Cited by 1,339Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataInformation and Cyber Security

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 488 of the 501 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Privacy in the Digital Age: a Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems1

Open access

Bélanger, France, Crossler, Robert E.·2011·MIS Quarterly

DOI 10.2307/41409971

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Information privacy refers to the desire of individuals to control or have some influence over data about themselves. Advances in information technology have raised concerns about information privacy and its impacts, and have motivated Information Systems researchers to explore information privacy issues, including technical solutions to address these concerns. In this paper, we inform researchers about the current state of information privacy research in IS through a critical analysis of the IS literature that considers information privacy as a key construct. The review of the literature reveals that information privacy is a multilevel concept, but rarely studied as such. We also find that information privacy research has been heavily reliant on student-based and USA-centric samples, which results in findings of limited generalizability. Information privacy research focuses on explaining and predicting theoretical contributions, with few studies in journal articles focusing on design and action contributions. We recommend that future research should consider different levels of analysis as well as multilevel effects of information privacy. We illustrate this with a multilevel framework for information privacy concerns. We call for research on information privacy to use a broader diversity of sampling populations, and for more design and action information privacy research to be published in journal articles that can result in IT artifacts for protection or control of information privacy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/41409971

Cites

488 of 488 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
(1994) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80231-2 · Cited by 48,420
Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind.
Triandis, H. C., & Hofstede, G. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393257 · Cited by 17,696
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Building theories from case study research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (2009) · STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI · doi:10.3280/so2008-002004 · Cited by 11,403
The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems
Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/248684 · Cited by 4,716
The Nature of Theory in Information Systems1
Gregor, S. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148742 · Cited by 3,306
Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model
Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Agarwal, J. (2004) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1040.0032 · Cited by 3,173
Understanding and Mitigating Uncertainty in Online Exchange Relationships: A Principal–Agent Perspective1
Pavlou, P. A., Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148783 · Cited by 2,646
An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions
Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0080 · Cited by 2,640

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 501 references

13 of the 501 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

Bélanger, 2009, Children Online Privacy: Issues with Parental Awareness and Control, 311
Donlan, A. E. 2007. “The IAPP Unveils Winners of the 2007 HP-IAPP Privacy Innovation Awards,” Marketwire (https://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Iapp-784595.html; retrieved August 19, 2009).
Goodman, 2005, Yahoo Says it Gave China Internet Data, Washington Post, A30
Lin, 2005, Information Privacy Concerns in the Customer Relationship Management Context: A Comparison of Consumer Attitudes in the United States, China, and Taiwan
Swartz, 2004, Canadian Firms Have Different Views of Privacy, Information Management Journal, 38, 14

Sorted by citations

Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews
Paré, G., Trudel, M.-C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008 · Cited by 1,987
What’s Different about Social Media Networks? A Framework and Research Agenda1
Kane, G. C., Alavi, M., Labianca, G., & Borgatti, S. P. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.1.13 · Cited by 923
ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research
Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.002 · Cited by 711
The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Data Network Effects for Creating User Value
Gregory, R. W., Henfridsson, O., Kaganer, E., & Kyriakou, H. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0178 · Cited by 540
Strategic opportunities (and challenges) of algorithmic decision-making: A call for action on the long-term societal effects of ‘datification’
Newell, S., & Marabelli, M. (2015) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2015.02.001 · Cited by 494
Privacy-Preserving Solutions for Blockchain: Review and Challenges
Bernal Bernabe, J., Canovas, J. L., Hernandez-Ramos, J. L., Torres Moreno, R., & Skarmeta, A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2950872 · Cited by 459
“whichwas highlighted by [32] as a keymultilevel concept that has been studied by diverse disciplines.”
Background
The state of play of blockchain technology in the financial services sector: A systematic literature review
Ali, O., Ally, M., Clutterbuck, & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102199 · Cited by 475
State of the Information Privacy Literature: Where Are We Now and Where Should We Go?
Pavlou (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409969 · Cited by 429
An Enhanced Fear Appeal Rhetorical Framework: Leveraging Threats to the Human Asset Through Sanctioning RhetoriC1
Johnston, A. C., Warkentin, M. E., & Siponen, M. T. (2015) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2015/39.1.06 · Cited by 412
Blissfully ignorant: the effects of general privacy concerns, general institutional trust, and affect in the privacy calculus
Kehr, F., Kowatsch, T., Wentzel, D., & Fleisch, E. (2015) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12062 · Cited by 410
‘Okay google, what about my privacy?’: user's privacy perceptions and acceptance of voice based digital assistants
Vimalkumar, M., Sharma, S. K., Singh, J. B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106763 · Cited by 402
Theories in online information privacy research: A critical review and an integrated framework
Li, Y. (2012) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.010 · Cited by 367
Brand co-creation through social commerce information sharing: The role of social media
Tajvidi, M., Richard, M., Wang, Y., & Hajli, N. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.008 · Cited by 403
Mobile health technology adoption across generations: Narrowing the digital divide
Fox, G., & Connolly, R. (2018) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12179 · Cited by 344
Understanding online safety behaviors: A protection motivation theory perspective
Tsai, H.-Y. S., Jiang, M., Alhabash, S., LaRose, R., Rifon, N. J., & Cotten, S. R. (2016) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2016.02.009 · Cited by 363
Linking information systems and entrepreneurship: A review and agenda for IT‐associated and digital entrepreneurship research
Steininger, D. M. (2018) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12206 · Cited by 356
Exploring the Security of Information Sharing on Social Networking Sites: The Role of Perceived Control of Information
Hajli, N., & Lin, X. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2346-x · Cited by 321
Location information disclosure in location-based social network services: Privacy calculus, benefit structure, and gender differences
Sun, Y., Wang, N., Shen, X., & Zhang, X. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.006 · Cited by 321
Achieving Rigor in Literature Reviews: Insights from Qualitative Data Analysis and Tool-Support
Bandara, W., Furtmueller, E., Gorbacheva, E., Miskon, S., & Beekhuyzen, J. (2015) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.03708 · Cited by 367
Privacy concerns and benefits of engagement with social media-enabled apps: A privacy calculus perspective
Jozani, M., Ayaburi, E., Ko, M., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106260 · Cited by 303
Factors Affecting Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty in Online Food Delivery Service during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Its Relation with Open Innovation
Prasetyo, Y. T., Tanto, H., Mariyanto, M., Hanjaya, C., Young, M. N., Persada, S. F., Ardiansyahmiraja, B., & Redi, A. A. N. P. (2021) · Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity · doi:10.3390/joitmc7010076 · Cited by 289
Making Transparency Transparent: The Evolution of Observation in Management Theory
Bernstein, E. S. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2014.0076 · Cited by 299
Research Commentary—Informing Privacy Research Through Information Systems, Psychology, and Behavioral Economics: Thinking Outside the “APCO” Box
Dinev, T., McConnell, A. R., & Smith, H. J. (2015) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2015.0600 · Cited by 277
Online self-disclosure: The privacy paradox explained as a temporally discounted balance between concerns and rewards
Hallam, C. R. A., & Zanella, G. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.033 · Cited by 274
Cultural and generational influences on privacy concerns: a qualitative study in seven European countries
Miltgen, C. L., & Peyrat‐Guillard, D. (2013) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2013.17 · Cited by 241
Understanding factors affecting users’ social networking site continuance: A gender difference perspective
Lin, X., Featherman, M. S., & Sarker, S. (2016) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.09.004 · Cited by 252
One app to trace them all? Examining app specifications for mass acceptance of contact-tracing apps
Trang, S. T.-N., Trenz, M., Weiger, W. H., Tarafdar, M., & Cheung, C. M. K. (2020) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2020.1784046 · Cited by 214
The impact of disposition to privacy, website reputation and website familiarity on information privacy concerns
Li, Y. (2013) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2013.09.018 · Cited by 205
What makes hosts trust Airbnb? Antecedents of hosts’ trust toward Airbnb and its impact on continuance intention
Wang, Y., Asaad, Y., & Filieri, R. (2020) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287519855135 · Cited by 194
Does privacy assurance on social commerce sites matter to millennials?
Wang, Y., & Herrando, C. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.016 · Cited by 201
Mitigating the intrusive effects of smart home assistants by using anthropomorphic design features: A multimethod investigation
Benlian, A., Klumpe, J., & Hinz, O. F. (2019) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12243 · Cited by 191
Digital transformation and hospitality management competencies: Toward an integrative framework
Busulwa, R., Pickering, M. E., & Mao, I. (2021) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103132 · Cited by 212
The Future of Frontline Research
Rafaeli, A., Altman, D., Gremler, D. D., Huang, M., Grewal, D., Iyer, B., Parasuraman, A., & de Ruyter, K. (2016) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670516679275 · Cited by 196
Why security and privacy research lies at the centre of the information systems (IS) artefact: proposing a bold research agenda
Lowry, P. B., Dinev, T., & Willison, R. (2017) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/s41303-017-0066-x · Cited by 185
Measuring mobile users' concerns for information privacy
Xu, H., Gupta, S., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2012) · Cited by 176
The role of virtual try-on technology in online purchase decision from consumers’ aspect
Zhang, T. C., Wang, W. Y. C., Cao, L., & Wang, Y. (2019) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-12-2017-0540 · Cited by 214
A chronological review of empirical research on personal information privacy concerns: An analysis of contexts and research constructs
Yun, H., Lee, G., & Kim, D. J. (2018) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2018.10.001 · Cited by 171
Who trusts social media?
Warner‐Søderholm, G., Bertsch, A., Sawe, E., Lee, D. R., Wolfe, T., Meyer, J., Engel, J., & Fatilua, U. N. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.026 · Cited by 198
Examining gender differences in people’s information-sharing decisions on social networking sites
Lin, X., & Wang, X. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.004 · Cited by 182
Understanding the patient privacy perspective on health information exchange: A systematic review
Shen, N., Bernier, T., Sequeira, L., Strauss, J., Silver, M. P., Carter-Langford, A., & Wiljer, D. (2019) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.01.014 · Cited by 170
The transparency challenge of blockchain in organizations
Sedlmeir, J., Lautenschlager, J., Fridgen, G., & Urbach, N. (2022) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-022-00536-0 · Cited by 162
Beyond The Privacy Paradox: Objective Versus Relative Risk in Privacy Decision Making1
Adjerid, I., Péer, E., & Acquisti, A. (2016) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2018/14316 · Cited by 182
User Compensation as a Data Breach Recovery Action: An Investigation of the Sony PlayStation Network Breach1
Goode, S., Hoehle, H., Venkatesh, V., & Brown, S. A. (2017) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2017/41.3.03 · Cited by 154
A Framework for Rigorously Identifying Research Gaps in Qualitative Literature Reviews
Müller-Bloch, C., & Kranz, J. J. (2015) · IT University Of Copenhagen (IT University of Copenhagen) · Cited by 154
Understanding the effects of trust and risk on individual behavior toward social media platforms: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence
Wang, Y., Min, Q., & Han, S. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.011 · Cited by 157
Privacy concerns and disclosure of biometric and behavioral data for travel
Ioannou, A., Tussyadiah, I. P., & Lü, Y. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102122 · Cited by 167
Dynamic information technology capability: Concept definition and framework development
Li, T. (., & Chan, Y. E. (2019) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2019.101575 · Cited by 151
The role of mobile‐computing self‐efficacy in consumer information disclosure
Keith, M. J., Babb, J. S., Lowry, P. B., Furner, C. P., & Abdullat, A. A. (2015) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12082 · Cited by 156
Understanding the Strategic Consequences of Customer Privacy Concerns: A Meta-Analytic Review
Okazaki, S., Eisend, M., Plangger, K. A., de Ruyter, K., & Grewal, D. (2020) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2020.05.007 · Cited by 148
Information privacy in e-service: Effect of organizational privacy assurances on individual privacy concerns, perceptions, trust and self-disclosure behavior
Mutimukwe, C., Kolkowska, E., & Grönlund, Å. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.101413 · Cited by 158
The SOR (stimulus-organism-response) paradigm in online learning: an empirical study of students’ knowledge hiding perceptions
Zhai, X., Wang, M., & Ghani, U. (2019) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1696841 · Cited by 159
Assessing AI adoption in developing country academia: A trust and privacy-augmented UTAUT framework
Rana, M. M., Siddiqee, M. S., Sakib, M. N., & Ahamed, M. R. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37569 · Cited by 143
Applying an Extended UTAUT2 Model to Explain User Acceptance of Lifestyle and Therapy Mobile Health Apps: Survey Study
Schomakers, E.-M., Lidynia, C., Vervier, L., Valdez, A. S. C., & Ziefle, M. (2021) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/27095 · Cited by 151
"Blockchain for the IoT: Privacy-Preserving Protection of Sensor Data"
ETH Zurich, S., Chanson, M., Bogner, A., ETH Zurich, S., Bilgeri, D., ETH Zurich, S., Fleisch, E., & Wortmann, F. (2019) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00567 · Cited by 176
Technology acceptance research: Meta-analysis
Marikyan, D., Papagiannidis, S., & Stewart, G. (2026) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/01655515231191177 · Cited by 140
The role of privacy policy on consumers’ perceived privacy
Chang, Y., Wong, S. F., Libaque-Sáenz, C. F., & Lee, H. (2018) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2018.04.002 · Cited by 160
Exploring the competing influences of privacy concerns and positive beliefs on citizen acceptance of contact tracing mobile applications
Fox, G., Clohessy, T., van der Werff, L., Rosati, P., & Lynn, T. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106806 · Cited by 146
Making Decisions about Privacy
Knijnenburg, B. P., & Kobsa, A. (2013) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/2499670 · Cited by 141
Dimensionality of information disclosure behavior
Knijnenburg, B. P., Kobsa, A., & Jin, H. (2013) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.06.003 · Cited by 135
Studying innovation ecosystems using ecology theory
Shaw, D., & Allen, T. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.030 · Cited by 147
Personal information privacy and emerging technologies
Conger, S. A., Pratt, J. H., & Loch, K. D. (2012) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00402.x · Cited by 131
Privacy Concerns and Data Sharing in the Internet of Things: Mixed Methods Evidence from Connected Cars
Cichy, P., Salge, T. O., & Kohli, R. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/14165 · Cited by 146
A privacy-preserving smart parking system using an IoT elliptic curve based security platform
Chatzigiannakis, I., Vitaletti, A., & Pyrgelis, A. (2016) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2016.03.014 · Cited by 127
Is AI-based digital marketing ethical? Assessing a new data privacy paradox
Saura, J. R., Škare, V., & Došen, Đ. O. (2024) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2024.100597 · Cited by 187
AI-driven public services and the privacy paradox: do citizens really care about their privacy?
Willems, J., Schmid, M. J., Vanderelst, D. F., Vogel, D., & Ebinger, F. (2022) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2022.2063934 · Cited by 139
Exploring information privacy regulation, risks, trust, and behavior
Miltgen, C. L., & Smith, H. J. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.06.006 · Cited by 139
The Digital Stressors Scale: Development and Validation of a New Survey Instrument to Measure Digital Stress Perceptions in the Workplace Context
Fischer, T., Reuter, M., & Riedl‬, R. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.607598 · Cited by 145
A Conceptual Model for Investigating the Effect of Privacy Concerns on E-Commerce Adoption: A Study on United Arab Emirates Consumers
Akour, I. A., Alnazzawi, N., Alshurideh, M. T., Almaiah, M. A., Kurdi, B. H. A., Alfaisal, R., & Salloum, S. A. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11223648 · Cited by 125
Blockchain integration in healthcare: a comprehensive investigation of use cases, performance issues, and mitigation strategies
Kasyapa, M. S., & Vanmathi, C. (2024) · Frontiers Digit. Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2024.1359858 · Cited by 104
How do investors decide? An interdisciplinary review of decision-making in crowdfunding
Hoegen, A., Steininger, D. M., & Veit, D. J. (2017) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-017-0269-y · Cited by 133
Privacy Aspects of Recommender Systems
Friedman, A., Knijnenburg, B. P., Vanhecke, K., Martens, L., & Berkovsky, S. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_19 · Cited by 129
Online information quality and consumer satisfaction: The moderating roles of contextual factors – A meta-analysis
Ghasemaghaei, M., & Hassanein, K. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.07.001 · Cited by 135
Drivers and Inhibitors of Internet Privacy Concern: A Multidimensional Development Theory Perspective
Hong, W., Chan, F. K. Y., & Thong, J. Y. L. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04237-1 · Cited by 127
Relative convenience, relative advantage, perceived security, perceived privacy, and continuous use intention of China’s WeChat Pay: A mixed-method two-phase design study
Mombeuil, C., & Uhde, H. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102384 · Cited by 123
Perception of privacy and data protection in the context of the development of artificial intelligence
Mazurek, G., & Małagocka, K. (2019) · Journal of Management Analytics · doi:10.1080/23270012.2019.1671243 · Cited by 143
Communicating Personal Health Information in Virtual Health Communities: An Integration of Privacy Calculus Model and Affective Commitment
Kordzadeh, N., & Warren, J. (2017) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00446 · Cited by 123
Antecedents and outcomes of information privacy concerns in a peer context: An exploratory study
Özdemir, Z. D., Smith, H. J., & Benamati, J. ‘. (2017) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/s41303-017-0056-z · Cited by 134
Privacy concerns in E-commerce: A taxonomy and a future research agenda
Bandara, R. J., Fernando, M., & Akter, S. (2019) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-019-00375-6 · Cited by 133
Privacy in the Sharing Economy
Berlin, T., Teubner, T., & Flath, C. M. (2019) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00534 · Cited by 129
Information disclosure of social media users
Benson, V., Saridakis, G., & Tennakoon, H. (2015) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-10-2014-0232 · Cited by 119
Exploring the Privacy Concerns in Using Intelligent Virtual Assistants under Perspectives of Information Sensitivity and Anthropomorphism
Ha, Q.-A., Chen, V., Uy, H. U., & Capistrano, E. P. S. (2020) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1834728 · Cited by 116
Information disclosure in e-commerce: A systematic review and agenda for future research
Kolotylo-Kulkarni, M., Xia, W., & Dhillon, G. S. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.006 · Cited by 124
Resolving the privacy paradox: Toward a cognitive appraisal and emotion approach to online privacy behaviors
Li, H. Z., Luo, X. R., Zhang, J., & Xu, H. (2017) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2017.02.005 · Cited by 111
Privacy concerns in the smart home context
Guhr, N., Werth, O., Blacha, P. P. H., & Breitner, M. H. (2020) · SN Applied Sciences · doi:10.1007/s42452-020-2025-8 · Cited by 130
Impact of privacy concerns on resistance to smart services: does the ‘Big Brother effect’ matter?
Mani, Z., & Chouk, I. (2019) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2019.1667856 · Cited by 109
Prospective Teachers’ Perceptions of Barriers to Technology Integration in Education
Dinç, E. (2019) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cet.634187 · Cited by 164
Critical review of supply chain innovation research (1999–2016)
Wong, D., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2019) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.01.017 · Cited by 107
The users’ perspective on the privacy-utility trade-offs in health recommender systems
Valdez, A. S. C., & Ziefle, M. (2018) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.04.003 · Cited by 110
Writing Qualitative IS Literature Reviews—Guidelines for Synthesis, Interpretation, and Guidance of Research
Schryen, G. (2015) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.03712 · Cited by 143
Users' Information Privacy Concerns and Privacy Protection Behaviors in Social Networks
Adhikari, K., & Panda, R. K. (2018) · Journal of Global Marketing · doi:10.1080/08911762.2017.1412552 · Cited by 106
The diffusion of e-participation in public administrations: A systematic literature review
Steinbach, M., Sieweke, J., & Süß, S. (2019) · Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10919392.2019.1552749 · Cited by 116
Engineering Privacy by Design: Are engineers ready to live up to the challenge?
Bednar, K., Spiekermann, S., & Langheinrich, M. (2019) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2019.1583296 · Cited by 112
Privacy and Artificial Intelligence
Curzon, J., Kosa, T. A., Akalu, R., & El‐Khatib, K. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2021.3088084 · Cited by 117
Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law
Lae (2014) · ADVANCED SCIENCES INDEX · Cited by 98
Mobile Commerce and Consumer Privacy Concerns
Zhang, R., Chen, J. Q., & Lee, C. J. (2013) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2013.11645648 · Cited by 97
An exploratory investigation of factors affecting and best predicting the renewed adoption of mobile wallets
Mombeuil, C. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102127 · Cited by 104
Assessing the Impact of Granular Privacy Controls on Content Sharing and Disclosure on Facebook
Cavusoglu, H., Phan, T. Q., Cavusoglu, H., & Airoldi, E. M. (2016) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2016.0672 · Cited by 94
Investigating perceived risks and benefits of information privacy disclosure in IT-enabled ride-sharing
Cheng, X., Hou, T., & Mou, J. (2021) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103450 · Cited by 96
Transformative privacy calculus: Conceptualizing the personalization‐privacy paradox on social media
Cloarec, J., Meyer‐Waarden, L., & Munzel, A. (2024) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21998 · Cited by 104
“While privacy calculus is generally viewed as a simple antecedent of online data disclosure (Bélanger & Crossler, 2011; Smith et al., 2011), our study shows that privacy calculus can influence the strength of the positive relationship between internet ‐ related happiness and SNSPF, and hence the…”
Information Disclosure and the Diffusion of Information Security Attacks
Mitra, S., & Ransbotham, S. (2015) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2015.0587 · Cited by 93

Authors: Bélanger, F., & Crossler, R. E.
Affiliations: Pamplin College of Business, Virginia Tech, 3007 Pamplin Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0101 U.S.A.
Mississippi State University (US)
ORCID: Crossler, Robert E.
Venue: MIS Quarterly
Publisher: MIS Quarterly
Published: 2011-12-01
Volume: 35
Issue: 4
Pages: 1017-A36
ISSN: 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
2162-9730
DOI: 10.2307/41409971
OpenAlex: W1870146437
Cited by: 1,339
References: 501
Citations by year: 2026: 108 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 112 · 2022: 114 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 112 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 107 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 83 · 2015: 89 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 23
FWCI: 145.71
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
hdl.handle.net
Locations: MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
Keywords: data privacy, multilevel analysis, multi-level framework, privacy concerns, privacy preservation, data control, digital era

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Privacy in the Digital Age: a Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems1

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks