The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making: A User??s Guide
Open accessAbstract
Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are regularly used in health economics to elicit preferences for healthcare products and programmes. There is growing recognition that DCEs can provide more than information on preferences and, in particular, they have the potential to contribute more directly to outcome measurement for use in economic evaluation. Almost uniquely, DCEs could potentially contribute to outcome measurement for use in both cost-benefit and cost-utility analysis. Within this expanding remit, our intention is to provide a resource for current practitioners as well as those considering undertaking a DCE, using DCE results in a policy/commercial context, or reviewing a DCE. We present the fundamental principles and theory underlying DCEs. To aid in undertaking and assessing the quality of DCEs, we discuss the process of carrying out a choice study and have developed a checklist covering conceptualizing the choice process, selecting attributes and levels, experimental design, questionnaire design, pilot testing, sampling and sample size, data collection, coding of data, econometric analysis, validity, interpretation and welfare and policy analysis. In this fast-moving area, a number of issues remain on the research frontier. We therefore outline potentially fruitful areas for future research associated both with DCEs in general, and with health applications specifically, paying attention to how the results of DCEs can be used in economic evaluation. We also discuss emerging research trends. We conclude that if appropriately designed, implemented, analysed and interpreted, DCEs offer several advantages in the health sector, the most important of which is that they provide rich data sources for economic evaluation and decision making, allowing investigation of many types of questions, some of which otherwise would be intractable analytically. Thus, they offer viable alternatives and complements to existing methods of valuation and preference elicitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We followed recommended guidelines to design and implement the DCE. [7, 8, 11–16]”
From Assessing the American public's preferences for reforms to teen driving licensure systems: a discrete choice experiment (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“The opt-out option has the potential to make the choices more realistic [34] by simulating a real-world context where individuals can exercise their right not to take up an app, given the apps on offer [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“However, this type of design is often considered impractical due to the high number of choice tasks required [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“The higher the number of attributes, alternatives, and choice tasks, the higher the task complexity [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“When a range is not wide enough, there is a risk that participants could ignore the attributes because they judge the difference between levels to be insignificant [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“When perfect orthogonality and balance cannot be achieved or are not desirable, an efficient design can be applied [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior
McFadden, D. L. (1972) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 14,203
Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
Drummond, M. E., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198529446.001.0001 · Cited by 13,648
Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method
Dillman, D. A. (2007) · Cited by 9,587
A New Approach to Consumer Theory
Lancaster, K. J. (1966) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/259131 · Cited by 8,471
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait́, J., & Adamowicz, W. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753831 · Cited by 7,008
Self-citationA New Approach to Consumer Theory
Lancaster, K. J. (1976) · Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-51565-1_34 · Cited by 6,946
Addelman, S., Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (1979) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1267766 · Cited by 6,753
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Hensher, 1983, Transport Res, 890, 11
- Ryan, 2003, Applied Health Econ Health Policy, 2, 55
- Chakraborty, 1994, J Health Care Mark, 14, 21
- Swait, 1993, JMark Res, 30, 305
- Longo, 2006, Br J Gen Practice, 56, 35
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,001
Public Preferences for a COVID-19 Vaccination Program in Quebec: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Morillon, G. F., & Poder, T. G. (2022) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-021-01124-4 · Cited by 15
Preventive audiology: An African perspective
Sebothoma, B., Govender, S., Joubert, K., Kanji, A., Moroe, N., Masuku, K. P., Maluleke, N. P., & Ntlhakana, L. (2022) · doi:10.4102/aosis.2022.bk209 · Cited by 15
Quantifying preferences for asthma control in parents and adolescents using best–worst scaling
Ungar, W. J., Hadioonzadeh, A., Najafzadeh, M., Tsao, N., Dell, S., & Lynd, L. D. (2014) · Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2014.03.014 · Cited by 15
Barnes, J., Stuart, J., Allen, E., Petrou, S., Sturgess, J., Barlow, J., Macdonald, G. M., Spiby, H., Aistrop, D., Melhuish, E. C., et al. (2017) · Public Health Research · doi:10.3310/phr05090 · Cited by 17
What Do Patients Want from Otolaryngologists? A Discrete Choice Experiment
Naunheim, M. R., Rathi, V. K., Naunheim, M. L., Alkire, B. C., Lam, A. C., Song, P. C., & Shrime, M. G. (2017) · Otolaryngology · doi:10.1177/0194599817717662 · Cited by 15
Barber, S., Pavitt, S. H., Khambay, B., Bekker, H., & Meads, D. M. (2018) · JDR Clinical & Translational Research · doi:10.1177/2380084418780324 · Cited by 15
Sugar-sweetened beverage price elasticities in a hypothetical convenience store
Blake, M. R., Lancsar, E., Peeters, A., & Backholer, K. (2019) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.021 · Cited by 15
Self-citationNicolet, A., van Asselt, A. D. I., Vermeulen, K. M., & Krabbe, P. F. M. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0235666 · Cited by 15
A step-by-step guide to design, implement, and analyze a discrete choice experimentPreprint
Pérez-Troncoso, D. (2020) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.11235 · Cited by 15
Karia, A. M., Chen, L., Norman, R., Robinson, S., Webster, R. J., & Sim, T. F. (2025) · International Journal of Pharmacy Practice · doi:10.1093/ijpp/riaf120 · Cited by 14
Lerusse, A., & de Walle, S. V. (2021) · Journal of Behavioral Public Administration · doi:10.30636/jbpa.41.206 · Cited by 14
Protection or Peril of Following the Crowd in a Pandemic-Concurrent Flood Evacuation
Borowski, E. C., & Stathopoulos, A. (2022) · Natural Hazards Review · doi:10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000577 · Cited by 14
Loa, P., & Habib, K. N. (2023) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.1177/03611981221145133 · Cited by 14
Exploring employment preferences of nurses to improve retention in rural China
Bao, M., Wang, H., Huang, C., Wang, L., Xie, C., & Chen, G. (2023) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104473 · Cited by 14
Menges, D., Piatti, M. C., Omlin, A. G., Cathomas, R. L., Benamran, D. A., Fischer, S., Iselin, C. E., Küng, M., Lorch, A., Prause, L. W., et al. (2023) · European Urology Open Science · doi:10.1016/j.euros.2023.03.001 · Cited by 14
Dranitsaris, G., Zhang, Q., Mu, L., Weyrer, C., Drysdale, E., Neumann, P. J., Atri, A., & Monfared, A. A. T. (2023) · Alzheimer s Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-023-01207-8 · Cited by 14
Yiu, H. H. E., Buckell, J., Petrou, S., Stewart-Brown, S. L., & Madan, J. J. (2023) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115928 · Cited by 14
Shim, J. K., Foti, N., Vasquez, E. E., Fullerton, S. M., Bentz, M., Jeske, M., & Lee, S. S. (2023) · AJOB Empirical Bioethics · doi:10.1080/23294515.2023.2201478 · Cited by 14
Teng, Y., Wei, Y., Chen, Y., Yan, J., Liu, S., Li, F., Bao, S., Ren, Y., Liu, L., & Yang, Y. (2023) · Integrative Medicine Research · doi:10.1016/j.imr.2023.100969 · Cited by 14
Fischer, A.-K., & Mühlbacher, A. C. (2023) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/46056 · Cited by 14
Vo, L. K., Allen, M. J., Cunich, M. M., Thillainadesan, J., McPhail, S., Sharma, P., Wallis, S., McGowan, K., & Carter, H. E. (2023) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116459 · Cited by 16
Zhou, H., Song, C., Chi, X., Li, W., & Han, H. (2023) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103652 · Cited by 15
Ahoudou, I., Sogbohossou, D. E. O., Hotegni, N. V. F., Adjé, C. O. A., Komlan, F. A., Moumouni-Moussa, I., & Achigan-Dako, E. G. (2023) · Experimental Agriculture · doi:10.1017/s0014479723000224 · Cited by 14
Liu, S., Xiang, Y., Gu, Y., Chen, N., Fu, P., Wei, Y., Zhao, P., Li, Y., Du, C., Mu, W., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104695 · Cited by 14
Patient versus physician preferences for lipid‐lowering drug therapy: A discrete choice experiment
Zhang, L., Chen, J., Cao, Z., Zhang, M., Ma, R., Zhang, P., Yao, G., & Li, X. (2024) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.14043 · Cited by 14
Ong, C., Cook, A. R., Tan, K., & Wang, Y. (2024) · JMIR Public Health and Surveillance · doi:10.2196/53200 · Cited by 14
Anougmar, S., Fockaert, L., Michiel, K., Passel, S. V., & Schoubroeck, S. V. (2025) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107525 · Cited by 14
Implementing artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening: Women’s preferences
Pearce, A. M., Carter, S. M., Frazer, H. M. L., Houssami, N., Macheras‐Magias, M., Webb, G., & Marinovich, M. L. (2025) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.35859 · Cited by 14
de Vries, S. T., de Vries, F. M., Dekker, T., Haaijer‐Ruskamp, F. M., de Zeeuw, D., Ranchor, A. V., & Denig, P. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139755 · Cited by 14
Preferences for physician services in Ukraine: a discrete choice experiment
Danyliv, A., Pavlova, M., Gryga, I., & Groot, W. N. J. (2014) · The International Journal of Health Planning and Management · doi:10.1002/hpm.2239 · Cited by 14
Prosser, L. A., Payne, K., Rusinak, D., Shi, P., & Messonnier, M. L. (2013) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-013-0029-6 · Cited by 14
Baji, P., Gulàcsi, L., Golovics, P. A., Lovasz, B. D., Péntek, M., Brodszky, V., Rencz, F., & Lakatos, P. L. (2016) · Value in Health Regional Issues · doi:10.1016/j.vhri.2016.07.004 · Cited by 14
Consumer willingness to pay for low acrylamide content
Harkness, C., & Areal, F. (2018) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-01-2018-0043 · Cited by 14
Villeneuve, E., Landa, P., Allen, M. J., Spencer, A. E., Prosser, S., Gibson, A., Kelsey, K., Mújica-Mota, R., Manktelow, B. N., Modi, N., et al. (2018) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr06350 · Cited by 14
Botha, W., Donnolley, N. R., Shanahan, M., Norman, R. J., & Chambers, G. M. (2018) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2018.1549055 · Cited by 15
Pig farmers’ willingness to pay for management strategies to reduce aggression between pigs
Peden, R. S. E., Akaichi, F., Camerlink, I., Boyle, L. A., & Turner, S. P. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0224924 · Cited by 14
Crossnohere, N. L., Janse, S., Janssen, E. M., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2020) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-020-00450-7 · Cited by 14
Ostermann, J., Njau, B., Hobbie, A. M., Mtuy, T. B., Masaki, M., Shayo, A. M., van Zwetselaar, M., Masnick, M. F., Flaherty, B. P., Brown, D. S., et al. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039313 · Cited by 14
Johnson, B. J., Golley, R. K., Zarnowiecki, D. M., Hendrie, G. A., & Huynh, E. K. (2020) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-020-01062-y · Cited by 15
Phạm, T. C. A., Le, M. H., & Vu, T. K. O. (2020) · Journal of International Economics and Management · doi:10.38203/jiem.020.3.0015 · Cited by 14
Patients Place More of an Emphasis on Physical Recovery Than Return to Work or Financial Recovery
O’Hara, N. N., Kringos, D. S., Slobogean, G. P., Degani, Y., & Klazinga, N. (2020) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/corr.0000000000001583 · Cited by 16
Herbst, F. A., Stiel, S., Damm, K., de Jong, L., Stahmeyer, J. T., & Schneider, N. (2021) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-021-00792-5 · Cited by 14
Shields, G., Wright, S. J., Adrian Wells, A., Doherty, P., Capobianco, L., & Davies, L. M. (2021) · Open Heart · doi:10.1136/openhrt-2021-001747 · Cited by 14
Huls, S. P. I., Lancsar, E., Donkers, B., & Ride, J. (2022) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.4599 · Cited by 14
Self-citationMaluleke, N. P. (2022) · doi:10.4102/aosis.2022.bk209.10 · Cited by 14
Föhn, Z., Nicolet, A., Marti, J., Kaufmann, C., & Balthasar, A. (2023) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2023.01.002 · Cited by 14
Ung, M. J., Martin, S., Terris‐Prestholt, F., Quaife, M., Tieosapjaroen, W., Phillips, T. R., Lee, D. M., Chow, E. P. F., Medland, N., Bavinton, B. R., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1018983 · Cited by 14
Khan, A. A., Khan, S. U., Yao, L., Khan, Z. A., Ali, U., & Zhao, M. (2023) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110438 · Cited by 14
Varhol, R., Norman, R., Randall, S. M., Lee, C., Trevenen, L., Boyd, J., & Robinson, S. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0290528 · Cited by 14
Shiroiwa, T., King, M. T., Norman, R., Müller, F., Campbell, R., Kemmler, G., Murata, T., Shimozuma, K., & Fukuda, T. (2024) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-024-03655-7 · Cited by 14
When you can’t have the cake and eat it too
Carlsen, B., Hole, A. R., Kolstad, J. R., & Norheim, O. F. (2012) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.08.005 · Cited by 14
Turbitt, E., Wiest, M. M., Halliday, J. L., Amor, D. J., & Metcalfe, S. A. (2014) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/ejhg.2014.11 · Cited by 14
Özdemir, S. (2014) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-014-0084-x · Cited by 14
van de Schoot, T., Pavlova, M., Атанасова, Е., & Groot, W. N. J. (2015) · The International Journal of Health Planning and Management · doi:10.1002/hpm.2325 · Cited by 14
de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Bergstra, A. D., Bliemer, M. C. J., Trijssenaar-Buhre, I. J. M., & Burdorf, A. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142507 · Cited by 14
Chen, T., Lai, M., & Chung, K. (2015) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzv098 · Cited by 14
A best–worst scaling in Colombian patients to rank the characteristics of HIV/AIDS treatment
Hendriks, A. F. W., Wijnen, B. F. M., Engelen, R. P. L. B. V., Conde, R., Evers, S., Rodríguez, J. L. G., Govers, M., Mühlbacher, A. C., & Hiligsmann, M. (2018) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2018.1440401 · Cited by 14
Evidence‐Based Medicine in Otolaryngology Part XII: Assessing Patient Preferences
Naunheim, M. R., Randolph, G. W., & Shin, J. J. (2020) · Otolaryngology · doi:10.1177/0194599820950723 · Cited by 14
The Burden of Informal Caregiving for Adults with Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review
Legese, N., Das, N., Watts, J. J., Robinson, S., Chen, G., & Gao, L. (2025) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-025-01523-x · Cited by 13
Jin, S., Tan, Z., Liu, T., Chan, S. N., Sheng, J., Wong, T.-H., Huang, J. V., Zhang, C. J. P., & Ming, W. (2022) · JMIR Serious Games · doi:10.2196/34586 · Cited by 14
Boxebeld, S., Mouter, N., & van Exel, J. N. A. (2023) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-023-00859-9 · Cited by 13
Brandstetter, L., Jírů-Hillmann, S., Störk, S., Heuschmann, P. U., Wöckel, A., & Reese, J. (2024) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-024-00679-6 · Cited by 13
Arije, O., Madan, J. J., & Hlungwani, T. M. (2024) · Health Economics Review · doi:10.1186/s13561-024-00497-4 · Cited by 13
Wortley, S., Tong, A., Lancsar, E., Salkeld, G. P., & Howard, K. (2015) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-015-0176-0 · Cited by 13
Self-citationWebb, E., Stamp, E., Collinson, M., Farrin, A. J., Stevens, J., Burton, W., Rutter, H., Schofield, H., & Bryant, M. (2020) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-020-09576-7 · Cited by 13
Models of generalist and specialist care in smaller hospitals in England: a mixed-methods study
Vaughan, L., Bardsley, M., Bell, D., Davies, M. S., Goddard, A. F., Imison, C., Melnychuk, M., Stephen Morris, A., & Rafferty, A. M. (2021) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr09040 · Cited by 13
Torbica, A., Rognoni, C., & Tarricone, R. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18094916 · Cited by 13
Lim, K., Lee, J., & Lee, H. (2021) · Utilities Policy · doi:10.1016/j.jup.2021.101223 · Cited by 13
Li, H., Yuan, H., Wan, G., Xue, H., & Zhang, X. (2021) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-021-06505-1 · Cited by 13
Apantaku, G. O., Aguiar, M., Kaal, K. J., McDonald, P. J., Connolly, M. B., Hrincu, V. M., Illes, J., & Harrison, M. J. (2021) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-021-00544-w · Cited by 13
Chen, G., Ratcliffe, J., Milte, R., Khadka, J., & Kaambwa, B. (2021) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114440 · Cited by 13
Sypek, M. P., Howell, M., Howard, K., Wong, G., Duncanson, E., Clayton, P. A., Hughes, P., & McDonald, S. P. (2021) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/ajt.16898 · Cited by 13
Lieberz, D., Borgeson, H., Dobson, S., Ewings, L., Johnson, K., Klaysmat, K., Schultz, A., Tasson, R., & Borstad, A. L. (2022) · Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · doi:10.17294/2330-0698.1874 · Cited by 13
Grauman, Å., Johansson, J. V., Falahee, M., & Veldwijk, J. (2022) · Preventive Medicine Reports · doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101683 · Cited by 15
Wickramasekera, N., Coates, E. J., Barr, A., Lee, M. J., Blackwell, S. E., Bedford, H., Dames, N. B., Sebastian, S., Probert, C. S., Shackley, P., et al. (2022) · Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1080/00365521.2022.2036808 · Cited by 13
Natsky, A. N., Vakulin, A., Chai‐Coetzer, C. L., McEvoy, R. D., Adams, R., & Kaambwa, B. (2022) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-022-00716-1 · Cited by 13
Jiang, M., Gong, Y., Fang, Y., Yao, X., Feng, L., Zhu, S., Peng, J., & Shi, X. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19042145 · Cited by 13
Delivering patient‐centered care through shared decision making in overactive bladder
Paudel, R., & Lane, G. I. (2022) · Neurourology and Urodynamics · doi:10.1002/nau.24915 · Cited by 13
Amaador, K., Nieuwkerk, P. T., Minnema, M. C., Kersten, M. J., & Vos, J. M. I. (2022) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.5080 · Cited by 13
Gc, V. S., Iglesias, C. P., Erdem, S., Hassan, L., Peek, N. B., & Manca, A. (2022) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462322003233 · Cited by 13
Wammes, J. D., Swait́, J., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Monin, J. K., Labrie, N., & Vroomen, J. L. M. (2022) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-220604 · Cited by 13
Narayanan, S., Makarov, N., Magkos, E., Grau, J. M. S., Aifadopoulou, G., & Antoniou, C. (2023) · Smart Cities · doi:10.3390/smartcities6030060 · Cited by 13
The notion of validity in experimental crowd dynamics
Haghani, M. (2023) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103750 · Cited by 14
Thomson, R. G., Brún, A. D., Flynn, D., Ternent, L., Price, C., Rodgers, H., Ford, G. A., Rudd, M. P., Lancsar, E., Simpson, S., et al. (2017) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr05040 · Cited by 13
Self-citationPinto, D., Danilovich, M., Hansen, P., Finn, D. J., Chang, R. W., Holl, J. L., Heinemann, A. W., & Böckenholt, U. (2016) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.11.024 · Cited by 13
Thought for Food: Nutritional Information and Educational Disparities in Diet
Koç, H., & van Kippersluis, H. (2017) · Journal of Human Capital · doi:10.1086/694571 · Cited by 13
Moving (back) to greener pastures? Social benefits and costs of climate forest planting in Norway
Iversen, E. K., Lindhjem, H., Jacobsen, J. B., & Grimsrud, K. (2019) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104390 · Cited by 13
Incorporating patient preferences in the design and operation of cancer screening facility networks
Küçükyazicı, B., Zhang, Y., Ardestani-Jaafari, A., & Song, L. (2020) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2020.03.082 · Cited by 13
Estimating the Cultural Value of Wild Animals in the Qinling Mountains, China: A Choice Experiment
Hou, Y., Liu, T., Zhao, Z., & Wen, Y. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10122422 · Cited by 13
Valuing Preferences for the Process and Outcomes of Clinical Genetics Services: A Pilot Study
Gray, E., Eden, M., Vass, C., McAllister, M., Louviere, J. J., & Payne, K. (2015) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-015-0133-0 · Cited by 13
Self-citationCommunity Preferences for the Allocation & Donation of Organs - The PAraDOx Study
Howard, K., Jan, S., Rose, J. M., Chadban, S. J., Allen, R. D. M., Irving, M. J., Tong, A., Wong, G., Craig, J. C., & Cass, A. (2011) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-386 · Cited by 13
Neurologists’ preferences for device-aided therapy for advanced Parkinson’s disease in Japan
Fujioka, S., Mishima, T., Yamazaki, T., Bebrysz, M., Nomoto, M., Yamaguchi, J., Fujimura, K., Migita, H., Aballéa, S., & Tsuboi, Y. (2022) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1080/03007995.2022.2129800 · Cited by 12
Zhu, Z., Liu, Y., Zhang, N., & Peng, Z. (2023) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103808 · Cited by 12
Livingstone, A., Howard, K., Menzies, A. M., Long, G. V., Stockler, M. R., & Morton, R. L. (2023) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-023-00635-w · Cited by 12
Nurses’ job preferences on the internet plus nursing service program: a discrete choice experiment
He, Y., Feng, G., Wang, C., Yang, D., Hu, L., Ming, W., & Chen, W. (2024) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-023-01692-0 · Cited by 12
Liu, Y., Du, S., Liu, C., Xue, T., & Tang, Y. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1324776 · Cited by 12
Patient preferences for the diagnosis of coeliac disease: A discrete choice experiment
Shiha, M. G., Wickramasekera, N., Raju, S. A., Penny, H. A., & Sanders, D. S. (2024) · United European Gastroenterology Journal · doi:10.1002/ueg2.12651 · Cited by 12
Hilo, A. A., & McPeak, J. G. (2024) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-024-11971-4 · Cited by 15
Hewage, S. A., Senanayake, S. J., Brain, D., Allen, M. J., McPhail, S. M., Parsonage, W. A., Walters, T. E., & Kularatna, S. (2025) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/58556 · Cited by 13
Rothery, C., Bojke, L., Richardson, G. A., Bojke, C., Moverley, A. R., Coates, L. C., Thorp, L., Waxman, R., & Helliwell, P. (2016) · Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1007/s10067-016-3452-1 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle University (GB)
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Lancsar, Emily
- Venue
- PharmacoEconomics
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 661-677
- ISSN
- 1170-7690 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122707212
- Cited by
- 1,707
- References
- 107
- Citations by year
- 2026: 159 · 2025: 163 · 2024: 156 · 2023: 155 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 135 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 55.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- PharmacoEconomics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- discrete choice experiment, healthcare decision-making, outcome measurement, economic evaluation, cost-benefit analysis, cost-utility analysis, preference elicitation, questionnaire design, validity, welfare analysis, policy analysis
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Health, Choice Behavior, Consumer Behavior, Costs and Cost Analysis, Health Services Research, Humans, Policy Making, Models, Econometric, Patient Satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
