The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol
Abstract
We are grateful for the comments of Kenneth Arrow, Kennette Benedict, Robert Biller, David Brereton, Louise Comfort, Jerry Feldman, Victor Fuchs, Anne Miner, J. Rounds, Alan Saltzstein, Guje Sevon, and J. Serge Taylor; for the assistance of Julia Ball; and for grants from the Spencer Foundation, Brookings Institution, Hoover Institution, and National Institute of Education. Formal theories of rational choice suggest that information about the possible consequences of alternative actions will be sought and used only if the precision, relevance, and reliability of the information are compatible with its cost. Empirical studies of information in organizations portray a pattern that is hard to rationalize in such terms. In particular, organizations systematically gather more information than they use, yet continue to ask for more. We suggest that this behavior is a consequence of some ways in which organizational settings for information use differ from those anticipated in a simple decision-theory vision. In particular, the use of information is embedded in social normsthat make it highly symbolic. Some of the implications of such a pattern of information use are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The social construction of reality : a treatise in the sociology of knowledge
Simpson, G., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091739 · Cited by 16,462
Cited by
Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556620 · Cited by 4,020
Self-citationThe psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation.
Loewenstein, G. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75 · Cited by 2,738
Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393701 · Cited by 2,426
Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity1
Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M., & Valacich, J. S. (2008) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148857 · Cited by 1,511
Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (2008) · European Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1017/s0003975609000150 · Cited by 1,265
Organizational improvisation and organizational memory
Moorman, C., & Miner, A. S. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259058 · Cited by 1,248
Central Perspectives and Debates in Organization Theory
Astley, W. G., & de Ven, A. H. V. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392620 · Cited by 1,224
From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world
Bromley, P., & Powell, W. W. (2012) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2012.684462 · Cited by 1,656
The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership Under Pressure
Boin, A., 't Hart, P., Stern, E., & Sundelius, B. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490880 · Cited by 932
Actualizing organizational memory with information systems
Stein, E. W., & Zwass, V. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.85 · Cited by 843
Robey, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (1999) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.10.2.167 · Cited by 765
Levinthal, D., & Rerup, C. (2006) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0197 · Cited by 744
Organizational culture and performance measurement systems
Henri, J.-F. (2006) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2004.10.003 · Cited by 700
Laverty, K. J. (1996) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9702100316 · Cited by 690
Artificial intelligence in organizations: New opportunities for phenomenon-based theorizing
von Krogh, G. (2018) · Academy of Management Discoveries · doi:10.5465/amd.2018.0084 · Cited by 641
The illusory diffusion of innovation: An examination of assimilation gaps
Fichman, R. G., & Kemerer, C. F. (1999) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.10.3.255 · Cited by 633
Accountability Myopia: Losing Sight of Organizational Learning
Ebrahim, A. (2005) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0899764004269430 · Cited by 617
A Stupidity‐Based Theory of Organizations
Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01072.x · Cited by 534
PROCEDURAL RATIONALITY IN THE STRATEGIC DECISION‐MAKING PROCESS*
Dean, J. W., & Sharfman, M. P. (1993) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00317.x · Cited by 412
The dynamics of standardization: Three perspectives on standards in organization studies
Brunsson, N., Rasche, A., & Seidl, D. (2012) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840612450120 · Cited by 392
Have We Learned Anything New About the Use of Evaluation?
Weiss, C. H. (1998) · American Journal of Evaluation · doi:10.1177/109821409801900103 · Cited by 384
Substituting Human Decision-Making with Machine Learning: Implications for Organizational Learning
Balasubramanian, N., Ye, Y., & Xu, M. (2022) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0470 · Cited by 377
Predict and Surveil: Data, Discretion, and the Future of Policing
Brayne, S. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190684099.001.0001 · Cited by 334
Interventions Promoting Educators’ Use of Data: Research Insights and Gaps
Marsh, J. A. (2012) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811211401106 · Cited by 328
Rethinking Connections Between Research and Practice in Education: A Conceptual Framework
Farley-Ripple, E., May, H., Karpyn, A., Tilley, K., & McDonough, K. (2018) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x18761042 · Cited by 313
Developing a process model of problem recognition
Cowan, D. A. (1986) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258395 · Cited by 257
New challenges in organizational research: high reliability organizations
Roberts, K. H. (1989) · Industrial Crisis Quarterly · doi:10.1177/108602668900300202 · Cited by 218
O’Leary, M. B., Wilson, J. M., & Metiu, A. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.4.13 · Cited by 191
The Institutional Basis of Democratic Accountability
Olsen, J. P. (2013) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402382.2012.753704 · Cited by 159
The coordination of work activities: Cooperation and conflict in a hospital context
Symon, G., Long, K., & Ellis, J. (1996) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/bf00141934 · Cited by 148
van der Voort, H. G., Klievink, A. J., Arnaboldi, M., & Meijer, A. J. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2018.10.011 · Cited by 142
“According to Feldman and March, policymakers' information requests have a symbolic di-mension (Feldman & March, 1981).”
BackgroundForgetting as a feature, not a bug: the dualityof memory and implications for ubiquitous computing
Bannon, L. J. (2006) · CoDesign · doi:10.1080/15710880600608230 · Cited by 115
Inert facts and the illusion of knowledge: strategic uses of ignorance in HIV clinics
Heimer, C. A. (2012) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085147.2011.637332 · Cited by 96
District decision-making for health in low-income settings: a systematic literature review
Wickremasinghe, D., Hashmi, I. E., Schellenberg, J., & Avan, B. I. (2016) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czv124 · Cited by 91
Employment Ads: A Configurational Research Agenda
Rafaeli, A., & Oliver, A. L. (1998) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/105649269874009 · Cited by 80
Metrics Matter: How Properties and Perceptions of Data Shape Teachers’ Instructional Responses
Farrell, C. C., & Marsh, J. A. (2016) · Educational Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0013161x16638429 · Cited by 54
Do compassionate firms outperform? The role of organizational learning
Guinot, J., Miralles, S., Rodríguez-Sánchez, A., & Chiva, R. (2020) · Employee Relations: The International Journal · doi:10.1108/er-07-2019-0275 · Cited by 40
In Storage, Yet on Display: An Empirical Investigation of Robots' Value as Social Signals
Beane, M. I. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3319502.3374775 · Cited by 17
O'Leary, M. B., Wilson, J. M., & Metiu, A. (2013) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2322710 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Feldman, M. S., & March, J. G.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1981-06
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082894840
- Cited by
- 1,721
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 45.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.