The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making: A User??s Guide
Open accessAbstract
Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are regularly used in health economics to elicit preferences for healthcare products and programmes. There is growing recognition that DCEs can provide more than information on preferences and, in particular, they have the potential to contribute more directly to outcome measurement for use in economic evaluation. Almost uniquely, DCEs could potentially contribute to outcome measurement for use in both cost-benefit and cost-utility analysis. Within this expanding remit, our intention is to provide a resource for current practitioners as well as those considering undertaking a DCE, using DCE results in a policy/commercial context, or reviewing a DCE. We present the fundamental principles and theory underlying DCEs. To aid in undertaking and assessing the quality of DCEs, we discuss the process of carrying out a choice study and have developed a checklist covering conceptualizing the choice process, selecting attributes and levels, experimental design, questionnaire design, pilot testing, sampling and sample size, data collection, coding of data, econometric analysis, validity, interpretation and welfare and policy analysis. In this fast-moving area, a number of issues remain on the research frontier. We therefore outline potentially fruitful areas for future research associated both with DCEs in general, and with health applications specifically, paying attention to how the results of DCEs can be used in economic evaluation. We also discuss emerging research trends. We conclude that if appropriately designed, implemented, analysed and interpreted, DCEs offer several advantages in the health sector, the most important of which is that they provide rich data sources for economic evaluation and decision making, allowing investigation of many types of questions, some of which otherwise would be intractable analytically. Thus, they offer viable alternatives and complements to existing methods of valuation and preference elicitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We followed recommended guidelines to design and implement the DCE. [7, 8, 11–16]”
From Assessing the American public's preferences for reforms to teen driving licensure systems: a discrete choice experiment (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“The opt-out option has the potential to make the choices more realistic [34] by simulating a real-world context where individuals can exercise their right not to take up an app, given the apps on offer [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“However, this type of design is often considered impractical due to the high number of choice tasks required [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“The higher the number of attributes, alternatives, and choice tasks, the higher the task complexity [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“When a range is not wide enough, there is a risk that participants could ignore the attributes because they judge the difference between levels to be insignificant [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“When perfect orthogonality and balance cannot be achieved or are not desirable, an efficient design can be applied [20].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior
McFadden, D. L. (1972) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 14,203
Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
Drummond, M. E., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198529446.001.0001 · Cited by 13,648
Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method
Dillman, D. A. (2007) · Cited by 9,587
A New Approach to Consumer Theory
Lancaster, K. J. (1966) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/259131 · Cited by 8,471
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait́, J., & Adamowicz, W. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753831 · Cited by 7,008
Self-citationA New Approach to Consumer Theory
Lancaster, K. J. (1976) · Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-51565-1_34 · Cited by 6,946
Addelman, S., Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (1979) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1267766 · Cited by 6,753
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Hensher, 1983, Transport Res, 890, 11
- Ryan, 2003, Applied Health Econ Health Policy, 2, 55
- Chakraborty, 1994, J Health Care Mark, 14, 21
- Swait, 1993, JMark Res, 30, 305
- Longo, 2006, Br J Gen Practice, 56, 35
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,001
The Impact of Empathy—Explaining Diversity in Street-Level Decision-Making
Jensen, D. C., & Pedersen, L. B. (2016) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muw070 · Cited by 82
Mentzakis, E., Stefanowska, P., & Hurley, J. (2010) · Health Economics Policy and Law · doi:10.1017/s1744133110000344 · Cited by 79
Respondent Understanding in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Scoping Review
Pearce, A. M., Harrison, M. J., Watson, V., Street, D. J., Howard, K., Bansback, N. J., & Bryan, S. (2020) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-020-00467-y · Cited by 76
Craig, B. M., Pickard, A. S., Stolk, E. A., & Brazier, J. E. (2013) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x13482524 · Cited by 76
Pretesting Discrete-Choice Experiments: A Guide for Researchers
Campoamor, N. B., Guerrini, C. J., Brooks, W. B., Bridges, J. F. P., & Crossnohere, N. L. (2024) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-024-00672-z · Cited by 74
Wymbs, F. A., Cunningham, C. E., Chen, Y., Rimas, H. L., Deal, K., Waschbusch, D. A., & Pelham, W. E. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2015.1004678 · Cited by 74
Janssen, E. M., Hauber, B., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2017) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.001 · Cited by 76
Cunningham, C. E., Walker, J. R., Eastwood, J. D., Westra, H. A., Rimas, H. L., Chen, Y., Marcus, M., Swinson, R. P., Bracken, K., & The Mobilizing Minds Research Group (2013) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.811324 · Cited by 79
Retaining rural doctors: Doctors' preferences for rural medical workforce incentives
Li, J., Scott, A., McGrail, M. R., Humphreys, J., & Witt, J. C. (2014) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.053 · Cited by 73
Veldwijk, J., van der Heide, I., Rademakers, J. J. D. J. M., Schuit, A. J., de Wit, G. A., Uiters, E., & Lambooij, M. (2015) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x15597225 · Cited by 80
Trapero‐Bertran, M., Rodríguez‐Martin, B., & López‐Bastida, J. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0219905 · Cited by 72
Wearable Devices in Health Monitoring from the Environmental towards Multiple Domains: A Survey
Haghi, M., Danyali, S., Ayasseh, S., Wang, J., Aazami, R., & Deserno, T. M. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21062130 · Cited by 76
Rao, K. D., Ryan, M., Shroff, Z. C., Vujicic, M., Ramani, S., & Berman, P. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082984 · Cited by 72
Application of Discrete Choice Experiment in Health Care: A Bibliometric Analysis
Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, Z., Li, X., Pang, X., & Wang, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.673698 · Cited by 75
Taylor, S. A., Mallett, S., Miles, A., Stephen Morris, A., Quinn, L., Clarke, C. S., Beare, S., Bridgewater, J. A., Goh, V., Janes, S. M., et al. (2019) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta23660 · Cited by 70
Kimman, M., Dellaert, B. G. C., Boersma, L. J., Lambin, P., & Dirksen, C. D. (2010) · Acta Oncologica · doi:10.3109/02841860903536002 · Cited by 73
When does online review matter to consumers? The effect of product quality information cues
Kim, R. Y. (2020) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-020-09398-0 · Cited by 69
Payne, K., Fargher, E., Roberts, S. A., Tricker, K. J., Elliott, R. A., Ratcliffe, J., & Newman, W. G. (2011) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2010.10.007 · Cited by 71
Marshall, H. S., Chen, G., Clarke, M. F., & Ratcliffe, J. (2015) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.11.075 · Cited by 69
Groenewoud, S., van Exel, J. N. A., Bobinac, A., Berg, M., Huijsman, R., & Stolk, E. A. (2015) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12306 · Cited by 73
Koopmanschap, M. A., Stolk, E. A., & Koolman, X. (2010) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462310000048 · Cited by 68
Interactive stated choice surveys: a study of air travel behaviour
Collins, A. T., Rose, J. M., & Hess, S. (2011) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-011-9327-z · Cited by 66
Welte, T. (2012) · Deutsches Ärzteblatt international · doi:10.3238/arztebl.2012.0759 · Cited by 66
Preferences for COVID-19 vaccine distribution strategies in the US: A discrete choice survey
Eshun‐Wilson, I., Mody, A., Tram, K. H., Bradley, C., Sheve, A., Fox, B., Thompson, V. L. S., & Geng, E. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256394 · Cited by 67
Sample size selection for discrete choice experiments using design features
Assele, S. Y., Meulders, M., & Vandebroek, M. L. (2023) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2023.100436 · Cited by 65
Parental and societal values for the risks and benefits of childhood combination vaccines
Gidengil, C. A., Lieu, T. A., Payne, K., Rusinak, D., Messonnier, M. L., & Prosser, L. A. (2012) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.03.022 · Cited by 65
Dirksen, C. D., Utens, C. M. A., Joore, M. A., van Barneveld, T. A., Boer, B., Dreesens, D. H. H., van Laarhoven, H., Smit, C., Stiggelbout, A. M., & van der Weijden, T. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-64 · Cited by 65
Application of Discrete-Choice Experiment Methods in Tobacco Control: A Systematic Review
Regmi, K., Kaphle, D., Timilsina, S., & Tuha, N. A. A. (2017) · PharmacoEconomics - Open · doi:10.1007/s41669-017-0025-4 · Cited by 65
Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare Discrete Choice Experiments: A Primer
Vass, C., Wright, S. J., Burton, M. P., & Payne, K. (2017) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-017-0282-4 · Cited by 68
Patients' preferences for treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer
Noordman, B. J., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Coene, P. L. O., van der Harst, E., Lagarde, S. M., Shapiro, J., Wijnhoven, B. P. L., & van Lanschot, J. J. B. (2018) · British journal of surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.10897 · Cited by 65
Fecke, W., Danne, M., & Mußhoff, O. (2018) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2018.05.032 · Cited by 64
Using Conjoint Analysis and Choice Experiments to Estimate QALY Values
Flynn, T. N. (2010) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.2165/11535660-000000000-00000 · Cited by 64
Men’s preferences for prostate cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment
de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Rose, J. M., Donkers, B., Essink‐Bot, M., Bangma, C. H., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2013) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.5 · Cited by 64
IJzerman, M. J., van Til, J. A., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2011) · Patient · doi:10.2165/11587140-000000000-00000 · Cited by 63
Porteous, T., Ryan, M., Bond, C. M., Watson, M. C., & Watson, V. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152257 · Cited by 63
Women’s Preferences for Treatment of Perinatal Depression and Anxiety: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Ride, J., & Lancsar, E. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0156629 · Cited by 62
Self-citationWortley, S., Wong, G., Kieu, A., & Howard, K. (2014) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-014-0054-3 · Cited by 62
Parental preferences for rotavirus vaccination in young children: A discrete choice experiment
Veldwijk, J., Lambooij, M., Bruijning-Verhagen, P. C. J. L., Smit, H. A., & de Wit, G. A. (2014) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.09.004 · Cited by 62
Higgins, A., Barnett, J. C., Meads, C., Singh, J., & Longworth, L. (2014) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.2670 · Cited by 62
Preferences for antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis C: a discrete choice experiment
Mühlbacher, A. C., Bridges, J. F. P., Bethge, S., Dintsios, C., Schwalm, A., Gerber‐Grote, A., & Nübling, M. (2016) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-016-0763-8 · Cited by 62
A Discrete Choice Study of Patient Preferences for Dialysis Modalities
Walker, R., Morton, R. L., Palmer, S. C., Marshall, M. R., Tong, A., & Howard, K. (2017) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.06830617 · Cited by 62
An exploration of methods for obtaining 0 = dead anchors for latent scale EQ-5D-Y values
Shah, K. K., Ramos-Goñi, J. M., Kreimeier, S., & Devlin, N. J. (2020) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-020-01205-9 · Cited by 63
Consumer preferences for teledermoscopy screening to detect melanoma early
Spinks, J., Janda, M., Soyer, H. P., & Whitty, J. A. (2016) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x15586701 · Cited by 61
Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies
Whitty, J. A., Ratcliffe, J., Chen, G., & Scuffham, P. (2014) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x14526640 · Cited by 61
People with dementia and carer preferences for home support services in early-stage dementia
Chester, H., Clarkson, P., Davies, L. M., Sutcliffe, C., Davies, S., Feast, A. R., Hughes, J., Challis, D., & Members of the HOST-D (Home Support in Dementia) Programme Management Group. (2016) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2016.1247424 · Cited by 61
Chinese consumer preferences for fresh produce: Interaction between food safety labels and brands
Yin, S., Hu, W., Chen, Y.-S., Han, F., Wang, Y., & Chen, M. (2018) · Agribusiness · doi:10.1002/agr.21585 · Cited by 61
Taking the Shortcut: Simplifying Heuristics in Discrete Choice Experiments
Veldwijk, J., Marceta, S. M., Swait́, J., Lipman, S. A., & de Bekker-Grob, E. W. (2023) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-023-00625-y · Cited by 66
Patients’ preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete-choice experiment
Hiligsmann, M., Dellaert, B. G. C., Dirksen, C. D., van der Weijden, T., Goemaere, S., Reginster, J., Watson, V., & Boonen, A. E. R. C. H. (2014) · Arthritis Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/ar4465 · Cited by 59
Acceptability of Financial Incentives for Health Behaviours: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Giles, E. L., Becker, F., Ternent, L., Sniehotta, F. F., McColl, E., & Adams, J. M. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157403 · Cited by 59
Brún, A. D., Flynn, D., Ternent, L., Price, C., Rodgers, H., Ford, G. A., Rudd, M. P., Lancsar, E., Simpson, S., Teah, J., et al. (2018) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3305-5 · Cited by 59
Self-citationDetermann, D., Korfage, I. J., Fagerlin, A., Steyerberg, E. W., Bliemer, M. C. J., Voeten, H. A. C. M., Richardus, J. H., Lambooij, M., & de Bekker-Grob, E. W. (2016) · Eurosurveillance · doi:10.2807/1560-7917.es.2016.21.22.30247 · Cited by 58
U.K. utility weights for the EORTC QLU‐C10D
Norman, R., Mercieca‐Bebber, R., Rowen, D., Brazier, J. E., Cella, D. F., Pickard, A. S., Street, D. J., Viney, R. C., Revicki, D. A., & King, M. T. (2019) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.3950 · Cited by 58
Tockhorn‐Heidenreich, A., Ryan, M., & Hernández, R. A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-4068-9_10 · Cited by 58
Milte, R., Ratcliffe, J., Chen, G., & Crotty, M. (2017) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2017.11.004 · Cited by 58
What do nurses and midwives value about their jobs? Results from a discrete choice experiment
Scott, A., Witt, J. C., Duffield, C. M., & Kalb, G. R. J. (2014) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1177/1355819614554924 · Cited by 58
Registered nurses’ preferences for rural and urban jobs: A discrete choice experiment
Fields, B. E., Bell, J. F., Bigbee, J. L., Thurston, H., & Spetz, J. (2018) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.05.012 · Cited by 59
Goranitis, I., Best, S., Christodoulou, J., Stark, Z., & Boughtwood, T. F. (2020) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41436-020-0809-2 · Cited by 59
Valuing health at the end of life: an empirical study of public preferences
Shah, K. K., Tsuchiya, A., & Wailoo, A. (2013) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-013-0482-3 · Cited by 57
Spinks, J., & Mortimer, D. (2015) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-016-0251-1 · Cited by 57
Beckker, K. D., Witte, K. D., & Campenhout, G. V. (2021) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2021.06.022 · Cited by 55
Robyn, P. J., Shroff, Z. C., Zang, O. R., Kingué, S., Djienouassi, S., Kouontchou, C., & Sorgho, G. (2015) · International Journal of Health Policy and Management · doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.27 · Cited by 55
Preferences for the delivery of community pharmacy services to help manage chronic conditions
Whitty, J. A., Kendall, E. A., Sav, A., Kelly, F., McMillan, S. S., King, M. A., & Wheeler, A. (2014) · Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.06.007 · Cited by 55
on behalf of the RHO Group, Klose, K., Kreimeier, S., Tangermann, U., Aumann, I., & Damm, K. (2016) · Health Economics Review · doi:10.1186/s13561-016-0094-6 · Cited by 55
Wittenberg, E., Bharel, M., Bridges, J. F. P., Ward, Z. J., & Weinreb, L. (2016) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.1937 · Cited by 55
Vallejo‐Torres, L., Melnychuk, M., Vindrola‐Padros, C., Aitchison, M., Clarke, C. S., Fulop, N., Hines, J. E. W., Levermore, C., Maddineni, S. B., Perry, C., et al. (2018) · British journal of surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.10761 · Cited by 55
Gerard, K., Tinelli, M., Latter, S. M., Blenkinsopp, A., & Smith, A. J. (2012) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.006 · Cited by 54
Mamine, F., Farès, M., & Minviel, J. (2020) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106721 · Cited by 54
Yang, Y., Solgaard, H. S., & Haider, W. (2014) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.11.001 · Cited by 53
What Do Parents Value Regarding Pediatric Palliative and Hospice Care in the Home Setting?
Boyden, J. Y., Ersek, M. T., Deatrick, J. A., Widger, K. A., LaRagione, G., Lord, B. T., & Feudtner, C. (2020) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.07.024 · Cited by 52
Research Note: The smallest worthwhile effect of a health intervention
Ferreira, M. L. (2018) · Journal of physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2018.07.008 · Cited by 52
Colver, A. F., Rapley, T., Parr, J. R., McConachie, H., Dovey‐Pearce, G., Couteur, A. S. L., McDonagh, J. E. R., Bennett, C., Hislop, J., Maniatopoulos, G., et al. (2019) · Programme Grants for Applied Research · doi:10.3310/pgfar07040 · Cited by 53
Chorus, C. G., Sandorf, E. D., & Mouter, N. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0238683 · Cited by 53
Mühlbacher, A. C., Rudolph, I., Lincke, H.-J., & Nübling, M. (2009) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-149 · Cited by 52
Pabst, E., Corsi, A. M., Vecchio, R., Annunziata, A., & Loose, S. M. (2020) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.104843 · Cited by 51
The Patient Perspective of Diabetes Care: A Systematic Review of Stated Preference Research
von Arx, L., & Kjær, T. (2014) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-014-0057-0 · Cited by 51
Ruwaard, D. (2016) · International Journal of Integrated Care · doi:10.5334/ijic.2208 · Cited by 51
Cunningham, C. E., Chen, Y., Vaillancourt, T., Rimas, H. L., Deal, K., Cunningham, L. J., & Ratcliffe, J. (2014) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.21560 · Cited by 50
Rockers, P. C., Jaskiewicz, W., Kruk, M. E., Phathammavong, O., Vangkonevilay, P., Paphassarang, C., Phachanh, I. T., Wurts, L., & Tulenko, K. (2013) · Human Resources for Health · doi:10.1186/1478-4491-11-22 · Cited by 50
Fifer, S. J., Ho, K.-A., Lybrand, S., Axford, L. J., & Roach, S. (2020) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-020-07018-6 · Cited by 51
Understanding migration aversion using elicited counterfactual choice probabilities
Koşar, G., Ransom, T., & van der Klaauw, W. (2021) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.07.056 · Cited by 50
Willingness to pay for microgrids to enhance community resilience
Hotaling, C., Bird, S., & Heintzelman, M. D. (2021) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112248 · Cited by 47
Drivers of vaccine decision-making in South Africa: A discrete choice experiment
Verelst, F., Kessels, R., Delva, W., Beutels, P., & Willem, L. (2019) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.056 · Cited by 49
Parents’ preferences for seasonal influenza vaccine for their children in Japan
Shono, A., & Kondo, M. (2014) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.07.002 · Cited by 51
Conjoint Analysis: A Research Method to Study Patients’ Preferences and Personalize Care
Al‐Omari, B., Farhat, J., & Ershaid, M. (2022) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm12020274 · Cited by 48
Bessen, T., Chen, G., Street, J., Eliott, J., Karnon, J. D., Keefe, D. M. K., & Ratcliffe, J. (2014) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.800 · Cited by 48
Persson, M., Sandy, J. R., Waylen, A. E., Wills, A. K., Al-Ghatam, R., Ireland, A. J., Hall, A. J., Hollingworth, W., Jones, T., Peters, T. J., et al. (2015) · Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research · doi:10.1111/ocr.12104 · Cited by 48
Martelli, N., Hansen, P., van den Brink, H., Boudard, A., Cordonnier, A.-L., Devaux, C., Pineau, J., Prognon, P., & Borget, I. (2015) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2015.12.002 · Cited by 56
HIV testing preferences among long distance truck drivers in Kenya: a discrete choice experiment
Strauss, M., George, G., Lansdell, E., Mantell, J. E., Govender, K., Romo, M. L., Odhiambo, J. O., Mwai, E., Nyaga, E. N., & Kelvin, E. A. (2017) · AIDS Care · doi:10.1080/09540121.2017.1367086 · Cited by 48
Webb, E., Meads, D. M., Eskytė, I., King, N. V., Dracup, N., Chataway, J., Ford, H. L., Marti, J., Pavitt, S. H., Schmierer, K., et al. (2018) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-017-0296-y · Cited by 49
Buckell, J., & Hess, S. (2019) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.03.011 · Cited by 49
Zhu, J., Li, J., Zhang, Z., Li, H., & Cai, L. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023363 · Cited by 48
Walsh, S., O'Shea, E., Pierse, T., Kennelly, B., Keogh, F., & Doherty, E. (2020) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112675 · Cited by 47
Comparison of statistical analysis methods for object case best–worst scaling
Cheung, K. L., Mayer, S., Simon, J., de Vries, H., Evers, S., Kremer, I., & Hiligsmann, M. (2018) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2018.1553781 · Cited by 52
Health Technology Assessment in Osteoporosis
Hiligsmann, M., Kanis, J. А., Compston, J. E., Cooper, C. C., Flamion, B., Bergmann, P., Body, J., Boonen, S., Bruyère, O., Devogelaer, J., et al. (2013) · Calcified Tissue International · doi:10.1007/s00223-013-9724-8 · Cited by 47
Ostermann, J., Njau, B. J., Mtuy, T. B., Brown, D. S., Mühlbacher, A. C., & Thielman, N. M. (2015) · AIDS Care · doi:10.1080/09540121.2014.998612 · Cited by 47
Linley, W. G., & Hughes, D. A. (2013) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-013-0030-0 · Cited by 51
Struik, M. H. L., Koster, F., Schuit, A. J., Nugteren, R., Veldwijk, J., & Lambooij, M. (2014) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-69 · Cited by 47
Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for new medicines in rare disease patients and caregivers
Morel, T., Aymé, S., Cassiman, D. M., Simoens, S., Morgan, M., & Vandebroek, M. L. (2016) · Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · doi:10.1186/s13023-016-0444-9 · Cited by 50
McTaggart-Cowan, H. M., King, M. T., Norman, R., Costa, D. S. J., Pickard, A. S., Regier, D. A., Viney, R. C., & Peacock, S. J. (2019) · MDM Policy & Practice · doi:10.1177/2381468319842532 · Cited by 47
The relative value of different QALY types
Lancsar, E., Gu, Y., Gyrd‐Hansen, D., Butler, J., Ratcliffe, J., Bulfone, L., & Donaldson, C. (2020) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102303 · Cited by 51
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle University (GB)
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Lancsar, Emily
- Venue
- PharmacoEconomics
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 661-677
- ISSN
- 1170-7690 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122707212
- Cited by
- 1,707
- References
- 107
- Citations by year
- 2026: 159 · 2025: 163 · 2024: 156 · 2023: 155 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 135 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 55.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- PharmacoEconomics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- discrete choice experiment, healthcare decision-making, outcome measurement, economic evaluation, cost-benefit analysis, cost-utility analysis, preference elicitation, questionnaire design, validity, welfare analysis, policy analysis
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Health, Choice Behavior, Consumer Behavior, Costs and Cost Analysis, Health Services Research, Humans, Policy Making, Models, Econometric, Patient Satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
