Cited by 73Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Enhancement stimulants: perceived motivational and cognitive advantages

Open access
Ilieva, Irena P., Farah, Martha J.·2013·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract

Psychostimulants like Adderall and Ritalin are widely used for cognitive enhancement by people without ADHD, although the empirical literature has shown little conclusive evidence for effectiveness in this population. This paper explores one potential explanation of this discrepancy: the possibility that the benefit from enhancement stimulants is at least in part motivational, rather than purely cognitive. We review relevant laboratory, survey, and interview research and present the results of a new survey of enhancement users with the goal of comparing perceived cognitive and motivational effects. These users perceived stimulant effects on motivationally-related factors, especially "energy" and "motivation," and reported motivational effects to be at least as pronounced as cognitive effects, including the effects on "attention."

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2013.00198

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only one prior study (Ilieva et al., 2013) included baseline, stimulant, and placebo conditions.

    “Only one study (Ilieva et al., 2013) included baseline, stimulant, and placebo conditions”

    From Effects of stimulant medication on neuropsychological functioning in college students without ADHD. (2026) · cites this paper as Ilieva et al., 2013

    The Methods (Procedure and materials; page unavailable) describe this paper's study as an online survey of past stimulant use and perceived effects, not a study with baseline, stimulant, and placebo conditions. The Introduction mentions a separate placebo-controlled study by the authors, but our copy does not say that this paper included the three claimed conditions or establish the claim that it was the only such study. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In that prior study, performance was not examined across the three conditions.

    “however, performance was not examined across the three conditions.”

    From Effects of stimulant medication on neuropsychological functioning in college students without ADHD. (2026) · cites this paper as Ilieva et al., 2013

    The Methods (Procedure and materials; page unavailable) describe a survey of perceived stimulant effects, and the Discussion explicitly asks how stimulant-enhanced motivation affects actual performance. This supports that the paper did not examine actual performance. It does not describe three conditions in its own study; the Introduction mentions three task/drug conditions only when discussing Volkow et al. (2004). (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Amphetamine and its derivatives have modest cognitive benefits as prescription stimulants and enhance motivation and energy in healthy subjects.

    “Although AMP and its derivatives have modest cognitive benefits as prescription stimulants and enhance motivation and energy in heathy subjects, studies have shown that they have limited cognitive effects in heathy subjects (see Ilieva & Farah, 2013; Simons et al., 2012).”

    From Systematic reviews of the acute effects of amphetamine on working memory and other cognitive performances in healthy individuals, with a focus on the potential influence of personality traits (2023) · cites this paper as Ilieva & Farah, 2013

    The Discussion says prescription stimulants have modest cognitive benefits and limited effects on laboratory measures in healthy young adults. It also reports laboratory evidence for motivation-related effects, but this study measured users’ perceived improvements in motivation and energy; the Discussion explicitly says it does not establish actual behavioral effects. The claim presents those perceived improvements as established effects in healthy subjects. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Similar screening criteria have been used by other studies.

    “Similar screening criteria have been used by other studies (e.g., Ilieva et al., 2013).”
  • Existing literature has demonstrated that individuals without ADHD engage in NPS partly due to perceived, non-cognitive enhancements in motivation.

    “Existing literature has demonstrated that individuals without ADHD engage in NPS partly due to perceived, non-cognitive enhancements in motivation (Ilieva & Farah, 2013).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ilieva, I. P., & Farah, M. J.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Ilieva, Irena P.
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2013
Volume
7
Pages
198-198
ISSN
1662-453X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164544300
Cited by
72
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
cognitive enhancement, psychostimulants, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, motivation, perceived consequences, energy, attention, Adderall, methylphenidate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review