The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes
Abstract
In this article we examine the meaning of team process. We first define team process in the context of a multiphase episodic framework related to goal accomplishment, arguing that teams are multitasking units that perform multiple processes simultaneously and sequentially to orchestrate goal-directed taskwork. We then advance a taxonomy of team process dimensions synthesized from previous research and theorizing. a taxonomy that reflects our time-based conceptual framework. We conclude with implications for future research and application.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although individual team members might react differently to working in a virtual team, multi-level theory suggests that team members collectively develop shared experiences, called team emergent states159,160.”
From Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory (2022) · cites this paper as [160]
In the citing paper
“these self-report methods have limitations, particularly in scalability and providing an emergent, temporal insight into cohesion dynamics (Marks et al., 2001).”
From An unobtrusive approach to modelling team cohesion and collaboration in ecological classroom settings (2026) · cites this paper as Marks et al., 2001
In the citing paper
“defining it as an emergent state, a dynamic temporal component, that is altered with team experiences.”
From Interpersonal Physiological Synchrony Predicts Group Cohesion (2022) · cites this paper as Marks et al., 2001
Citations
Cites
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Hammer, T. H., Anderson, J. F., Gurdon, M. A., Jick, T. D., Petit, A., Stern, R. N., Schwartz, H., Vardi, Y., & Dunnette, M. D. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391755 · Cited by 11,947
Research in Organizational Behavior.
Grimes, A. J., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392975 · Cited by 11,303
Stockton, R. A., & Kerlinger, F. N. (1974) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1162206 · Cited by 7,359
Developmental sequence in small groups.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0022100 · Cited by 5,778
Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5278 · Cited by 5,483
A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance
Tosi, H. L., Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1991) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258875 · Cited by 4,840
Ireland, R. D., Elfring, T., & Hmieleski, K. M. (2011) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781849807630.00017 · Cited by 4,777
Tosi, H. L. (1991) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4278976 · Cited by 4,147
A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict
Jehn, K. A. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393638 · Cited by 4,050
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,009
Gibson, C. B., Waller, M. J., Carpenter, M. A., & Conte, J. M. (2007) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.445 · Cited by 97
Intrafunctional Competitive Intelligence and Sales Performance: A Social Network Perspective
Ahearne, M., Lam, S. K., Hayati, B., & Kraus, F. (2013) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.11.0217 · Cited by 91
Knight, A. P. (2013) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0866 · Cited by 101
Peñarroja, V., Orengo, V., Zornoza, A., & Hernández, A. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.020 · Cited by 89
Team conflict dynamics: Implications of a dyadic view of conflict for team performance
Humphrey, S. E., Aime, F., Cushenbery, L. D., Hill, A., & Fairchild, J. (2017) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.08.002 · Cited by 96
Advancing Teams Research: What, When, and How to Measure Team Dynamics Over Time
Delice, F., Rousseau, M., & Feitosa, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01324 · Cited by 124
Virtuality and Team Performance: Understanding the Impact of Variety of Practices
Lu, M., Watson‐Manheim, M. B., Chudoba, K. M., & Wynn, E. (2006) · Journal of Global Information Technology Management · doi:10.1080/1097198x.2006.10856412 · Cited by 90
How Different Team Downsizing Approaches Influence Team-Level Adaptation And Performance
DeRue, D. S., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M. D., Ilgen, D. R., & Jundt, D. K. (2008) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2008.30776769 · Cited by 87
Chandrasekaran, A., & Mishra, A. (2012) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01329.x · Cited by 100
Multiteam Systems: An Integrated Review and Comparison of Different Forms
Zaccaro, S. J., Dubrow, S. R., Torres, E. M., & Campbell, L. N. P. (2020) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-045418 · Cited by 92
Self-citationCollins, C. G., & Parker, S. K. (2010) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317909x484271 · Cited by 95
Exploring social networks on the team level—A review of the empirical literature
Henttonen, K. (2010) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2010.03.005 · Cited by 95
Measuring and Modeling Shared Leadership
Gockel, C., & Werth, L. (2010) · Journal of Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000023 · Cited by 90
Interactive Effects of Team Virtuality and Work Design on Team Functioning
Handke, L., Klonek, F. E., Parker, S. K., & Kauffeld, S. (2020) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496419863490 · Cited by 88
Chong, D., van Eerde, W., Chai, K., & Rutte, C. G. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2010.2048914 · Cited by 97
Transformational leadership and work unit innovation: A dyadic two-wave investigation
Sheehan, M., Garavan, T. N., & MORLEY, M. J. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.072 · Cited by 112
Knowledge Management Processes and Work Group Innovation
Farr, J. L., Sin, H., & Tesluk, P. E. (2003) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-008044198-6/50039-5 · Cited by 90
Farh, C. I. C., Oh, J. K., Hollenbeck, J. R., Yu, A., Lee, S. M., & King, D. D. (2019) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2017.0778 · Cited by 87
Schaefer, U., & Bouwmeester, O. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04520-6 · Cited by 103
Musick, G., O’Neill, T., Schelble, B. G., McNeese, N. J., & Henke, J. B. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106852 · Cited by 102
Shin, Y., & Eom, C. (2014) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.42 · Cited by 88
Resick, C. J., Murase, T., Randall, K. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2014) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.03.005 · Cited by 95
Rosas, S. R. (2016) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-016-0340-3 · Cited by 86
Rispens, S., Greer, L. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2007) · International Journal of Conflict Management · doi:10.1108/10444060710833450 · Cited by 86
Conflict in medical teams: opportunity or danger?
Greer, L. L., Saygı, Ö., Aaldering, H., & Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2012) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04321.x · Cited by 86
Managing sales teams in a virtual environment
Rapp, A. A., Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J. E., & Rapp, T. L. (2010) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.02.003 · Cited by 90
Self-citationIntegrating the science of team training: Guidelines for continuing education *
Weaver, S. J., Rosen, M. A., Salas, E., Baum, K. D., & King, H. B. (2010) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1002/chp.20085 · Cited by 86
Advancing a Research Agenda for Leadership in Dangerous Contexts
Hannah, S. T., Campbell, D. J., & Matthews, M. D. (2010) · Military Psychology · doi:10.1080/08995601003644452 · Cited by 89
Bell, S. T., Brown, S. G. U., & Mitchell, T. D. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00811 · Cited by 85
Leadership Training in Health Care Action Teams
Rosenman, E. D., Shandro, J. R., Ilgen, J. S., Harper, A. L., & Fernandez, R. (2014) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000413 · Cited by 85
Brennan, S., Bosch, M., Buchan, H., & Green, S. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-20 · Cited by 93
The Dark Side of Structural Holes
Bizzi, L. (2013) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206312471385 · Cited by 85
ADAPTER: Analysing and developing adaptability and performance in teams to enhance resilience
van der Beek, D., & Schraagen, J. M. (2015) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.019 · Cited by 89
When and how knowledge sharing benefits team creativity: The importance of cognitive team diversity
Men, C., Fong, P. S. W., Luo, J., Zhong, J., & Huo, W. (2017) · Journal of Management & Organization · doi:10.1017/jmo.2017.47 · Cited by 87
Rico, R., Gibson, C. B., Sánchez‐Manzanares, M., & Clark, M. A. (2019) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/2041386619869972 · Cited by 90
Virtual Team Performance in a Highly Competitive Environment
Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U. M., & Gurǎu, C. (2011) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601110391251 · Cited by 106
Lin, H., & Rababah, N. M. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.06.005 · Cited by 85
Integrating self-regulation theories of work motivation into a dynamic process theory
Vancouver, J. B. (2008) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.02.001 · Cited by 91
Across Borders and Technologies: Advancements in Virtual Teams Research
Kirkman, B. L., Gibson, C. B., & Kim, K. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928286.013.0025 · Cited by 88
Castelao, E. F., Russo, S. G., Cremer, S., Strack, M., Kaminski, L., Eich, C. B., Timmermann, A., & Boos, M. (2011) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.05.009 · Cited by 83
Maltarich, M. A., Kukenberger, M. R., Reilly, G., & Mathieu, J. E. (2016) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601116681127 · Cited by 94
Self-citationLaborious but Elaborate: The Benefits of Really Studying Team Dynamics
Kolbe, M., & Boos, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01478 · Cited by 94
Effects of empowering leadership on performance in management team
Tung, H., & Chang, Y. (2011) · Journal of Chinese Human Resource Management · doi:10.1108/20408001111148720 · Cited by 98
Manser, T., Howard, S. K., & Gaba, D. M. (2008) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140130801961919 · Cited by 80
Murray, J. Y., & Chao, M. C. (2005) · Journal of International Marketing · doi:10.1509/jimk.13.3.54 · Cited by 83
The magic of collective emotional intelligence in learning groups: No guys needed for the spell!
Curșeu, P. L., Pluut, H., Boroş, S., & Meslec, N. (2014) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12075 · Cited by 84
Spink, A. H., Cole, C., & Waller, M. J. (2008) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.2008.1440420110 · Cited by 84
Presbitero, A. (2020) · Journal of International Management · doi:10.1016/j.intman.2020.100809 · Cited by 82
Fisher, D. M. (2013) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034625 · Cited by 81
Human-autonomy Teaming: Need for a guiding team-based framework?
O’Neill, T., Flathmann, C., McNeese, N. J., & Salas, E. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107762 · Cited by 96
Interpersonal relationships at work.
Reich, T. C., & Hershcovis, M. S. (2010) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/12171-006 · Cited by 82
TMT Potency and Strategic Decision‐Making in High Technology Firms
Clark, K. D., & Maggitti, P. G. (2012) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01060.x · Cited by 81
Kwong, C. C. Y., Thompson, P., & Cheung, C. W. M. (2012) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2011.0007a · Cited by 81
Team Role Experience and Orientation
Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kukenberger, M. R., Donsbach, J. S., & Alliger, G. M. (2014) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601114562000 · Cited by 89
Self-citationAdvancing Our Understanding of Team Motivation
Park, G., Spitzmüller, M., & DeShon, R. P. (2013) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206312471389 · Cited by 93
Gevers, J., & Peeters, M. A. G. (2008) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.544 · Cited by 86
The Dynamics of Personal and Social Identity Formation
Postmes, T., Baray, G., Haslam, S. A., Morton, T. A., & Swaab, R. I. (2006) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446211946.n12 · Cited by 83
Work Groups and Teams in Organizations: Review Update
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2013) · eCommons (Cornell University) · Cited by 81
Team building and hidden costs of control
Riener, G., & Wiederhold, S. (2016) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.12.008 · Cited by 83
What Happens to Bad Actors in Organizations? A Review of Actor-Centric Outcomes of Negative Behavior
Zhong, R., & Robinson, S. L. (2020) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320976808 · Cited by 87
Paunova, M. M. (2015) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.002 · Cited by 84
Team Adaptiveness in Dynamic Contexts
Lei, Z., Waller, M. J., Hagen, J. U., & Kaplan, S. A. (2015) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601115615246 · Cited by 84
Centralization of member voice in teams: Its effects on expertise utilization and team performance.
Sherf, E. N., Sinha, R., Tangirala, S., & Awasty, N. (2018) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000305 · Cited by 86
Leadership and member voice in action teams: Test of a dynamic phase model.
Farh, C. I. C., & Chen, G. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000256 · Cited by 88
Team tenure and team performance: A meta‐analysis and process model
Gonzalez-Mule, E. N., Cockburn, B. S., McCormick, B. W., & Zhao, P. (2019) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12319 · Cited by 84
Employee-(ro)bot collaboration in service: an interdependence perspective
Le, K. B. Q., Sajtos, L., & Fernandez, K. V. (2022) · Journal of service management · doi:10.1108/josm-06-2021-0232 · Cited by 88
Cohesion and satisfaction as mediators of the team trust – team effectiveness relationship
DeOrtentiis, P. S., Summers, J. K., Ammeter, A. P., Douglas, C., & Ferris, G. R. (2013) · Career Development International · doi:10.1108/cdi-03-2013-0035 · Cited by 97
Mind the gap: The role of leadership in multiteam system collective cognition
Murase, T., Carter, D. R., DeChurch, L. A., & Marks, M. A. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.06.003 · Cited by 79
Self-citationTeam composition, cognition, and effectiveness: Examining mental model similarity and accuracy.
Resick, C. J., Dickson, M. W., Mitchelson, J. K., Allison, L. K., & Clark, M. A. (2010) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0018444 · Cited by 92
Choi, J. N. (2009) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00851.x · Cited by 81
Measuring Teamwork in Health Care Settings: A Review of Survey InstrumentsPreprint
Valentine, M., Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1838538 · Cited by 83
Many cheers make light the work: how social support triggers process gains in teams
Hüffmeier, J., & Hertel, G. (2011) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683941111112631 · Cited by 87
When feeling safe isn’t enough
Sanner, B., & Bunderson, J. S. (2015) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/2041386614565145 · Cited by 96
A Fitting Approach to Construct and Measurement Alignment
Luciano, M. M., Mathieu, J. E., Park, S., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (2017) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428117728372 · Cited by 87
Self-citationBraun, M. T., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Brown, T. A., & DeShon, R. P. (2020) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496420907157 · Cited by 97
Creative Collaboration and the Self‐Concept: A Study of Toy Designers
Elsbach, K. D., & Flynn, F. J. (2013) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12024 · Cited by 78
Peralta, C. F., Lopes, P. N., Gilson, L. L., Lourenço, P. R., & Pais, L. (2014) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12079 · Cited by 87
Achieving more with less: Extra milers’ behavioral influences in teams.
Li, N., Zhao, H. H., Walter, S. L., Zhang, X., & Jia, Y. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000010 · Cited by 77
An Exploratory Study of Group Development and Team Learning
Raes, E., Kyndt, E., Decuyper, S., den Bossche, P. V., & Dochy, F. J. R. C. (2015) · Human Resource Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/hrdq.21201 · Cited by 90
Conflict and Cooperation in Diverse Workgroups
King, E., Hebl, M., & Beal, D. (2009) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01600.x · Cited by 73
Conflict Management through the Lens of System Dynamics
Cronin, M. A., & Bezrukova, K. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2017.0021 · Cited by 79
Frequent CEO Turnover and Firm Performance: The Resilience Effect of Workforce Diversity
Kim, Y., Jeong, S. S., Yiu, D. W., & Moon, J. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04534-0 · Cited by 80
Things Are Not Always What They Seem: The Origins and Evolution of Intragroup Conflict
Shah, P. P., Peterson, R. S., Jones, S. L., & Ferguson, A. J. (2020) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839220965186 · Cited by 82
The effects of collaboration on performance: a multilevel validation in project teams
Franç, N. A., Chiocchio, O., Grenier, S., Taoheed, T. O., Neill, N. A., Savaria, K., & Willms, J. D. (2012) · International Journal of Project Organisation and Management · doi:10.1504/ijpom.2012.045362 · Cited by 96
Kacmar, K. M., Bachrach, D. G., Harris, K. J., & Noble, D. W. (2011) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.004 · Cited by 84
Heled, E., Somech, A., & Waters, L. E. (2015) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2015.1058971 · Cited by 77
Schulkin, J. A. (2010) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc.123.3.0367 · Cited by 77
Teamwork situated in multiteam systems: Key lessons learned and future opportunities.
Shuffler, M. L., & Carter, D. R. (2018) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000322 · Cited by 81
A dependency taxonomy for agile software development projects
Strode, D. E. (2015) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-015-9574-1 · Cited by 88
Cognitive Neurophysiologic Synchronies
Stevens, R. H., Galloway, T. L., Wang, P., & Berka, C. (2011) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720811427296 · Cited by 77
van Knippenberg, D. (2019) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/2041386619897618 · Cited by 93
Wang, Z., Ren, S., Chadee, D. D., Liu, M., & Cai, S. (2021) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-09-2020-0683 · Cited by 76
Hsu, J. S., Chang, J. Y. T., Klein, G. L., & Jiang, J. J. (2010) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.12.001 · Cited by 82
Relationships Among Teamwork Behavior, Trust, Perceived Team Support, and Team Commitment
Sheng, C., Tian, Y.-F., & Chen, M.-C. (2010) · Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal · doi:10.2224/sbp.2010.38.10.1297 · Cited by 78
Structure and Function of Team Learning Emergence
Kostopoulos, K. C., Spanos, Y. E., & Prastacos, G. P. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311419366 · Cited by 83
Capturing the multilevel dynamics of emergence
Kozlowski, S. W. J., Chao, G. T., Grand, J. A., Braun, M. T., & Kuljanin, G. (2016) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/2041386614547955 · Cited by 76
Bezrukova, K., Spell, C. S., Caldwell, D., & Burger, J. M. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000039 · Cited by 76
House, A., Power, N., & Alison, L. J. (2013) · Cognition Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-013-0259-6 · Cited by 82
The Demands of Industry 4.0 on Project Teams
Marnewick, C., & Marnewick, A. L. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2019.2899350 · Cited by 80
Team Cognition at a Crossroad: Toward Conceptual Integration and Network Configurations
Mohammed, S., Rico, R., & Alipour, K. K. (2021) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0159 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Florida International University (US)
- University of Connecticut (US)
- George Mason University (US)
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 356
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981712955
- Cited by
- 3,659
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 188 · 2025: 192 · 2024: 214 · 2023: 217 · 2022: 227 · 2021: 234 · 2020: 225 · 2019: 210 · 2018: 205 · 2017: 214 · 2016: 167 · 2015: 184 · 2014: 187 · 2013: 162 · 2012: 179
- FWCI
- 37.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Keywords
- team processes, goal achievement, multitasking, taskwork, goal-directed behavior, team dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review