Cited by 82Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsBehavioral Health and Interventions

A randomized comparison of two motivationally enhanced Internet behavioral weight loss programs

Webber, Kelly H., Tate, Deborah F., Michael Bowling, J.·2008·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Purpose Sixty-six women participated in this study, which compared two 16-week motivationally enhanced weight loss interventions. Both intervention groups, which are entitled "Minimal" and "Enhanced" throughout the description that follows, received a motivationally enhanced initial face-to-face weight loss session. The initial session was followed by a 16-week Internet behavioral weight loss program, which included a study website with weekly lessons, an online self-monitoring diary form, web links to related sites, and separate message boards. The Enhanced group also received weekly moderated online chat group sessions led using motivational techniques.Results Both groups lost weight over time (p<0.001), however the group by time interaction was non-significant (p=0.19). The Minimal group lost 5.22+/-4.72 kg and the Enhanced group lost 3.71+/-4.46 kg. In the Enhanced group, online chat session attendance averaged 8.0 of the 16 chats offered. Greater program utilization was associated with greater weight loss in both groups.Conclusions The addition of weekly motivationally enhanced online chats did not increase weight loss in this study. Further research is needed on the type and frequency of group support that is most desirable and beneficial in Internet weight loss interventions and could also explore building motivation for program utilization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2008.06.008

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Webber, K. H., Tate, D. F., & Michael Bowling, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Webber, Kelly H.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09
Volume
46
Issue
9
Pages
1090-1095
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012461951
Cited by
82
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
16.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
weight loss, behavioral weight loss, motivation, self-monitoring, program utilization, women
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Behavior Therapy, Diet, Reducing, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Motivation, Professional-Patient Relations, Self-Help Groups, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review