Cited by 336Aging, Health, and DisabilityChronic Disease Management StrategiesFrailty in Older Adults

Association of Diabetes, Comorbidities, and A1C With Functional Disability in Older Adults

Open access
Kalyani, Rita Rastogi, Saudek, Christopher D., Brancati, Frederick L., Selvin, Elizabeth·2010·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship of diabetes and functional disability in older adults and the possible mediating roles of comorbidities and A1C. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed data from a nationally representative sample of 6,097 participants aged ≥60 years in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2006. Diabetes was defined by self-report. Disability was defined as difficulty performing a physical task. We evaluated disability by grouping 19 physical tasks into five functional groups: lower-extremity mobility (LEM), general physical activities (GPA), activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), and leisure and social activities (LSA). RESULTS: Older U.S. adults with diabetes had the greatest disability in GPA (prevalence 73.6% [95% CI 70.2–76.9]), followed by LEM (52.2% [48.5–55.9]), IADL (43.6% [40.1–47.2]), ADL (37.2% [33.1–41.3]), and LSA groups (33.8% [30.8–36.9]). Diabetes was associated with two to three times increased odds of disability across functional groups (all P < 0.05). Comorbidities, mostly cardiovascular disease and obesity, and poor glycemic control (A1C ≥8%) together explained up to 85% of the excess odds of disability associated with diabetes, whereas poor glycemic control alone explained only ∼10% of the excess odds. Adjustment for comorbidities, A1C, and diabetes duration fully attenuated the associations of diabetes with disability in all functional groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with diabetes have a high prevalence of disabilities with variable associations attributable to comorbidities and A1C. Aggressive management of cardiovascular risk factors and obesity may significantly reduce the burden of disability in this population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc09-1597

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Up to 70% of adults with diabetes have difficulty with routine physical tasks, and diabetes is a potent risk factor for most geriatric syndromes.

    “Up to 70% of adults with diabetes have difficulty carrying out routine physical tasks, with lower extremity mobility limitations particularly evident, and diabetes is a potent risk factor for most geriatric syndromes.34”
  • Part of the mobility reduction in older people with diabetes may be mediated by a direct effect of diabetes on skeletal muscle.

    “Although comorbidities—such as cardiovascular disease and obesity—probably contribute to physical disability in diabetes, evidence is emerging that part of the mobility reduction process in older individuals with diabetes is mediated by a direct effect of diabetes on skeletal muscle.34”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kalyani, R. R., Saudek, C. D., Brancati, F. L., & Selvin, E.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Kalyani, Rita Rastogi
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2010-02-25
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
1055-1060
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2137138384
Cited by
336
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 20
FWCI
18.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p60dk079637-02)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P60 DK-079637, K01DK076595, K24DK062222, P30DK079637, R21DK080294, K23DK093583)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000052, KL2RR025006)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, functional disability, older adults, comorbidities, glycemic control, HbA1c, cardiovascular disease, obesity, activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, lower extremity mobility, physical activity, diabetes duration
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Diabetes Mellitus, Disability Evaluation, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Leisure Activities, Male, Motor Activity, Nutrition Surveys, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, United States, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Age Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review