Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 45

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Small Acute Benefits of 4 Weeks Processing Speed Training Games on Processing Speed and Inhibition Performance and Depressive Mood in the Healthy Elderly People: Evidence from a Randomized Control Trial

Nouchi, Rui, Saito, Toshiki, Nouchi, Haruka, Kawashima, Ryuta·2016·Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00302PMC PMC5179514
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00302

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

FIGURE 1 Consolidated standards of reporting trial (CONSORT) diagram.
FIGURE 1 Consolidated standards of reporting trial (CONSORT) diagram.CC BY · PubMed Central
FIGURE 2 A processing speed training game and knowledge quiz training games. For connection numbers (A), participants connect numbers in number order. In the case of (A), participants are asked to draw the lines from a smaller number to a big number as quick as possible (1→2→3→4→5). For translating figures to numbers (B), participants select numbers related to target figures. The rule is presented at the top left corner of the screen. The numeric keypad (response pad) is present at right side of the screen. In the case of (B), circle correspond to 1, triangle correspond to 2, and star correspond to 3. The rule is changed every game. The target figure is presented around the center of the screen. In the case, participants are asked to touch the specific number (3) related to the target figure (triangle) as quick as possible. For calculation with whack-a-mole (C), participants conduct simple calculations with tapping targets. The numeric keypad (response pad) is present at right side of the screen. In the case of (C), the tapping target is a mole. A numerical expression is presented around the center of the screen (e.g., 1 + 9). The tapping target is moving until participant tap the target and the number of the tapping target increase during the game. In the case, participants are asked to response the answer of the numerical expression (10) and to tap the target as quick as possible. For the meaning of words (D), participants answer a pronunciation of Kanji. A quiz is presented at the top of the screen. In the case of (D), the target Kanji (: squilla) is presented. The five pronunciations are presented. In the case, the first pronunciation is dojyou (: loach), the second pronunciation is saba (: mackerel), the third pronunciation is kaba (: hippopotamus), the fourth pronunciation is iwana (: char), the fifth pronunciation is syako (: squilla). Participants are asked to select the corrected pronunciation of the target Kanji (in this case, the corrected answer is the fifth pronunciation: syako).
FIGURE 2 A processing speed training game and knowledge quiz training games. For connection numbers (A), participants connect numbers in number order. In the case of (A), participants are asked to draw the lines from a smaller number to a big number as quick as possible (1→2→3→4→5). For translating figures to numbers (B), participants select numbers related to target figures. The rule is presented at the top left corner of the screen. The numeric keypad (response pad) is present at right side of the screen. In the case of (B), circle correspond to 1, triangle correspond to 2, and star correspond to 3. The rule is changed every game. The target figure is presented around the center of the screen. In the case, participants are asked to touch the specific number (3) related to the target figure (triangle) as quick as possible. For calculation with whack-a-mole (C), participants conduct simple calculations with tapping targets. The numeric keypad (response pad) is present at right side of the screen. In the case of (C), the tapping target is a mole. A numerical expression is presented around the center of the screen (e.g., 1 + 9). The tapping target is moving until participant tap the target and the number of the tapping target increase during the game. In the case, participants are asked to response the answer of the numerical expression (10) and to tap the target as quick as possible. For the meaning of words (D), participants answer a pronunciation of Kanji. A quiz is presented at the top of the screen. In the case of (D), the target Kanji (: squilla) is presented. The five pronunciations are presented. In the case, the first pronunciation is dojyou (: loach), the second pronunciation is saba (: mackerel), the third pronunciation is kaba (: hippopotamus), the fourth pronunciation is iwana (: char), the fifth pronunciation is syako (: squilla). Participants are asked to select the corrected pronunciation of the target Kanji (in this case, the corrected answer is the fifth pronunciation: syako).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Au, 2016, There is no convincing evidence that working memory training is NOT effective: A reply to Melby-Lervag and Hulme (2015)., Psychon. Bull. Rev., 23, 331, 10.3758/s13423-015-0967-4 · DOI
  2. Ball, 1988, Age and visual search: Expanding the useful field of view., J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 5, 2210, 10.1364/JOSAA.5.002210 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ball, 2007, The impact of speed of processing training on cognitive and everyday functions., J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., 62, 19, 10.1093/geronb/62.special_issue_1.19 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Baune, 2006, The association between depressive mood and cognitive performance in an elderly general population – the MEMO study., Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord., 22, 142, 10.1159/000093745 · DOI
  5. Benjamini, 2006, Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate., Biometrika, 93, 491, 10.1093/biomet/93.3.491 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Burdick, 2005, Predictors of functional impairment in residents of assisted-living facilities: the Maryland assisted living study., J. Gerontol. A, 60, 258, 10.1093/gerona/60.2.258 · DOI
  7. Carretti, 2007, Does strategic memory training improve the working memory performance of younger and older adults?, Exp. Psychol., 54, 311, 10.1027/1618-3169.54.4.311 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Casutt, 2014, The relation between performance in on-road driving, cognitive screening and driving simulator in older healthy drivers., Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 22, 232, 10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.007 · DOI
  9. Corbett, 2015, The effect of an online cognitive training package in healthy older adults: an online randomized controlled trial., J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc., 16, 990, 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.06.014 · DOI
  10. Edwards, 2009a, Cognitive speed of processing training delays driving cessation., J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., 64, 1262, 10.1093/gerona/glp131 · DOI
  11. Edwards, 2009b, The longitudinal impact of cognitive speed of processing training on driving mobility., Gerontologist, 49, 485, 10.1093/geront/gnp042 · DOI
  12. Edwards, 2005, The impact of speed of processing training on cognitive and everyday performance., Aging Mental Health, 9, 262, 10.1080/13607860412331336788 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Faul, 2009, Statistical power analyses using G∗ power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses., Behav. Res. Methods, 41, 1149, 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Folstein, 1975, Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician., J. Psychiatr. Res., 12, 189, 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Gibson, 1997, The measurement of mood states in older adults., J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., 52, 167, 10.1093/geronb/52B.4.P167 · DOI
  16. Hakoda, 1990, Group version of the Stroop and reverse-Stroop test: the effects of reaction mode, order and practice., Kyoiku Shinrigaku Kenkyu (Jpn. J. Educ. Psychol.), 38, 389, 10.5926/jjep1953.38.4_389 · DOI
  17. Heuchert, 2012, POMS-2 Manual: A Profile of Mood States
  18. Iida, 2011, Implicit attenuation of subsequent emotion by cognitive activity., Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci., 11, 476, 10.3758/s13415-011-0045-y · DOI
  19. Iida, 2012, Prior cognitive activity implicitly modulates subsequent emotional responses to subliminally presented emotional stimuli., Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci., 12, 337, 10.3758/s13415-012-0084-z · DOI
  20. Ito, 2004, Performance of verbal fluency tasks in Japanese healthy adults : effect of gender, age and education on the performance., Shinkei Shinrigaku Kenkyu (Jpn. J. Neuropsychol.), 20, 254
  21. Jewsbury, 2016, Integrating the switching, inhibition, and updating model of executive function with the Cattell-Horn-Carroll model., J. Exp. Psychol., 145, 220, 10.1037/xge0000119 · DOI
  22. Jobe, 2001, ACTIVE: a cognitive intervention trial to promote independence in older adults., Control Clin. Trials, 22, 453, 10.1016/S0197-2456(01)00139-8 · DOI
  23. Lagopoulos, 2012, Frontal lobe changes occur early in the course of affective disorders in young people., BMC Psychiatry, 12, 10.1186/1471-244X-12-4 · DOI
  24. Lampit, 2014, Computerized cognitive training in cognitively healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effect modifiers., PLoS Med., 11, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001756 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Mahncke, 2006, Memory enhancement in healthy older adults using a brain plasticity-based training program: a randomized, controlled study., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 103, 12523, 10.1073/pnas.0605194103 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Nouchi, 2014, Improving cognitive function from children to old age: a systematic review of recent smart ageing intervention studies., Adv. Neurosci., 2014, 10.1155/2014/235479 · DOI
  27. Nouchi, 2012a, Brain training game improves executive functions and processing speed in the elderly: a randomized controlled trial., PLoS ONE, 7, 10.1371/journal.pone.0029676 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Nouchi, 2013, Brain training game boosts executive functions, working memory and processing speed in the young adults: a randomized controlled trial., PLoS ONE, 8, 10.1371/journal.pone.0055518 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Nouchi, 2012b, Beneficial effects of reading aloud and solving simple arithmetic calculations (learning therapy) on a wide range of cognitive functions in the healthy elderly: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial., Trials, 13, 10.1186/1745-6215-13-32 · DOI
  30. Nouchi, 2016, Reading aloud and solving simple arithmetic calculation intervention (learning therapy) improves inhibition, verbal episodic memory, focus attention and processing speed in healthy elderly people: evidence from a randomized controlled trial., Front. Hum. Neurosci., 10, 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00217 · DOI
  31. Nouchi, 2014, Four weeks of combination exercise training improved executive functions, episodic memory, and processing speed in healthy elderly people: evidence from a randomized controlled trial., Age, 36, 787, 10.1007/s11357-013-9588-x · DOI
  32. Nozawa, 2015, Effects of different types of cognitive training on cognitive function, brain structure, and driving safety in senior daily drivers: a pilot study., Behav. Neurol., 2015, 10.1155/2015/525901 · DOI
  33. Ono, 2001, The Subjective Well-Being Enventory.
  34. Papp, 2009, Immediate and delayed effects of cognitive interventions in healthy elderly: a review of current literature and future directions., Alzheimers Dement., 5, 50, 10.1016/j.jalz.2008.10.008 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Piccinin, 1999, Contribution of cognitive abilities to performance and improvement on a substitution coding task., Psychol. Aging, 14, 539, 10.1037/0882-7974.14.4.539 · DOI
  36. Raven, 1965, Guide to Using the Coloured Progressive Matrices.
  37. Reitan, 1955, The relation of the trail making test to organic brain damage., J. Consult. Psychol., 19, 393, 10.1037/h0044509 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Richmond, 2011, Working memory training and transfer in older adults., Psychol. Aging, 26, 813, 10.1037/a0023631 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Ritchie, 2014, A strong link between speed of visual discrimination and cognitive ageing., Curr. Biol., 24, R681, 10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.012 · DOI
  40. Schneider, 2012, “The Cattell-Horn-Carroll model of intelligence,” in, Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues
  41. Sell, 1994, The subjective well-being inventory (SUBI)., Int. J. Ment. Health, 23, 89, 10.1080/00207411.1994.11449289 · DOI
  42. Smits, 1997, Norms for an abbreviated Raven’s coloured progressive matrices in an older sample., J. Clin. Psychol., 53, 687, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199711)53:7687::AID-JCLP63.0.CO;2-F · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199711)53:7687::aid-jclp63.0.co;2-f
  43. Takeuchi, 2014, Working memory training improves emotional states of healthy individuals., Front. Syst. Neurosci., 8, 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00200 · DOI
  44. Tsourtos, 2002, Evidence of an early information processing speed deficit in unipolar major depression., Psychol. Med., 32, 259, 10.1017/S0033291701005001 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Watanabe, 2011, Group version of the stroop and reverse-stroop test: an asymmetric developmental trait in two kinds of interference., Kyusyu Daigaku Shinrigaku Kenkyu (Kyushu Univ. Psychol. Res.), 12, 41
  46. Wechsler, 1987, Wechsler Memory Scale Revised.
  47. Wechsler, 1997, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale
  48. Whalley, 2013, Prediction of depression in individuals at high familial risk of mood disorders using functional magnetic resonance imaging., PLoS ONE, 8, 10.1371/journal.pone.0057357 · DOI
  49. Wolinsky, 2013, A randomized controlled trial of cognitive training using a visual speed of processing intervention in middle aged and older adults., PLoS ONE, 8, 10.1371/journal.pone.0061624 · DOI
  50. Wolinsky, 2009, The effect of speed-of-processing training on depressive symptoms in ACTIVE., J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., 64, 468, 10.1093/gerona/gln044 · DOI
  51. Yesavage, 1982, Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report., J. Psychiatr. Res., 17, 37, 10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Yokoyama, 2015, Japanese Version POMS-2 Manual: A Profile of Mood States

Cited by

See all 45

Metadata

Authors
Nouchi, R., Saito, T., Nouchi, H., & Kawashima, R.
Venue
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2016-12-23
Volume
8
ISSN
1663-4365
DOI
10.3389/fnagi.2016.00302
PMC
PMC5179514
Cited by
45
References
11
Funders
  • Tohoku University
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.