Cited by 61Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases

Evaluation of body fat distribution in pcos and its association with carotid atherosclerosis and insulin resistance

Karabulut, Aysun, Yaylali, Güzin Fidan, Demirlenk, Semra, Sevket, Osman, Acun, Ayhan·2012·Gynecological Endocrinology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare body fat distribution in PCOS with healthy controls and to investigate the factors associated with carotid artery intima media thickness (IMT) and insulin resistance. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A case control study was conducted in 46 women with PCOS and 43 age matched controls. Anthropometrical measurements, hormonal levels, lipid and glucose profile were evaluated. Body fat thickness in four regions and carotid IMT were measured. Body fat distribution was compared between groups. Correlation of these parameters with carotid artery IMT and insulin resistance was investigated. RESULT(S): Visceral and subcutaneous fat thickness and the mean carotid artery IMT were significantly higher in PCOS subjects (p < 0.01). In correlation analysis, age, body mass index (BMI) and waist hip ratio (WHR) showed correlation with carotid artery IMT (r = 0,55, p < 0,001; r = 0.41, p < 0.008 and r = 0.34 p = 0.03, respectively), whereas visceral fat thickness presented a correlation with HOMA-IR index as a sign of insulin resistance. CONCLUSION(S): Fat accumulation is more prominent in visceral and subcutaneous regions in PCOS. Increased BMI and abdominal type of obesity are closely related to the increased carotid artery IMT and insulin resistance. Weight control and regional weight loss are important part of the treatment for the future health of women with PCOS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09513590.2011.589929

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karabulut, A., Yaylali, G. F., Demirlenk, S., Sevket, O., & Acun, A.
Affiliations
  • Denizli Devlet Hastanesi (TR)
  • Denizli State Hospital, Department of Endocrinology, Denizli, Turkey
  • Denizli State Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Denizli, Turkey
Corresponding author
Karabulut, Aysun
Venue
Gynecological Endocrinology
Published
2011-07-20
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
111-114
ISSN
  • 0951-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0766
OpenAlex
W2066323486
Cited by
61
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gynecological Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, body fat distribution, visceral fat, subcutaneous adipose tissue, carotid intima-media thickness, carotid atherosclerosis, insulin resistance, abdominal obesity, waist-to-hip ratio, body mass index, HOMA-IR
MeSH terms
Adult, Carotid Artery Diseases, Female, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Prospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Case-Control Studies, Tunica Intima, Tunica Media, Intra-Abdominal Fat, Body Fat Distribution, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review