The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making: A User??s Guide
Open accessAbstract
Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are regularly used in health economics to elicit preferences for healthcare products and programmes. There is growing recognition that DCEs can provide more than information on preferences and, in particular, they have the potential to contribute more directly to outcome measurement for use in economic evaluation. Almost uniquely, DCEs could potentially contribute to outcome measurement for use in both cost-benefit and cost-utility analysis. Within this expanding remit, our intention is to provide a resource for current practitioners as well as those considering undertaking a DCE, using DCE results in a policy/commercial context, or reviewing a DCE. We present the fundamental principles and theory underlying DCEs. To aid in undertaking and assessing the quality of DCEs, we discuss the process of carrying out a choice study and have developed a checklist covering conceptualizing the choice process, selecting attributes and levels, experimental design, questionnaire design, pilot testing, sampling and sample size, data collection, coding of data, econometric analysis, validity, interpretation and welfare and policy analysis. In this fast-moving area, a number of issues remain on the research frontier. We therefore outline potentially fruitful areas for future research associated both with DCEs in general, and with health applications specifically, paying attention to how the results of DCEs can be used in economic evaluation. We also discuss emerging research trends. We conclude that if appropriately designed, implemented, analysed and interpreted, DCEs offer several advantages in the health sector, the most important of which is that they provide rich data sources for economic evaluation and decision making, allowing investigation of many types of questions, some of which otherwise would be intractable analytically. Thus, they offer viable alternatives and complements to existing methods of valuation and preference elicitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We followed recommended guidelines to design and implement the DCE. [7, 8, 11–16]”
From Assessing the American public's preferences for reforms to teen driving licensure systems: a discrete choice experiment (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“The opt-out option has the potential to make the choices more realistic [34] by simulating a real-world context where individuals can exercise their right not to take up an app, given the apps on offer [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“However, this type of design is often considered impractical due to the high number of choice tasks required [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“The higher the number of attributes, alternatives, and choice tasks, the higher the task complexity [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“When a range is not wide enough, there is a risk that participants could ignore the attributes because they judge the difference between levels to be insignificant [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“When perfect orthogonality and balance cannot be achieved or are not desirable, an efficient design can be applied [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior
McFadden, D. L. (1972) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 14,203
Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
Drummond, M. E., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198529446.001.0001 · Cited by 13,648
Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method
Dillman, D. A. (2007) · Cited by 9,587
A New Approach to Consumer Theory
Lancaster, K. J. (1966) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/259131 · Cited by 8,471
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait́, J., & Adamowicz, W. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753831 · Cited by 7,008
Self-citationA New Approach to Consumer Theory
Lancaster, K. J. (1976) · Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-51565-1_34 · Cited by 6,946
Addelman, S., Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (1979) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1267766 · Cited by 6,753
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Hensher, 1983, Transport Res, 890, 11
- Ryan, 2003, Applied Health Econ Health Policy, 2, 55
- Chakraborty, 1994, J Health Care Mark, 14, 21
- Swait, 1993, JMark Res, 30, 305
- Longo, 2006, Br J Gen Practice, 56, 35
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,001
Komine, M., Kim, H., Yi, J., Zhong, Y., Sakai, Y., Crawford, B., Habiro, K., Hikichi, Y., & Feldman, S. R. (2023) · The Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/1346-8138.16746 · Cited by 32
Nafees, B., Lloyd, A. J., Ziani, E., Nicolas, L., Soubeyrand, B., Bornhöft, C., & Fordham, B. (2015) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s87229 · Cited by 32
Nafees, B., Setyawan, J., Lloyd, A. J., Ali, S., Hearn, S., Sasané, R., Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S., & Hodgkins, P. (2014) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-013-0515-6 · Cited by 32
Hofman, R., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Richardus, J. H., de Koning, H. J., van Ballegooijen, M., & Korfage, I. J. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104772 · Cited by 32
Burnett, H. F., Regier, D. A., Feldman, B. M., Miller, F. A., & Ungar, W. J. (2012) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.21698 · Cited by 35
Bottomley, C. J., Lloyd, A. J., Gary, B., & Adlard, N. (2017) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2017.1336099 · Cited by 32
Sun, H., Wang, H., Xu, N., Li, J., Shi, J., Zhou, N., Ni, M., Hu, X., & Chen, Y. (2019) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s224529 · Cited by 32
McGrady, M. E., Pai, A. L. H., & Prosser, L. A. (2020) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2020.1715813 · Cited by 32
Sharma, M., Ong, J. J., Celum, C., & Terris‐Prestholt, F. (2020) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100653 · Cited by 32
del Bosque, C. I. E., Spiller, A., & Risius, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13052440 · Cited by 32
Laba, T., Brien, J.-A. E., & Jan, S. (2012) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/1471-2296-13-61 · Cited by 32
Patient Preferences for a Polypill for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases
Laba, T., Howard, K., Rose, J. M., Peiris, D., Redfern, J., Usherwood, T. P., Cass, A., Patel, A. A., & Jan, S. (2015) · Annals of Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1177/1060028015570468 · Cited by 32
Najafzadeh, M., Johnston, K., Peacock, S. J., Connors, J. M., Marra, M. A., Lynd, L. D., & Marra, C. A. (2013) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-454 · Cited by 32
Mahumud, R. A., Alamgir, N. I., Hossain, M. T., Baruwa, E. M., Sultana, M., Gow, J., Alam, K., Ahmed, S. M., & Khan, J. A. M. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm8020132 · Cited by 32
Job preferences for healthcare administration students in China: A discrete choice experiment
Liu, S., Li, S., Li, Y., Wang, H., Zhao, J., & Chen, G. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0211345 · Cited by 32
Willingness to pay for long-term home care services: Evidence from a stated preferences analysis
Amilon, A., Ladenburg, J., Sirén, A., & Østergaard, S. V. (2020) · The Journal of the Economics of Ageing · doi:10.1016/j.jeoa.2020.100238 · Cited by 32
Foote, C., Morton, R. L., Jardine, M., Gallagher, M., Brown, M. A., Howard, K., & Cass, A. (2014) · Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfu257 · Cited by 31
Adolescent values for immunisation programs in Australia: A discrete choice experiment
Wang, B., Chen, G., Ratcliffe, J., Afzali, H. H. A., Giles, L. C., & Marshall, H. S. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181073 · Cited by 31
Carer preferences for home support services in later stage dementia
Kampanellou, E., Chester, H., Davies, L. M., Davies, S., Giebel, C. M., Hughes, J., Challis, D., Clarkson, P., & Members of the HOST-D (Home Support in Dementia) Programme Management Group (2017) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2017.1394441 · Cited by 31
de Freitas, H. M., Ito, T., Hadi, M., Al-Jassar, G., Henry-Szatkowski, M., Nafees, B., & Lloyd, A. J. (2019) · Advances in Therapy · doi:10.1007/s12325-018-0861-3 · Cited by 31
Stated-preference research in HIV: A scoping review
Humphrey, J. M., Yebei, V. N., MacDonald, K. R., Wools‐Kaloustian, K., & Zimet, G. D. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0224566 · Cited by 31
Jia, E., Gu, Y., Peng, Y., Li, X., Shen, X., Jiang, M., & Xiong, J. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17113987 · Cited by 31
Shields, G., Brown, L., Adrian Wells, A., Capobianco, L., & Vass, C. (2020) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-020-00439-2 · Cited by 31
Krauth, C., Oedingen, C., Bartling, T., Dreier, M., Spura, A., Bock, F. D., von Rüden, U., Betsch, C., Korn, L., & Robra, B. (2021) · International Journal of Public Health · doi:10.3389/ijph.2021.591027 · Cited by 32
Rural Development and Rural Tourism: The Impact of Infrastructure Investments
de Almeida, A. M. M., & Machado, L. P. (2021) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.95610 · Cited by 31
Consumers' willingness to pay for food safety attributes of tomato
Joya, K., Ramli, N. N., Shamsudin, M. N., & Kamarulzaman, N. H. (2021) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-02-2021-0164 · Cited by 31
Seghieri, C., Mengoni, A., & Nuti, S. (2013) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-013-0542-8 · Cited by 31
Early rehabilitation management after stroke: What do stroke patients prefer?
Laver, K., Ratcliffe, J., George, S., Lester, L., WALKER, R. B., Burgess, L. C., & Crotty, M. (2011) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/16501977-0678 · Cited by 33
Eliciting Preferences for Key Attributes of Intrapartum Care in The Netherlands
Haken, T. M. V. H.-T., Pavlova, M., Hendrix, M. J. C., Nieuwenhuijze, M. J., Vries, R. G. D., & Nijhuis, J. G. (2014) · Birth · doi:10.1111/birt.12081 · Cited by 30
Hofman, R., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Raat, H., Helmerhorst, T. J. M., van Ballegooijen, M., & Korfage, I. J. (2014) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-454 · Cited by 30
Taste, choice and timing: Investigating resident and carer preferences for meals in aged care homes
Milte, R., Ratcliffe, J., Chen, G., Miller, M., & Crotty, M. (2018) · Nursing and Health Sciences · doi:10.1111/nhs.12394 · Cited by 30
Just how loyal are Islamic banking customers?
Ireland, J. (2018) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-09-2016-0138 · Cited by 30
Zhu, S., Chang, J., Hayat, K., Li, P., Ji, W., & Fang, Y. (2020) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.11.020 · Cited by 30
Bao, M., & Huang, C. (2021) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02573-3 · Cited by 30
Preferences of the Public for Sharing Health Data: Discrete Choice Experiment
Johansson, J. V., Bentzen, H. B., Shah, N., Haraldsdóttir, E., Jónsdóttir, G. A., Kaye, J. S., Mascalzoni, D., & Veldwijk, J. (2021) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/29614 · Cited by 31
Gregory, J. W., Robling, M. R., Bennert, K., Channon, S., Cohen, D. R., Crowne, E. C., Hambly, H., Hawthorne, K., Hood, K., Longo, M., et al. (2011) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta15290 · Cited by 30
Robyn, P. J., Bärnighausen, T., Souares, A., Savadogo, G., Bicaba, B. W., Sié, A., & Sauerborn, R. (2012) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-159 · Cited by 30
Dong, D., Özdemir, S., Bee, Y. M., Toh, S.-A. E. S., Bilger, M., & Finkelstein, E. A. (2016) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2016.03.1837 · Cited by 30
Biasiotto, R., Johansson, J. V., Alemu, M. B., Romano, V., Bentzen, H. B., Kaye, J. S., Ancillotti, M., Blom, J. M. C., Chassang, G., Hallinan, D., et al. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/47066 · Cited by 31
Benning, T. M., Dellaert, B. G. C., Severens, J. L., & Dirksen, C. D. (2014) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2014.04.007 · Cited by 29
Bolt, T., Kobayashi, H., & Mahlich, J. (2018) · PharmacoEconomics - Open · doi:10.1007/s41669-018-0104-1 · Cited by 29
Stenehjem, D. D., Au, T. H., Ngorsuraches, S., Ma, J., Bauer, H., Wanishayakorn, T., Nelson, R., Pfeiffer, C. M., Schwartz, J. M., Korytowsky, B., et al. (2019) · Melanoma Research · doi:10.1097/cmr.0000000000000572 · Cited by 29
Livingstone, K. M., Lamb, K. E., Abbott, G., Worsley, T., & McNaughton, S. A. (2020) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-020-01059-7 · Cited by 29
Coxon, D., Frisher, M., Jinks, C., Jordan, K. P., Paskins, Z., & Peat, G. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009625 · Cited by 30
Michaels-Igbokwe, C., Lagarde, M., Cairns, J., & Terris‐Prestholt, F. (2014) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.016 · Cited by 29
Fegert, J. M., Slawik, L., Wermelskirchen, D., Nübling, M., & Mühlbacher, A. C. (2011) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1586/erp.11.22 · Cited by 29
Health-related quality of life in Parkinson’s: impact of ‘off’ time and stated treatment preferences
Kerr, C., Lloyd, E. J., Kosmas, C. E., Smith, H. T., Cooper, J. A., Johnston, K., McIntosh, E., & Lloyd, A. J. (2015) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-015-1187-0 · Cited by 29
Beidas, R. S., Volpp, K. G., Buttenheim, A. N., Marcus, S. C., Olfson, M., Pellecchia, M., Stewart, R. E., Williams, N. J., Becker-Haimes, E. M., Candon, M., et al. (2019) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/12121 · Cited by 28
Medical Shared Decision Making with a Virtual Agent
Zhang, Z., & Bickmore, T. (2018) · Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents · doi:10.1145/3267851.3267883 · Cited by 28
Quaife, M., Eakle, R., Cabrera, M., Vickerman, P. T., Tsepe, M., Cianci, F., Delany‐Moretlwe, S., & Terris‐Prestholt, F. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010682 · Cited by 28
Herrmann, A., Sanson‐Fisher, R., Hall, A. E., Wall, L., Zdenkowski, N., & Waller, A. E. (2017) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-017-3944-9 · Cited by 29
Public preferences for primary care provision in Germany – a discrete choice experiment
Krinke, K.-S., Tangermann, U., Amelung, V. E., & Krauth, C. (2019) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-019-0967-y · Cited by 28
Sun, H., Wang, H., Shi, L., Wang, M., Li, J., Shi, J., Ni, M., Hu, X., & Chen, Y. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032336 · Cited by 28
Goranitis, I., Best, S., Christodoulou, J., Boughtwood, T. F., & Stark, Z. (2021) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41431-021-00874-1 · Cited by 29
Ramos-Goñi, J. M., Estévez-Carrillo, A., Rivero‐Arias, O., Rowen, D., Mott, D. J., Shah, K. K., & Oppe, M. (2022) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2022.03.001 · Cited by 29
Goedegebuur, J., Abbel, D., Accassat, S., Achterberg, W. P., Akbari, A., Arfuch, V. M., Baddeley, E., Bax, J. J., Becker, D., Bergmeijer, B., et al. (2023) · Thrombosis Research · doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2023.05.008 · Cited by 28
Patients' preferences for treatment outcomes of add-on antiepileptic drugs: A conjoint analysis
Manjunath, R., Yang, J., & Ettinger, A. B. (2012) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.05.020 · Cited by 28
Willingness to Pay for Obesity Pharmacotherapy
Doyle, S., Lloyd, A. J., Birt, J. A., Curtis, B. H., Ali, S., Godbey, K., Sierra‐Johnson, J., & Halford, J. C. G. (2012) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2011.387 · Cited by 28
Hill, M. K., Suri, R., Nash, E. F., Stephen Morris, A., & Chitty, L. S. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm3010176 · Cited by 28
Farmers’ Willingness to Participate in a Carbon Sequestration Program – A Discrete Choice Experiment
Block, J. B., Danne, M., & Mußhoff, O. (2024) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-024-01963-9 · Cited by 30
Thrasher, J. F., Islam, F., Davis, R. E., Popova, L., Lambert, V., Cho, Y. J., Salloum, R. G., Louviere, J. J., & Hammond, D. G. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15020282 · Cited by 28
Self-citationMeasuring stroke patients’ exercise preferences using a discrete choice experiment
Geidl, W., Knocke, K., Schupp, W., & Pfeifer, K. (2018) · Neurology International · doi:10.4081/ni.2018.6993 · Cited by 27
Mott, D. J., Chami, N., & Tervonen, T. (2020) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.1831 · Cited by 27
How Do Parents Evaluate and Select Schools? Evidence From a Survey Experiment
Haderlein, S. A. K. (2021) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312211046360 · Cited by 27
Sarfo, Y., Mußhoff, O., Weber, R., & Danne, M. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0257909 · Cited by 30
Eliciting Health Care Preferences With Discrete Choice Experiments
O’Hara, N. N. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8794 · Cited by 27
Stated Preferences of Physicians and Chronic Pain Sufferers in the Use of Classic Strong Opioids
Chancellor, J. V. M., Martin, M., Liedgens, H., Baker, M. G., & Müller-Schwefe, G. H. H. (2011) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2011.07.002 · Cited by 27
Patient preferences for next generation neural prostheses to restore bladder function
Sanders, P., IJzerman, M. J., Roach, M. J., & Gustafson, K. J. (2010) · Spinal Cord · doi:10.1038/sc.2010.65 · Cited by 27
Benning, T. M., Kimman, M., Dirksen, C. D., Boersma, L. J., & Dellaert, B. G. C. (2012) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.04.007 · Cited by 27
Providing Informal Care in Terminal Illness
Hall, J. P., Kenny, P. M., Hossain, I., Street, D. J., & Knox, S. A. (2013) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x13500719 · Cited by 27
What criteria do decision makers in Thailand use to set priorities for vaccine introduction?
Pooripussarakul, S., Riewpaiboon, A., Bishai, D. M., Muangchana, C., & Tantivess, S. (2016) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3382-5 · Cited by 27
Harris, C. A., Shauver, M. J., Yuan, F., Nasser, J. S., & Chung, K. C. (2018) · The Journal Of Hand Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.03.001 · Cited by 27
Insurees’ preferences in hospital choice—A population-based study
Schuldt, J., Doktor, A., Lichters, M., Vogt, B., & Robra, B. (2017) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.08.004 · Cited by 26
Webb, E., O'Dwyer, J. L., Meads, D. M., Kind, P., & Wright, P. (2020) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-020-01173-0 · Cited by 26
Gwara, S., Wale, E. Z., Odindo, A. O., & Buckley, C. A. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12166490 · Cited by 27
FMCG firms’ margin management: consumer trade-offs among product price, quantity and quality
Wilkins, S., & Ireland, J. (2020) · Journal of Strategic Marketing · doi:10.1080/0965254x.2020.1849362 · Cited by 26
Angell, B. J., Khan, M., Islam, M. R., Mandeville, K., Naher, N., Hutchinson, E., McKee, M., Ahmed, S. M., & Balabanova, D. (2021) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006001 · Cited by 26
Zhang, X., Shao, C., Wang, B.-B., & Huang, S.-C. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19127130 · Cited by 25
Willingness to provide informal care to older adults in Germany: a discrete choice experiment
de Jong, L., Schmidt, T., Stahmeyer, J. T., Eberhard, S., Zeidler, J., & Damm, K. (2022) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-022-01483-5 · Cited by 26
Cornelisse, S., Vos, M. S., Groenewoud, H., Mastenbroek, S., Ramos, L., Braat, D. D. M., Stalmeier, P. F. M., & Fleischer, K. (2022) · Human Reproduction Open · doi:10.1093/hropen/hoac030 · Cited by 26
Felgner, S., & Henschke, C. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0280441 · Cited by 29
Hendrix, M. J. C., Pavlova, M., Nieuwenhuijze, M. J., Severens, J. L., & Nijhuis, J. G. (2010) · Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.3109/0167482x.2010.527400 · Cited by 26
Understanding Patient Preferences in Medication Nonadherence: A Review of Stated Preference Data
Laba, T., Essue, B. M., Kimman, M., & Jan, S. (2014) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-014-0099-3 · Cited by 26
Gallego, G., Dew, A., Bulkeley, K., Veitch, C., Lincoln, M., Bundy, A. C., & Brentnall, J. (2015) · Human Resources for Health · doi:10.1186/s12960-015-0013-7 · Cited by 26
Patient-centric HTA: different strokes for different folks
Mühlbacher, A. C. (2015) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1586/14737167.2015.1038245 · Cited by 26
Bouman, A. C., ten Cate‐Hoek, A. J., Dirksen, C. D., & Joore, M. A. (2015) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/jth.13228 · Cited by 26
Aregay, F. A., Yao, L., & Zhao, M. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8100970 · Cited by 26
dosReis, S., Castillo, W. C., Ross, M., Fitz-Randolph, M., Vaughn-Lee, A., & Butler, B. (2016) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.013 · Cited by 26
Strauss, M., George, G., & Rhodes, D. (2016) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-016-1602-8 · Cited by 26
Mostly harmless regulation? Electronic cigarettes, public policy, and consumer welfare
Kenkel, D., Peng, S., Pesko, M. F., & Wang, H. (2020) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.4136 · Cited by 26
Fawsitt, C. G., Bourke, J., Greene, R. A., McElroy, B., Krucien, N., Murphy, R., & Lutomski, J. E. (2017) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.09.013 · Cited by 26
Fulop, N., Ramsay, A. I. G., Vindrola‐Padros, C., Aitchison, M., Boaden, R., Brinton, V., Clarke, C. S., Hines, J. E. W., Hunter, R. M., Levermore, C., et al. (2016) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0520-5 · Cited by 25
von Wedel, P., & Hagist, C. (2022) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-022-07769-x · Cited by 26
Castronuovo, L., Tiscornia, M. V., Guarnieri, L., Martins, E., Gomes, F. D. S., & Allemandi, L. (2022) · Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública · doi:10.26633/rpsp.2022.137 · Cited by 25
Makkar, S. R., Williamson, A. B., Turner, T., Redman, S., & Louviere, J. J. (2015) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0013-z · Cited by 25
Self-citationKjær, N. K., Halling, A., & Pedersen, L. B. (2015) · Education for Primary Care · doi:10.1080/14739879.2015.11494300 · Cited by 25
Barrett, A. N., Advani, H., Chitty, L. S., Su, L., Biswas, A., Tan, W., Hill, M. K., & Choolani, M. A. (2016) · Singapore Medical Journal · doi:10.11622/smedj.2016114 · Cited by 25
on behalf of the STREAMLINE investigators, Miles, A., Taylor, S. A., Evans, R. E. C., Halligan, S., Beare, S., Bridgewater, J. A., Goh, V., Janes, S. M., Navani, N., et al. (2019) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06153-4 · Cited by 25
Patient Preferences in Subglottic Stenosis Treatment: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Naunheim, M. R., Naunheim, M. L., Rathi, V. K., Franco, R. A., Shrime, M. G., & Song, P. C. (2017) · Otolaryngology · doi:10.1177/0194599817742851 · Cited by 24
Patient Preferences and Urologist Judgments on Prostate Cancer Therapy in Japan
Nakayama, M., Kobayashi, H., Okazaki, M., Imanaka, K., Yoshizawa, K., & Mahlich, J. (2018) · American Journal of Men s Health · doi:10.1177/1557988318776123 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle University (GB)
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Lancsar, Emily
- Venue
- PharmacoEconomics
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 661-677
- ISSN
- 1170-7690 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122707212
- Cited by
- 1,707
- References
- 107
- Citations by year
- 2026: 159 · 2025: 163 · 2024: 156 · 2023: 155 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 135 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 55.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- PharmacoEconomics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- discrete choice experiment, healthcare decision-making, outcome measurement, economic evaluation, cost-benefit analysis, cost-utility analysis, preference elicitation, questionnaire design, validity, welfare analysis, policy analysis
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Health, Choice Behavior, Consumer Behavior, Costs and Cost Analysis, Health Services Research, Humans, Policy Making, Models, Econometric, Patient Satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
