Cited by 41Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and Health

The validity and inter-device variability of the Apple Watch™ for measuring maximal heart rate

Open access
Abt, Grant, Bray, James, Benson, Amanda Clare·2018·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

Maximal heart rate (HRmax) is a fundamental measure used in exercise prescription. The Apple Watch™ measures heart rate yet the validity and inter-device variability of the device for measuring HRmax are unknown. Fifteen participants completed a maximal oxygen uptake test while wearing an Apple Watch™ on each wrist. Criterion HRmax was measured using a Polar T31™ chest strap. There were good to very good correlations between the watches and criterion (left: r = 0.87 [90%CI: 0.67 to 0.95]; right: r = 0.98 [90%CI: 0.94 to 0.99]). Standardised mean bias for the left and right watches compared to the criterion were 0.14 (90%CI: −0.12 to 0.39; trivial) and 0.04 (90%CI: −0.07 to 0.15; trivial). Standardised typical error of the estimate for the left and right watches compared to the criterion were 0.51 (90%CI: 0.38 to 0.80; moderate) and 0.22 (90%CI: 0.16 to 0.34; small). Inter-device standardised typical error was 0.46 (90%CI: 0.36 to 0.68; moderate), ICC = 0.84 (90%CI: 0.65 to 0.93). The Apple Watch™ has good to very good criterion validity for measuring HRmax, with no substantial under- or over-estimation. There were moderate and small prediction errors for the left and right watches. Inter-device variability in HRmax is moderate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640414.2017.1397282

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 14 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abt, G., Bray, J., & Benson, A. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Hull (GB)
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Abt, Grant
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2017-11
Volume
36
Issue
13
Pages
1447-1452
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W2765153122
Cited by
41
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
No funding
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
maximal heart rate, Apple Watch, wearable heart rate monitor, criterion validity, inter-device variability, VO2max, exercise prescription
MeSH terms
Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Reproducibility of Results, Exercise, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review