The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making: A User??s Guide
Open accessAbstract
Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are regularly used in health economics to elicit preferences for healthcare products and programmes. There is growing recognition that DCEs can provide more than information on preferences and, in particular, they have the potential to contribute more directly to outcome measurement for use in economic evaluation. Almost uniquely, DCEs could potentially contribute to outcome measurement for use in both cost-benefit and cost-utility analysis. Within this expanding remit, our intention is to provide a resource for current practitioners as well as those considering undertaking a DCE, using DCE results in a policy/commercial context, or reviewing a DCE. We present the fundamental principles and theory underlying DCEs. To aid in undertaking and assessing the quality of DCEs, we discuss the process of carrying out a choice study and have developed a checklist covering conceptualizing the choice process, selecting attributes and levels, experimental design, questionnaire design, pilot testing, sampling and sample size, data collection, coding of data, econometric analysis, validity, interpretation and welfare and policy analysis. In this fast-moving area, a number of issues remain on the research frontier. We therefore outline potentially fruitful areas for future research associated both with DCEs in general, and with health applications specifically, paying attention to how the results of DCEs can be used in economic evaluation. We also discuss emerging research trends. We conclude that if appropriately designed, implemented, analysed and interpreted, DCEs offer several advantages in the health sector, the most important of which is that they provide rich data sources for economic evaluation and decision making, allowing investigation of many types of questions, some of which otherwise would be intractable analytically. Thus, they offer viable alternatives and complements to existing methods of valuation and preference elicitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We followed recommended guidelines to design and implement the DCE. [7, 8, 11–16]”
From Assessing the American public's preferences for reforms to teen driving licensure systems: a discrete choice experiment (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“The opt-out option has the potential to make the choices more realistic [34] by simulating a real-world context where individuals can exercise their right not to take up an app, given the apps on offer [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“However, this type of design is often considered impractical due to the high number of choice tasks required [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“The higher the number of attributes, alternatives, and choice tasks, the higher the task complexity [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“When a range is not wide enough, there is a risk that participants could ignore the attributes because they judge the difference between levels to be insignificant [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“When perfect orthogonality and balance cannot be achieved or are not desirable, an efficient design can be applied [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior
McFadden, D. L. (1972) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 14,203
Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
Drummond, M. E., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198529446.001.0001 · Cited by 13,648
Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method
Dillman, D. A. (2007) · Cited by 9,587
A New Approach to Consumer Theory
Lancaster, K. J. (1966) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/259131 · Cited by 8,471
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait́, J., & Adamowicz, W. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753831 · Cited by 7,008
Self-citationA New Approach to Consumer Theory
Lancaster, K. J. (1976) · Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-51565-1_34 · Cited by 6,946
Addelman, S., Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (1979) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1267766 · Cited by 6,753
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Hensher, 1983, Transport Res, 890, 11
- Ryan, 2003, Applied Health Econ Health Policy, 2, 55
- Chakraborty, 1994, J Health Care Mark, 14, 21
- Swait, 1993, JMark Res, 30, 305
- Longo, 2006, Br J Gen Practice, 56, 35
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,001
Agarwal, S., Anaba, U. C., Abuya, T., Kintu, R., Casseus, A., Hossain, S., Obadha, M., & Warren, C. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033601 · Cited by 23
Tully, M. P., Bernsten, C. B., Aitken, M., & Vass, C. (2020) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-020-01139-5 · Cited by 19
Baggott, C., Hansen, P., Hancox, R. J., Hardy, J., Sparks, J., Holliday, M., Weatherall, M., Beasley, R. W., Reddel, H. K., & Fingleton, J. (2020) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214343 · Cited by 19
Patient Preferences for Surgical Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis
Hutyra, C. A., González, J. M., Yang, J., Johnson, F. R., Reed, S. D., Amendola, A., Bolognesi, M. P., Berend, K. R., Berend, M. E., MacDonald, S. J., et al. (2020) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.20.00132 · Cited by 19
Analysis of Patientsʼ Preferences
Mühlbacher, A. C., & Nübling, M. (2010) · Patient · doi:10.2165/11584640-000000000-000009 · Cited by 20
An Application of a Proposed Framework for Formulary Listing in Low-Income Countries
Diaby, V., & Lachaîne, J. (2011) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.2165/11595220-000000000-00000 · Cited by 19
Eliciting patients' preferences for epilepsy diagnostics: A discrete choice experiment
Wijnen, B. F. M., de Kinderen, R. J. A., Colon, A., Dirksen, C. D., Essers, B. A. B., Hiligsmann, M., Leijten, F. S. S., Ossenblok, P., & Evers, S. (2014) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.11.029 · Cited by 19
Determann, D., Lambooij, M., Gyrd‐Hansen, D., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Steyerberg, E. W., Heldoorn, M., Pedersen, L. B., & de Wit, G. A. (2016) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocw158 · Cited by 19
‘Should I stay or should I go now?’: A qualitative study of why UK doctors retire
Cleland, J., Porteous, T., Ejebu, O., & Skåtun, D. (2020) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.14157 · Cited by 19
Encouraging junior doctors to work in rural Sudan: a discrete choice experiment
Nurelhuda, N. M., Bashir, A. O., Kogali, S. E., Hassanein, M., Kruk, M. E., & Aziz, M. A. (2018) · Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal · doi:10.26719/2018.24.9.838 · Cited by 18
Preferences for a polygenic test to estimate cancer risk in a general Australian population
Venning, B., Saya, S., Lourenço, R. D. A., Street, D. J., & Emery, J. D. (2022) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.gim.2022.07.011 · Cited by 18
Angeli, F., Jaiswal, A., & Shrivastava, S. (2022) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115427 · Cited by 19
Willems, D., Hinzpeter, E.-L., van der Zee, H. H., Sayed, C. J., Ingram, J. R., Beaudart, C., Evers, S., & Hiligsmann, M. (2023) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-022-00614-7 · Cited by 18
Engidaw, M., Alemu, M. B., Amare, G., & Yitayal, M. (2023) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04133-3 · Cited by 18
Huls, S. P. I., van Exel, J. N. A., & de Bekker-Grob, E. W. (2023) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104986 · Cited by 18
Hansford, H. J., Jones, M. D., Cashin, A. G., Ostelo, R., Chiarotto, A., Williams, S. A., Sharma, S., Rose, J. M., Devonshire, J. J., Ferraro, M. C., et al. (2024) · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12279 · Cited by 18
Using augmented reality to inform consumer choice and lower carbon footprints
Isley, S., Ketcham, R., & Arent, D. J. (2017) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa6def · Cited by 21
Hill, M. K., Oteng‐Ntim, E., Forya, F., Petrou, M., Stephen Morris, A., & Chitty, L. S. (2017) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12568 · Cited by 18
Powell, P. A., Carlton, J., Rowen, D., & Brazier, J. E. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023685 · Cited by 18
The relative importance of genetic parenthood
Hendriks, S., van Wely, M., D’Hooghe, T., Meißner, A., Mol, F., Peeraer, K., Repping, S., & Dancet, E. A. F. (2019) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.02.008 · Cited by 18
Future of Patients in Healthcare Evaluation: The Patient-Informed Reference Case
Slejko, J. F., Mattingly, T. J., Mullins, C. D., Perfetto, E. M., & dosReis, S. (2019) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.003 · Cited by 18
Li, S., Liu, S., Ratcliffe, J., Gray, A. M., & Chen, G. (2019) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s201913 · Cited by 18
Harrison, M. J., Bansback, N. J., Aguiar, M., Koehn, C. L., Shojania, K., Finckh, A., & Hudson, M. (2020) · Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1007/s10067-020-05072-w · Cited by 18
Balliauw, M., Onghena, E., & Mulkens, S. (2020) · International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship · doi:10.1108/ijsms-12-2019-0138 · Cited by 18
Preferred Lung Cancer Screening Modalities in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Zhao, Z., Du, L., Wang, L., Wang, Y., Yang, Y., & Dong, H. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13236110 · Cited by 18
Rowen, D., Powell, P. A., Hole, A. R., Aragón, M. J., Castelli, A., & Jacobs, R. (2022) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114885 · Cited by 18
Goossens, A. J. M., Cheung, K. L., Sijstermans, E., Conde, R., Rodríguez, J. L. G., & Hiligsmann, M. (2020) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2020.1735398 · Cited by 18
Mahieu, P., Andersson, H., Beaumais, O., Sourd, R. C. D., & Wolff, F. (2015) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.4286.9602 · Cited by 18
Doble, B., Harris, A., Thomas, D. M., Fox, S. B., & Lorgelly, P. K. (2013) · Pharmacogenomics · doi:10.2217/pgs.13.142 · Cited by 18
Ngorsuraches, S., & Thongkeaw, K. (2015) · SpringerPlus · doi:10.1186/s40064-015-1482-9 · Cited by 18
Katz, D. A., Stewart, K. R., Paez, M., Weg, M. W. V., Grant, K. M., Hamlin, C., & Gaeth, G. J. (2018) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-018-0316-6 · Cited by 18
Adhikari, S. R., & Supakankunit, S. (2014) · WHO South-East Asia Journal of Public Health · doi:10.4103/2224-3151.206733 · Cited by 17
Muntingh, A., Hoogendoorn, A. W., van Schaik, A., van Straten, A., Stolk, E. A., van Balkom, A. J. L. M., & Batelaan, N. M. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0219588 · Cited by 18
Mott, D. J., Hampson, G., Llewelyn, M., Mestre‐Ferrandiz, J., & Hopkins, M. M. (2019) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-019-00516-0 · Cited by 17
Liu, F., Hu, H., Wang, J., Chen, Y., Sun, H., & Hu, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.653450 · Cited by 17
Sarikhani, Y., Ostovar, T., Rossi‐Fedele, G., Edirippulige, S., & Bastani, P. (2021) · Value in Health Regional Issues · doi:10.1016/j.vhri.2020.12.001 · Cited by 17
Lancsar, E., Ride, J., Black, N., Burgess, L., & Peeters, A. (2021) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.4451 · Cited by 17
Self-citationHow Will the End of Bear Bile Farming in Vietnam Influence Consumer Choice?
Davis, E. O., Veríssimo, D., Crudge, B., Sam, S., Cao, D. T., Ho, P. V., Dang, N. T. H., Nguyen, T. D., Nguyen, H. N., Cao, T. T., et al. (2021) · Conservation and Society · doi:10.4103/cs.cs_74_21 · Cited by 17
3D Printing in LMICs: Functional Design for Upper Limb Prosthetics in Uganda
Hussaini, A., Kyberd, P., Mulindwa, B., Ssekitoleko, R., Keeble, W., Kenney, L. P. J., & Howard, D. (2023) · Prosthesis · doi:10.3390/prosthesis5010011 · Cited by 17
Patient Preferences of a Low-Income Hispanic Population for Mental Health Services in Primary Care
Herman, P. M., Ingram, M., Rimas, H. L., Carvajal, S. C., & Cunningham, C. E. (2015) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-015-0687-0 · Cited by 17
Preferences for Pharmacist Counselling in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Kawaguchi, T., Azuma, K., Yamaguchi, T., Iwase, S., Matsunaga, T., Yamada, K., Miyamatsu, H., Takeuchi, H., Kohno, N., Akashi, T., et al. (2014) · Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin · doi:10.1248/bpb.b14-00452 · Cited by 17
Patient Preference Research in Otolaryngology
Naunheim, M. R., Wittenberg, E., & Shrime, M. G. (2017) · JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2017.1086 · Cited by 17
Svedsäter, H., Leather, D. A., Robinson, T., Doll, H., Nafees, B., & Bradshaw, L. (2017) · Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2017.09.010 · Cited by 17
Obi, C., Sanou, E. I. R., Tur-Cardona, J., Bartolini, F., Gheysen, G., & Speelman, S. (2018) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.06.006 · Cited by 17
Buchanan, J. P., Blair, E. M., Thomson, K. L., Ormondroyd, E., Watkins, H. C., Taylor, J. C., & Wordsworth, S. (2019) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41431-019-0452-z · Cited by 17
Kurczewska-Michalak, M., Kardas, P., & Czajkowski, M. (2020) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12030236 · Cited by 17
Bauer, B., Brockmeier, B., Devonshire, V. A., Charbonne, A., Wach, D., & Hendin, B. A. (2020) · Neurodegenerative Disease Management · doi:10.2217/nmt-2020-0034 · Cited by 17
Gutierrez, J. I., Dubov, A., Altice, F. L., & Vlahov, D. (2021) · Military Medical Research · doi:10.1186/s40779-021-00323-6 · Cited by 17
The Willingness to Pay for Residential PV Plants in Italy: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Bragolusi, P., & D’Alpaos, C. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su131910544 · Cited by 17
Romo, M. L., Zimba, R., Kulkarni, S., Berry, A., You, W., Mirzayi, C. A., Westmoreland, D. A., Parcesepe, A. M., Waldron, L., Rane, M. S., et al. (2021) · JMIR Public Health and Surveillance · doi:10.2196/32846 · Cited by 17
COVID-19 Vaccination Preferences of University Students and Staff in Hong Kong
Fung, L. W., Zhao, J., Yan, V. K. C., Blais, J. E., Chan, J. C. H., Li, S. T. H., Shami, J. J. P., Kwan, C. M. L., Wei, Y., Wong, C. K. H., et al. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.12681 · Cited by 17
Brain, D., Jadambaa, A., & Kularatna, S. (2022) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08464-7 · Cited by 17
Mühlbacher, A. C., & Bethge, S. (2016) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.007 · Cited by 17
Sydavong, T., Goto, D., Kawata, K., Kaneko, S., & Ichihashi, M. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210355 · Cited by 17
Williams, G., & Kinchin, I. (2023) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-022-01528-9 · Cited by 16
Motivation and Competition in Health Care
Scott, A., & Sivey, P. M. (2017) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.4533 · Cited by 16
Lendado, T. A., Workie, S. B., Sadamo, F. E., Samuel, S., Assele, D. D., & Awato, M. A. (2022) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-022-07874-x · Cited by 16
Wang, H., Sun, H., Jin, C., Wang, M., Luo, Y., Song, W., & Wang, H. (2022) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s371188 · Cited by 16
Morillon, G. F., Benkhalti, M., Dagenais, P., & Poder, T. G. (2022) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13685 · Cited by 16
Genie, M. G., Ryan, M., & Krucien, N. (2023) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.4658 · Cited by 16
Assessment of women’s treatment preferences for vasomotor symptoms due to menopause
Shiozawa, A., Thurston, R. C., Cook, E. E., Yang, H., King, D. D., Kristy, R. M., & Mancuso, S. (2023) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1080/14737167.2023.2250916 · Cited by 16
Valuing SF-6Dv2 Using a Discrete Choice Experiment in a General Population in Quebec, Canada
Ameri, H., & Poder, T. G. (2024) · International Journal of Health Policy and Management · doi:10.34172/ijhpm.8404 · Cited by 16
Hua, R., Fu, H., Liang, G., & Yang, F. (2024) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-024-12000-0 · Cited by 16
Russo, P. L., Chen, G., Cheng, A. C., Richards, M. J., Graves, N., Ratcliffe, J., & Hall, L. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011397 · Cited by 16
Marsh, K., Thokala, P., Mühlbacher, A. C., & Lanitis, T. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47540-0_4 · Cited by 16
Sever, I., Verbič, M., & Klarić, E. (2017) · Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2017.12.005 · Cited by 16
Sham surgery: justified but practical? A systematic review of sham surgery trials in orthopaedics
Bunzli, S., Dowsey, M., & Choong, P. (2018) · The South African Orthopaedic Journal (SAOJ) · doi:10.17159/2309-8309/2018/v17n3a1 · Cited by 16
Boeri, M., Szegvari, B., Hauber, B., Mange, B., Mountian, I., Schiff, M. H., & Maniadakis, N. (2019) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s203775 · Cited by 16
Biddell, C. B., O’Leary, M. C., Wheeler, S. B., & Spees, L. P. (2020) · Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0306 · Cited by 17
Lv, Y., Fu, Q. J., Shen, X., Jia, E., Li, X., Peng, Y., Yan, J., Jiang, M., & Xiong, J. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17228420 · Cited by 16
Lévesque, A., Kermagoret, C., Poder, T. G., L’Ecuyer-Sauvageau, C., Ψ, J. H., Sauvé, S., & Dupras, J. (2021) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106997 · Cited by 18
Mühlbacher, A. C., Sadler, A., & Juhnke, C. (2021) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-021-01264-6 · Cited by 16
Geda, S. A., & Kühl, R. W. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13052786 · Cited by 16
What Tinnitus Therapy Outcome Measures Are Important for Patients?– A Discrete Choice Experiment
Rademaker, M. M., Essers, B. A. B., Stokroos, R. J., Smit, A. L., & Stegeman, I. (2021) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.668880 · Cited by 17
Gong, C. L., Hay, J. W., Meeker, D., & Doctor, J. N. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012739 · Cited by 16
Paul, P., Berlin, C., Maessen, M., & Valtonen, H. J. (2018) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2018.1444260 · Cited by 16
Mathijssen, E. G. E., van Heuckelum, M., van Dijk, L., Vervloet, M., Zonnenberg, S., Vriezekolk, J. E., & van den Bemt, B. J. F. (2018) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s170721 · Cited by 16
Choice models with mixtures: An application to a cocktail experiment
Goos, P., & Hamidouche, H. (2019) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.04.006 · Cited by 16
Preferences for centralised emergency medical services: discrete choice experiment
Bhattarai, N., McMeekin, P. J., Price, C., & Vale, L. D. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030966 · Cited by 16
Brinkmann, M., Diedrich, L., Krauth, C., Robra, B.-P., Stahmeyer, J. T., & Dreier, M. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042399 · Cited by 15
Hammond, J., Klapwijk, J. E., Riedijk, S. R., Lou, S., Ormond, K. E., Vogel, I., Hui, L., Sziepe, E.-J., Buchanan, J. P., Malmgren, C. I., et al. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261898 · Cited by 15
Preferences for private health insurance in China: A discrete choice experiment
Chen, N., Bai, J., Nicholas, S., Maitland, E., Tan, J., & Wang, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.985582 · Cited by 17
Wang, S. Y., Cantarelli, P., Groene, O., Stargardt, T., & Bellè, N. (2022) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.11.009 · Cited by 15
Hennessy, J., Mortimer, D., Sweeney, R., & Woode, M. E. (2023) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116184 · Cited by 15
Patient Preferences in the Treatment of Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis
Ameen, M., Alhusayen, R. O., Brandi, H., Bøgelund, M., Jensen, H. H., Reitzel, S. B., & Thyssen, J. P. (2024) · Acta Dermato Venereologica · doi:10.2340/actadv.v104.24339 · Cited by 15
Kurniati, A., Efendi, F., Ismawiningsih, I., Mulyani, N., Zakaria, Z., Ambarwati, R., Prasetyo, H., Muljandari, E., Damayanti, I., Noor, A., et al. (2024) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s459158 · Cited by 15
Wymbs, F. A., Chen, Y., Rimas, H. L., Deal, K., Waschbusch, D. A., & Pelham, W. E. (2016) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-016-0588-1 · Cited by 15
Allocating external financing for health: a discrete choice experiment of stakeholder preferences
Grépin, K. A., Pinkstaff, C. B., Hole, A. R., Henderson, K., Norheim, O. F., Røttingen, J., & Ottersen, T. (2017) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czx017 · Cited by 15
Citizen preferences for possible energy policies at the national and state levels
Peterson, M., & Feldman, D. (2018) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.069 · Cited by 16
General Population vs. Patient Preferences in Anticoagulant Therapy: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Najafzadeh, M., Schneeweiß, S., Choudhry, N. K., Avorn, J., & Gagne, J. J. (2018) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-018-0329-1 · Cited by 15
de Jong, L., Plöthner, M., Stahmeyer, J. T., Eberhard, S., Zeidler, J., & Damm, K. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023253 · Cited by 15
Exploring women's preferences for HPV‐based cervical cancer screening in South Africa
Oberlin, A. M., Pasipamire, T., & Chibwesha, C. J. (2019) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.12869 · Cited by 15
Settumba, S. N., Shanahan, M., Butler, T. G., Schofield, P. W., Lafferty, L., Simpson, P. L., & Chambers, G. M. (2019) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-019-00484-5 · Cited by 15
Zhu, J., Li, J., Zhang, Z., & Li, H. (2019) · The International Journal of Health Planning and Management · doi:10.1002/hpm.2841 · Cited by 15
Lê, J. T., Bicket, A. K., Janssen, E. M., Grover, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Vold, S. D., Tarver, M. E., Eydelman, M. B., Bridges, J. F. P., & Li, T. (2019) · Ophthalmology Glaucoma · doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2019.08.007 · Cited by 15
Arslan, I. G., Huls, S. P. I., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Rozendaal, R. M., Persoons, M. C. T., Hell, M. E. S.-V., Bindels, P., Bierma‐Zeinstra, S., & Schiphof, D. (2020) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2020.07.002 · Cited by 15
Preference of influenza vaccination among the elderly population in Shaanxi province, China
Jiang, M., Li, P., Yao, X., Hayat, K., Gong, Y., Zhu, S., Peng, J., Shi, X., Pu, Z., Huang, Y., et al. (2021) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2021.1913029 · Cited by 15
Consumers' Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Personalised Nutrition
Pérez-Troncoso, D., Epstein, D., & Castañeda-García, J. (2021) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-021-00647-3 · Cited by 13
Saposnik, G., Andhavarapu, S., Fernández, Ó., Kim, H. J., Wiendl, H., Foss, M. M., Zuo, F., Havrdová, E., Celius, E., Cáceres, F., et al. (2021) · Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.msard.2021.103404 · Cited by 15
Cleland, J., Porteous, T., Ejebu, O., Ryan, M., & Skåtun, D. (2021) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.11.004 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle University (GB)
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Lancsar, Emily
- Venue
- PharmacoEconomics
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 661-677
- ISSN
- 1170-7690 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122707212
- Cited by
- 1,707
- References
- 107
- Citations by year
- 2026: 159 · 2025: 163 · 2024: 156 · 2023: 155 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 135 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 55.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- PharmacoEconomics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- discrete choice experiment, healthcare decision-making, outcome measurement, economic evaluation, cost-benefit analysis, cost-utility analysis, preference elicitation, questionnaire design, validity, welfare analysis, policy analysis
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Health, Choice Behavior, Consumer Behavior, Costs and Cost Analysis, Health Services Research, Humans, Policy Making, Models, Econometric, Patient Satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
