Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Distribution of lipid droplets in hippocampal neurons and microglia: impact of diabetes and exercise

Seferi, Gezime, Mjønes, Harald S, Havik, Mona, Reiersen, Herman, Dalen, Knut Tomas, Nordengen, Kaja, Morland, Cecilie·2024·Life Science Alliance

Abstract

Neuroinflammation, aging, and neurodegenerative disorders are associated with excessive accumulation of neutral lipids in lipid droplets (LDs) in microglia. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may cause neuroinflammation and is a risk factor for neurodegenerative disorders. Here, we show that hippocampal pyramidal neurons contain smaller, more abundant LDs than their neighboring microglia. The density of LDs varied between pyramidal cells in adjacent subregions, with CA3 neurons containing more LDs than CA1 neurons. Within the CA3 region, a gradual increase in the LD content along the pyramidal layer from the hilus toward CA2 was observed. Interestingly, the high neuronal LD content correlated with less ramified microglial morphotypes. Using the db/db model of T2DM, we demonstrated that diabetes increased the number of LDs per microglial cell without affecting the neuronal LD density. High-intensity interval exercise induced smaller changes in the number of LDs in microglia but was not sufficient to counteract the diabetes-induced changes in LD accumulation. The changes observed in response to T2DM may contribute to the cerebral effects of T2DM and provide a mechanistic link between T2DM and neurodegenerative disorders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26508/lsa.202302239

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1007/s11064-009-0087-5 · DOI
  2. 10.1186/1423-0127-20-49 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024777 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1083/jcb.1.1.69 · DOI
  5. 10.1186/s12974-016-0580-0 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.3389/fnins.2020.00742 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.12.019 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.08.024 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1002/glia.23978 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/jnc.13648 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.1413706111 · DOI
  12. 10.3389/fcell.2022.863907 · DOI
  13. 10.1159/000337428 · DOI
  14. 10.2337/dc15-1588 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70284-2 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/j.rehab.2018.11.001 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1038/s41574-020-0381-5 · DOI
  18. 10.1194/jlr.D011940 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/ejn.14375 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.1004.1001 · DOI
  21. 10.1074/jbc.M108414200 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/s41467-021-27365-7 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2012.01.007 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1101/2023.04.03.535373 · DOI
  25. Nelson S , Chris M (2006) Structural and functional properties of hippocampal neurons. In The Hippocampus Book, Andersen P , Morris R , Amaral D , Bliss T , O’Keefe J (eds), pp 133–159. Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  26. 10.3389/fncel.2015.00019 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.molbrainres.2005.07.018 · DOI
  28. Jarc, 2019, Lipid droplets and the management of cellular stress, Yale J Biol Med, 92, 435
  29. 10.1186/s12974-023-02740-x · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.10.020 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.3389/fninf.2023.1211188 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/ejn.15812 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/0026-0495(94)90194-5 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.tcb.2007.06.004 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/s11095-021-03098-6 · DOI
  36. 10.3389/fnins.2022.884579 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Seferi, G., Mjønes, H. S., Havik, M., Reiersen, H., Dalen, K. T., Nordengen, K., & Morland, C.
Affiliations
  • Section for Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo
  • Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo
  • Department of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Venue
Life Science Alliance
Published
2024-08-08
Volume
7
Issue
10
Pages
e202302239
ISSN
2575-1077
Cited by
9
References
20
Language
en
Funders
Universitetet i Oslo

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review