Le Comportement de l'Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l'Ecole Americaine

Allais, M.·1953·Econometrica

DOI 10.2307/1907921

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1907921

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497
Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00122574 · Cited by 15,467
Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice Under Uncertainty
Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232669 · Cited by 4,042
The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long: Theory and Evidence
SHEFRIN, H., & STATMAN, M. (1985) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05002.x · Cited by 3,553
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013) · World Scientific Handbook in Financial Economics Series · doi:10.1142/9789814417358_0006 · Cited by 3,091
A Discounting Framework for Choice With Delayed and Probabilistic Rewards.
Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.769 · Cited by 1,676
SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITY AND DELAY
Rachlin, H., Raineri, A., & Cross, D. (1991) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1991.55-233 · Cited by 1,341
Decisions from Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice
Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., & Erev, I. (2004) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00715.x · Cited by 1,225
On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672 · Cited by 840
Decision by sampling
Stewart, N., Chater, N., & Brown, G. D. A. (2006) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.003 · Cited by 737
Anomalies: Utility Maximization and Experienced Utility
Kahneman, D., & Thaler, R. H. (2005) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.870494 · Cited by 639
Imagined futures: Fictional expectations in the economy
Beckert, J. (2013) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/s11186-013-9191-2 · Cited by 552
Heterogeneity in Risky Choice Behavior in a Broad Population
von Gaudecker, H.-M., van Soest, A., & Wengström, E. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.2.664 · Cited by 349
Decision making, movement planning and statistical decision theory
Trommershäuser, J., Maloney, L. T., & Landy, M. S. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.010 · Cited by 314
Risk, unexpected uncertainty, and estimation uncertainty: Bayesian learning in unstable settings
Payzan-LeNestour, E., & Bossaerts, P. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001048 · Cited by 267
Dopamine Reward Prediction Error Responses Reflect Marginal Utility
Stauffer, W. R., Lak, A., & Schultz, W. (2014) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.08.064 · Cited by 204
In Pursuit of Error: A Survey of Uncertainty Visualization Evaluation
Hullman, J., Qiao, X., Correll, M., Kale, A., & Kay, M. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2018.2864889 · Cited by 187
Maximization, learning, and economic behavior
Erev, I., & Roth, A. E. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1402846111 · Cited by 155
Functional neuroimaging of intertemporal choice models: a review
Carter, R. M., Meyer, J. R., & Huettel, S. A. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics · doi:10.1037/a0018046 · Cited by 124
Deal or No Deal? Decision Making under Risk in a Large-Payoff Game Show
Post, T., van den Assem, M. J., Baltussen, G., & Thaler, R. H. (2008) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.98.1.38 · Cited by 110
Quantum probability in decision making from quantum information representation of neuronal states
Khrennikov, A., Basieva, I., Pothos, E. M., & Yamato, I. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-34531-3 · Cited by 93
Axiomatic methods, dopamine and reward prediction error
Caplin, A., & Dean, M. (2008) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2008.07.007 · Cited by 88
The empirical relationship between nonstandard economic behaviors
Dean, M., & Ortoleva, P. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1821353116 · Cited by 78
From behavioural economics to neuroeconomics to decision neuroscience: The ascent of biology in research on human decision making
Bossaerts, P., & Murawski, C. (2015) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.07.001 · Cited by 63
Studying and improving reasoning in humans and machines
Yax, N., Anlló, H., & Palminteri, S. (2024) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00091-8 · Cited by 40
Lets keep the con out of experimental a methodological note
Roth, A. E. (1994) · Empirical Economics · doi:10.1007/bf01175875 · Cited by 21

Authors: Allais, M.
Venue: Econometrica
Publisher: JSTOR
Published: 1953-10
Volume: 21
Issue: 4
Pages: 503
ISSN: 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.2307/1907921
OpenAlex: W2333311386
Cited by: 4,112
References: 0
FWCI: 2.24
Type: journal article
Language: fr
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review