Cited by 50Physical Activity and HealthMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Behavior Change Techniques Incorporated in Fitness Trackers: Content Analysis

Open access
Chia, Gladys Lai Cheng, Anderson, Angelika, McLean, Louise Anne·2019·JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of fitness trackers as tools of self-management to promote physical activity is increasing. However, the content of fitness trackers remains unexplored. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to use the Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy v1 (BCTTv1) to examine if swim-proof fitness trackers below Aus $150 (US$ 105) incorporate behavior change techniques (BCTs) that relate to self-management strategies to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior and to determine if content of the fitness trackers correspond to physical activity guidelines. METHODS: A total of two raters used the BCTTv1 to code 6 fitness trackers that met the inclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria were the ability to track activity, be swim proof, be compatible with Android and Apple operating systems, and cost below Aus $150. RESULTS: All fitness trackers contained BCTs known to promote physical activity, with the most frequently used BCTs overlapping with self-management strategies, including goal setting, self-monitoring, and feedback on behavior. Fitbit Flex 2 (Fitbit Inc) contained the most BCTs at 20. Huawei Band 2 Pro (Huawei Technologies) and Misfit Shine 2 (Fossil Group) contained the least BCTs at 11. CONCLUSIONS: Fitness trackers contain evidence-based BCTs that overlap with self-management strategies, which have been shown to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior. Fitness trackers offer the prospect for physical activity interventions that are cost-effective and easily accessed by a wide population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/12768

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some behavioural intervention strategies might not be cost-prohibitive for individuals or unprofitable for the manufacturer.

    “Some of these behavioural intervention strategies might not be cost-prohibitive for individuals or unprofitable for the manufacturer, which is encouraging108.”
  • A study examining low-cost fitness trackers (defined as less than US$105) on the market showed no correlation between the cost of the device and the number of BCTs incorporated.

    “Interestingly, a study examining low-cost fitness trackers (defined as <US$105) on the market showed no correlation between the cost of the device and the number of BCTs incorporated.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health 2010 Geneva World Health Organisation 26180873
  2. [57]Cooper JO Heron TE Heward WL Applied Behavior Analysis, Second Edition 2007 Upper Saddle River, NJ Pearson/Merrill-Prentice Hall

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chia, G. L. C., Anderson, A., & McLean, L. A.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • University of Waikato (NZ)
Corresponding author
Chia, Gladys Lai Cheng
Venue
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Published
2019-07-23
Volume
7
Issue
7
Pages
e12768
ISSN
2291-5222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2962808436
Cited by
50
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Commons (University of Waikato) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
wearable activity trackers, behaviour change techniques, self-management strategies, physical activity promotion, sedentary behavior, goal setting, self-monitoring, physical activity guidelines, low-cost wearable device, Fitbit, misfit
MeSH terms
Fitness Trackers, Self-Management, Australia, Behavior Therapy, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Humans, Software Design, Exercise, Sedentary Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review