Cited by 157Frailty in Older AdultsChronic Disease Management StrategiesNutrition and Health in Aging

Hyperglycemia and incidence of frailty and lower extremity mobility limitations in older women

Open access
Kalyani, Rita R., Tian, Jing, Xue, Qian‐Li, Walston, Jeremy, Cappola, Anne R., Fried, Linda P., Brancati, Frederick L., Blaum, Caroline S.·2012·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the degree to which hyperglycemia predicts the development of frailty and lower extremity mobility limitations. Design: Secondary data analysis of longitudinal data collected in a prospective cohort study. Setting: B altimore, M aryland. Participants: Three hundred twenty‐nine women from the W omen's H ealth and A ging S tudy II aged 70 to 79 at baseline who had all variables needed for analysis. Measurements: Glycosylated hemoglobin ( H b A 1c) at baseline, categorized as less than 5.5%, 5.5% to 5.9%, 6.0% to 6.4%, 6.5% to 7.9%, and 8.0% and greater, was the independent variable. The incidence of frailty and lower extremity mobility limitations (based on self‐reported walking difficulty, walking speed, and S hort P erformance P hysical B attery score) was determined (follow‐up ≈ 9 years). Frailty was assessed using the C ardiovascular H ealth S tudy criteria. Covariates included demographic characteristics, body mass index, interleukin‐6 level, and clinical history of comorbidities. Statistical analyses included Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Cox regression models adjusted for important covariates. Results: In time‐to‐event analyses, H b A 1c category was associated with incidence of walking difficulty ( P = .049) and low physical performance ( P = .001); association with incidence of frailty and low walking speed had a trend toward significance (both P = .10). In regression models adjusted for demographic characteristics, H b A 1c of 8.0% or greater (vs < 5.5%) was associated with an approximately three‐times greater risk of incident frailty and three to five times greater risk of lower extremity mobility limitations (all P < .05). In fully adjusted models, H b A 1c of 8.0% or greater (vs < 5.5%) was associated with incident frailty (hazard ratio ( HR ) = 3.33, 95% confidence interval ( CI ) = 1.24–8.93), walking difficulty ( HR = 3.47, 95% CI = 1.26–9.55), low walking speed ( HR = 2.82, 95% CI = 1.19–6.71), and low physical performance ( HR = 3.60, 95% CI = 1.52–8.53). Conclusion: Hyperglycemia is associated with the development of frailty and lower extremity mobility limitations in older women. Future studies should identify mediators of these relationships.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04099.x

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some older adults with diabetes have other underlying chronic conditions, substantial diabetes-related comorbidity, limited cognitive or physical functioning, or frailty.

    “Some older adults with diabetes have other underlying chronic conditions, substantial diabetes-related comorbidity, limited cognitive or physical functioning, or frailty (48,49).”

    From 13. Older Adults: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024</i> (2024) · cites this paper as [49]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) links diabetes in older people to impaired physical functioning, lower-extremity mobility limitations, and frailty. The Discussion mentions cardiovascular disease and neuropathy, but the paper does not establish substantial diabetes-related comorbidity or address limited cognitive functioning. It therefore supports only part of the list attributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some older adults with diabetes have other underlying chronic conditions, substantial diabetes-related comorbidity, limited cognitive or physical functioning, or frailty.

    “Some older adults with diabetes have other underlying chronic conditions, substantial diabetes-related comorbidity, limited cognitive or physical functioning, or frailty (58,59).”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [59]

    The Introduction associates diabetes in older adults with lower-extremity mobility limitations and frailty, supporting the physical-functioning and frailty portions of the claim. The Methods (Variables) record chronic conditions and neuropathy, but the cited passages do not establish substantial diabetes-related comorbidity or address limited cognitive functioning. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Hyperglycaemia is associated with frailty and incident mobility limitations, potentially mediated by loss of muscle.

    “Hyperglycaemia is associated with the development of frailty and incident mobility limitations, potentially mediated by loss of muscle.44”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kalyani, R. R., Tian, J., Xue, Q., Walston, J., Cappola, A. R., Fried, L. P., Brancati, F. L., & Blaum, C. S.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-08-10
Volume
60
Issue
9
Pages
1701-1707
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2065888972
Cited by
157
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r37ag019905-10)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG021493, R37-AG019905, R37-AG19905, P30AG021334)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK079637, K23DK093583)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
hyperglycemia, frailty, older women, HbA1c, walking speed, physical performance, walking difficulty, type 2 diabetes, aging, physical function decline, interleukin-6, comorbidities, body mass index, cardiovascular risk factors
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Longitudinal Studies, Prospective Studies, Baltimore, Incidence, Chi-Square Distribution, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Walking, Frail Elderly, Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Mobility Limitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review