CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,493Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesEvaluation of Teaching PracticesHuman Resource Development and Performance Evaluation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Staff Development and the Process of Teacher Change

GUSKEY, THOMAS R.·1986·Educational Researcher
DOI 10.3102/0013189x015005005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article presents a model that describes the process of teacher change, particularly through staff development programs. The model suggests a temporal sequence of events that is hypothesized to typify the process front staff development to enduring change in teachers’ perceptions and attitudes. Research evidence supporting the model is summarized and the conditions under which change might be facilitated are described. Several principles for enhancing the change process to improve staff development efforts are also outlined.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0013189x015005005

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. AshtonPTWebbRBDodaNA study of teachers’ sense of efficacy1983Washington, DCNational Institute of Education(Final Report, Contract No. 400-79-0075)
  2. BermanPIngrainHMannDThinking about programmed and adaptive implementation: Matching strategies to situationsWhy policies succeed or fail1980Beverly Hills, CASage
  3. BloomBSLearning for masteryEvaluation Comment196812112
  4. BloomBSBlockJHMastery learningMastery learning: Theory and practice1971New YorkMcGraw-Hill
  5. BloomBSHuman characteristics and school learning1976New YorkMcGraw-Hill
  6. BloomBSMadausGFHastingsJTEvaluation to improve learning1981New YorkMcGraw-Hill
  7. BrophyJETeacher behavior and student learningEducational Leadership1979373338
  8. 10.1177/016146817507600609 · DOI
  9. 10.1177/016146815705800901 · DOI
  10. CrandallDPThe teacher’s role in school improvementEducational Leadership198341369
  11. CrandallDPLoucks-HorsleySBauchnerJESchmidtWBEisemanJWCoxPLMilesMBHubermanAMTaylorBLGoldbergJAShireGThompsonCLTaylorJAPeople, policies, and practices: Examining the chain of school improvement1982Andover, MAThe NETWORK, Inc
  12. DaviesDRubinLJNotes and working papers prepared for the Senate Subcommittee on EducationImproving inservice education: Proposals and procedures for change (p. 38)1967BostonAllyn & Bacon1971
  13. DolanLJThe affective correlates of home support, instructional quality, and achievement1980University of ChicagoUnpublished doctoral dissertation
  14. FlandersGSummary report: Professional development study1980VancouverBritish Columbia Teachers’ Federation
  15. FullanMCorwinRResearch on the implementation of educational changeResearch in sociology of education and socialization1981Vol. 2Greenwich, CNJAI Press
  16. FullanMThe meaning of educational change1982New YorkTeachers College Press
  17. GerstenRGuskeyTRFrom reluctance to commitment: Two studies of evolving teacher attitudes toward mastery learning1985AprilPaper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research AssociationChicago
  18. GuskeyTRInservice education, classroom results, and teacher change1979University of ChicagoUnpublished doctoral dissertation
  19. HarootunianBYargarGPTeachers’ conceptions of their own success1980AprilPaper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research AssociationBoston
  20. HarrisBMImproving staff performance through inservice education1980BostonAllyn & Bacon
  21. HarrisBMBessentWMcIntyreKEInservice education: A guide to better practice1969Englewood Cliffs, N JPrentice Hall
  22. HollyFTeachers’ views on inservice trainingPhi Delta Kappan198263417418
  23. HoodPBlackwellLThe role of teachers and other school practitioners in decision making and innovation1980San FranciscoFar West Laboratory
  24. HoweyKRVaughanJCGriffinGACurrent patterns of staff developmentStaff development. Eighty-second yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education1983ChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press
  25. HubermanMECRI, Masepa, North Plains: A case study1981Andover, MAThe NETWORK, Inc
  26. JohnsonTJBaldwinTWileyDEThe teacher’s perception and attribution of causation1969Washington, DCU.S. Office of Education(Final Report, Project No. 5-1068)
  27. JoyceBRMcNairKMDiazRMcKibbinMDInterviews: Perceptions of professionals and policy makers1976Stanford, CAStanford Center for Research and Development in Teaching, Stanford University
  28. JoyceRBShowersBImproving inservice training: The messages of researchEducational Leadership198037379385
  29. JoyceRBShowersBThe coaching of teachingEducational Leadership198240410
  30. LawrenceGPatterns of effective inservice education1974TallahasseeFlorida Department of Education
  31. LewinKA dynamic theory of personality1935New YorkMcGraw Hill
  32. LittleJWSchool success and staff development: The role of staff development in urban desegrated schools. Executive summary1981Washington, D.CNational Institute of Education
  33. LortieDCSchoolteacher: A sociological study1975ChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press
  34. MazzarellaJAResearch synthesis on staff developmentEducational Leadership198038182185
  35. RicheyHGHenryNBGrowth of the modern conception of inservice educationInservice education. Fifty-sixth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education1957ChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press
  36. RubinLJThe inservice education of teachers1978BostonAllyn & Bacon
  37. SmithLGeoffreyWThe complexities of an urban classroom1968New YorkHolt, Rinehart & Winston
  38. SmithLKeithPAnatomy of educational innovation: An organizational analysis of an elementary school1971New YorkWiley
  39. SparksGMSynthesis of research on staff development for effective teachingEducational Leadership19834136572
  40. WagstoffLMcCulloughTInservice educators: Education’s disaster areaAdministrators Handbook197321814
  41. WardBATikinoffWJAn interactive model of research and development in teaching (Report 76-1)1976San FranciscoFar West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development
  42. WardBATikinoffWJCollaborative research: Implications of research for practice1982Washington, DCNational Institute of Education
  43. WoodFHThompsonSRGuidelines for better staff developmentEducational Leadership198037374378

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
GUSKEY, T. R.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
GUSKEY, THOMAS R.
ORCID
GUSKEY, THOMAS R.
Venue
Educational Researcher
Publisher
American Educational Research Association (AERA)
Published
1986-05
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
5-12
ISSN
  • 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-102X
DOI
10.3102/0013189x015005005
OpenAlex
W2126995272
Cited by
1,493
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 73 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 86
FWCI
85.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Educational Researcher (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
Keywords
teacher change, employee development, professional development programs, teacher perceptions, teacher attitudes, change process model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review