Cited by 15Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPediatric Pain Management Techniques

Reliability and validity study of the Finnish version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ)

Ojala, Tapio, Piirainen, Arja, Sipilä, Kirsi, Suutama, Timo, Häkkinen, Arja·2013·Disability and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Purpose: Acceptance has been discovered to be successful in improving quality of life when adjusting to chronic pain. Instead of avoiding and controlling the pain, the goal is to confront the pain and to live a value directed life. Thus far, there has not been an instrument in Finnish to assess the acceptance of chronic pain. This study aimed at translating the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-(CPAQ)-into Finnish and assessing its reliability and validity. Method: Eighty-one persons with different types of chronic pain responded to the CPAQ, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), RAND-36 and questions of sociodemographic and pain-related variables. Results: The responders’ ages varied from 16 to 83 years (mean = 48.5 years) and 63% of them were women. For 55% of the participants, the pain had lasted more than 4 years and 63% from the sample had chronic pain in the low back or lower extremities. In test-retest analysis, the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC ) values were good, 0.81–0.87. Internal consistency was very good (α = 0.86). There was no floor-ceiling effect in the Finnish version of CPAQ. Correlation was found between both subscales of the CPAQ and every domain of the RAND-36 (r = 0.23; 0.68) and the BDI (r = −0.24; −0.62). Education, age, pain avoidance, social support and pain intensity correlated with either one of the subscales or total CPAQ. CPAQ revealed no association between fear of pain and pain duration. Conclusions: In conclusion, the Finnish version of the CPAQ is a reliable and valid method for measuring chronic pain acceptance.Implications for RehabilitationChronic Pain Acceptance QuestionnaireThere has not been an instrument in Finnish to assess the acceptance of chronic pain.The Finnish version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) is a reliable and valid method for measuring chronic pain acceptance.In physiotherapy, CPAQ can be a useful instrument collecting background information of the chronic pain patient and assessing when to consult a psychologist. In addition in long therapies assessing the enhanced acceptance can be monitored with CPAQ.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09638288.2012.694572

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ojala, T., Piirainen, A., Sipilä, K., Suutama, T., & Häkkinen, A.
Affiliations
University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Corresponding author
Ojala, Tapio
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2012-06-25
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
306-314
ISSN
  • 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5165
OpenAlex
W2170903915
Cited by
15
References
39
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disability and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Jyväskylän Yliopisto
  • Oulun Yliopistollinen Sairaala
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire, chronic pain acceptance, Finnish translation, psychometric validation, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, quality of life, depression, pain avoidance, social support, fear of pain, pain duration, low back pain, cross-cultural adaptation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Attitude to Health, Culture, Depression, Female, Finland, Helplessness, Learned, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors, Translating, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review