Cited by 292Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingFungal and yeast genetics research

Fungal Biofilms and Drug Resistance

Open access
Jabra-Rizk, Mary Ann, Falkler, William A., Meiller, Timothy F.·2004·Emerging Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Candida species, including the novel opportunistic pathogen Candida dubliniensis, are now emerging as major agents of nosocomial infections. Many such manifestations of infections associated with the formation of Candida biofilms include those occurring on devices such as indwelling intravascular catheters. Fungal biofilm-associated infections are frequently refractory to conventional therapy because of resistance to antimicrobial agents. This resistance could be in part due to the surface-induced upregulation of drug efflux pumps. Biofilm-associated Candida show uniform resistance to a wide spectrum of the currently available conventional antifungal agents, which implies that antimicrobial drugs that specifically target biofilm-associated infections are needed. The novel classes of antifungal agents, the lipid formulation of amphotericins, and the echinocandins have demonstrated unique antifungal activity against the resistant Candida biofilms, providing a breakthrough in the treatment of life-threatening invasive systemic mycoses. The use of drugs effective in combating biofilm-associated infections could lead to major developments in the treatment of fungal implant infections.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3201/eid1001.030119

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Members from Acremonium, Aspergillus, Cladosporium, Fusarium, and Pneumocystis, in addition to Candida, are among the biofilm formers tested for drug susceptibility in vitro.

    “These include (in addition to Candida) members from Acremonium, Aspergillus, Cladosporium, Fusarium, and Pneumocystis (9, 20, 35, 42, 79, 160, 176).”

    From <i>Candida albicans</i> Biofilms and Human Disease (2015) · cites this paper as [79]

  • Cells in biofilms have been found to be more resistant to drugs compared with cells grown in suspension culture.

    “For example, a number of these biofilm formers (Table 3) have been tested for drug susceptibility in vitro, and cells in biofilms have been found to be more resistant to drugs compared with cells grown in suspension culture.”

    From <i>Candida albicans</i> Biofilms and Human Disease (2015) · cites this paper as [79]

  • Current antifungal drugs have only two specific targets: ergosterol biosynthesis and 1,3-β-D-glucan synthesis.

    “Current antifungal drugs have only two specific targets (ergosterol biosynthesis and 1,3-β-D-glucan synthesis)”

    From <i>Candida albicans</i> Biofilms and Human Disease (2015) · cites this paper as [79]

  • It is widely believed that antifungal drugs with new mechanisms of action are needed.

    “and it is widely believed that antifungal drugs with new mechanisms of action are needed (4, 18, 79).”

    From <i>Candida albicans</i> Biofilms and Human Disease (2015) · cites this paper as [79]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jabra-Rizk, M. A., Falkler, W. A., & Meiller, T. F.
Affiliations
  • Dental School, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Venue
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Published
2004-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
14-19
ISSN
  • 1080-6040 (ISSN-L)
  • 1080-6059
OpenAlex
W2138749370
Cited by
292
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Emerging infectious diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
fungal biofilms, Candida, Candida dubliniensis, antifungal resistance, drug efflux pumps, nosocomial infections, echinocandins, invasive fungal infections
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Candida, Drug Resistance, Fungi, Biofilms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review