Cited by 157Circadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Validity of the Japanese version of the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire

Kitamura, Shingo, Hida, Akiko, Aritake, Sayaka, Higuchi, Shigekazu, Enomoto, Minori, Kato, Mie, Vetter, Céline, Roenneberg, Till +1 more·2014·Chronobiology International

Abstract

To assess circadian preference with a score, the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) has been used for more than 3 decades now. More recently, the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire (MCTQ) was developed: it asks for sleep-wake behavior on work and free days and uses the midpoint of sleep on free days (MSF), corrected for sleep debt accumulated during the work week as an indicator of chronotype (MSFsc). In this study, we developed a Japanese version of the MCTQ by using a translation/back-translation approach including an examination of its semantic validity. In a subsequent questionnaire survey, 450 adult men and women completed the Japanese versions of the MCTQ and MEQ. Results showed that MEQ scores were significantly negatively correlated with mid-sleep parameters assessed by the MCTQ, on both, work and free days, as well as with the chronotype measure MSFsc (r = -0.580 to -0.652, all p < 0.001). As in the original German version, the strongest correlation was observed between MEQ score and MSF. A physiological validation study using dim light melatonin onset as a circadian phase marker (N = 37) showed a high correlation between chronotype as assessed with the MSFsc (r = 0.542, p < 0.001), and less so for MEQ score (r = -0.402, p = 0.055). These results demonstrate the validity of the Japanese MCTQ and provide further support of the adequacy of the MCTQ as a chronotype measure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/07420528.2014.914035

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The MEQ measures psychological preference for behavior but has been shown to correlate less with DLMO than measures of sleep timing obtained with the MCTQ in one study but not in another.

    “The MEQ specifically measures the psychological preference for behavior but has been shown to correlate less with DLMO than measures of sleep timing obtained with the MCTQ in one study (34) but not in another (26).”
  • The MCTQ is known to provide data on social jet lag and has been reported to correlate better than the MEQ with biological measures such as DLMO in one study but not in another.

    “To this end, the MCTQ is known to provide data on social jet lag and has been reported to correlate better than the MEQ with biological measures such as DLMO in one study (34) but not in another (26).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kitamura, S., Hida, A., Aritake, S., Higuchi, S., Enomoto, M., Kato, M., Vetter, C., Roenneberg, T., & Mishima, K.
Affiliations
  • National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP)
  • Kyushu University (JP)
  • Institut für Medizinische Psychologie (DE)
Corresponding author
Mishima, Kazuo
Venue
Chronobiology International
Published
2014-05-14
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
845-850
ISSN
  • 0742-0528 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-6073
OpenAlex
W2010352546
Cited by
157
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chronobiology International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
Munich Chronotype Questionnaire, chronotype, circadian preference, Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire, Japanese translation, cross-cultural adaptation, sleep midpoint, sleep debt, dim light melatonin onset, questionnaire validity, semantic validity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Biological Clocks, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Humans, Male, Melatonin, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Wakefulness, Asian People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review