Cited by 428Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsGestational Diabetes Research and Management

Insulin resistance, polycystic ovary syndrome, and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Open access
Ovalle, Fernando, Azziz, Ricardo·2002·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To review the definition and prevalence of two insulin resistance (IR)-associated phenotypes, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and type 2 diabetes mellitus, as well as the risk and nature of their simultaneous presentation.Design Review of published literature.Result(s) Insulin resistance affects between 10% and 25% of the general population. Two common disorders frequently associated with IR are PCOS, affecting 4% to 6% of reproductive-aged women, and type 2 diabetes mellitus, which is observed in about 2% to 6% of similarly aged women. Overall, about 50% to 70% of women with PCOS and 80% to 100% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have variable degrees of IR. Insulin resistance and its secondary hyperinsulinemia appear to underlie many of the endocrine features of PCOS in a large proportion of such patients. The risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus among PCOS patients is 5- to 10-fold higher than normal. In turn, the risk of PCOS among reproductive-aged type 2 diabetes mellitus patients appears to be similarly increased.Conclusion(s) It remains to be determined whether PCOS and type 2 diabetes mellitus represent no more than different clinical manifestations of the same IR syndrome, with their phenotypic differences due to the presence or absence of a coincidental genetic defect at the level of the ovary or pancreas, respectively, or representing the result of etiologically different subtypes of IR syndromes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03111-4

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ovalle, F., & Azziz, R.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Azziz, Ricardo
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-06
Volume
77
Issue
6
Pages
1095-1105
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984254712
Cited by
428
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 26
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (K24-D01346)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD029364, R01-HD29364)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Keywords
insulin resistance, polycystic ovary syndrome, type 2 diabetes, hyperinsulinemia, PCOS prevalence, women of reproductive age, metabolic syndrome
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Europe, Female, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Terminology as Topic, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Risk Factors, United States, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review