The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making: A User??s Guide
Open accessAbstract
Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are regularly used in health economics to elicit preferences for healthcare products and programmes. There is growing recognition that DCEs can provide more than information on preferences and, in particular, they have the potential to contribute more directly to outcome measurement for use in economic evaluation. Almost uniquely, DCEs could potentially contribute to outcome measurement for use in both cost-benefit and cost-utility analysis. Within this expanding remit, our intention is to provide a resource for current practitioners as well as those considering undertaking a DCE, using DCE results in a policy/commercial context, or reviewing a DCE. We present the fundamental principles and theory underlying DCEs. To aid in undertaking and assessing the quality of DCEs, we discuss the process of carrying out a choice study and have developed a checklist covering conceptualizing the choice process, selecting attributes and levels, experimental design, questionnaire design, pilot testing, sampling and sample size, data collection, coding of data, econometric analysis, validity, interpretation and welfare and policy analysis. In this fast-moving area, a number of issues remain on the research frontier. We therefore outline potentially fruitful areas for future research associated both with DCEs in general, and with health applications specifically, paying attention to how the results of DCEs can be used in economic evaluation. We also discuss emerging research trends. We conclude that if appropriately designed, implemented, analysed and interpreted, DCEs offer several advantages in the health sector, the most important of which is that they provide rich data sources for economic evaluation and decision making, allowing investigation of many types of questions, some of which otherwise would be intractable analytically. Thus, they offer viable alternatives and complements to existing methods of valuation and preference elicitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We followed recommended guidelines to design and implement the DCE. [7, 8, 11–16]”
From Assessing the American public's preferences for reforms to teen driving licensure systems: a discrete choice experiment (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“The opt-out option has the potential to make the choices more realistic [34] by simulating a real-world context where individuals can exercise their right not to take up an app, given the apps on offer [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“However, this type of design is often considered impractical due to the high number of choice tasks required [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“The higher the number of attributes, alternatives, and choice tasks, the higher the task complexity [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“When a range is not wide enough, there is a risk that participants could ignore the attributes because they judge the difference between levels to be insignificant [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“When perfect orthogonality and balance cannot be achieved or are not desirable, an efficient design can be applied [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior
McFadden, D. L. (1972) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 14,203
Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
Drummond, M. E., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198529446.001.0001 · Cited by 13,648
Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method
Dillman, D. A. (2007) · Cited by 9,587
A New Approach to Consumer Theory
Lancaster, K. J. (1966) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/259131 · Cited by 8,471
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait́, J., & Adamowicz, W. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753831 · Cited by 7,008
Self-citationA New Approach to Consumer Theory
Lancaster, K. J. (1976) · Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-51565-1_34 · Cited by 6,946
Addelman, S., Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (1979) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1267766 · Cited by 6,753
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Hensher, 1983, Transport Res, 890, 11
- Ryan, 2003, Applied Health Econ Health Policy, 2, 55
- Chakraborty, 1994, J Health Care Mark, 14, 21
- Swait, 1993, JMark Res, 30, 305
- Longo, 2006, Br J Gen Practice, 56, 35
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,001
Understanding Midwives’ Preferences for Providing Information About Newborn Bloodspot Screening
Wright, S. J., Ulph, F., Lavender, T., Dharni, N., & Payne, K. (2018) · MDM Policy & Practice · doi:10.1177/2381468317746170 · Cited by 10
Wranik, W. D., Jakubczyk, M., & Drachal, K. (2019) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2019.10.012 · Cited by 10
Robles, L. A., Wright, S. J., Hackshaw‐McGeagh, L., Shingler, E., Shiridzinomwa, C., Lane, J. A., Martin, R. M., & Burden, S. T. (2020) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-019-0549-8 · Cited by 10
Nittas, V., Mütsch, M., & Puhan, M. A. (2020) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/16087 · Cited by 10
Zwack, C. C., Haghani, M., & de Bekker-Grob, E. W. (2024) · Health Economics Review · doi:10.1186/s13561-023-00471-6 · Cited by 13
Gawronski, B. E., Salloum, R. G., & Duarte, J. D. (2024) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2024.1384667 · Cited by 9
Harrington, E. K., Hauber, B., Congo, O., Kimanthi, S., Dollah, A., Onono, M. A., & Bukusi, E. A. (2024) · Frontiers in Reproductive Health · doi:10.3389/frph.2024.1360390 · Cited by 9
Salisbury, A., Ciardi, J., Norman, R., Smit, A. K., Cust, A. E., Low, C., Caruana, M., Gordon, L. G., Canfell, K., Steinberg, J., et al. (2024) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-024-00893-1 · Cited by 9
Sommer, J., Dyczmons, J., Grobosch, S., Gontscharuk, V., Vomhof, M., Roden, M., & Icks, A. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036995 · Cited by 9
Raghunandan, R., Howard, K., Marra, C. A., Tordoff, J. M., & Smith, A. J. (2020) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-020-00615-3 · Cited by 11
Elegbede, O., Kerr, J. M., Richardson, R. B., & Sanou, A. (2020) · Energy Sustainable Development/Energy for sustainable development · doi:10.1016/j.esd.2020.12.001 · Cited by 10
Coates, E. J., Wickramasekera, N., Barr, A., Shackley, P., Lee, M. J., Hind, D., Probert, C. S., Sebastian, S., Totton, N., Blackwell, S., et al. (2022) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/rhxr5192 · Cited by 9
Stamuli, E., Corry, S., & Foss, P. (2023) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462323000168 · Cited by 9
Yao, J., Fu, R., Zhu, M., Dong, X., Shi, Y., Zhang, X., & Yuan, H. (2023) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105893 · Cited by 9
Zhu, W., Zhang, M., Pan, J., Shi, L., Gao, H., & Xie, S. (2023) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-023-02180-4 · Cited by 9
Job preferences of master of public health students in China: a discrete choice experiment
Luo, N., Bai, R., Sun, Y., Li, X., Liu, L., Xu, X., & Liu, L. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04993-9 · Cited by 9
Veldwijk, J., Smith, I. P., Oliveri, S., Petrocchi, S., Smith, M. Y., Lanzoni, L., Janssens, R., Huys, I., de Wit, G. A., & Groothuis‐Oudshoorn, C. G. M. (2024) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x231222421 · Cited by 10
Morrish, N., Snowsill, T., Dodman, S., & Medina‐Lara, A. (2024) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x241227425 · Cited by 9
Lin, W. T., Nayga, R. M., & Yang, W. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1002/jaa2.116 · Cited by 10
Ratcliffe, J., Lancsar, E., Luszcz, M. A., Crotty, M., Gray, L., Paterson, J., & Cameron, I. D. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005788 · Cited by 9
Self-citationNotten, K. J. B., Essers, B. A. B., Weemhoff, M., Rutten, A., Donners, J. J. A. E., van Gestel, I., Kruitwagen, R. F. P. M., Roovers, J., & Dirksen, C. D. (2014) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12924 · Cited by 9
Cunningham, C., Hutchings, T., Henderson, J., Rimas, H. L., & Chen, Y. (2016) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s105605 · Cited by 9
Olveira, G., Olmos, M. Á. M., de Bobadilla, B. F., Ferrer, M., Virgili, N. M., Vega, B., Blanco, M., Layola, M., Lizán, L., & Gozalbo, I. (2017) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/s41430-017-0023-8 · Cited by 9
Rankin, L., Stålnacke, B., Fowler, C. J., & Gallego, G. (2018) · Scandinavian Journal of Pain · doi:10.1515/sjpain-2018-0039 · Cited by 9
Molema, C. C. M., Veldwijk, J., Wendel‐Vos, W., de Wit, G. A., van de Goor, I., & Schuit, A. J. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0219112 · Cited by 9
Oliveira, S., & Pinto, L. M. C. (2020) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-020-00768-0 · Cited by 9
Discrete Choice Experiments to Elicit Patient Preferences for Decision Making in Transplantation
James, L. J., Wong, G., Tong, A., Craig, J. C., Howard, K., & Howell, M. (2020) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/tp.0000000000003500 · Cited by 9
Brocklehurst, P. R., Hoare, Z., Woods, C. W., Williams, L., Brand, A., Shen, J., Breckons, M., Ashley, J., Jenkins, A., Gough, L., et al. (2021) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr09030 · Cited by 9
Konstantinus, A. (2021) · Maritime Transport Research · doi:10.1016/j.martra.2021.100015 · Cited by 9
Mental healthcare for children with chronic conditions: a qualitative study
Jones, R., Hiscock, H., Wurzel, D. F., Kao, K., Freeman, J. L., & Ride, J. (2021) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/archdischild-2021-321795 · Cited by 9
Bastien, G., Grande, C. D., Dyachenko, A., Kaczorowski, J. A., Pagé, M. G., Brissette, S., Lespérance, F., Dubreucq, S., Hooley, P., & Jutras‐Aswad, D. (2021) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108857 · Cited by 9
Zartab, S., Nikfar, S., Karimpour-Fard, N., Jamshidi, A., Varahrami, V., Homayouni, A., & Kebriaeezadeh, A. (2021) · Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology · doi:10.31138/mjr.32.2.104 · Cited by 9
Hirsch‐Moverman, Y., Strauss, M., George, G., Mutiti, A., Mafukidze, A., Shongwe, S., Dube, G. S., Sadr, W. M. E., Mantell, J. E., & Howard, A. A. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048443 · Cited by 9
Xu, R. H., Zhou, L.-M., Wong, E. L., & Wang, D. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.757310 · Cited by 9
What Outcomes Are Most Important to Patients Following a Lower Extremity Limb-threatening Injury?
Wong, A. L., Burke, C. E., Bangura, A., O’Hara, N. N., Mundy, L. R., O’Toole, R. V., & Pensy, R. A. (2022) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000005470 · Cited by 9
Murray, C. C., Twiddy, M., Meads, D. M., Hess, S., Wright, J. M., Mitchell, E., Hulme, C. T., Dodd, S., Gent, H., Gregson, A., et al. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008965 · Cited by 9
The development of quality indicators in mental healthcare: a discrete choice experiment
Schellings, R., Essers, B. A. B., Kessels, A. G. H., Brunner, F., van de Ven, T., & Robben, P. B. M. (2012) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-12-103 · Cited by 9
Botha, W., Donnolley, N. R., Shanahan, M., & Chambers, G. M. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020509 · Cited by 9
Nichols, E., O’Hara, N. N., Degani, Y., Sprague, S., Adachi, J. D., Bhandari, M., Holick, M. F., Connelly, D. W., & Slobogean, G. P. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019685 · Cited by 9
Modal Preference in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: An Experiment With New Modes of Transport
Nguyen, D. C., Hoang, H. D., Hoang, H. T., Bui, Q. T., & Nguyen, L. P. (2019) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244019841928 · Cited by 9
Anaka, M., Chan, D. L. H., Pattison, S. T., Thawer, A., Franco, B. B., Moody, L., Jackson, C., Segelov, E., & Singh, S. (2023) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1093/oncolo/oyad312 · Cited by 8
Public preferences for online medical consultations in China: a discrete choice experiment
Wang, P., Huang, Y., Li, H., & Xi, X. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1282387 · Cited by 8
Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for safe pork products in rural Kenya
Gichuyia, C. M., Mtimet, N., Fèvre, E. M., Thomas, L. F., Gathura, P. B., Onono, J. O., & Akaichi, F. (2024) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109450 · Cited by 8
Woode, M. E., Perera, U. D. S., Degeling, C., Aquino, Y. S. J., Houssami, N., Carter, S. M., & Chen, G. (2025) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-025-00742-w · Cited by 12
Schoot, T. S., van Til, J. A., Groothuis‐Oudshoorn, C. G. M., Rombeek, C., Lusseveld, M. J., van Marum, R. J., Hilbrands, L. B., & Kerckhoffs, A. P. M. (2025) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2025.06.010 · Cited by 8
Lv, Y., Ren, R., Tang, C., Song, K., Li, S., & Wang, H. (2022) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s367985 · Cited by 8
Tan, S., Wang, Y., Tang, Y., Jiang, R., Chen, M., Chen, H., & Yang, F. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.1005453 · Cited by 8
Dennison, R. A., Thomas, C., Stephen Morris, A., & Usher‐Smith, J. A. (2023) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107786 · Cited by 8
Xie, P., Li, H.-Q., Peng, W.-L., & Yang, H. (2024) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s444800 · Cited by 8
McDermott, J. H., Sharma, V., Newman, W. G., Wilson, P. M., Payne, K., & Wright, S. J. (2024) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bcp.16058 · Cited by 8
Wang, J., Wei, Y., Galizzi, M. M., Kwan, H. S., Zee, B. C.-Y., Fung, H., Yung, T. K. C., Wong, E. L., Yue, Q., Lee, M. K. L., et al. (2024) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.107994 · Cited by 8
Whitty, J. A., Lancsar, E., Lourenço, R. D. A., Howard, K., & Stolk, E. A. (2024) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-024-00696-5 · Cited by 8
Self-citationSaldarriaga, E. M., Chen, Y., Montaño, M. A., Thuo, N. B., Kiptinness, C., Terris‐Prestholt, F., Stergachis, A. S., Mugambi, M. L., Ngure, K., Ortblad, K. F., et al. (2024) · Journal of the International AIDS Society · doi:10.1002/jia2.26356 · Cited by 8
Kostaki, S.-M., & Linardakis, M. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13182-0 · Cited by 8
A new SF-6Dv2 value set based on a hybrid model using SG, cTTO, and DCE data
Poder, T. G., & Ameri, H. (2024) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117632 · Cited by 8
Care coordination for adults and older people
Abendstern, M., Jasper, R., Loynes, N., Hughes, J., Sutcliffe, C., & Challis, D. (2016) · Journal of Integrated Care · doi:10.1108/jica-08-2016-0028 · Cited by 8
Clinician Perceptions of the Importance of Hospital Discharge Components for Children
Blaine, K., Rogers, J., O'Neill, M. R., McBride, S. C., Faerber, J., Feudtner, C., & Berry, J. G. (2017) · Journal for Healthcare Quality · doi:10.1097/jhq.0000000000000084 · Cited by 8
Parents' Preferences for School- and Community-Based Services for Children at Risk for ADHD
Wymbs, F. A. (2018) · School Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s12310-018-9258-3 · Cited by 8
The Role of Personality in Treatment-Related Outcome Preferences Among Pharmacy Students
Law, E. H., Jiang, R., Kaczynski, A., Mühlbacher, A. C., & Pickard, A. S. (2018) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe6891 · Cited by 8
Patient's Engagement in the Identification of Critical Outcomes in Sarcopenia
Beaudart, C., Bruyère, O., Cruz-Jentoft, A. J., Vaquero-Pinto, M. N., Locquet, M., Bauer, J., Cooper, C. C., Rolland, Y., Dupuy, C., Landi, F., et al. (2019) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2019.09.004 · Cited by 8
Dintsios, C., Chernyak, N., Grehl, B., & Icks, A. (2018) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-018-0884-5 · Cited by 8
Oluboyede, Y., Ternent, L., Vale, L. D., & Allen, J. (2019) · PharmacoEconomics - Open · doi:10.1007/s41669-019-0135-2 · Cited by 8
Valuing families' preferences for drug treatment: a discrete choice experiment
Shanahan, M., Seddon, J. L., Ritter, A. J., & Lourenço, R. D. A. (2019) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.14816 · Cited by 8
Napora, J. K., Demyanovich, H. K., Mulliken, A., Oslin, K. A., Pensy, R. A., Slobogean, G. P., O’Toole, R. V., & O’Hara, N. N. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039888 · Cited by 8
Nazari, A., López‐Valcárcel, B. G., & Najafi, S. (2021) · Value in Health Regional Issues · doi:10.1016/j.vhri.2020.10.002 · Cited by 9
Boncinelli, F., Contini, C., Gerini, F., Romano, C., Scozzafava, G., & Casini, L. (2020) · Wine Economics and Policy · doi:10.36253/web-7978 · Cited by 8
Neter, E., Glass‐Marmor, L., Haiien, L., & Miller, A. (2021) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s291485 · Cited by 8
Oedingen, C., Bartling, T., Schrem, H., Mühlbacher, A. C., & Krauth, C. (2021) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114360 · Cited by 8
Cabrera, G. E. M., Mariel, P., & Alvarado, L. K. A. (2022) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101935 · Cited by 8
Gutierrez, J. I., Vlahov, D., Dubov, A., & Altice, F. L. (2022) · Journal of Urban Health · doi:10.1007/s11524-022-00615-9 · Cited by 8
Methods to Summarize Discrete-Choice Experiments in a Systematic Review: A Scoping Review
Choudhary, D., Thomas, M., Pacheco‐Barrios, K., Zhang, Y., Alonso‐Coello, P., Schünemann, H. J., & Hazlewood, G. S. (2022) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-022-00587-7 · Cited by 8
Adolescent and Parent Preferences for Hypodontia: Discrete Choice Experiment
Barber, S., Bekker, H., Marti, J., Pavitt, S. H., Khambay, B., & Meads, D. M. (2022) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/00220345221111386 · Cited by 8
Smith, I. P., Whichello, C. L., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Mölken, M. R., Veldwijk, J., & de Wit, G. A. (2023) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-022-00612-9 · Cited by 8
Bywall, K. S., Esbensen, B. A., Heidenvall, M., Erlandsson, I., Lason, M., HANSSON, M. G., & Johansson, J. V. (2023) · BMC Rheumatology · doi:10.1186/s41927-023-00341-y · Cited by 8
Bergrath, E., Pavlova, M., & Groot, W. N. J. (2014) · Risks · doi:10.3390/risks2020146 · Cited by 8
Flynn, D., Ternent, L., Becker, F., Oluboyede, Y., & Adams, J. M. (2017) · MDM Policy & Practice · doi:10.1177/2381468317708319 · Cited by 8
Ong, J. J., Neke, N. M., Wambura, M., Kuringe, E., Grund, J. M., Plotkin, M., d’Elbée, M., Rueda, S. T., Mahler, H. R., Weiss, H. A., et al. (2019) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x19852095 · Cited by 8
Parental preferences for a mandatory vaccination scheme in England: A discrete choice experiment
Smith, L., & Carter, B. (2022) · The Lancet Regional Health - Europe · doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100359 · Cited by 8
HEADROOM BEYOND THE QUALITY- ADJUSTED LIFE-YEAR: THE CASE OF COMPLEX PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY
van Nimwegen, K. J. M., Lilford, R. J., van der Wilt, G. J., & Grutters, J. P. C. (2017) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462317000046 · Cited by 8
Health utilities in cancer patients
Poder, T. G., Carrier, N., McFadden, N., & Pavic, M. (2019) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000014647 · Cited by 8
Surgeons preference for lumbar disk surgery: a discrete choice experiment
Gadjradj, P. S., Harhangi, B. S., van Tulder, M. W., Peul, W. C., & de Bekker-Grob, E. W. (2021) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-021-06838-9 · Cited by 8
Kinghorn, P. (2010) · UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) · Cited by 8
Preferences for Neurodevelopmental Follow-Up Care for Children: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Sharma, P., Kularatna, S., Abell, B., McPhail, S., & Senanayake, S. J. (2024) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-024-00717-3 · Cited by 7
Gutierrez, J. I., Montgomery, E., Dilworth, S. E., McNulty, M., Colasanti, J. A., Johnson, M. O., Koester, K. A., Sauceda, J. A., Erguera, X. A., Dance, K. V., et al. (2025) · JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes · doi:10.1097/qai.0000000000003661 · Cited by 7
Kryszak, Ł., Czyżewski, B., Sapa, A., & Lucaşenco, E. (2025) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108606 · Cited by 7
Chen, N., Bai, D., & Ning, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1508369 · Cited by 7
Li, H., Han, J., Yuan, H., Wan, G., Xue, H., & Zhang, X. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049742 · Cited by 7
Khan, M. U., Balbontín, C., Bliemer, M. C. J., & Aslani, P. (2022) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13462 · Cited by 7
Parent's preferences for unscheduled paediatric healthcare: A discrete choice experiment
Nicholson, E., McDonnell, T., Conlon, C., Brún, A. D., Doherty, E., & McAuliffe, É. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13802 · Cited by 7
Valuing the Dental Caries Utility Index in Australia
Hettiarachchi, R. M., Kularatna, S., Byrnes, J., Mulhern, B. J., Chen, G., & Scuffham, P. (2023) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x231197149 · Cited by 7
Wang, H., Chen, Q., & Katare, B. (2023) · Agribusiness · doi:10.1002/agr.21853 · Cited by 7
Public preferences in healthcare resource allocation: A discrete choice experiment in South Korea
Bae, E.-Y., Lim, M. K., Lee, B., Bae, G., & Hong, J. (2023) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104932 · Cited by 7
Patient preferences for generic substitution policies: a discrete choice experiment in China
Zhang, L., Li, D., Li, X., & Yan, J. (2024) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2024.1400156 · Cited by 7
Latt, P. M., Soe, N. N., King, A. J., Lee, D. M., Phillips, T. R., Xu, X., Chow, E. P. F., Fairley, C. K., Zhang, L., & Ong, J. J. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-20688-2 · Cited by 8
Uptake and service preferences of human papillomavirus vaccination in men who have sex with men
Zhang, R., Wong, N. S., Chung, S. L., Kwan, C. K., Kwan, T. H., & Lee, S. S. (2024) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2024.2440956 · Cited by 7
Bohorquez, N. G., Weerasuriya, S. R., Brain, D., Senanayake, S. J., Kularatna, S., & Barnett, A. G. (2025) · Prometheus · doi:10.13169/prometheus.40.4.0002 · Cited by 7
Howard, K., Arendts, G., Jan, S., & Beck, M. J. (2012) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001081 · Cited by 7
Ranking medical innovations according to perceived health benefit
Fermont, J. M., Douw, K., Vondeling, H., & IJzerman, M. J. (2016) · Health Policy and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2016.02.009 · Cited by 7
Cho, S., & Choi, G. (2018) · Journal of Food Products Marketing · doi:10.1080/10454446.2018.1522285 · Cited by 7
Mühlbacher, A. C., & Juhnke, C. (2019) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462319000217 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle University (GB)
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Lancsar, Emily
- Venue
- PharmacoEconomics
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 661-677
- ISSN
- 1170-7690 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122707212
- Cited by
- 1,707
- References
- 107
- Citations by year
- 2026: 159 · 2025: 163 · 2024: 156 · 2023: 155 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 135 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 55.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- PharmacoEconomics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- discrete choice experiment, healthcare decision-making, outcome measurement, economic evaluation, cost-benefit analysis, cost-utility analysis, preference elicitation, questionnaire design, validity, welfare analysis, policy analysis
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Health, Choice Behavior, Consumer Behavior, Costs and Cost Analysis, Health Services Research, Humans, Policy Making, Models, Econometric, Patient Satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
