The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Using Mammographic Data: Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
Background: Machine learning (ML) has become a vital part of medical imaging research. ML methods have evolved over the years from manual seeded inputs to automatic initializations. The advancements in the field of ML have led to more intelligent and self-reliant computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems, as the learning ability of ML methods has been constantly improving. More and more automated methods are emerging with deep feature learning and representations. Recent advancements of ML with deeper and extensive representation approaches, commonly known as deep learning (DL) approaches, have made a very significant impact on improving the diagnostics capabilities of the CAD systems. Objective: This review aimed to survey both traditional ML and DL literature with particular application for breast cancer diagnosis. The review also provided a brief insight into some well-known DL networks. Methods: In this paper, we present an overview of ML and DL techniques with particular application for breast cancer. Specifically, we search the PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Springer, and Web of Science databases and retrieve the studies in DL for the past 5 years that have used multiview mammogram datasets. Results: The analysis of traditional ML reveals the limited usage of the methods, whereas the DL methods have great potential for implementation in clinical analysis and improve the diagnostic capability of existing CAD systems. Conclusions: From the literature, it can be found that heterogeneous breast densities make masses more challenging to detect and classify compared with calcifications. The traditional ML methods present confined approaches limited to either particular density type or datasets. Although the DL methods show promising improvements in breast cancer diagnosis, there are still issues of data scarcity and computational cost, which have been overcome to a significant extent by applying data augmentation and improved computational power of DL algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21056 · Cited by 14,362
Identity mappings in deep residual networks
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_38 · Cited by 10,741
Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networks
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.05027 · Cited by 10,665
Shin, H.-C., Roth, H. R., Gao, M., Lu, L., Xu, Z., Nogues, I., Yao, J., Mollura, D., & Summers, R. M. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2528162 · Cited by 5,759
Top 10 algorithms in data mining
Wu, X., Kumar, V., Ross Quinlan, J., Ghosh, J., Yang, Q., Motoda, H., McLachlan, G. J., Ng, A., Liu, B., Yu, P. S., et al. (2008) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-007-0114-2 · Cited by 5,667
Brain tumor segmentation with Deep Neural Networks
Havaei, M., Davy, A., Warde-Farley, D., Biard, A., Courville, A., Bengio, Y., Pal, C., Jodoin, P.-M., & Larochelle, H. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.05.004 · Cited by 3,278
Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning?
Tajbakhsh, N., Shin, J. Y., Gurudu, S. R., Hurst, R. T., Kendall, C. B., Gotway, M. B., & Liang, J. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2535302 · Cited by 3,277
Recent Trends in Deep Learning Based Natural Language Processing [Review Article]
Young, T., Hazarika, D., Poria, S., & Cambria, E. (2018) · IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · doi:10.1109/mci.2018.2840738 · Cited by 2,921
Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Litjens, G., Gerke, P., Jacobs, C., van Riel, S. J., Wille, M. M. W., Naqibullah, M., Sanchez, C. I., & van Ginneken, B. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2536809 · Cited by 1,258
Landwehr, N., Hall, M., & Frank, E. (2005) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-005-0466-3 · Cited by 1,214
Hierarchical Feature Representation and Multimodal Fusion with Deep Learning for AD/MCI Diagnosis
Suk, H.-I., Lee, S.-W., & Shen, D. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.077 · Cited by 968 · cited 1×
“To overcome the data insufficiency challenge, many research groups have devised different strategies: (1) using 2D patches or 3D cubes instead of using the whole image as input [59,60], which also reduces the model parameters and alleviates overfitting; (2) by introducing data augmentation using some affine transforma…”
(2007) · Foundations of SQL Server 2005 Business Intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-1-4302-0248-6_11 · Cited by 941
Cheng, J.-Z., Ni, D., Chou, Y.-H., Qin, J., Tiu, C.-M., Chang, Y.-C., Huang, C.-S., Shen, D., & Chen, C.-M. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep24454 · Cited by 755 · cited 1×
“…challenge, many research groups have devised different strategies: (1) using 2D patches or 3D cubes instead of using the whole image as input [59,60], which also reduces the model parameters and alleviates overfitting; (2) by introducing data augmentation using some affine transformations…”
Trends in Breast Cancer by Race and Ethnicity: Update 2006
Smigal, C., Jemal, A., Ward, E., Cokkinides, V., Smith, R., Howe, H. L., & Thun, M. (2006) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.56.3.168 · Cited by 704
Detecting and classifying lesions in mammograms with Deep Learning
Ribli, D., Horváth, A., Unger, Z., Pollner, P., & Csabai, I. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-22437-z · Cited by 696
Automatic Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds From MR Images via 3D Convolutional Neural Networks
Dou, Q., Chen, H., Yu, L., Zhao, L., Qin, J., Wang, D., Mok, V. C., Shi, L., & Heng, P.-A. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2528129 · Cited by 679
Huynh, B. Q., Li, H., & Giger, M. L. (2016) · Journal of Medical Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jmi.3.3.034501 · Cited by 539
Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms
Cheng, H. D., Shi, X. J., Min, R., Hu, L. M., Cai, X. P., & Du, H. N. (2006) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2005.07.006 · Cited by 538
Convolutional neural network improvement for breast cancer classification
Ting, F. F., Tan, Y. J., & Sim, K. S. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.11.008 · Cited by 449
A support vector machine-based ensemble algorithm for breast cancer diagnosis
Wang, H., Zheng, B., Yoon, S. W., & Ko, H. S. (2018) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.12.001 · Cited by 440
Unsupervised Deep Learning Applied to Breast Density Segmentation and Mammographic Risk Scoring
Kallenberg, M., Petersen, K., Nielsen, M., Ng, A. Y., Diao, P., Igel, C., Vachon, C. M., Holland, K., Winkel, R. R., Karssemeijer, N., et al. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2532122 · Cited by 439
Mammographic Screening for Breast Cancer
Fletcher, S. W., & Elmore, J. G. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp021804 · Cited by 378
A review of computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer: Toward the detection of subtle signs
Rangayyan, R. M., Ayres, F. J., & Leo Desautels, J. E. (2007) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/j.jfranklin.2006.09.003 · Cited by 337
A deep learning approach for the analysis of masses in mammograms with minimal user intervention
Dhungel, N., Carneiro, G., & Bradley, A. P. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.01.009 · Cited by 336
Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Deep Learning: Clinical Implementation
Lehman, C. D., Yala, A., Schuster, T., Dontchos, B., Bahl, M., Swanson, K., & Barzilay, R. (2019) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2018180694 · Cited by 294
Discrimination of Breast Cancer with Microcalcifications on Mammography by Deep Learning
Wang, J., Yang, X., Cai, H., Tan, W., Jin, C., & Li, L. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep27327 · Cited by 291
A deep learning method for classifying mammographic breast density categories
Mohamed, A. A., Berg, W. A., Peng, H., Luo, Y., Jankowitz, R. C., & Wu, S. (2018) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.12683 · Cited by 266
Jin, X., Xu, A., Bie, R., & Guo, P. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11691730_11 · Cited by 261
Samala, R. K., Chan, H.-P., Hadjiiski, L., Helvie, M. A., Richter, C. D., & Cha, K. H. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2870343 · Cited by 237
SD-CNN: A shallow-deep CNN for improved breast cancer diagnosis
Gao, F., Wu, T., Li, J., Zheng, B., Ruan, L., Shang, D., & Patel, B. (2018) · Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2018.09.004 · Cited by 213
Chan, H.-P., Wei, D., Helvie, M. A., Sahiner, B., Adler, D. D., Goodsitt, M. M., & Petrick, N. (1995) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/40/5/010 · Cited by 208
Sprague, B. L., Conant, E. F., Onega, T., Garcia, M. P., Beaber, E. F., Herschorn, S. D., Lehman, C. D., Tosteson, A. N. A., Lacson, R., Schnall, M. D., et al. (2016) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m15-2934 · Cited by 202
Brandt, K. R., Scott, C. G., Ma, L., Mahmoudzadeh, A. P., Jensen, M. R., Whaley, D. H., Wu, F. F., Malkov, S., Hruska, C. B., Norman, A. D., et al. (2016) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2015151261 · Cited by 183
Three-Class Mammogram Classification Based on Descriptive CNN Features
Jadoon, M. M., Zhang, Q., Haq, I. U., Butt, S., & Jadoon, A. (2017) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2017/3640901 · Cited by 169
Conditional Infilling GANs for Data Augmentation in Mammogram Classification
Wu, E., Wu, K., Cox, D., & Lotter, W. E. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00946-5_11 · Cited by 168
Deep Learning to Distinguish Recalled but Benign Mammography Images in Breast Cancer Screening
Aboutalib, S., Mohamed, A. A., Berg, W. A., Zuley, M. L., Sumkin, J. H., & Wu, S. (2018) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-1115 · Cited by 149
Pratiwi, M., Alexander, Harefa, J., & Nanda, S. (2015) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.340 · Cited by 145
Tourassi, G. D., Vargas‐Voracek, R., Catarious, D. M., & Floyd, C. E. (2003) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.1589494 · Cited by 143
Adversarial deep structured nets for mass segmentation from mammograms
Zhu, W., Xiang, X., Tran, T. D., Hager, G. D., & Xie, X. S. (2018) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2018.8363704 · Cited by 139
Transfer representation learning for medical image analysis
Shie, C., Chuang, C.-H., Chou, C., Wu, M.-H., & Chang, E. Y. (2015) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2015.7318461 · Cited by 136
Jung, H., Kim, B., Lee, I., Yoo, M., Lee, J., Ham, S., Woo, O.-H., & Kang, J. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203355 · Cited by 134
Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Mammographic Masses Using Scalable Image Retrieval
Jiang, M., Zhang, S., Li, H., & Metaxas, D. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2014.2365494 · Cited by 114
Breast Density Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
Wu, N., Geras, K. J., Shen, Y., Su, J., Kim, S. G., Kim, E. S., Wolfson, S., Moy, L. P., & Cho, K. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2018.8462671 · Cited by 95
Diagnosis of Breast Cancer using Decision Tree Data Mining Technique
Sumbaly, R., Vishnusri, N., & Jeyalatha, S. (2014) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/17219-7456 · Cited by 92
A new automatic mass detection method for breast cancer with false positive reduction
Liu, X., & Zeng, Z. (2014) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2014.10.040 · Cited by 89
Fully automated classification of mammograms using deep residual neural networks
Dhungel, N., Carneiro, G., & Bradley, A. P. (2017) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2017.7950526 · Cited by 84
Youk, J. H., Gweon, H. M., Son, E. J., & Kim, J. (2016) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.15.15472 · Cited by 75
Breast mass classification via deeply integrating the contextual information from multi-view data
Wang, H., Feng, J., Zhang, Z., Su, H., Cui, L., He, H., & Liu, L. (2018) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2018.02.026 · Cited by 68
Prediction of reader estimates of mammographic density using convolutional neural networks
Ionescu, G. V., Fergie, M., Berks, M., Harkness, E. F., Hulleman, J., Brentnall, A. R., Cuzick, J. M., Evans, D. G., & Astley, S. (2019) · Journal of medical imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jmi.6.3.031405 · Cited by 58
Local energy-based shape histogram feature extraction technique for breast cancer diagnosis
Kanwal, S., & Hussain, A. (2015) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.057 · Cited by 56
Pal, N. R., Bhowmick, B., Patel, S. K., et al. (2008) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2007.06.015 · Cited by 53
Blakely, T. A., Shaw, C., Atkinson, J., Cunningham, R., & Sarfati, D. (2011) · Cancer Causes & Control · doi:10.1007/s10552-011-9804-x · Cited by 49
Artificial Neural Networks in Mammography Interpretation and Diagnostic Decision Making
Ayer, T., Chen, Q., & Burnside, E. S. (2013) · Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine · doi:10.1155/2013/832509 · Cited by 44
A novel feature ranking method for prediction of cancer stages using proteomics data
Saghapour, E., Kermani, S., & Sehhati, M. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184203 · Cited by 43
Singh, V. K., Romaní, S., Rashwan, H. A., et al. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00934-2_92 · Cited by 43
Magna, G., Casti, P., Sowmya, V. J., Salmeri, M., Mencattini, A., Martinelli, E., & Natale, C. D. (2016) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2016.02.019 · Cited by 42
Ahn, C., Heo, C., Jin, H., & Kim, J. H. (2017) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.2254264 · Cited by 41
Sert, E., Ertekin, Ş., & Halıcı, U. (2017) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2017.8036918 · Cited by 40
Bora, V. R., Kothari, A., & Keskar, A. G. (2015) · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10278-015-9813-5 · Cited by 38
Gastounioti, A., Oustimov, A., Hsieh, M.-K., Pantalone, L., Conant, E. F., & Despina Kontos, B. (2018) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2017.12.025 · Cited by 38
Dhungel, N., Carneiro, G., & Bradley, A. P. (2015) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2015.7163983 · Cited by 36
Mammogram classification using dynamic time warping
Gardezi, S. J. S., Faye, I., Sánchez‐Bornot, J. M., Kamel, N., & Hussain, M. (2017) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-016-4328-8 · Cited by 36
Self-citationRamírez-Villegas, J. F., & Ramírez-Moreno, D. F. (2011) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2011.08.015 · Cited by 34
Analysis of mammogram images based on texture features of curvelet sub-bands
Gardezi, S. J. S., Faye, I., & Eltoukhy, M. M. (2014) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.2054183 · Cited by 21
Self-citationA method to reduce curvelet coefficients for mammogram classification
Eltoukhy, M. M., Gardezi, S. J. S., & Faye, I. (2014) · IEEE Region 10 Symposium (TENSYMP) · doi:10.1109/tenconspring.2014.6863116 · Cited by 13
Self-citation
Cited by
Role of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Real-Life Clinical Practice: Systematic Review
Yin, J., Ngiam, K. Y., & Teo, H. H. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/25759 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Gardezi, S. J. S., Elazab, A., Lei, B., & Wang, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2019-07-26
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e14464
- ISSN
- 1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2965014579
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 3.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
