Cited by 45Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMental Health Research Topics

Recent developments in the use of smartphone interventions for mental health

Mehrotra, Seema, Tripathi, Ravikesh·2018·Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this update is to provide an overview of the breadth of research studies published from April 2017 to April 2018 on mobile-based interventions for mental health, with a special emphasis on smartphone-based interventions. RECENT FINDINGS: Several studies during the review period have described the process of applying user-centred design in the development of mental health apps and novel approaches to enhance user-engagement. Studies on consumer perspectives indicate largely positive findings about open-ness to utilize mental health apps. There is a scarcity of similar studies on health providers. Efficacy studies have provided evidence for apps for a variety of psychiatric disorders. There are fewer studies on preventive and promotive interventions. Although a plethora of mental health apps is available for public, most have not undergone scientific evaluation. Many well researched apps are not accessible to public. The potential of smartphone technology in enhancing healthcare service delivery in low-resource settings has also been examined in a few studies. SUMMARY: Evidence for acceptability, feasibility and efficacy of mobile-based mental health interventions for facilitating recovery is on the rise. More research is needed on implementation and integration of these interventions in diverse real-world clinical and community contexts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yco.0000000000000439

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Technology-based interventions have been used for functions including screening, symptom identification, self-care, improving help-seeking attitudes, and prevention and treatment of mental health concerns.

    “Such interventions have been used to serve a wide range of functions such as screening, symptom identification, self-care, improving help-seeking attitudes, and prevention and treatment of mental health concerns.16,17”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mehrotra, S., & Tripathi, R.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (IN)
  • National Forensic Sciences University (IN)
Corresponding author
Mehrotra, Seema
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Published
2018-09
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
379-388
ISSN
0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2840928893
Cited by
45
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Indian Council of Medical Research
  • Indian Council of Social Science Research
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
smartphone-based intervention, mental health apps, user-centered design, user engagement, customer perspective, health provider perspectives, mental illness, resource-limited settings, health care delivery, feasibility and acceptability
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Mental Disorders, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Mental Health Services, Telemedicine, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review