The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making: A User??s Guide
Open accessAbstract
Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are regularly used in health economics to elicit preferences for healthcare products and programmes. There is growing recognition that DCEs can provide more than information on preferences and, in particular, they have the potential to contribute more directly to outcome measurement for use in economic evaluation. Almost uniquely, DCEs could potentially contribute to outcome measurement for use in both cost-benefit and cost-utility analysis. Within this expanding remit, our intention is to provide a resource for current practitioners as well as those considering undertaking a DCE, using DCE results in a policy/commercial context, or reviewing a DCE. We present the fundamental principles and theory underlying DCEs. To aid in undertaking and assessing the quality of DCEs, we discuss the process of carrying out a choice study and have developed a checklist covering conceptualizing the choice process, selecting attributes and levels, experimental design, questionnaire design, pilot testing, sampling and sample size, data collection, coding of data, econometric analysis, validity, interpretation and welfare and policy analysis. In this fast-moving area, a number of issues remain on the research frontier. We therefore outline potentially fruitful areas for future research associated both with DCEs in general, and with health applications specifically, paying attention to how the results of DCEs can be used in economic evaluation. We also discuss emerging research trends. We conclude that if appropriately designed, implemented, analysed and interpreted, DCEs offer several advantages in the health sector, the most important of which is that they provide rich data sources for economic evaluation and decision making, allowing investigation of many types of questions, some of which otherwise would be intractable analytically. Thus, they offer viable alternatives and complements to existing methods of valuation and preference elicitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We followed recommended guidelines to design and implement the DCE. [7, 8, 11–16]”
From Assessing the American public's preferences for reforms to teen driving licensure systems: a discrete choice experiment (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“The opt-out option has the potential to make the choices more realistic [34] by simulating a real-world context where individuals can exercise their right not to take up an app, given the apps on offer [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“However, this type of design is often considered impractical due to the high number of choice tasks required [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“The higher the number of attributes, alternatives, and choice tasks, the higher the task complexity [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“When a range is not wide enough, there is a risk that participants could ignore the attributes because they judge the difference between levels to be insignificant [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“When perfect orthogonality and balance cannot be achieved or are not desirable, an efficient design can be applied [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior
McFadden, D. L. (1972) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 14,203
Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
Drummond, M. E., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198529446.001.0001 · Cited by 13,648
Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method
Dillman, D. A. (2007) · Cited by 9,587
A New Approach to Consumer Theory
Lancaster, K. J. (1966) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/259131 · Cited by 8,471
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait́, J., & Adamowicz, W. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753831 · Cited by 7,008
Self-citationA New Approach to Consumer Theory
Lancaster, K. J. (1976) · Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-51565-1_34 · Cited by 6,946
Addelman, S., Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (1979) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1267766 · Cited by 6,753
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Hensher, 1983, Transport Res, 890, 11
- Ryan, 2003, Applied Health Econ Health Policy, 2, 55
- Chakraborty, 1994, J Health Care Mark, 14, 21
- Swait, 1993, JMark Res, 30, 305
- Longo, 2006, Br J Gen Practice, 56, 35
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,001
Larsen, A., Tele, A., & Kumar, M. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-06499-w · Cited by 47
How to attract health students to remote areas in Indonesia: a discrete choice experiment
Efendi, F., Chen, C., Nursalam, N., Andriyani, N. W. F., Kurniati, A., & Nancarrow, S. (2015) · The International Journal of Health Planning and Management · doi:10.1002/hpm.2289 · Cited by 46
Michaels-Igbokwe, C., MacDonald, S. E., & Currie, G. R. (2017) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-017-0244-x · Cited by 47
Zhou, H., Norman, R., Xia, J. C., Hughes, B., Kelobonye, K., Nikolova, G., & Falkmer, T. (2020) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2020.04.020 · Cited by 48
Diks, M. E., Hiligsmann, M., & van der Putten, I. M. (2021) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/s12879-021-06398-9 · Cited by 48
Simoni, J. M., Tapia, K., Lee, S.-J., Graham, S. M., Beima-Sofie, K., Mohamed, Z. H., Christodoulou, J., Ho, R., & Collier, A. C. (2020) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-019-02701-7 · Cited by 45
Important features of home-based support services for older Australians and their informal carers
McCaffrey, N., Gill, L., Kaambwa, B., Cameron, I. D., Patterson, J., Crotty, M., & Ratcliffe, J. (2015) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1111/hsc.12185 · Cited by 45
Wong, S. F., Norman, R., Dunning, T. L., Ashley, D. M., & Lorgelly, P. K. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006661 · Cited by 45
Tang, C., Xu, J., & Zhang, M. (2016) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1829-0 · Cited by 45
Chen, W. Y., Liekens, I., & Broekx, S. (2017) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-017-0885-5 · Cited by 48
Incorporating equity in economic evaluations: a multi-attribute equity state approach
Round, J. A., & Paulden, M. (2017) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-017-0897-3 · Cited by 45
Determann, D., Gyrd‐Hansen, D., de Wit, G. A., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Steyerberg, E. W., Lambooij, M., & Pedersen, L. B. (2019) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x19862275 · Cited by 45
Gao, S., & Wang, C. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126712 · Cited by 45
Achievement of Sustained Net Plasma Heating in a Fusion Experiment with the Optometrist Algorithm
Baltz, E. A., Trask, E., Binderbauer, M. W., Dikovsky, M., Hiroshi, G. O. T. A., Mendoza, R., Platt, J. C., & Riley, P. F. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-06645-7 · Cited by 45
Barber, S., Bekker, H., Marti, J., Pavitt, S. H., Khambay, B., & Meads, D. M. (2018) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-018-0338-0 · Cited by 44
Constraints to adopting soil fertility management practices in Malawi: A choice experiment approach
Krah, K., Michelson, H., Perge, E., & Jindal, R. (2019) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104651 · Cited by 46
Boyden, J. Y., Feudtner, C., Deatrick, J. A., Widger, K. A., LaRagione, G., Lord, B. T., & Ersek, M. T. (2021) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-020-00703-0 · Cited by 44
Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review
Vass, C., Gray, E., & Payne, K. (2015) · International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy · doi:10.1007/s11096-015-0221-1 · Cited by 44
McNamara, A., Chen, G., George, S., WALKER, R. B., & Ratcliffe, J. (2013) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2013.02.034 · Cited by 43
Howard, K., Gerard, K., Adelson, P. L., Bryce, R. L., Wilkinson, C., & Turnbull, D. A. (2014) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-330 · Cited by 43
Random Regret-Based Discrete-Choice Modelling: An Application to Healthcare
de Bekker-Grob, E. W., & Chorus, C. G. (2013) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-013-0059-0 · Cited by 43
Association of Preferences for Papillary Thyroid Cancer Treatment With Disease Terminology
Nickel, B., Howard, K., Brito, J. P., Barratt, A. L., Moynihan, R. N., & McCaffery, K. J. (2018) · JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2018.1694 · Cited by 44
Tünneßen, M., Hiligsmann, M., Stock, S., & Vennedey, V. (2020) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2020.1725022 · Cited by 44
Lack, A., Hiligsmann, M., Bloem, P. N., Tünneßen, M., & Hutubessy, R. C. W. (2020) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.08.078 · Cited by 43
Milte, R., Ratcliffe, J., Chen, G., Lancsar, E., Miller, M., & Crotty, M. (2014) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2014.05.005 · Cited by 43
Self-citationCorazza, I., Pennucci, F., & Rosis, S. D. (2021) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.03.014 · Cited by 42
Najafzadeh, M., Lynd, L. D., Davis, J. C., Bryan, S., Anis, A. H., Marra, M. A., & Marra, C. A. (2012) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2011.26 · Cited by 42
Essers, B. A. B., van Helvoort-Postulart, D., Prins, M. H., NEUMANN, M. H. A. M., & Dirksen, C. D. (2010) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.2165/11532240-000000000-00000 · Cited by 42
Makkar, S. R., Turner, T., Williamson, A. B., Louviere, J. J., Redman, S., Haynes, A. S., Green, S., & Brennan, S. (2015) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0069-9 · Cited by 42
Self-citationVass, C., & Payne, K. (2017) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-017-0518-0 · Cited by 42
Economic Evaluations of Public Health Surveillance Systems: a Systematic Review
Herida, M., Dervaux, B., & Desenclos, J. (2016) · European Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckv250 · Cited by 42
Alayli, A., Dellaert, B. G. C., Knox, S. A., Ament, A. J. H. A., Lakerveld, J., Bot, S. D. M., Nijpels, G., & Severens, J. L. (2013) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2211 · Cited by 41
Men's preferences and trade‐offs for prostate cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment
Howard, K., Salkeld, G. P., Patel, M. I., Mann, G. J., & Pignone, M. P. (2014) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12301 · Cited by 41
Job preferences for medical students in China
Liu, S., Li, S., Yang, R., Liu, T., & Chen, G. (2018) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000012358 · Cited by 41
Pignone, M. P., Howard, K., Brenner, A. T., Crutchfield, T. M., Hawley, S. T., Lewis, C. L., & Sheridan, S. (2013) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2651 · Cited by 41
Jaynes, J., Wong, W. K., & Xu, H. (2016) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.6882 · Cited by 40
Sever, I., & Verbič, M. (2017) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.003 · Cited by 40
Assessing Smoking Cessation Messages with a Discrete Choice Experiment
Thrasher, J. F., Anshari, D., Lambert, V., Islam, F., Mead, E. L., Popova, L., Salloum, R. G., Moodie, C. S., Louviere, J. J., & Lindblom, E. N. (2018) · Tobacco Regulatory Science · doi:10.18001/trs.4.2.7 · Cited by 40
Self-citationPreferences for linkage to HIV care services following a reactive self-test
d’Elbée, M., Indravudh, P. P., Mwenge, L., Kumwenda, M., Simwinga, M., Choko, A. T., Hensen, B., Neuman, M., Ong, J. J., Sibanda, E. L., et al. (2018) · AIDS · doi:10.1097/qad.0000000000001918 · Cited by 40
Holmes, E. A. F., Plumpton, C., Baker, G. A., Jacoby, A., Ring, A., Williamson, P. R., Marson, A. G., & Hughes, D. A. (2018) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/cpt.1231 · Cited by 40
What can discrete choice experiments do for you?
Cleland, J., Porteous, T., & Skåtun, D. (2018) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.13657 · Cited by 40
Preferences of people with Type 2 diabetes for diabetes care: a discrete choice experiment
Hertroijs, D. F. L., Elissen, A., Brouwers, M. C. G. J., Hiligsmann, M., Schaper, N. C., & Ruwaard, D. (2019) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/dme.13969 · Cited by 40
Jiang, S., Ren, R., Gu, Y., Jeet, V., Liu, P., & Li, S. (2022) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-022-01198-8 · Cited by 39
Eliciting Preferences to Inform Patient-Centred Policies: the Case of Psoriasis
Torbica, A., Fattore, G., & Ayala, F. (2014) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-013-0126-6 · Cited by 39
TO “VAPE” OR SMOKE? EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE ON ADULT SMOKERS
Marti, J., Buckell, J., Maclean, J. C., & Sindelar, J. L. (2018) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/ecin.12693 · Cited by 39
Analysis of Academic Literature on Environmental Valuation
Guijarro, F., & Tsinaslanidis, P. E. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17072386 · Cited by 39
Merlo, G., van Driel, M., & Hall, L. (2020) · Health Economics Review · doi:10.1186/s13561-020-00295-8 · Cited by 39
Does the Inclusion of a Cost Attribute in Forced and Unforced Choices Matter?
Pedersen, L. B., Kjær, T., Kragstrup, J., & Gyrd‐Hansen, D. (2011) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/s1755-5345(13)70044-7 · Cited by 39
Can Patients Diagnosed with Schizophrenia Complete Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis Tasks?
Bridges, J. F. P., Kinter, E. T., Schmeding, A., Rudolph, I., & Mühlbacher, A. C. (2011) · Patient · doi:10.2165/11589190-000000000-00000 · Cited by 39
Mariel, P., Hoyos, D., Meyerhoff, J., Czajkowski, M., Dekker, T., Glenk, K., Jacobsen, J. B., Liebe, U., Olsen, S. B., Sagebiel, J., et al. (2020) · SpringerBriefs in economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62669-3_2 · Cited by 39
Discrete choice experiments in pharmacy: a review of the literature
Naik-Panvelkar, P., Armour, C. L., & Saini, B. (2012) · International Journal of Pharmacy Practice · doi:10.1111/ijpp.12002 · Cited by 38
Patients' valuation of the prescribing nurse in primary care: a discrete choice experiment
Gerard, K., Tinelli, M., Latter, S. M., Smith, A. J., & Blenkinsopp, A. (2014) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12193 · Cited by 38
Whitty, J. A., Burton, P., Kendall, E. A., Ratcliffe, J., Wilson, A. J., Littlejohns, P., & Scuffham, P. (2014) · International Journal of Health Policy and Management · doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2014.61 · Cited by 38
Chinese consumer trust and preferences for organic labels from different regions
Chen, M., Wang, Y., Yin, S., Hu, W., & Han, F. (2019) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-02-2018-0128 · Cited by 38
Pavlova, M., Hendrix, M. J. C., Nouwens, E., Nijhuis, J. G., & van Merode, G. G. (2009) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.05.008 · Cited by 38
The Preferences of Shared Micro-Mobility Users in Urban Areas
Jaber, A., Hamadneh, J., & Csonka, B. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3297083 · Cited by 37
Parents’ preferences and willingness-to-pay for human papilloma virus vaccines in Thailand
Ngorsuraches, S., Nawanukool, K., Petcharamanee, K., & Poopantrakool, U. (2015) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice · doi:10.1186/s40545-015-0040-8 · Cited by 37
Veldwijk, J., Determann, D., Lambooij, M., van Til, J. A., Korfage, I. J., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., & de Wit, G. A. (2016) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0140-4 · Cited by 42
Consumer preferences for food allergen labeling
Marra, C. A., Harvard, S. S., Grubisić, M., Galo, J. S., Clarke, A. E., Elliott, S. J., & Lynd, L. D. (2017) · Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1186/s13223-017-0189-6 · Cited by 37
Watson, A. J. M., Cook, J., Hudson, J., Kilonzo, M. M., Wood, J., Bruhn, H., Brown, S. R., Buckley, B. S., Curran, F., Jayne, D. G., et al. (2017) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta21700 · Cited by 37
Patients’ Preferences in Anticoagulant Therapy
Najafzadeh, M., Gagne, J. J., Choudhry, N. K., Polinski, J. M., Avorn, J., & Schneeweiß, S. (2014) · Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · doi:10.1161/circoutcomes.114.001013 · Cited by 38
Talati, Z., Norman, R., Kelly, B., Dixon, H., Neal, B. C., Miller, C. L., & Pettigrew, S. (2018) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqy248 · Cited by 37
Vass, C., Davison, N., Stichele, G. V., & Payne, K. (2019) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-019-00391-w · Cited by 37
Heidenreich, S., Phillips-Beyer, A., Flamion, B., Ross, M., Seo, J., & Marsh, K. (2020) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-020-00475-y · Cited by 37
Johnson, P. T., Bancroft, T., Barron, R. L., Legg, J. C., Li, X., Watson, H. H., Naeim, A., Watkins, A. K., & Marshall, D. A. (2014) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2014.01.002 · Cited by 37
Krucien, N., Gafni, A., & Pelletier‐Fleury, N. (2014) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.3076 · Cited by 36
Cheng, J., Pullenayegum, E., Marshall, D. A., Marshall, J. K., & Thabane, L. (2012) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-15 · Cited by 36
Veldwijk, J., Lambooij, M., van Gils, P. F., Struijs, J. N., Smit, H. A., & de Wit, G. A. (2013) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-1099 · Cited by 36
Revicki, D. A., King, M. T., Viney, R. C., Pickard, A. S., Mercieca‐Bebber, R., Shaw, J. W., Müller, F., & Norman, R. (2021) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x211003569 · Cited by 36
King, M. T., Norman, R., Mercieca‐Bebber, R., Costa, D. S. J., McTaggart-Cowan, H. M., Peacock, S. J., Janda, M., Müller, F., Viney, R. C., Pickard, A. S., et al. (2021) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2021.01.007 · Cited by 36
Ratcliffe, J., Bourke, S., Li, J., Mulhern, B. J., Hutchinson, C. L., Khadka, J., Milte, R., & Lancsar, E. (2022) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-022-01158-2 · Cited by 36
Self-citationChronic pain patients’ treatment preferences: a discrete-choice experiment
Mühlbacher, A. C., JUNKER, U., Juhnke, C., Stemmler, E., Kohlmann, T., Leverkus, F., & Nübling, M. (2014) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-014-0614-4 · Cited by 36
Shafey, M., Lupichuk, S. M., Do, T., Owen, C., & Stewart, D. A. (2010) · Bone Marrow Transplantation · doi:10.1038/bmt.2010.225 · Cited by 36
Nurses' decision on seclusion: patient characteristics, contextual factors and reflexivity in teams
Boumans, C. E., Egger, J. I. M., Souren, P. M., Mann-Poll, P. S., & Hutschemaekers, G. J. M. (2011) · Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01777.x · Cited by 36
Scuffham, P., Ratcliffe, J., Kendall, E. A., Burton, P., Wilson, A. J., Chalkidou, K., Littlejohns, P., & Whitty, J. A. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005437 · Cited by 36
Howard, K., Salkeld, G. P., Pignone, M. P., Hewett, P. J., Cheung, P., Olsen, J. R., Clapton, W., & Roberts‐Thomson, I. C. (2011) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2011.07.012 · Cited by 37
Consumer preferences for telehealth in Australia: A discrete choice experiment
Savira, F., Robinson, S., Toll, K., Spark, L. C., Thomas, E., Nesbitt, J., Frean, I., & Norman, R. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0283821 · Cited by 37
Preferences for Palliative and End-of-Life Care: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments
Xia, Q., Kularatna, M., Virdun, C., Button, E., Close, E., & Carter, H. E. (2023) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2023.07.005 · Cited by 35
Guo, N., Marra, C. A., FitzGerald, J. M., Elwood, R. K., Anis, A. H., & Marra, F. (2011) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2011.05.003 · Cited by 35
Newman, P. A., Cameron, M. P., Roungprakhon, S., Tepjan, S., & Riccardo Scarpa, A. (2015) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-015-1258-9 · Cited by 35
A systematic review on methods used to evaluate patient preferences in psoriasis treatments
Gutknecht, M., Schaarschmidt, M., Herrlein, O., & Augustin, M. (2016) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.13749 · Cited by 35
Consumer Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Nutraceuticals: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Teoh, S. L., Ngorsuraches, S., Lai, N. M., & Chaiyakunapruk, N. (2021) · Value in Health Regional Issues · doi:10.1016/j.vhri.2020.09.003 · Cited by 35
Do Preferences for Urban Amenities Really Differ by Skill?
Arntz, M., Brüll, E., & Lipowski, C. (2021) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/lbac025 · Cited by 35
Community Preferences for the Allocation of Donor Organs for Transplantation
Howard, K., Jan, S., Rose, J. M., Wong, G., Irving, M. J., Tong, A., Craig, J. C., Chadban, S. J., Allen, R. D. M., & Cass, A. (2014) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/tp.0000000000000365 · Cited by 36
Pedersen, L. B., Kjær, T., Kragstrup, J., & Gyrd‐Hansen, D. (2012) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.01.002 · Cited by 36
Parents’ Preferences for Enhanced Access in the Pediatric Medical Home
Zickafoose, J. S., DeCamp, L. R., & Prosser, L. A. (2015) · Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3534 · Cited by 35
Mühlbacher, A. C., & Bethge, S. (2015) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-015-0750-5 · Cited by 36
Guerra, R. L., Castaneda, L., de Albuquerque, R. D. C. R., Ferreira, C. B. T., Corrêa, F. D. M., Fernandes, R. R. A., & de Almeida, L. M. (2019) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-019-00375-w · Cited by 35
Rimkutė, D., & van der Voet, J. (2023) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13749 · Cited by 34
Vass, C., Rigby, D., & Payne, K. (2017) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.010 · Cited by 34
Černauskas, V., Angeli, F., Jaiswal, A., & Pavlova, M. (2018) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3264-x · Cited by 34
Umar, N., Quaife, M., Exley, J., Shuaibu, A., Hill, Z. E., & Marchant, T. (2020) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002135 · Cited by 35
What health plans do people prefer? The trade-off between premium and provider choice
Determann, D., Lambooij, M., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Hayen, A. P., Varkevisser, M., Schut, E., & de Wit, G. A. (2016) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.022 · Cited by 34
Hiligsmann, M., Dellaert, B. G. C., Dirksen, C. D., Watson, V., Bours, S., Goemaere, S., Reginster, J., Roux, C., McGowan, B., Silke, C., et al. (2017) · Rheumatology · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kex071 · Cited by 34
Bywall, K. S., Kihlbom, U., HANSSON, M. G., Falahee, M., Raza, K., Baecklund, E., & Veldwijk, J. (2020) · Arthritis Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13075-020-02391-w · Cited by 34
van der Voet, J., & Lerusse, A. (2024) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muae011 · Cited by 34
Buttorff, C., Trujillo, A. J., Diez‐Canseco, F., Bernabé‐Ortiz, A., & Miranda, J. J. (2015) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.06.033 · Cited by 33
Rotteveel, A. H., Lambooij, M., Zuithoff, N. P. A., van Exel, J. N. A., Moons, K. G. M., & de Wit, G. A. (2020) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-020-00890-x · Cited by 36
Preferences for COVID-19 epidemic control measures among French adults: a discrete choice experiment
Sicsic, J., Blondel, S., Chyderiotis, S., Langot, F., & Mueller, J. E. (2022) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-022-01454-w · Cited by 33
Attributes Used for Cancer Screening Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review
Hall, R., Medina‐Lara, A., Hamilton, W. T., & Spencer, A. E. (2021) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-021-00559-3 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle University (GB)
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Lancsar, Emily
- Venue
- PharmacoEconomics
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 661-677
- ISSN
- 1170-7690 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122707212
- Cited by
- 1,707
- References
- 107
- Citations by year
- 2026: 159 · 2025: 163 · 2024: 156 · 2023: 155 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 135 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 55.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- PharmacoEconomics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- discrete choice experiment, healthcare decision-making, outcome measurement, economic evaluation, cost-benefit analysis, cost-utility analysis, preference elicitation, questionnaire design, validity, welfare analysis, policy analysis
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Health, Choice Behavior, Consumer Behavior, Costs and Cost Analysis, Health Services Research, Humans, Policy Making, Models, Econometric, Patient Satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
