The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient fault-tolerant code switching via one-way transversal CNOT gates
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Code switching is an established technique that facilitates a universal set of FT quantum gate operations by combining two QEC codes with complementary sets of gates, which each by themselves are easy to implement fault-tolerantly. In this work, we present a code switching scheme that respects the constraints of FT circuit design by only making use of transversal gates. These gates are intrinsically FT without additional qubit overhead. We analyze application of the scheme to low-distance color codes, which are suitable for operation in existing quantum processors, for instance based on trapped ions or neutral atoms. We briefly discuss connectivity constraints that arise for architectures based on superconducting qubits. Numerical simulations of circuit-level noise indicate that a logical T-gate, facilitated by our scheme, could outperform both flag-FT magic state injection protocols and a physical T-gate at low physical error rates. Transversal code switching naturally scales to code pairs of arbitrary code distance. We observe improved performance of a distance-5 protocol compared to both the distance-3 implementation and the physical gate for realistically attainable physical entangling gate error rates. We discuss how the scheme can be implemented with a large degree of parallelization, provided that logical auxiliary qubits can be prepared reliably enough. Our logical T-gate circumvents potentially costly magic state factories. The requirements to perform QEC and to achieve an FT universal gate set are then essentially the same: Prepare logical auxiliary qubits offline, execute transversal gates and perform fast-enough measurements. Transversal code switching thus serves to enable more practical hardware realizations of FT universal quantum computation. The scheme alleviates resource requirements for experimental demonstrations of quantum algorithms run on logical qubits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“A variant of code switching, transversal code switching, is a fault-tolerant protocol for universal quantum computation proposed in [278] which uses a self-dual (CSS) code and a (CSS) tri-orthogonal code .”
From Quantum error correction and fault tolerance: A comprehensive tutorial (2026) · cites this paper as [278]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gottesman, D., & Chuang, I. L. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/46503 · Cited by 1,860
Architecture for a large-scale ion-trap quantum computer
Kielpinski, D., Monroe, C., & Wineland, D. J. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00784 · Cited by 1,589
Superconducting Qubits: Current State of Play
Kjaergaard, M., Schwartz, M. E., Braumüller, J., Krantz, P., Wang, J. I.-J., Gustavsson, S., & Oliver, W. D. (2020) · Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics · doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031119-050605 · Cited by 1,544 · cited 1×
“State-of-the-art superconducting architectures are essentially restricted to nearest-neighbor connectivity and long-range coupling is a work in progress [21, 63].”
Universal quantum computation with ideal Clifford gates and noisy ancillas
Bravyi, S., & Kitaev, A. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.022316 · Cited by 1,525
Quantum error correction for quantum memories
Terhal, B. M. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.307 · Cited by 1,354
Quantum computing with realistically noisy devices
Knill, E. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03350 · Cited by 1,184 · cited 2×
“Other FT QEC algorithms, like Steane-type [26, 27] or Knill-type [10, 28, 29] error correction, make use of transversal gates.”
Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays
Bluvstein, D., Evered, S. J., Geim, A. A., Li, S. H., Zhou, H., Manovitz, T., Ebadi, S., Cain, M., Kalinowski, M., Hangleiter, D., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06927-3 · Cited by 1,119
Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold
Collaborators, G. Q. A. A., Acharya, R., Abanin, D. A., Aghababaie-Beni, L., Aleiner, I., Andersen, T. I., Ansmann, M., Arute, F., Arya, K., Asfaw, A., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08449-y · Cited by 778 · cited 1×
“Re-markably, these added components have demonstrated improvements of overall circuit performance in real devices compared to a non-FT implementation, despite being noisy themselves [4–11].”
Surface code quantum computing by lattice surgery
Horsman, D., Fowler, A. G., Devitt, S., & Meter, R. V. (2012) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/12/123011 · Cited by 598 · cited 2×
“Transversal CNOT gates are appealing because they do not require a repetition overhead to respect fault tolerance such as, e.g., implementations via lattice surgery [30–32].”
Quantum computing with neutral atoms
Henriet, L., Beguin, L., Signoles, A., Lahaye, T., Browaeys, A., Reymond, G.-O., & Jurczak, C. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-09-21-327 · Cited by 550
Research works printed but not linked: 113
- E. T. Campbell, B. M. Terhal, and C. Vuillot, Roads towards fault-tolerant universal quantum computation, Nature 549, 172 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
- C. Ryan-Anderson, et al., Realization of real-time fault-tolerant quantum error correction, Physical Review X 11, 041058 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
- C. Ryan-Anderson, et al., Implementing fault-tolerant entangling gates on the five-qubit code and the color code (2022), arXiv:2208.01863 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- Google Quantum AI, Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit, Nature 614, 676 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
- M. P. da Silva, et al., Demonstration of logical qubits and repeated error correction with better-than-physical error rates (2024), arXiv:2404.02280 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- K. Mayer, et al., Benchmarking logical three-qubit quantum Fourier transform encoded in the Steane code on a trapped-ion quantum computer (2024), arXiv:2404.08616 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- C. Ryan-Anderson, et al., High-fidelity and fault-tolerant teleportation of a logical qubit using transversal gates and lattice surgery on a trapped-ion quantum computer (2024), arXiv:2404.16728 [quant-ph]. · DOI · Paper page
- H. Goto, Minimizing resource overheads for fault-tolerant preparation of encoded states of the Steane code, Scientific Reports 6, 1 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
- T. J. Yoder and I. H. Kim, The surface code with a twist, Quantum 1, 2 (2017). · DOI
- R. Chao and B. W. Reichardt, Fault-tolerant quantum computation with few qubits, npj Quantum Information 4, 42 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
- C. Chamberland and M. E. Beverland, Flag fault-tolerant error correction with arbitrary distance codes, Quantum 2, 53 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
- B. W. Reichardt, Fault-tolerant quantum error correction for Steane's seven-qubit color code with few or no extra qubits, Quantum Science and Technology 6, 015007 (2020). · DOI
- P. Prabhu and B. W. Reichardt, Fault-tolerant syndrome extraction and cat state preparation with fewer qubits, 16th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography , 5:1 (2021). · DOI
- D. Bhatnagar, M. Steinberg, D. Elkouss, C. G. Almudever, and S. Feld, Low-depth flag-style syndrome extraction for small quantum error-correction cdes, 2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering , 63 (2023). · DOI
- C. Du, Z. Ma, Y. Liu, Q. Duan, and Y. Fei, Parallel flagged fault-tolerant error correction for stabilizer codes of distance 5, Advanced Quantum Technologies , 2300291 (2024). · DOI
- P.-H. Liou and C.-Y. Lai, Reducing quantum error correction overhead with versatile flag-sharing syndrome extraction circuits (2024), arXiv:2407.00607 [quant-ph]. · DOI
- S. Bravyi, O. Dial, J. M. Gambetta, D. Gil, and Z. Nazario, The future of quantum computing with superconducting qubits, Journal of Applied Physics 132 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
- D. Bluvstein, et al., A quantum processor based on coherent transport of entangled atom arrays, Nature 604, 451 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
- L. Pause, et al., Supercharged two-dimensional tweezer array with more than 1000 atomic qubits, Optica 11, 222 (2024). · DOI
- H. J. Manetsch, et al., A tweezer array with 6100 highly coherent atomic qubits (2024), arXiv:2403.12021 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- A. M. Steane, Active stabilization, quantum computation, and quantum state synthesis, Physical Review Letters 78, 2252 (1997). · DOI
- L. Postler, et al., Demonstration of fault-tolerant Steane quantum error correction, PRX Quantum 5, 030326 (2024). · DOI · Paper page
- E. Knill, Scalable quantum computation in the presence of large detected-error rates (2004), arXiv:quant-ph/0312190 [quant-ph]. · DOI
- L. Z. Cohen, I. H. Kim, S. D. Bartlett, and B. J. Brown, Low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum computing using long-range connectivity, Science Advances 8, eabn1717 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
- A. Cowtan and S. Burton, CSS code surgery as a universal construction, Quantum 8, 1344 (2024). · DOI
- B. Eastin and E. Knill, Restrictions on transversal encoded quantum gate sets, Physical Review Letters 102, 110502 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
- A. G. Fowler, M. Mariantoni, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation, Physical Review A 86, 032324 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
- J. T. Anderson, G. Duclos-Cianci, and D. Poulin, Fault-tolerant conversion between the Steane and Reed-Muller quantum codes, Physical Review Letters 113, 080501 (2014). · DOI
- H. Bombín, Gauge color codes: Optimal transversal gates and gauge fixing in topological stabilizer codes, New Journal of Physics 17, 083002 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
- A. Kubica and M. E. Beverland, Universal transversal gates with color codes: A simplified approach, Physical Review A 91, 032330 (2015). · DOI
- H. Bombín and M. A. Martín-Delgado, Topological quantum distillation, Physical Review Letters 97, 180501 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
- H. Bombin and M. A. Martin-Delgado, Exact topological quantum order in $D=3$ and beyond: Branyons and brane-net condensates, Phys. Rev. B 75, 075103 (2007). · DOI
- F. Butt, S. Heußen, M. Rispler, and M. Müller, Fault-tolerant code-switching protocols for near-term quantum processors, PRX Quantum 5, 020345 (2024). · DOI
- I. Pogorelov, et al., Experimental fault-tolerant code switching, Nature Physics 21, 298 (2025). · DOI
- K. Betsumiya and A. Munemasa, On triply even binary codes, Journal of the London Mathematical Society 86, 1 (2012). · DOI
- M. Shi, H. Lu, J.-L. Kim, and P. Solé, Triorthogonal codes and self-dual codes, Quantum Information Processing 23, 1 (2024). · DOI
- M. Sullivan, Code conversion with the quantum Golay code for a universal transversal gate set, Physical Review A 109, 042416 (2024). · DOI · Paper page
- A. Paetznick and B. W. Reichardt, Universal fault-tolerant quantum computation with only transversal gates and error correction, Physical Review Letters 111, 090505 (2013a). · DOI
- A. Steane, Multiple-particle interference and quantum error correction, Proceedings of the Royal Society A 452, 2551 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
- A. M. Steane, Quantum Reed-Muller codes, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 45, 1701 (1999). · DOI
- D. Gottesman, An introduction to quantum error correction and fault-tolerant quantum computation (2009), arXiv:0904.2557 [quant-ph]. · DOI
- H. Zhou, et al., Algorithmic fault tolerance for fast quantum computing (2024), arXiv:2406.17653 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- S. Heußen, et al., Strategies for a practical advantage of fault-tolerant circuit design in noisy trapped-ion quantum computers, Physical Review A 107, 042422 (2023). · DOI
- C. Chamberland and A. W. Cross, Fault-tolerant magic state preparation with flag qubits, Quantum 3, 143 (2019). · DOI
- S. J. Evered, et al., High-fidelity parallel entangling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature 622, 268 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
- C. Figgatt, et al., Parallel entangling operations on a universal ion-trap quantum computer, Nature 572, 368 (2019). · DOI
- Y. Zhu, et al., Pairwise-parallel entangling gates on orthogonal modes in a trapped-ion chain, Advanced Quantum Technologies 6, 2300056 (2023a). · DOI
- M. Valentini, et al., Demonstration of two-dimensional connectivity for a scalable error-corrected ion-trap quantum processor architecture (2024), arXiv:2406.02406 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- O. Higgott, et al., Optimal local unitary encoding circuits for the surface code, Quantum 5, 517 (2021). · DOI
- C. Moore and M. Nilsson, Parallel quantum computation and quantum codes (1998), arXiv:quant-ph/9808027 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- X.-M. Zhang, T. Li, and X. Yuan, Quantum state preparation with optimal circuit depth: Implementations and applications, Physical Review Letters 129, 230504 (2022). · DOI
- J. T. Anderson, On the power of reusable magic states (2012), arXiv:1205.0289 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- C. Piveteau and D. Sutter, Circuit knitting with classical communication, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 70, 2734 (2024). · DOI
- K. Mølmer and A. Sørensen, Multiparticle entanglement of hot trapped ions, Physical Review Letters 82, 1835 (1999). · DOI
- A. Sørensen and K. Mølmer, Entanglement and quantum computation with ions in thermal motion, Physical Review A 62, 022311 (2000). · DOI
- C. J. Ballance, High-fidelity quantum logic in Ca$^+$ (Springer, 2017). · DOI
- A. M. Steane, Fast fault-tolerant filtering of quantum codewords (2004), arXiv:quant-ph/0202036 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- A. W. Cross, D. P. DiVincenzo, and B. M. Terhal, A comparative code study for quantum fault-tolerance (2009), arXiv:0711.1556 [quant-ph]. · DOI
- D. Amaro, M. Müller, and A. K. Pal, Scalable characterization of localizable entanglement in noisy topological quantum codes, New Journal of Physics 22, 053038 (2020). · DOI
- R. Zen, et al., Quantum circuit discovery for fault-tolerant logical state preparation with reinforcement learning (2024), arXiv:2402.17761 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- T. Peham, L. Schmid, L. Berent, M. Müller, and R. Wille, Automated synthesis of fault-tolerant state preparation circuits for quantum error-correction codes, PRX Quantum 6, 020330 (2025). · DOI
- F. Kreppel, et al., Quantum circuit compiler for a shuttling-based trapped-ion quantum computer, Quantum 7, 1176 (2023). · DOI
- D. Schoenberger, S. Hillmich, M. Brandl, and R. Wille, Using Boolean satisfiability for exact shuttling in trapped-ion quantum computers, 29th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference , 127 (2024a). · DOI
- S. Aaronson and D. Gottesman, Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits, Physical Review A 70, 052328 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
- C. Ryan-Anderson, Quantum algorithms, architecture, and error correction, Ph.D. thesis, The University of New Mexico (2018).
- S. Heußen, D. Winter, M. Rispler, and M. Müller, Dynamical subset sampling of quantum error-correcting protocols, Physical Review Research 6, 013177 (2024). · DOI
- A. Kubica, The ABCs of the color code: A study of topological quantum codes as toy models for fault-tolerant quantum computation and quantum phases of matter, Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology (2018).
- Y. Takada and K. Fujii, Improving threshold for fault-tolerant color-code quantum computing by flagged weight optimization, PRX Quantum 5, 030352 (2024). · DOI · Paper page
- C. Chamberland, T. Jochym-O'Connor, and R. Laflamme, Overhead analysis of universal concatenated quantum codes, Physical Review A 95, 022313 (2017). · DOI
- M. Vasmer and A. Kubica, Morphing quantum codes, PRX Quantum 3, 030319 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
- B. W. Reichardt, Quantum universality from magic states distillation applied to CSS codes, Quantum Information Processing 4, 251 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
- R. S. Gupta, et al., Encoding a magic state with beyond break-even fidelity, Nature 625, 259–263 (2024). · DOI · Paper page
- C. Chamberland and K. Noh, Very low overhead fault-tolerant magic state preparation using redundant ancilla encoding and flag qubits, npj Quantum Information 6, 91 (2020). · DOI
- B. D. Jones, N. Linden, and P. Skrzypczyk, The Hadamard gate cannot be replaced by a resource state in universal quantum computation, Quantum 8, 1470 (2024). · DOI
- T. Jochym-O'Connor and R. Laflamme, Using concatenated quantum codes for universal fault-tolerant quantum gates, Physical Review Letters 112, 010505 (2014). · DOI
- T. J. Yoder, R. Takagi, and I. L. Chuang, Universal fault-tolerant gates on concatenated stabilizer codes, Physical Review X 6, 031039 (2016). · DOI
- S. D. Buchbinder, C. L. Huang, and Y. S. Weinstein, Encoding an arbitrary state in a [7, 1, 3] quantum error correction code, Quantum information processing 12, 699 (2013). · DOI
- P. Aliferis, D. Gottesman, and J. Preskill, Quantum accuracy threshold for concatenated distance-3 codes, Quantum Information and Computation 6, 97 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
- S. Yoshida, S. Tamiya, and H. Yamasaki, Concatenate codes, save qubits, npj Quantum Information 11, 88 (2025). · DOI
- H. Goto, High-performance fault-tolerant quantum computing with many-hypercube codes, Science Advances 10, eadp6388 (2024). · DOI
- H. Yamasaki and M. Koashi, Time-efficient constant-space-overhead fault-tolerant quantum computation, Nature Physics , 1 (2024). · DOI
- M. DeCross, et al., Computational power of random quantum circuits in abitrary geometries, Physical Review X 15, 021052 (2025). · DOI
- S. Bravyi and J. Haah, Magic-state distillation with low overhead, Physical Review A 86, 052329 (2012). · DOI
- H. Bombin, Transversal gates and error propagation in 3D topological codes (2018), arXiv:1810.09575 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- W. Hensinger, et al., T-junction ion trap array for two-dimensional ion shuttling, storage, and manipulation, Applied Physics Letters 88, 034101 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
- R. B. Blakestad, et al., High-fidelity transport of trapped-ion qubits through an $X$-junction trap array, Physical Review Letters 102, 153002 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
- K. Wright, et al., Reliable transport through a microfabricated X-junction surface-electrode ion trap, New Journal of Physics 15, 033004 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
- G. Shu, et al., Heating rates and ion-motion control in a $Y$-junction surface-electrode trap, Physical Review A 89, 062308 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
- A. Bautista-Salvador, et al., Multilayer ion trap technology for scalable quantum computing and quantum simulation, New Journal of Physics 21, 043011 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
- Z. Cai, A. Siegel, and S. Benjamin, Looped pipelines enabling effective 3D qubit lattices in a strictly 2D device, PRX Quantum 4, 020345 (2023). · DOI
- M. Cain, et al., Correlated decoding of logical algorithms with transversal gates (2024), arXiv:2403.03272 [quant-ph]. · DOI
- K. H. Wan, M. Webber, A. G. Fowler, and W. K. Hensinger, An iterative transversal CNOT decoder (2024), arXiv:2407.20976 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- K. Sahay, Y. Lin, S. Huang, K. R. Brown, and S. Puri, Error correction of transversal controlled-NOT gates for scalable surface code computation (2024), arXiv:2408.01393 [quant-ph]. · DOI
- S. Veroni, M. Müller, and G. Giudice, Optimized measurement-free and fault-tolerant quantum error correction for neutral atoms, Physical Review Research 6, 043253 (2024). · DOI
- S. P. Jain and V. V. Albert, Transversal Clifford and T-Gate codes of short length and high distance, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory 6, 127 (2025). · DOI · Paper page
- G. Zhu, S. Sikander, E. Portnoy, A. W. Cross, and B. J. Brown, Non-Clifford and parallelizable fault-tolerant logical gates on constant and almost-constant rate homological quantum LDPC codes via higher symmetries (2023b), arXiv:2310.16982 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- J. Old, M. Rispler, and M. Müller, Lift-connected surface codes, Quantum Science and Technology 9 (2024). · DOI
- S. Huang, T. Jochym-O'Connor, and T. J. Yoder, Homomorphic logical measurements (2022), arXiv:2211.03625 [quant-ph]. · DOI
- A. Cross, Z. He, P. Rall, and T. Yoder, Linear-size ancilla systems for logical measurements in qLDPC codes (2024), arXiv:2407.18393 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- Q. Xu, et al., Fast and parallelizable logical computation with homological product codes (2024), arXiv:2407.18490 [quant-ph]. · DOI
- A. Paetznick and B. W. Reichardt, Fault-tolerant ancilla preparation and noise threshold lower bounds for the 23-qubit Golay code (2013b), arXiv:1106.2190 [quant-ph]. · DOI
- J. Durandau, et al., Automated generation of shuttling sequences for a linear segmented ion trap quantum computer, Quantum 7, 1175 (2023). · DOI
- D. Schoenberger, S. Hillmich, M. Brandl, and R. Wille, Shuttling for scalable trapped-ion quantum computers (2024b), arXiv:2402.14065 [quant-ph]. · DOI
- H. Kaufmann, et al., Fast ion swapping for quantum-information processing, Physical Review A 95, 052319 (2017). · DOI
- M. Palmero, S. Martínez-Garaot, U. G. Poschinger, A. Ruschhaupt, and J. G. Muga, Fast separation of two trapped ions, New Journal of Physics 17, 093031 (2015). · DOI
- T. Ruster, et al., Experimental realization of fast ion separation in segmented Paul traps, Physical Review A 90, 033410 (2014). · DOI
- A. Walther, et al., Controlling fast transport of cold trapped ions, Physical Review Letters 109, 080501 (2012). · DOI
- G. A. Paz-Silva, G. K. Brennen, and J. Twamley, Fault tolerance with noisy and slow measurements and preparation, Physical Review Letters 105, 100501 (2010). · DOI
- S. Heußen, D. F. Locher, and M. Müller, Measurement-free fault-tolerant quantum error correction in near-term devices, PRX Quantum 5, 010333 (2024). · DOI
- S. Veroni, A. Paler, and G. Giudice, Universal quantum computation via scalable measurement-free error correction (2025), arXiv:2412.15187 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- F. Butt, D. F. Locher, K. Brechtelsbauer, H. P. Büchler, and M. Müller, Measurement-free, scalable, and fault-tolerant universal quantum computing, Science Advances 11, eadv2590 (2025a). · DOI
- F. Butt, et al., Demonstration of measurement-free universal fault-tolerant quantum computation (2025b), arXiv:2506.22600 [quant-ph]. · DOI
- K. Brechtelsbauer, et al., Measurement-free quantum error correction optimized for biased noise (2025), arXiv:2505.15669 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Magic state cultivation: growing T states as cheap as CNOT gates
Gidney, C., Shutty, N., & Jones, C. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.17595 · Cited by 9
“Many papers have attempted to optimize the cost of magic state distillation or to replace it with other techniques [Fow+12; FD12; Li15; FG18; GF19b; Lit19; Sin+22; Gid23; HIF24; Ito+24; Lee+24; Bro20; BKS21; VB19; Bom18; CN20; HH24].”
MethodQuantum error correction and fault tolerance: A comprehensive tutorial
Spencer, D. J., Jain, S. P., Tanggara, A., Sun, Z., Haug, T., Khu, D., & Bharti, K. (2026) · arXiv
Metadata
- Authors
- Heußen, S., & Hilder, J.
- Affiliations
- neQxt, 50670 Cologne, Germany
- Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
- Venue
- Quantum
- Published
- 2025-09-03
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 1846
- ISSN
- 2521-327X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4413956988
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6
- FWCI
- 3.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Quantum (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- “MILLENION-SGA1” EU Project (101114305)
- US Army Research Office (W911NF-21-1-000)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- code-switching, fault-tolerant quantum computing, color codes, magic state distillation, trapped-ion quantum computer, neutral-atom quantum processors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient fault-tolerant code switching via one-way transversal CNOT gates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.22331/q-2025-09-03-1846
- The paper
- Heußen, S., & Hilder, J. (2025). Efficient fault-tolerant code switching via one-way transversal CNOT gates. Quantum. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2025-09-03-1846