Cited by 100Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPediatric Pain Management Techniques

Investigating acceptance in adjustment to chronic pain: Is acceptance broader than we thought?

Nicholas, Michael K., Asghari, Ali·2006·Pain

Abstract

Research on the role of acceptance in adjustment to persisting pain has been facilitated by the development of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ). However, to date the CPAQ has been used to explore acceptance of pain without taking into account the likely contribution of other cognitive variables that have been shown to influence adjustment to persisting pain. This study examined the role of pain acceptance, as measured by the CPAQ, in accounting for adjustment to pain when controlling for the effects of other cognitive variables. The results indicated that while the Activity engagement subscale of the CPAQ was predictive of depression severity, neither of the CPAQ's two subscales was predictive of pain severity or physical disability. These findings differ from some reported previously and they suggest that the CPAQ, by itself, may not be sufficient to explain the processes of acceptance of pain and, hence, adjustment to pain. The findings also indicate that the Pain willingness subscale of the CPAQ is not robust and should be discarded. A broader approach to investigating acceptance of pain is proposed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2006.04.032

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nicholas, M. K., & Asghari, A.
Affiliations
Shahed University (IR)
Corresponding author
Nicholas, Michael K.
Venue
Pain
Published
2006-10
Volume
124
Issue
3
Pages
269-279
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089512943
Cited by
100
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
pain acceptance, Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire, depression, pain intensity, physical disability, cognitive factors, activity engagement
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Depression, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Predictive Value of Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review