The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making: A User??s Guide
Open accessAbstract
Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are regularly used in health economics to elicit preferences for healthcare products and programmes. There is growing recognition that DCEs can provide more than information on preferences and, in particular, they have the potential to contribute more directly to outcome measurement for use in economic evaluation. Almost uniquely, DCEs could potentially contribute to outcome measurement for use in both cost-benefit and cost-utility analysis. Within this expanding remit, our intention is to provide a resource for current practitioners as well as those considering undertaking a DCE, using DCE results in a policy/commercial context, or reviewing a DCE. We present the fundamental principles and theory underlying DCEs. To aid in undertaking and assessing the quality of DCEs, we discuss the process of carrying out a choice study and have developed a checklist covering conceptualizing the choice process, selecting attributes and levels, experimental design, questionnaire design, pilot testing, sampling and sample size, data collection, coding of data, econometric analysis, validity, interpretation and welfare and policy analysis. In this fast-moving area, a number of issues remain on the research frontier. We therefore outline potentially fruitful areas for future research associated both with DCEs in general, and with health applications specifically, paying attention to how the results of DCEs can be used in economic evaluation. We also discuss emerging research trends. We conclude that if appropriately designed, implemented, analysed and interpreted, DCEs offer several advantages in the health sector, the most important of which is that they provide rich data sources for economic evaluation and decision making, allowing investigation of many types of questions, some of which otherwise would be intractable analytically. Thus, they offer viable alternatives and complements to existing methods of valuation and preference elicitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We followed recommended guidelines to design and implement the DCE. [7, 8, 11–16]”
From Assessing the American public's preferences for reforms to teen driving licensure systems: a discrete choice experiment (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“The opt-out option has the potential to make the choices more realistic [34] by simulating a real-world context where individuals can exercise their right not to take up an app, given the apps on offer [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“However, this type of design is often considered impractical due to the high number of choice tasks required [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“The higher the number of attributes, alternatives, and choice tasks, the higher the task complexity [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“When a range is not wide enough, there is a risk that participants could ignore the attributes because they judge the difference between levels to be insignificant [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“When perfect orthogonality and balance cannot be achieved or are not desirable, an efficient design can be applied [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior
McFadden, D. L. (1972) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 14,203
Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
Drummond, M. E., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198529446.001.0001 · Cited by 13,648
Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method
Dillman, D. A. (2007) · Cited by 9,587
A New Approach to Consumer Theory
Lancaster, K. J. (1966) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/259131 · Cited by 8,471
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait́, J., & Adamowicz, W. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753831 · Cited by 7,008
Self-citationA New Approach to Consumer Theory
Lancaster, K. J. (1976) · Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-51565-1_34 · Cited by 6,946
Addelman, S., Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (1979) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1267766 · Cited by 6,753
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Hensher, 1983, Transport Res, 890, 11
- Ryan, 2003, Applied Health Econ Health Policy, 2, 55
- Chakraborty, 1994, J Health Care Mark, 14, 21
- Swait, 1993, JMark Res, 30, 305
- Longo, 2006, Br J Gen Practice, 56, 35
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bridges, J. F. P., Hauber, A. B., Marshall, D., Lloyd, A., Prosser, L. A., Regier, D. A., Johnson, F. R., & Mauskopf, J. (2011) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.013 · Cited by 2,029
Reed Johnson, F., Lancsar, E., Marshall, D., Kilambi, V., Mühlbacher, A., Regier, D. A., Bresnahan, B. W., Kanninen, B., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2013) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223 · Cited by 1,799
Self-citationContemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies
Johnston, R. J., Boyle, K., Adamowicz, W., Bennett, J., Brouwer, R., Cameron, T. A., Hanemann, W. M., Hanley, N. D., Ryan, M., Scarpa, R., et al. (2017) · Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists · doi:10.1086/691697 · Cited by 1,554
Hauber, A. B., González, J. M., Groothuis-Oudshoorn, C. G. M., Prior, T., Marshall, D. A., Cunningham, C., IJzerman, M. J., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2016) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004 · Cited by 1,330
Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature
de Bekker‐Grob, E. W., Ryan, M., & Gerard, K. (2012) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.1697 · Cited by 1,329
Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical Guide
de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Donkers, B., Jonker, M. F., & Stolk, E. A. (2015) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-015-0118-z · Cited by 987
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature
Clark, M. D., Determann, D., Petrou, S., Moro, D., & de Bekker-Grob, E. W. (2014) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x · Cited by 898
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future
Soekhai, V., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Ellis, A. R., & Vass, C. (2018) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2 · Cited by 841
The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments
Hoyos, D. (2010) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.011 · Cited by 849
Coast, J., Al‐Janabi, H., Sutton, E. J., Horrocks, S., Vosper, A. J., Swancutt, D. R., & Flynn, T. N. (2011) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.1739 · Cited by 595
Nardi, P. M. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315635088-9 · Cited by 541
Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values
Hunink, M. G. M., Weinstein, M. C., Wittenberg, E., Drummond, M. F., Pliskin, J. S., Wong, J. B., & Glasziou, P. P. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139506779 · Cited by 425
Quaife, M., Terris‐Prestholt, F., Tanna, G. L. D., & Vickerman, P. T. (2018) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-018-0954-6 · Cited by 387
Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health – How are Studies being Designed and Reported?
Marshall, D. A., Bridges, J. F. P., Hauber, B., Cameron, R., Donnalley, L., Fyie, K., & Johnson, F. R. (2010) · Patient · doi:10.2165/11539650-000000000-00000 · Cited by 364
Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments
Mariel, P., Hoyos, D., Meyerhoff, J., Czajkowski, M., Dekker, T., Glenk, K., Jacobsen, J. B., Liebe, U., Olsen, S. B., Sagebiel, J., et al. (2020) · SpringerBriefs in economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62669-3 · Cited by 386
Discrete Choice Experiments: A Guide to Model Specification, Estimation and Software
Lancsar, E., Fiebig, D. G., & Hole, A. R. (2017) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-017-0506-4 · Cited by 363
Self-citationHerrmann, C., Rhein, S., & Sträter, K. F. (2022) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106219 · Cited by 246
Designing Discrete Choice Experiments: Do Optimal Designs Come at a Price?
Louviere, J. J., Islam, T., Wasi, N., Street, D. J., & Burgess, L. (2008) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/586913 · Cited by 252
Self-citationThe effects of cognitive, affective, and sensory attributes on hotel choice
Kim, D., & Perdue, R. R. (2013) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.05.012 · Cited by 264
Ramos-Goñi, J. M., Craig, B. M., Oppe, M., Ramallo‐Fariña, Y., Prades, J. L. P., Luo, N., & Rivero‐Arias, O. (2017) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.023 · Cited by 238
The Effect of Including an Opt-Out Option in Discrete Choice Experiments
Veldwijk, J., Lambooij, M., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Smit, H. A., & de Wit, G. A. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111805 · Cited by 253
Morton, R. L., Snelling, P. L., Webster, A. C., Rose, J. M., Masterson, R., Johnson, D. W., & Howard, K. (2012) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.111355 · Cited by 239
de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Hol, L., Donkers, B., van Dam, L., Habbema, J. D., van Leerdam, M. E., Kuipers, E. J., Essink‐Bot, M., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2009) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00670.x · Cited by 227
Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future
Louviere, J. J., & Lancsar, E. (2009) · Health Economics Policy and Law · doi:10.1017/s1744133109990193 · Cited by 209
Self-citationEarly Assessment of Medical Technologies to Inform Product Development and Market Access
IJzerman, M. J., & Steuten, L. (2011) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.2165/11593380-000000000-00000 · Cited by 189
Designing a Stated Choice Experiment: The Value of a Qualitative Process
Kløjgaard, M. E., Bech, M., & Søgaard, R. (2012) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/s1755-5345(13)70050-2 · Cited by 184
Surveillance for ocular hypertension: an evidence synthesis and economic evaluation.
Burr, J., Botello-Pinzon, P., Takwoingi, Y., Hernández, R., Vazquez-Montes, M., Elders, A., Asaoka, R., Banister, K., van der Schoot, J., Fraser, C., et al. (2012) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta16290 · Cited by 180
The use of discrete choice experiments to inform health workforce policy: a systematic review
Mandeville, K., Lagarde, M., & Hanson, K. (2014) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-367 · Cited by 184
The Role of Qualitative Research Methods in Discrete Choice Experiments
Vass, C., Rigby, D., & Payne, K. (2017) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x16683934 · Cited by 218
Choice Experiments to Quantify Preferences for Health and Healthcare: State of the Practice
Mühlbacher, A. C., & Johnson, F. R. (2016) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-016-0232-7 · Cited by 179
Soekhai, V., Whichello, C. L., Levitan, B. S., Veldwijk, J., Pinto, C. A., Donkers, B., Huys, I., van Overbeeke, E., Juhaeri, J., & de Bekker-Grob, E. W. (2019) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2019.05.001 · Cited by 175
Haghani, M., Bliemer, M. C. J., Rose, J. M., Oppewal, H., & Lancsar, E. (2021) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2021.100322 · Cited by 180
Self-citationRockers, P. C., Ryan, M., Kolstad, J. R., & Dolea, C. (2012) · Cited by 167
‘I will choose when to test, where I want to test’
Indravudh, P. P., Sibanda, E. L., d’Elbée, M., Kumwenda, M., Ringwald, B., Maringwa, G., Simwinga, M., Nyirenda, L. J., Johnson, C., Hatzold, K., et al. (2017) · AIDS · doi:10.1097/qad.0000000000001516 · Cited by 165
International Valuation Protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L
Ramos-Goñi, J. M., Oppe, M., Stolk, E. A., Shah, K. K., Kreimeier, S., Rivero‐Arias, O., & Devlin, N. J. (2020) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-020-00909-3 · Cited by 166
Best worst discrete choice experiments in health: Methods and an application
Lancsar, E., Louviere, J. J., Donaldson, C., Currie, G. R., & Burgess, L. (2012) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.007 · Cited by 159
Self-citationLouviere, J. J., & Flynn, T. N. (2010) · Patient · doi:10.2165/11539660-000000000-00000 · Cited by 145
Self-citationValuing SF-6D Health States Using a Discrete Choice Experiment
Norman, R., Viney, R. C., Brazier, J. E., Burgess, L., Cronin, P., King, M. T., Ratcliffe, J., & Street, D. J. (2013) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x13503499 · Cited by 143
Are Healthcare Choices Predictable? The Impact of Discrete Choice Experiment Designs and Models
de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Swait́, J., Kassahun, H. T., Bliemer, M. C. J., Jonker, M. F., Veldwijk, J., Cong, K., Rose, J. M., & Donkers, B. (2019) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2019.04.1924 · Cited by 147
Janssen, E. M., Marshall, D. A., Hauber, B., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2017) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1080/14737167.2017.1389648 · Cited by 136
Haghani, M., Bliemer, M. C. J., Rose, J. M., Oppewal, H., & Lancsar, E. (2021) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2021.100309 · Cited by 150
Self-citationA Reporting Checklist for Discrete Choice Experiments in Health: The DIRECT Checklist
Ride, J., Goranitis, I., Meng, Y., LaBond, C., & Lancsar, E. (2024) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-024-01431-6 · Cited by 134
Self-citationKleij, K.-S., Tangermann, U., Amelung, V. E., & Krauth, C. (2017) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2433-7 · Cited by 134
Including Opt-Out Options in Discrete Choice Experiments: Issues to Consider
Campbell, D., & Erdem, S. (2018) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-018-0324-6 · Cited by 137
Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: A Scoping Review
Joy, S. M., Little, E., Maruthur, N. M., Purnell, T. S., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2013) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-013-0089-7 · Cited by 127
Reconceptualising the External Validity of Discrete Choice Experiments
Lancsar, E., & Swait́, J. (2014) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-014-0181-7 · Cited by 140
Self-citationJunior doctors’ preferences for specialty choice
Sivey, P. M., Scott, A., Witt, J. C., Joyce, C., & Humphreys, J. S. (2012) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.07.001 · Cited by 124
Acceptance of Vaccinations in Pandemic Outbreaks: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Determann, D., Korfage, I. J., Lambooij, M., Bliemer, M. C. J., Richardus, J. H., Steyerberg, E. W., & de Bekker-Grob, E. W. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102505 · Cited by 123
Brunie, A., Wamala-Mucheri, P., Otterness, C., Akol, A., Chen, M., Bufumbo, L., & Weaver, M. A. (2014) · Global Health Science and Practice · doi:10.9745/ghsp-d-13-00140 · Cited by 122
Hill, M. K., Fisher, J., Chitty, L. S., & Stephen Morris, A. (2012) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2012.68 · Cited by 121
Whitty, J. A., Lancsar, E., Rixon, K., Golenko, X., & Ratcliffe, J. (2014) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-014-0063-2 · Cited by 126
Self-citationHarrison, M. J., Milbers, K., Hudson, M., & Bansback, N. J. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014719 · Cited by 121
Rockers, P. C., Jaskiewicz, W., Wurts, L., Kruk, M. E., Mgomella, G. S., Ntalazi, F., & Tulenko, K. (2012) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-212 · Cited by 119
Nimdet, K., Chaiyakunapruk, N., Vichansavakul, K., & Ngorsuraches, S. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122760 · Cited by 119
Hiligsmann, M., van Durme, Geusens, P., Dellaert, B. G. C., Dirksen, van der Weijden, T., Reginster, J., & Boonen (2013) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s38408 · Cited by 118
Flynn, T. N., Louviere, J. J., Peters, T. J., & Coast, J. (2010) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.008 · Cited by 118
Self-citationAdaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis
Cunningham, C. E., Deal, K., & Chen, Y. (2010) · Patient · doi:10.2165/11537870-000000000-00000 · Cited by 118
Ali, S., & Ronaldson, S. J. (2012) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/bmb/lds020 · Cited by 119
The state of the art of discrete choice experiments in food research
Lizin, S., Rousseau, S., Kessels, R., Meulders, M., Pepermans, G., Speelman, S., Vandebroek, M. L., den Broeck, G. V., Loo, E. J. V., & Verbeke, W. (2022) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104678 · Cited by 125
Consumer preferences for household-level battery energy storage
Agnew, S., & Dargusch, P. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.030 · Cited by 114
Abiiro, G. A., Leppert, G., Mbera, G. B., Robyn, P. J., & Allegri, M. D. (2014) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-235 · Cited by 113
Hill, M. K., Johnson, J.-A., Langlois, S. F., Lee, H. J., Winsor, S. H. M., Dineley, B., Horniachek, M., Lalatta, F., Ronzoni, L., Barrett, A. N., et al. (2015) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.249 · Cited by 111
Helter, T. M., & Boehler, C. E. H. (2016) · Journal of Substance Use · doi:10.3109/14659891.2015.1118563 · Cited by 110
Bien, D. R., Danner, M., Vennedey, V., Civello, D., Evers, S., & Hiligsmann, M. (2017) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-017-0235-y · Cited by 110
The Welfare Effects of Encouraging Rural-Urban Migration
Lagakos, D., Mobarak, A., & Waugh, M. (2018) · Econometrica · doi:10.3386/w24193 · Cited by 133
Deriving distributional weights for QALYs through discrete choice experiments
Lancsar, E., Wildman, J., Donaldson, C., Ryan, M., & Baker, R. M. (2011) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.01.003 · Cited by 107
Self-citationSzinay, D., Cameron, R., Naughton, F., Whitty, J. A., Brown, J., & Jones, A. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/32365 · Cited by 106
The impact of interpretive and reductive front-of-pack labels on food choice and willingness to pay
Talati, Z., Norman, R., Pettigrew, S., Neal, B. C., Kelly, B., Dixon, H., Ball, K., Miller, C. L., & Shilton, T. (2017) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-017-0628-2 · Cited by 104
Antibiotic prescribing in primary healthcare: Dominant factors and trade-offs in decision-making
Lum, E., Page, K., Whitty, J. A., Doust, J. A., & Graves, N. (2018) · Infection Disease & Health · doi:10.1016/j.idh.2017.12.002 · Cited by 108
Kemperman, A. D. A. M. (2021) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2020.103137 · Cited by 113
Valuing health at the end of life: A stated preference discrete choice experiment
Shah, K. K., Tsuchiya, A., & Wailoo, A. (2014) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.022 · Cited by 103
A Comparison of Methods for Converting DCE Values onto the Full Health-Dead QALY Scale
Rowen, D., Brazier, J. E., & van Hout, B. (2014) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x14559542 · Cited by 102
Can healthcare choice be predicted using stated preference data?
de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Donkers, B., Bliemer, M. C. J., Veldwijk, J., & Swait́, J. (2019) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112736 · Cited by 107
Patients’ preferences: a discrete-choice experiment for treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer
Mühlbacher, A. C., & Bethge, S. (2014) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-014-0622-4 · Cited by 103
Job preferences of undergraduate nursing students in eastern China: a discrete choice experiment
Liu, T., Li, S., Yang, R., Liu, S., & Chen, G. (2019) · Human Resources for Health · doi:10.1186/s12960-018-0335-3 · Cited by 103
Tobi, R. C. A., Harris, F., Rana, R., Brown, K. A., Quaife, M., & Green, R. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11236575 · Cited by 100
Risk as an Attribute in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Harrison, M. J., Rigby, D., Vass, C., Flynn, T. N., Louviere, J. J., & Payne, K. (2014) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-014-0048-1 · Cited by 99
Self-citationAdams, J. M., Bateman, B., Becker, F., Cresswell, T., Flynn, D., McNaughton, R. J., Oluboyede, Y., Robalino, S., Ternent, L., Gardner, B., et al. (2015) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta19940 · Cited by 106
Lugnér, A. K., & Krabbe, P. F. M. (2020) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1080/14737167.2020.1779062 · Cited by 99
Valuing Health State: An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Ethiopians
Welie, A. G., Gebretekle, G. B., Stolk, E. A., Mukuria, C., Krahn, M. D., Enquoselassie, F., & Fenta, T. G. (2019) · Value in Health Regional Issues · doi:10.1016/j.vhri.2019.08.475 · Cited by 96
Best–Worst Scaling and the Prioritization of Objects in Health: A Systematic Review
Hollin, I. L., Paskett, J., Schuster, A. L. R., Crossnohere, N. L., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2022) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-022-01167-1 · Cited by 101
Bridges, J. F. P., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Hauber, B., Heidenreich, S., Janssen, E. M., Bast, A., Hanmer, J., Danyliv, A., Low, E., Bouvy, J. C., et al. (2023) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2022.12.004 · Cited by 93
Patients’ and urologists’ preferences for prostate cancer treatment: a discrete choice experiment
de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Bliemer, M. C. J., Donkers, B., Essink‐Bot, M., Korfage, I. J., Roobol, M. J., Bangma, C. H., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2013) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.370 · Cited by 93
Laba, T., Brien, J.-A. E., Fransen, M., & Jan, S. (2013) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/1471-2474-14-160 · Cited by 90
Salloum, R. G., Shenkman, E. A., Louviere, J. J., & Chambers, D. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0675-8 · Cited by 93
Self-citationTervonen, T., Schmidt‐Ott, T., Marsh, K., Bridges, J. F. P., Quaife, M., & Janssen, E. M. (2018) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2018.04.1822 · Cited by 90
Brazzelli, M. G., Javanbakht, M., Imamura, M., Hudson, J., Moloney, E., Becker, F., Wallace, S. A., Omar, M. I., Shimonovich, M., MacLennan, G., et al. (2019) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta23140 · Cited by 89
Discrete Choice Experiment Response Rates: A Meta‐analysis
Watson, V., Becker, F., & de Bekker-Grob, E. W. (2016) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.3354 · Cited by 89
Reporting Guidelines for the Use of Expert Judgement in Model-Based Economic Evaluations
Iglesias, C. P., Thompson, A., Rogowski, W. H., & Payne, K. (2016) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-016-0425-9 · Cited by 86
Girls’ preferences for HPV vaccination: A discrete choice experiment
de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Hofman, R., Donkers, B., van Ballegooijen, M., Helmerhorst, T. J. M., Raat, H., & Korfage, I. J. (2010) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.08.001 · Cited by 84
Patient Preferences for Biologic Agents in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Discrete-Choice Experiment
Augustovski, F., Beratarrechea, A. G., Irazola, V. E., Rubinstein, F., Tesolin, P. D., González, J. M., Lencina, V., Scolnik, M., Waimann, C. A., Navarta, D. A., et al. (2013) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.11.007 · Cited by 84
Wu, J. H., Xie, S., He, X., Chen, G., Bai, G., Feng, D., Hu, M., Jiang, J., Wang, X., Wu, H., et al. (2021) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-020-00997-1 · Cited by 83
The Predictive Value of Discrete Choice Experiments in Public Health: An Exploratory Application
Salampessy, B. H., Veldwijk, J., Schuit, A. J., van den Brekel-Dijkstra, K., Neslo, R. E. J., de Wit, G. A., & Lambooij, M. (2015) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-015-0115-2 · Cited by 83
Preferences for Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: a Best–Best Discrete Choice Experiment
Ghijben, P., Lancsar, E., & Zavarsek, S. (2014) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-014-0188-0 · Cited by 86
Self-citationde Bekker-Grob, E. W., Veldwijk, J., Jonker, M. F., Donkers, B., Huisman, J., Buis, S., Swait́, J., Lancsar, E., Witteman, C. L. M., Bonsel, G. J., et al. (2018) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.01.054 · Cited by 81
Self-citationMühlbacher, A. C., & Nübling, M. (2010) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-010-0218-6 · Cited by 81
The landscape of econometric discrete choice modelling research
Haghani, M., Bliemer, M. C. J., & Hensher, D. A. (2021) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2021.100303 · Cited by 83
Diaby, V., & Goeree, R. A. (2013) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1586/14737167.2014.859525 · Cited by 80
Muthulingam, D., Bia, J., Madden, L. M., Farnum, S. O., Barry, D. T., & Altice, F. L. (2019) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2019.01.019 · Cited by 79
Financial Toxicity in Advanced and Metastatic Cancer: Overburdened and Underprepared
Rotter, J., Spencer, J. C., & Wheeler, S. B. (2019) · Journal of Oncology Practice · doi:10.1200/jop.18.00518 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle University (GB)
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Lancsar, Emily
- Venue
- PharmacoEconomics
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 661-677
- ISSN
- 1170-7690 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122707212
- Cited by
- 1,707
- References
- 107
- Citations by year
- 2026: 159 · 2025: 163 · 2024: 156 · 2023: 155 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 135 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 55.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- PharmacoEconomics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- discrete choice experiment, healthcare decision-making, outcome measurement, economic evaluation, cost-benefit analysis, cost-utility analysis, preference elicitation, questionnaire design, validity, welfare analysis, policy analysis
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Health, Choice Behavior, Consumer Behavior, Costs and Cost Analysis, Health Services Research, Humans, Policy Making, Models, Econometric, Patient Satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
