Cited by 21Cognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and MemoryCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

Dual n-back working memory training evinces superior transfer effects compared to the method of loci

Open access
Li, Wenjuan, Zhang, Qiuzhu, Qiao, Hongying, Jin, Donggang, Ngetich, Ronald K., Zhang, Junjun, Jin, Zhenlan, Li, Ling·2021·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Working memory (WM) training is a prevalent intervention for multiple cognitive deficits, however, the transfer effects to other cognitive tasks from gains in WM induced by different training techniques still remains controversial. Therefore, the current study recruited three groups of young adults to investigate the memory training transference, with N-back group (NBG) (n = 50) training on dual n-back task, Memory Palace group (MPG) (n = 50) on method of loci, and a blank control group (BCG) (n = 48) receiving no training. Our results showed that both training groups separately improved WM capacity on respective trained task. For untrained tasks, both training groups enhanced performance on digit-span task, while on change detection task, significant improvement was only observed in NBG. In conclusion, while both techniques can be used as effective training methods to improve WM, the dual n-back task training method, perhaps has a more prominent transfer effect than that of method of loci.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-021-82663-w

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [71]Lenhard, W. & Lenhard, A. Calculation of Effect Sizes. Retrieved from: https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html. Dettelbach (Germany): Psychometrica. 10.13140/RG.2.2.17823.92329 (2016). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, W., Zhang, Q., Qiao, H., Jin, D., Ngetich, R. K., Zhang, J., Jin, Z., & Li, L.
Affiliations
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Jin, Zhenlan
  • Li, Ling
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2021-02-04
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
3072-3072
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3127268694
Cited by
21
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61773092)
  • Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project (B12027)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  • Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program (2020YFS0230)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
working memory training, dual n-back task, method of loci, memory palace, transfer effects, digit span, change detection, cognitive training
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Practice, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review