Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 449

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fashion Shopping in Multichannel Retail: The Role of Technology in Enhancing the Customer Experience

Open access
Blázquez, Marta·2014·International Journal of Electronic Commerce
DOI 10.2753/jec1086-4415180404
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The difficulty of translating the in-store experience to the online environment is one of the main reasons why the fashion industry has been slower than other sectors to adopt e-commerce. Recently, however, new information technologies (ITs) have enabled consumers to evaluate fashion online, creating an interactive and exciting shopping experience. As a result, clothing has become the fastest-growing online category of goods bought in the United Kingdom. This trend could have serious consequences for brick-and-mortar stores. The aim of this quantitative research is to gain a better understanding of multichannel fashion-shopping experiences, focusing on the role of IT and the crossover effects between channels. In particular, I explore the influence of the level of online experience on the perceptions and motivations of fashion consumers when they buy across multiple channels. The theoretical framework of hedonic and utilitarian shopping values is applied to measure consumers' shopping experiences and shopping motivations to buy in different channels. The results from a quantitative survey of 439 consumers in the United Kingdom suggest the need to redefine the in-store shopping experience, promoting the use of technology as a way to create an engaging and integrated experience among channels. Retailers must think in all channels holistically, boosting interactive and new technologies for the Internet and taking advantage of all touchpoints with the consumer, including mobile devices and social networks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2753/jec1086-4415180404

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. T. Allard, 2009, When income matters: Customers evaluation of shopping malls' hedonic and utilitarian orientations, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16, 40, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2008.08.004 · DOI
  2. M. Arnold, 2003, Hedonic shopping motivations, Journal of Retailing, 79, 77, 10.1016/S0022-4359(03)00007-1 · DOI · Paper page
  3. B. Babin, 2000, Atmospheric affect as a tool for creating value and gaining share of customer, Journal of Business Research, 49, 91, 10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00011-9 · DOI · Paper page
  4. J. Baker, 2009, The influence of store environment on quality inferences and store image, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22, 328, 10.1177/0092070394224002 · DOI · Paper page
  5. R. Batra, 1990, Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes, Marketing Letters, 2, 159, 10.1007/BF00436035 · DOI · Paper page
  6. P. Biernacki, 1981, Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling, Sociological Methods & Research, 10, 141, 10.1177/004912418101000205 · DOI · Paper page
  7. S. Byun, 2011, Fast fashion and in-store hoarding: The drivers, moderator and consequences, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 29, 187, 10.1177/0887302X11411709 · DOI
  8. T. Childers, 2001, Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behaviour, Journal of Retailing, 77, 511, 10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00056-2 · DOI · Paper page
  9. A. Chu, 2007, Fashion Marketing, 151
  10. J. Chu, 2002, Enhancing the customer shopping experience: 2002 IBM/NRF "store of the future" survey
  11. A. Citrin, 2003, Consumer need for tactile input: An Internet retailing challenge, Journal of Business Research, 56, 915, 10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00278-8 · DOI · Paper page
  12. E. Clifford, 2011, Youth fashion—UK—2011
  13. E. Clifford, 2012, Fashion online—UK—March 2012
  14. A. Crowley, 1992, Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of attitudes toward product categories, Marketing Letters, 3, 239, 10.1007/BF00994132 · DOI · Paper page
  15. C. Dennis, 2010, Antecedents of Internet shopping intentions and the moderating effects of substitutability, International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 20, 411, 10.1080/09593969.2010.504008 · DOI
  16. H. Dittmar, 2004, Buying on the Internet: Gender differences in on-line and conventional shopping motivations, Sex Roles, 50, 423, 10.1023/B:SERS.0000018896.35251.c7 · DOI · Paper page
  17. N. Doherty, 2010, Evaluating the role of electronic commerce in transforming the retail sector, International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 20, 375, 10.1080/09593969.2010.504001 · DOI
  18. S. Eroglu, 2003, Empirical testing of a model of online store atmospherics and shopper responses, Psychology & Marketing, 20, 139, 10.1002/mar.10064 · DOI · Paper page
  19. K. Ford, 1986, The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis, Personnel Psychology, 39, 291, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00583.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. Forrester Research. The future of retail and tomorrow's consumer. Cambridge, MA, June 2011.
  21. G. Griffiths, 2008, Balancing clicks and bricks: Strategies for multichannel retailers, Journal of Global Business Issues, 2, 69
  22. E. Hirschman, 1982, Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions, Journal of Marketing, 46, 92, 10.2307/1251707 · DOI
  23. M. Holbrook, 1986, The Role of Affect in Consumer Behavior: Emerging Theories and Applications, 17
  24. M. Holbrook, 1982, The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings and fun, Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 508
  25. N. Irani, 2011, The effects of Iranian consumers' buying tendencies on hedonic and utilitarian shopping value, African Journal of Business Management, 5, 7449, 10.5897/AJBM11.257 · DOI
  26. M. Jones, 2006, Hedonic and utilitarian shopping value: Investigating differential effects on retail outcomes, Journal of Business Research, 59, 974, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
  27. A. Keng, 2003, Typology of online shoppers, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 20, 139, 10.1108/07363760310464604 · DOI · Paper page
  28. R. Kerin, 1992, Store shopping experience and consumer price-quality-value perceptions, Journal of Retailing, 68, 376
  29. B. Kilcourse, 2009, Walking the razor's edge: Managing the store experience in an economic singularity
  30. P. Kotler, 1972, Atmospherics as a marketing tool, Journal of Retailing, 49, 48
  31. R. Kozinets, 2002, Themed flagship brand stores in the new millennium, Journal of Retailing, 78, 17, 10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00063-X · DOI · Paper page
  32. V. Kumar, 2005, Who are the multichannel shoppers and how do they perform? Correlates of multichannel shopping behavior, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19, 44, 10.1002/dir.20034 · DOI · Paper page
  33. S. Levy, 1959, Symbols for sale, Harvard Business Review, 37, 117
  34. Y. Lu, 2006, Apparel acquisition via single vs. multiple channels: College students' perspectives in the U. S. and China, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13, 35, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2005.04.002 · DOI
  35. R. Marciniak, 2007, Fashion Marketing, 259
  36. C. Mathwick, 2002, The effect of dynamic retail experiences on experiential perceptions of value: An Internet and catalog comparison, Journal of Retailing, 78, 51
  37. S. Menon, 2002, Cross-category effects of induced arousal and pleasure on the Internet shopping experience, Journal of Retailing, 78, 31, 10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00064-1 · DOI · Paper page
  38. A. Merle, 2012, Whether and how virtual try-on influences consumer responses to an apparel Web site, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16, 41, 10.2753/JEC1086-4415160302 · DOI
  39. M. Nicholson, 2002, One brand, three ways to shop: Situational variables and multichannel consumer behaviour, Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 12, 131, 10.1080/09593960210127691 · DOI
  40. A. Ono, 2012, Consumer motivations in browsing online stores with mobile devices, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16, 153, 10.2753/JEC1086-4415160406 · DOI
  41. Oxford Institute of Retail Management. The future of retail business models. Final report for BCSC Educational Trust, Oxford Institute of Retail Management, Oxford, UK, December 2006.
  42. B. Pine, 2011, The Experience Economy
  43. N. Puccinelli, 2009, Customer experience management in retailing: Understanding the buying process, Journal of Retailing, 85, 15, 10.1016/j.jretai.2008.11.003 · DOI · Paper page
  44. A. Rohm, 2004, A typology of online shoppers based on shopping motivations, Journal of Business Research, 57, 748, 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00351-X · DOI · Paper page
  45. R. Roy, 2005, Multichannel retailing: A case study of early experiences, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19, 63, 10.1002/dir.20035 · DOI
  46. S. Sands, 2010, Does the online channel pay? A comparison of online versus offline information search on physical store spend, International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 20, 397, 10.1080/09593969.2010.504006 · DOI
  47. S. San Martín, 2009, Risk, drivers, and impediments to online shopping in Spain and Japan, Journal of Euromarketing, 18, 47, 10.1080/10496480902868425 · DOI
  48. D. Scarpi, 2012, Work and fun on the Internet: The effects of utilitarianism and hedonism online, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26, 53, 10.1016/j.intmar.2011.08.001 · DOI
  49. A. Schlosser, 2003, Experiencing products in the virtual world: The role of goal and imagery in influencing attitudes versus purchase intentions, Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 184, 10.1086/376807 · DOI · Paper page
  50. D. Schoenbachler, 2002, Multichannel shopping: Understanding what drives channel choice, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 19, 42, 10.1108/07363760210414943 · DOI · Paper page
  51. H. Schramm-Klein, 2011, Cross-channel integration—Is it valued by customers?, International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 21, 501, 10.1080/09593969.2011.618886 · DOI
  52. T. Sender, 2011, Fashion online
  53. N. Siddiqui, 2003, Retailer and consumer perceptions of online fashion retailers: Web site design issues, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 7, 345, 10.1108/13612020310496949 · DOI
  54. P. To, 2007, Shopping motivations on Internet: A study based on utilitarian and hedonic value, Technovation, 27, 774, 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Van Meter, K. Methodological and design issues: Techniques for assessing the representatives of snowball samples. National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph Series no. 98, E. Y. Lambert (ed.), Bethesda, MD, 1990 http://archives.drugabuse.gov/pdf/monographs/98.pdf · DOI
  56. T. Verhagen, 2009, Online purchase intentions: A multi-channel store image perspective, Information and Management, 46, 77, 10.1016/j.im.2008.12.001 · DOI
  57. J. Workman, 2010, Fashion consumer groups, gender, and need for touch, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 28, 126, 10.1177/0887302X09356323 · DOI
  58. K. Yang, 2009, The effects of customised site features on Internet apparel shopping, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 13, 128, 10.1108/13612020910939923 · DOI
  59. A. Yazdanparast, 2012, Need for touch and information processing strategies: An empirical examination, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11, 415, 10.1002/cb.1393 · DOI
  60. E. Yoh, 2003, Consumer adoption of the Internet: The case of apparel shopping, Psychology & Marketing, 20, 1095, 10.1002/mar.10110 · DOI
  61. V. Zeithaml, 1988, Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence, Journal of Marketing, 52, 2, 10.2307/1251446 · DOI · Paper page
  62. J. Zhang, 2010, Crafting integrated multichannel retail strategies, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24, 168, 10.1016/j.intmar.2010.02.002 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 449

Metadata

Authors
Blázquez, M.
Venue
International Journal of Electronic Commerce
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2014-07
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
97-116
ISSN
  • 1086-4415 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9301
DOI
10.2753/jec1086-4415180404
OpenAlex
W2023061332
Cited by
449
References
4
FWCI
89.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.