The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chicken & Egg: Competition among Intermediation Service Providers
Abstract
We analyze a model of imperfect price competition between intermediation service providers. We insist on features that are relevant for informational intermediation via the Internet: the presence of indirect network externalities, the possibility of using the nonexclusive services of several intermediaries, and the widespread practice of price discrimination based on users' identity and on usage. Efficient market structures emerge in equilibrium, as well as some specific form of inefficient structures. Intermediaries have incentives to propose non-exclusive services, as this moderates competition and allows them to exert market power. We analyze in detail the pricing and business strategies followed by intermediation services providers. Copyright 2003 by the RAND Corporation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Caillaud and Jullien (2003) show how an entering platform can use price discrimination to be successful even when market participants expect the entrant to fail.”
From The Economics of Two-Sided Markets (2009) · cites this paper as Caillaud and Jullien (2003)
In the citing paper
“It is also challenged to attract a viable number of users on the respective sides of the platform to overcome the chicken and egg problem (Caillaud & Jullien, 2003).”
From Digital platform ecosystems in flux: From proprietary digital platforms to wide-spanning ecosystems (2023) · cites this paper as Caillaud & Jullien, 2003
In the citing paper
“In many platforms, at least one side of the platform must be subsidized to overcome the chicken and egg problem (Caillaud & Jullien, 2003;Hagiu, 2006) and enable growth and subsequent adoption on the other side.”
From Digital platform ecosystems in flux: From proprietary digital platforms to wide-spanning ecosystems (2023) · cites this paper as Caillaud & Jullien, 2003
In the citing paper
“During digital platform formation, the focal platform firm focuses on establishing a platform-based product or service, creating fundamental technologies, and attracting users on various sides of the platform (Caillaud & Jullien, 2003;Hagiu, 2006).”
From Digital platform ecosystems in flux: From proprietary digital platforms to wide-spanning ecosystems (2023) · cites this paper as Caillaud & Jullien, 2003
Citations
Cites
Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring
Diamond, D. W. (1984) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297430 · Cited by 8,476
Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility
Katz, M. L. (1985) · American Economic Review · Cited by 6,052
Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets
Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1162/154247603322493212 · Cited by 5,642
A Theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price Variability
Admati, A. R., & Pfleiderer, P. (1988) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/1.1.3 · Cited by 3,282
Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation
Farrell, J., & Saloner, G. (1985) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2555589 · Cited by 2,554
On the Efficiency of Matching and Related Models of Search and Unemployment
Hosios, A. J. (1990) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297382 · Cited by 1,589
Trading Volume and Asset Liquidity
Pagano, M. (1989) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2937847 · Cited by 660
Information Gatekeepers on the Internet and the Competitiveness of Homogeneous Product Markets
Baye, M. R., & Morgan, J. W. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.3.454 · Cited by 631
Middlemen in Bilateral Search Markets
Yavaş, A. (1994) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/298350 · Cited by 182
Coordination and discrimination in contracting with externalities: divide and conquer?
Segal, I. (2003) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/s0022-0531(03)00114-5 · Cited by 178
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Competition in two-sided markets
Armstrong, M. (2006) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00037.x · Cited by 3,315
Two-sided markets: A progress report
Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2006) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00036.x · Cited by 2,994
Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2019) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20171452 · Cited by 2,744
Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2014) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12105 · Cited by 2,394
Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework
Gawer, A. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006 · Cited by 1,869
Metadata
- Authors
- Caillaud, B., & Jullien, B.
- Affiliations
- École nationale des ponts et chaussées (FR)
- ORCID
- Jullien, Bruno
- Venue
- The RAND Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 309
- ISSN
- 0741-6261 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008975493
- Cited by
- 1,799
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 74 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 119 · 2020: 143 · 2019: 108 · 2018: 106 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 88 · 2012: 74
- FWCI
- 96.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The RAND Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › ICT Impact and Policies
- Keywords
- price competition, indirect network externalities, price discrimination, market power, market structure, pricing strategy, business strategy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review