Cited by 94Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Computer-Assisted Cognitive-Behavior Therapy and Mobile Apps for Depression and Anxiety

Wright, Jesse H., Mishkind, Matthew, Eells, Tracy D., Chan, Steven R.·2019·Current Psychiatry Reports

Abstract

Purpose of review We reviewed research on computer-assisted cognitive-behavior therapy (CCBT) and mobile applications with the goals of assessing the effectiveness of these newer methods of delivering or augmenting treatment and making recommendations on the clinical use of computer tools in psychotherapy of depression and anxiety.Recent findings Research on CCBT has found solid evidence for efficacy when the use of a therapeutic computer program is supported by a clinician or other helping professionals. Lower levels of efficacy or ineffectiveness typically have been found when computer programs are used as stand-alone treatments. A large number of mobile apps have been created that claim to be useful for depression and/or anxiety. However, considerable caution is warranted in evaluating mobile apps and recommending them to patients. Research on mobile apps is still in an early stage of development. A number of well-established CCBT programs have been studied in multiple randomized, controlled trials and have been found to be effective. Such programs appear to have adequate quality, security, and efficacy to be used in clinical practice. Mobile apps offer easy portability and immediate access to coping strategies and may be useful for augmenting treatment. But clinicians need to select apps with integrity and reliable content for clinical use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11920-019-1031-2

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wright, J. H., Mishkind, M., Eells, T. D., & Chan, S. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Wright, Jesse H.
Venue
Current Psychiatry Reports
Published
2019-06-27
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
62-62
ISSN
  • 1523-3812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-1645
OpenAlex
W2954876826
Cited by
93
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Psychiatry Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
mobile application, depression, anxiety, digital mental health interventions, augmentation therapy, coping strategies
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Cognition, Depression, Humans, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review