Cited by 268Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

The U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study. A review

Turner, Robert C·1998·Diabetes Care

Abstract

The objective of the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), initiated in 1977, was set up to determine whether improved blood glucose control in people with type 2 diabetes will prevent the complications of diabetes. The UKPDS was also designed to determine whether there are differences between conventional policy (diet therapy) and three different regimens of intensive treatment policy, based on sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin. Interim efficacy analyses revealed that the intensive policies with sulfonylurea, insulin, and metformin were equally effective in reducing fasting plasma glucose concentrations. However, glucose and HbA1c measurements steadily increased with time, reflecting ongoing deterioration of beta-cell function. Cardiovascular disease was the major cause of complications, and the risk factors included raised LDL cholesterol concentrations, low HDL cholesterol concentrations, elevated blood pressure, elevated HbA1c concentrations, and smoking. A final study report was issued in September 1998, when the median duration of therapy was 11 years.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.21.3.c35

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turner, R. C.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Turner, Robert C
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
1998-12-01
Volume
21
Issue
Supplement_3
Pages
C35-C38
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2067958701
Cited by
267
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
UK Prospective Diabetes Study, type 2 diabetes, tight glycemic control, glycemic control, sulfonylureas, metformin, insulin therapy, beta-cell function, cardiovascular complications, cardiovascular risk factors, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, blood pressure, smoking, HbA1c, dietary therapy
MeSH terms
Insulin Secretion, Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Demography, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Angiopathies, Diet, Diabetic, Follow-Up Studies, United Kingdom, Humans, Hypertension, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Islets of Langerhans, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review