Interdependence and Group Effectiveness

Wageman, Ruth·1995·Administrative Science Quarterly

DOI 10.2307/2393703

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2393703

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639702300303 · Cited by 3,526
Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams
Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.413 · Cited by 2,385
Work Group Diversity
van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546 · Cited by 2,200
Is there a “Big Five” in Teamwork?
Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496405277134 · Cited by 1,930
The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals
Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0806 · Cited by 1,364
Social and Cognitive Factors Driving Teamwork in Collaborative Learning Environments: Team Learning Beliefs and Behaviors
Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W. H., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496406292938 · Cited by 792
The Collective Construction of Work Group Moods
Bartel, C. A., & Saavedra, R. (2000) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667070 · Cited by 678
Future work design research and practice: Towards an elaborated model of work design
Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D., & Cordery, J. L. (2001) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317901167460 · Cited by 617
Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates.
De Jong, B. A., Dirks, K. T., & Gillespie, N. (2016) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000110 · Cited by 616
To your heart's content: a model of affective diversity in top management teams
Barsade, S. G., Ward, A. J., Turner, J. D. F., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (2000) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667020 · Cited by 599
TIME, TEAMS, AND TASK PERFORMANCE: CHANGING EFFECTS OF SURFACE- AND DEEP-LEVEL DIVERSITY ON GROUP FUNCTIONING.
Price, K. H., Harrison, D. A., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/3069328 · Cited by 583
Recognizing and Utilizing Expertise in Work Groups: A Status Characteristics Perspective
Bunderson, J. S. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556637 · Cited by 527
Facing Differences With an Open Mind: Openness to Experience, Salience of Intragroup Differences, and Performance of Diverse Work Groups
Homan, A. C., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S. E., Knippenberg, D. V., Ilgen, D. R., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2008) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2008.35732995 · Cited by 525
The Contingent Effects of Management Support and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems Implementation1
Sharma, R., & Yetton, P. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036548 · Cited by 470
Diversity and team outcomes: the moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity
Schippers, M. C., Den Hartog, D. N., Koopman, P. L., & Wienk, J. A. (2003) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.220 · Cited by 464
Coordination as Energy-in-Conversation
Quinn, R. W., & Dutton, J. E. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281422 · Cited by 381
Boundary spanners’ identification, intergroup contact, and effective intergroup relations
Richter, A. W., West, M. A., van Dick, R., & Dawson, J. F. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.23478720 · Cited by 376
Does Team Communication Represent A One-Size-Fits-All Approach?: A Meta-Analysis Of Team Communication And Performance
Marlow, S. L., Lacerenza, C. N., Paoletti, J., Burke, C. S., & Salas, E. (2018) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.08.001 · Cited by 346
The effect of goal setting on group performance: A meta-analysis.
Kleingeld, A., van Mierlo, H., & Arends, L. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0024315 · Cited by 341
Communication in virtual teams: a conceptual framework and research agenda
Marlow, S. L., Lacerenza, C. N., & Salas, E. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.005 · Cited by 291
The Lure of the Virtual
Bailey, D. E., Leonardi, P. M., & Barley, S. R. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0703 · Cited by 277
What makes a good team player? Personality and team effectiveness.
Driskell, J. E., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & O'Shea, P. G. (2006) · Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.10.4.249 · Cited by 260
Something(s) old and something(s) new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness
Maynard, M. T., Mathieu, J. E., Rapp, T. L., & Gilson, L. L. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1772 · Cited by 225
Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features
van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2009) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.002 · Cited by 218
Leadership, Membership, and Voice: Civic Associations That Work
Andrews, K. T., Ganz, M., Baggetta, M., Han, H., & Lim, C. (2010) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/649060 · Cited by 215
The content of the message matters: The differential effects of promotive and prohibitive team voice on team productivity and safety performance gains.
Li, A. N., Liao, H., Tangirala, S., & Firth, B. M. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000215 · Cited by 188
Coordinating interdependencies in online communities: A study of an open source software project
Lindberg, A., Berente, N., Gaskin, J., & Lyytinen, K. (2016) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2016.0673 · Cited by 121
Counterproductive Behaviors and Psychological Well-being: The Moderating Effect of Task Interdependence
Aubé, C., Rousseau, V., Mama, C., & Morin, E. M. (2009) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-009-9113-5 · Cited by 94
Work-Group Design and Autonomy: A Field Study of the Interaction Between Task Interdependence and Group Autonomy
Langfred, C. W. (2000) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/104649640003100103 · Cited by 82
Interdependence and preference for group work: main and congruence effects on the satisfaction and performance of group members
Shaw, J. D., Duffy, M. K., & Stark, E. M. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(99)00045-8 · Cited by 151

Authors: Wageman, R.
Venue: Administrative Science Quarterly
Publisher: JSTOR
Published: 1995-03
Volume: 40
Issue: 1
Pages: 145
ISSN: 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.2307/2393703
OpenAlex: W2061530436
Cited by: 1,407
References: 0
FWCI: 13.89
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review