Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 666

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Guidelines for Management of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: Second Edition

Open access
MORI, Etsuro, ISHIKAWA, Masatsune, KATO, Takeo, KAZUI, Hiroaki, MIYAKE, Hiroji, MIYAJIMA, Masakazu, NAKAJIMA, Madoka, HASHIMOTO, Masaaki, KURIYAMA, Nagato, TOKUDA, Takahiko, ISHII, Kazunari, KAIJIMA, Mitsunobu, HIRATA, Yoshihumi, SAITO, Makoto, ARAI, Hajime·2012·Neurologia medico-chirurgica
DOI 10.2176/nmc.52.775
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Among the various disorders manifesting dementia, gait disturbance, and urinary incontinence in the elderly population, idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is becoming of great importance. After the publication of the first edition of the Guidelines for Management of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus in 2004 (the English version was published in 2008), clinical awareness of iNPH has risen dramatically, and the number of shunt surgeries has increased rapidly across Japan. Clinical and basic research on iNPH has increased significantly, and more high-level evidence has since been generated. The second edition of the Japanese Guidelines was thus published in July 2011, to provide a series of timely evidence-based recommendations related to iNPH. The revision of the Guidelines has been undertaken by a multidisciplinary expert working group of the Japanese Society of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus in conjunction with the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare research project on "Studies on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of normal pressure hydrocephalus." This English version of the second edition of the Guidelines was made to share these ideas with the international community and to promote international research on iNPH.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2176/nmc.52.775

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 666

Metadata

Authors
MORI, E., ISHIKAWA, M., KATO, T., KAZUI, H., MIYAKE, H., MIYAJIMA, M., NAKAJIMA, M., HASHIMOTO, M., KURIYAMA, N., TOKUDA, T., ISHII, K., KAIJIMA, M., HIRATA, Y., SAITO, M., & ARAI, H.
Venue
Neurologia medico-chirurgica
Publisher
Japan Neurosurgical Society
Published
2012
Volume
52
Issue
11
Pages
775-809
ISSN
  • 0470-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1349-8029
DOI
10.2176/nmc.52.775
OpenAlex
W1989881611
Cited by
666
References
104
FWCI
8.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.