001.0001 · Cited by 13,648
Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method
Dillman, D. A. (2007) · Cited by 9,587
A New Approach to Consumer Theory
Lancaster, K. J. (1966) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/259131 · Cited by 8,471
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait́, J., & Adamowicz, W. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753831 · Cited by 7,008
Self-citationA New Approach to Consumer Theory
Lancaster, K. J. (1976) · Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-51565-1_34 · Cited by 6,946
Addelman, S., Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (1979) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1267766 · Cited by 6,753
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Hensher, 1983, Transport Res, 890, 11
- Ryan, 2003, Applied Health Econ Health Policy, 2, 55
- Chakraborty, 1994, J Health Care Mark, 14, 21
- Swait, 1993, JMark Res, 30, 305
- Longo, 2006, Br J Gen Practice, 56, 35
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,001
Oedingen, C., Bartling, T., & Krauth, C. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026040 · Cited by 24
Johnson, J., Howard, K., Wilson, A. J., Ward, M. P., Gilbert, G. L., & Degeling, C. (2019) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.03.013 · Cited by 24
Subramanian, S., Edwards, P., Roberts, S. T., Musheke, M., & Mbizvo, M. T. (2019) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/15314 · Cited by 24
The preference of onboard activities in a new age of automated driving
Hamadneh, J., & Esztergár‐Kiss, D. (2022) · European Transport Research Review · doi:10.1186/s12544-022-00540-7 · Cited by 24
Mouter, N., Boxebeld, S., Kessels, R., van Wijhe, M., de Wit, G. A., Lambooij, M., & van Exel, J. N. A. (2022) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2022.03.013 · Cited by 24
Imperfect emissions information during flight choices and the role of CO2 labelling
Carroll, J., Brazil, W., Howard, M., & Denny, E. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112508 · Cited by 24
Blom, A. W., Beswick, A. D., Burston, A., Carroll, F. E., Garfield, K., Gooberman‐Hill, R., Harris, S. R. S., Kunutsor, S. K., Lane, J. A., Lenguerrand, E., et al. (2022) · Programme Grants for Applied Research · doi:10.3310/hdwl9760 · Cited by 24
Mekonnen, A. B., & Enqusselasie, F. (2015) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s87928 · Cited by 24
Mühlbacher, A. C., & Bethge, S. (2014) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-014-0223-1 · Cited by 24
Therapy preferences of patients with lung and colon cancer: a discrete choice experiment
Schmidt, K., Damm, K., Vogel, A., Golpon, H. A., Manns, M. P., Welte, T., & von der Schulenburg, J. M. G. (2017) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s138863 · Cited by 24
Quantifying Preferences in Drug Benefit‐Risk Decisions
Tervonen, T., Angelis, A., Hockley, K. S., Pignatti, F., & Phillips, L. D. (2019) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/cpt.1447 · Cited by 24
Race, Gender and Beauty: The Effect of Information Provision on Online Hiring Biases
Leung, W., Zhang, Z., Jibuti, D., Zhao, J., Klein, M., Pierce, C., Robert, L., & Zhu, H. (2020) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376874 · Cited by 29
Norman, R., Robinson, S., Dickinson, H., Williams, I., Meshcheriakova, E., Manipis, K., & Anstey, M. (2021) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-021-00498-z · Cited by 24
Patient Preferences for an Oral Anticoagulant after Major Orthopedic Surgery
Wilke, T. (2009) · Patient · doi:10.2165/01312067-200902010-00005 · Cited by 24
Eliasson, L., Bewley, A., Mughal, F., Johnston, K., Kuznik, A., Patel, C., & Lloyd, A. J. (2017) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s121838 · Cited by 23
López‐Bastida, J., Ramos-Goñi, J. M., Aranda-Reneo, I., Taruscio, D., Magrelli, A., & Kanavos, P. G. (2019) · Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · doi:10.1186/s13023-019-1126-1 · Cited by 23
Blake, M. R., Lancsar, E., Peeters, A., & Backholer, K. (2018) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2018.03.012 · Cited by 25
Self-citationPatterson, J. A., Holdford, D. A., & Harpe, S. E. (2018) · Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.08.002 · Cited by 23
Patient Preferences for Managing Insomnia: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Cheung, J. M. Y., Bartlett, D. J., Armour, C. L., Saini, B., & Laba, T. (2018) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-018-0303-y · Cited by 23
Preferences for aspects of antenatal and newborn screening: a systematic review
Vass, C., Georgsson, S., Ulph, F., & Payne, K. (2019) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-019-2278-7 · Cited by 22
Parental preferences for seizure detection devices: A discrete choice experiment
van Westrhenen, A., Wijnen, B. F. M., & Thijs, R. D. (2022) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.17202 · Cited by 22
Tauscher, J. S., DePue, M. K., Swank, J. M., & Salloum, R. G. (2023) · Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.josat.2022.208938 · Cited by 24
Blood Donors' Preferences Toward Incentives for Donation in China
Wang, Y., Zhai, P., Jiang, S., Li, C., & Li, S. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18320 · Cited by 22
Ordering Errors, Objections and Invariance in Utility Survey Responses
Wittenberg, E., & Prosser, L. A. (2011) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.2165/11590480-000000000-00000 · Cited by 22
Health Economics and Geriatrics: Challenges and Opportunities
Ratcliffe, J., Laver, K., Couzner, L., & Crotty, M. (2012) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/33549 · Cited by 22
Torbica, A., & Fattore, G. (2010) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.030 · Cited by 22
Laver, K., Ratcliffe, J., George, S., Lester, L. H., & Crotty, M. (2012) · Australian Occupational Therapy Journal · doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12018 · Cited by 22
Scuffham, P., Whitty, J. A., Taylor, M. J., & Saxby, R. C. (2010) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.2165/11531170-000000000-00000 · Cited by 22
Damery, S. L., Biswas, M., Billingham, L. J., Barton, P., Al‐Janabi, H., & Grimer, R. J. (2014) · European Journal of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2014.04.020 · Cited by 22
Ghimire, M., Boyer, T. A., Chung, C., & Moss, J. Q. (2016) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci.51.7.892 · Cited by 22
Ikenwilo, D., Heidenreich, S., Ryan, M., Mankowski, C., Nazir, J., & Watson, V. (2017) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-017-0263-7 · Cited by 22
Danne, M., Mußhoff, O., & Schulte, M. (2019) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.023 · Cited by 22
Individual-level determinants of waterpipe smoking demand in four Eastern-Mediterranean countries
Salloum, R. G., Nakkash, R. T., Abu-Rmeileh, N. M. E., Hamadeh, R. R., Darawad, M. W., Kheirallah, K. A., Al-Farsi, Y. M., Yusufali, A., Thomas, J., Mostafa, A., et al. (2018) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/day084 · Cited by 22
Methods for measuring patient preferences: an update and future directions
Meara, A. S., Crossnohere, N. L., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2019) · Current Opinion in Rheumatology · doi:10.1097/bor.0000000000000587 · Cited by 22
Deverill, M., Lancsar, E., Snaith, V., & Robson, S. C. (2010) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.03.015 · Cited by 22
Self-citationWang, N.-N., Luo, L., Pan, Y.-R., & Ni, X.-M. (2018) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-018-0109-z · Cited by 21
Sever, I., Verbič, M., & Klarić, E. (2019) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13095 · Cited by 21
Alfonso, Y. N., Lynch, M., Mensah, E., Piccinini, D., & Bishai, D. M. (2020) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/s12936-019-3082-6 · Cited by 21
Bridges, J. F. P., de la Cruz, M., Pavilack, M., Flood, E. M., Janssen, E. M., Chehab, N. H., & Fernandes, A. W. (2019) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon-2019-0396 · Cited by 21
Sijstermans, E., Cheung, K. L., Goossens, A. J. M., Conde, R., Rodríguez, J. L. G., & Hiligsmann, M. (2020) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2020.1735399 · Cited by 21
Callahan, R. L., Brunie, A., Lebrun, V., Chen, M., Godwin, C. L., Kanchan, L., & OlaOlorun, F. M. (2021) · Reproductive Health · doi:10.1186/s12978-021-01113-y · Cited by 21
Luévano, C. D., Sicsic, J., Pellissier, G., Chyderiotis, S., Arwidson, P., Olivier, C., Gagneux‐Brunon, A., Botelho-Nevers, É., Bouvet, É., & Mueller, J. E. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055148 · Cited by 25
A Comparison of Caregiver and Patient Preferences for Treating Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Crossnohere, N. L., Fischer, R. A., Vroom, E., Furlong, P., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2022) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-022-00574-y · Cited by 21
von Weinrich, P., Kong, Q., & Liu, Y. (2022) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x221111975 · Cited by 22
TB preventive therapy preferences among children and adolescents
Strauss, M., Wademan, D. T., Mcinziba, A., Hoddinott, G., Rafique, M., Jola, L. N., Streicher, C., Preez, K. D., Osman, M., Boffa, J., et al. (2023) · The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · doi:10.5588/ijtld.22.0645 · Cited by 21
Harris, P., Whitty, J. A., Kendall, E., Ratcliffe, J., Wilson, A. J., Littlejohns, P., & Scuffham, P. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006820 · Cited by 21
The changing role of economic evaluation in valuing medical technologies
Rotter, J., Foerster, D., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2012) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1586/erp.12.73 · Cited by 21
Physician and Patient Preferences for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Therapies
Shafrin, J. T., Bruno, A. S., MacEwan, J. P., Campinha‐Bacote, A., Trocio, J. N., Shah, M. B., Tan, W., & Romley, J. A. (2016) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2016.01.001 · Cited by 21
Willis, C. M., Britton, L., Swindells, M., Jones, E. M., Kemp, A. E., Muirhead, N., Gul, A., Matin, R., Knutsson, L., & Ali, M. (2016) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.14887 · Cited by 21
Developing attributes and levels for a discrete choice experiment on basic health insurance in Iran
Karyani, A. K., Rashidian, A., Sari, A. A., & Emamgholipour, S. (2018) · Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · doi:10.14196/mjiri.32.26 · Cited by 21
Bridges, J. F. P., Tsai, J., Janssen, E. M., Crossnohere, N. L., Fischer, R. A., & Peay, H. L. (2018) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-018-0330-8 · Cited by 21
Anteneh, Y., Zeleke, G., & Gebremariam, E. (2019) · Ecological Processes · doi:10.1186/s13717-019-0160-1 · Cited by 21
MacEwan, J. P., Doctor, J. N., Mulligan, K., May, S. G., Batt, K., Zacker, C., Lakdawalla, D. N., & Goldman, D. P. (2019) · MDM Policy & Practice · doi:10.1177/2381468319855386 · Cited by 21
Strauss, M., George, G., Mantell, J. E., Mapingure, M. P., Masvawure, T. B., Lamb, M. R., Zech, J. M., Musuka, G., Chingombe, I., Msukwa, M., et al. (2020) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-020-02994-z · Cited by 21
Parental Vaccine Preferences for Their Children in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Gong, T., Chen, G., Liu, P., Lai, X., Rong, H., Ma, X., Hou, Z., Fang, H., & Li, S. (2020) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines8040687 · Cited by 21
Degeling, C., Chen, G., Gilbert, G. L., Brookes, V., Thai, T. T. H., Wilson, A. J., & Johnson, J. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041592 · Cited by 21
Local politicians’ preferences in public procurement: ideological or strategic reasoning?
Lerusse, A., & de Walle, S. V. (2021) · Local Government Studies · doi:10.1080/03003930.2020.1864332 · Cited by 21
Assessing couples’ preferences for fresh or frozen embryo transfer: a discrete choice experiment
Abdulrahim, B., Scotland, G., Bhattacharya, S., & Maheshwari, A. (2021) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deab207 · Cited by 21
Consumer Preferences for Improved Hen Housing: Is a Cage a Cage?
Doyon, M., Bergeron, S., Cranfield, J., Tamini, L. D., & Criner, G. K. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie · doi:10.1111/cjag.12113 · Cited by 21
Dowsey, M. M., Scott, A., Nelson, E. A., Li, J., Sundararajan, V., Nikpour, M., & Choong, P. (2016) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1536-5 · Cited by 21
Turmeric trends: analyzing consumer preferences and willingness to pay
Ly, N., Govindasamy, R., & Mentreddy, S. R. (2024) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2024.1359040 · Cited by 20
O’Hara, N. N., Roy, L. M., O’Hara, L. M., Spiegel, J., Lynd, L. D., FitzGerald, J. M., Yassi, A., Nophale, L. E., & Marra, C. A. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133304 · Cited by 20
Mothers' preferences regarding new combination vaccines for their children in Japan, 2014
Shono, A., & Kondo, M. (2016) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2016.1255387 · Cited by 20
Supply disruptions and protection motivation: Why some managers act proactively (and others don't)
Bode, C., Macdonald, J. R., & Merath, M. (2021) · Journal of Business Logistics · doi:10.1111/jbl.12293 · Cited by 20
Nguyen, L. T. H., Gao, Z., & Anderson, J. L. (2022) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102272 · Cited by 20
Polygenic Risk Prediction in Diverticulitis
Roo, A. C. D., Chen, Y., Du, X., Handelman, S. K., Byrnes, M. E., Regenbogen, S. E., Speliotes, E. K., & Maguire, L. H. (2022) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000005623 · Cited by 20
Dennison, R. A., Taylor, L. C., Stephen Morris, A., Boscott, R. A., Harrison, H., Moorthie, S. A., Rossi, S. H., Stewart, G. D., & Usher‐Smith, J. A. (2023) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x231155790 · Cited by 21
Cunningham, C. E., Vaillancourt, T., Cunningham, L. J., Chen, Y., & Ratcliffe, J. (2011) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.20408 · Cited by 20
Prioritizing strategies for comprehensive liver cancer control in Asia: a conjoint analysis
Bridges, J. F. P., Dong, L., Gallego, G., Blauvelt, B. M., Joy, S. M., & Pawlik, T. M. (2012) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-376 · Cited by 20
Makkar, S. R., Williamson, A. B., Turner, T., Redman, S., & Louviere, J. J. (2015) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0022-y · Cited by 20
Self-citationMott, D. J., & Najafzadeh, M. (2015) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1586/14737167.2016.1115722 · Cited by 20
O’Hara, N. N., Slobogean, G. P., Mohammadi, T., Marra, C. A., Vicente, M. R., Khakban, A., & McKee, M. D. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1503/cjs.011915 · Cited by 20
Evaluating patient preference and satisfaction for human immunodeficiency virus therapy in France
Brégigeon, S., Chéret, A., Cabie, A., Prazuck, T., Volny‐Anne, A., Ali, S., Bottomley, C. J., Finkielsztejn, L., Philippe, C., & Parienti, J. (2017) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s130276 · Cited by 20
Danne, M., & Mußhoff, O. (2017) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-12756 · Cited by 20
Bolt, T., Mahlich, J., Nakamura, Y., & Nakayama, M. (2018) · Clinical Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.12.012 · Cited by 20
Carroll, F. E., Gooberman‐Hill, R., Strange, S., Blom, A. W., & Moore, A. J. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031645 · Cited by 20
Tobin, K., Maguire, S., Corr, B., Normand, C. E. M., Hardiman, O. M., & Galvin, M. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-06191-z · Cited by 20
Wanders, J. O. P., Veldwijk, J., de Wit, G. A., Hart, H. E., van Gils, P. F., & Lambooij, M. (2014) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-870 · Cited by 20
Antonini, M., Genie, M. G., Attwell, K., Attema, A. E., Ward, J. K., Melegaro, A., Torbica, A., Kelly, B. J., Berardi, C., Sequeira, A. R., et al. (2025) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117687 · Cited by 20
Vellinga, A., Devine, C., Ho, M. Y., Clarke, C., Leahy, P., Bourke, J., Devane, D., Duane, S., & Kearney, P. M. (2020) · Research Ethics · doi:10.1177/1747016119898669 · Cited by 19
Preventive healthcare facility location planning with quality-conscious clients
Krohn, R., Müller, S., & Haase, K. (2020) · OR Spectrum · doi:10.1007/s00291-020-00605-w · Cited by 19
Janse, S., Janssen, E. M., Huwig, T., Roy, U. B., Ferris, A. A., Presley, C. J., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2021) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1080/03007995.2021.1888707 · Cited by 19
Villanueva, A. J., Salazar‐Ordóñez, M., Granado‐Díaz, R., & Rodríguez‐Entrena, M. (2021) · Italian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1080/1828051x.2021.1982419 · Cited by 21
Nicolet, A., Perraudin, C., Wagner, J., Gilles, I., Krucien, N., Peytremann‐Bridevaux, I., & Marti, J. (2022) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-021-00568-2 · Cited by 19
Broomfield, G., Brown, S. D., & Yap, M. B. H. (2022) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2022.100522 · Cited by 23
Parental preference for influenza vaccine for children in China: a discrete choice experiment
Li, S., Gong, T., Chen, G., Liu, P., Lai, X., Rong, H., Ma, X., Hou, Z., & Fang, H. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055725 · Cited by 19
Zhang, M., He, X., Wu, J. H., Wang, X., Jiang, Q., & Xie, F. (2022) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2022.05.003 · Cited by 19
Patient preferences for pilonidal sinus treatments: A discrete choice experiment survey
Wickramasekera, N., Strong, E. B., Shackley, P., Callaghan, T., Lee, M. J., Hind, D., Brown, S. R., & PITSTOP Project Management Group and PITSTOP Collaborators (2023) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1111/codi.16482 · Cited by 19
Thomas, C., Ailawadhi, S., Popat, R., Kleinman, D. M., Ross, M., Gorsh, B., Mulnick, S., O’Neill, A., Paka, P., Hanna, M., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2023.1271657 · Cited by 19
Predicting the place of out-of-hours care—A market simulation based on discrete choice analysis
Philips, H., Mahr, D., Remmen, R., Weverbergh, M., Graeve, D. D., & Royen, P. V. (2012) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.04.010 · Cited by 19
Cunningham, C. E., Henderson, J. L., Niccols, A., Dobbins, M., Sword, W. A., Chen, Y., Mielko, S., Milligan, K., Lipman, E. L., Thabane, L., et al. (2012) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03832.x · Cited by 20
Stochastic variational inference for large-scale discrete choice models using adaptive batch sizes
Tan, L. S. L. (2015) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/s11222-015-9618-x · Cited by 19
What factors drive heterogeneity of preferences for micro-health insurance in rural Malawi?
Abiiro, G. A., Torbica, A., Kwalamasa, K., & Allegri, M. D. (2016) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czw049 · Cited by 19
Eliciting Preferences for Information Provision in Newborn Bloodspot Screening Programs
Wright, S. J., Ulph, F., Dharni, N., & Payne, K. (2017) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.007 · Cited by 19
Discrete choice experiment validation: A resource project case study
Que, S., Awuah-Offei, K., Weidner, N., & Wang, Y.-M. (2017) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2017.01.006 · Cited by 19
Whitaker, K. L., Ghanouni, A., Zhou, Y., Lyratzopoulos, G., & Stephen Morris, A. (2017) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp17x690905 · Cited by 19
Salloum, R. G., Louviere, J. J., Getz, K. R., Islam, F., Anshari, D., Cho, Y. J., O’Connor, R. J., Hammond, D. G., & Thrasher, J. F. (2017) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053579 · Cited by 19
Self-citationDeidda, M., Meleddu, M., & Pulina, M. (2018) · Health Policy and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2018.04.002 · Cited by 19
Eaton, S., Biggerstaff, D. L., Petrou, S., Osipenko, L., Gibbs, J., Estcourt, C. S., Sadiq, S. T., & Szczepura, A. K. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023663 · Cited by 19
Shapiro, L. M., Eppler, S. L., Baker, L. C., Harris, A. H. S., Gardner, M. J., & Kamal, R. N. (2019) · The Journal Of Hand Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.07.010 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle University (GB)
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Lancsar, Emily
- Venue
- PharmacoEconomics
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 661-677
- ISSN
- 1170-7690 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122707212
- Cited by
- 1,707
- References
- 107
- Citations by year
- 2026: 159 · 2025: 163 · 2024: 156 · 2023: 155 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 135 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 55.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- PharmacoEconomics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- discrete choice experiment, healthcare decision-making, outcome measurement, economic evaluation, cost-benefit analysis, cost-utility analysis, preference elicitation, questionnaire design, validity, welfare analysis, policy analysis
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Health, Choice Behavior, Consumer Behavior, Costs and Cost Analysis, Health Services Research, Humans, Policy Making, Models, Econometric, Patient Satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
