Cited by 109Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

A systematic review and economic evaluation of computerised cognitive behaviour therapy for depression and anxiety

Open access
Kaltenthaler, E., Shackley, P., Stevens, K., Beverley, C., Parry, G., Chilcott, J.·2002·Health Technology Assessment

Abstract

Printed copies of HTA monographs cost £20 each (post and packing free in the UK) to both public and private sector purchasers from our Despatch Agents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3310/hta6220

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Lovell K, Richards D. Multiple Access Points and Levels of Entry (MAPLE): ensuring choice, accessibility and equity for CBT services. Behav Cognitive Psychother 2000;28:379-91.
  2. Dowrick C, Casey P, Dalgard O. Outcomes of depression international network (ODIN). Br J Psychiatry 1998;172:359-63.
  3. Keeley H, Williams C, Shapiro DA. A United Kingdom survey of accredited Cognitive Behaviour Therapists' attitudes towards the use of structured self-help materials. Behav Cognitive Psychother. In press.
  4. Bowers W, Stuart S, MacFarlane R. Use of computer-administered cognitive-behavior therapy with depressed patients. Depression 1993;1:294-9.
  5. Grime PR. An open, randomised study, to compare the effects of a computerised cognitive behavioural therapy programme ('Beating the Blues') plus conventional care, vs conventional care alone, on absence from work due to anxiety, depression or stress. [Dissertation] Submitted for Membership of the Faculty of Occupational Medicine of the Royal College of Physicians. 2001.
  6. Proudfoot J, Goldberg D, Mann A, Everitt B, Marks I, Gray J. Computerised, interactive, multimedia cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression in general practice. Psychol Med. In press.
  7. Marks IM. Unevaluated or inefficient psycho- therapy approaches are hard to justify. BMJ 1994;309:1070-2.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaltenthaler, E., Shackley, P., Stevens, K., Beverley, C., Parry, G., & Chilcott, J.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Venue
Health Technology Assessment
Published
2002
Volume
6
Issue
22
Pages
1-89
ISSN
  • 1366-5278 (ISSN-L)
  • 2046-4924
OpenAlex
W2030211695
Cited by
109
References
73
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Technology Assessment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
Health Technology Assessment programme (01/23/01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
depression, anxiety, economic evaluation, cost-effectiveness, digital mental health interventions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Behavior Therapy, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Manifest Anxiety Scale, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review