Cited by 527Sleep and related disordersCircadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Comparison of the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire with the Horne-Östberg's Morningness-Eveningness Score

Zavada, Andrei, Gordijn, Marijke C. M., Beersma, Domien G. M., Daan, Serge, Roenneberg, Till·2005·Chronobiology International

Abstract

We report on results from an Internet survey of sleeping habits in a Dutch population using the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ), supplemented with the Horne-Ostberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ). The MCTQ was completed by 5,055 responders, of which 2,481 also completed the MEQ. MEQ score correlated well with the MCTQ assessment of time of mid-sleep on free days (MSF; r = - 0.73) and on workdays (MSW; r = - 0.61). MEQ was more strongly correlated with MSF (50% of sleep time) than with sleep onset (0%), rise time (100%), or with any other percentile (10 to 40, 60% to 90%) of sleep on free days. The study shows that chronotype (based on MSF as measured by the MCTQ) strongly correlates with morningness-eveningness (as measured by the MEQ). However, the MCTQ collects additional detailed information on sleep-wake behavior under natural conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1081/cbi-200053536

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The MCTQ provides detailed information on sleep-wake behavior that allows assessment of social jet lag.

    “Overall, the MCTQ provides the advantage of collecting detailed information on sleep-wake behavior that allows for the assessment of phenomena such as social jet lag (difference in mid-sleep timing between school and work days and school- and work-free days) (24, 33).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zavada, A., Gordijn, M. C. M., Beersma, D. G. M., Daan, S., & Roenneberg, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • Institut für Medizinische Psychologie (DE)
Corresponding author
Zavada, Andrei
Venue
Chronobiology International
Published
2005-01
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
267-278
ISSN
  • 0742-0528 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-6073
OpenAlex
W2043467631
Cited by
527
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 8
FWCI
13.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chronobiology International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
chronotype, Munich Chronotype Questionnaire, sleep timing, sleep onset, rise time, sleep-wake behavior, questionnaire agreement
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Biological Clocks, Child, Chronobiology Phenomena, Circadian Rhythm, Humans, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Sleep Deprivation, Statistics as Topic, Time Factors, Wakefulness, Photoperiod, Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review