Cited by 65Fatty Acid Research and HealthConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingEdible Oils Quality and Analysis

Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) and maintenance of normal cardiac function (ID 504, 506, 516, 527, 538, 703, 1128, 1317, 1324, 1325): EPA/DHA/DPA related health claims

Open access
EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA)·2010·EFSA Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1796

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, N. A. A. (.
Corresponding author
EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA)
Venue
EFSA Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10
Volume
8
Issue
10
Pages
1796
ISSN
1831-4732 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2972854100
Cited by
65
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
EFSA Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
Keywords
health claim substantiation, eicosapentaenoic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, docosapentaenoic acid, omega-3 fatty acids, cardiac function, cardiovascular health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review